Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

NYU Denies Booting Chinese Dissident

$
0
0

The Chinese dissident is leaving NYU amid reports that the university bowed to pressure from the Chinese government. “These are unrelated matters.”

Via: Brendan Mcdermid / Reuters

WASHINGTON — New York University is not kicking out Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng because of pressure from the Chinese government, a spokesman said on Thursday.

"The story's claims of 'outside pressure' are fanciful and false," university spokesman John Beckman said, referring to a New York Post story that alleges that NYU, seeking to build a university presence in Shanghai as part of its global expansion, bowed to pressure from the Chinese to stop harboring Chen. "If it were true, why would NYU have taken Mr. Chen in at the height of the public fervor, and why would the Chinese authorities have given us permissions to move forward with our Shanghai campus AFTER his arrival here?" Beckman asked.

Beckman continued:

The plain fact is that these are unrelated matters. In countless hours of conversations involving the establishment of our Shanghai campus, this matter has never come up.

We were pleased to offer Mr. Chen and his family a place to come and study and support his transition to the US when he first left China based on a pre-existing relationship he had with scholars here. But NYU and Mr. Chen had discussions beginning last fall that NYU could not support him indefinitely. We indicated that beyond this academic year he would need to make a transition to a more self-supporting life – with which NYU would and has been helping him – which would involve him finding new living arrangements and completing a book that would be a source of income for his family. During Mr. Chen's time here, NYU has been very generous, providing him and family with housing, health insurance, health care, food, clothing, electronic equipment both related to his blindness and for his family, as well as family, office and language translation support, and arranged opportunities for him to speak and write.

The claims in the story that Mr. Chen's advocacy was restrained are also completely untrue, as the record amply shows.

Beckman included a number of links to stories about advocacy Chen has participated in since coming to NYU.

After seeking asylum at the American Embassy in Beijing following persecution by Chinese authorities in 2012, Chen came to NYU. The deal was brokered by NYU Law professor and China scholar Jerome Cohen. Cohen didn't immediately return a request for comment.


Anthony Weiner Is Doing The Food Stamp Challenge

$
0
0

John Liu, city comptroller and another mayoral candidate, is doing the SNAP challenge too. “I’m gonna get probably a loaf of bread, some peanut butter, rice, lentils,” says Weiner.

View Video ›

Via:

Anthony Weiner, the former congressman running for mayor of New York City, announced Wednesday that he would undergo the "Food Stamp Challenge."

Weiner will live on $1.48 per meal for one week — the average benefit for city residents enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

"I doubt I'll be able to do that at any restaurant in the city," said Weiner.

Comptroller John Liu, also running for mayor this year, will live on a food stamp budget this week as well.

Sen. Chris Murphy, Democrat from Connecticut, took on the challenge earlier this year, but it was Newark Mayor Cory Booker who made the stunt most famous, when he documented his week on the diet extensively on Twitter last December.

Racists Escaped Extra Tax Scrutiny

$
0
0

As long as you don’t call yourself “tea party”…

Members of the National Socialist Movement on a 2010 march in LA (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — The IRS targeting of conservative groups appears to have stopped before it reached the true far right: The racist and militia groups that operate beyond the pale of American politics.

Many of those groups, their members and those who monitor hate groups say, are routinely denied non-profit status because of their racist views. But at least one of the foundations that backs racist — or "racialist," as the far right term has it — work says it has had no problems with the IRS during the latest allegations of a tax crackdown on the right.

Even as Washington scrambles to understand and tighten the vague tax rules around tax exempt organizations, one rule is relatively clear: No tax breaks for white supremacists. Political groups on both sides use the vague language in the tax code to turn donations for political activity into tax exempt charitable giving. That same vague language makes it hard for the IRS to stop these groups in any clear way. That's what led to a search for fixed rules inside the IRS, according to the IRS inspector general's report, and, finally, the improper targeting of conservative groups that IRS leaders apologized for. Republicans have charged the move was driven by politics, not the bureaucracy.

The IRS is backing off its latest attempts to draw ideological lines, but decades earlier, it won a rare battle with racist groups. After the IRS denied tax exempt status to the Mississippi-based white supremacist group The Nationalist Movement in the late 1980s, the group sued the IRS and lost. That established rules the IRS still uses to deny tax exempt status to racist groups. Vagaries still exist, and some groups that espouse racial politics still have tax exempt status. But as a general rule, Nazis don't get to be charities. The rule is so set in stone, that experts say they don't even bother seeking charitable status anymore.

The primary test is whether the organization "makes substantial use of inflammatory and disparaging terms," said Ellen Aprill, a professor at Loyola Law School.

The fight began with a 1983 Supreme Court ruling finding Bob Jones University could be denied tax exempt status because the government's "fundamental, overriding interest in eradicating racial discrimination in education" justified denying the school the tax breaks afforded other educational institutions. Later cases, helped refine these rules leading to regulations now used to deny racist groups tax exempt status under the claim that they are neither "educational" or "charitable." This is known as the "methodology test."

Aprill said groups a racial focus that still get tax exempt status, but they are generally able to prove some kind of educational purpose to their work.

"The IRS is between a rock and a hard place — people get upset when it does grant exemption, trying not to impose personal or even majority beliefs, and when it does not — accusing it of imposing personal or majority beliefs," she said. "In the Bob Jones case, the court said that a group could not be exempt if it violated fundamental public policy, but except for discrimination on the basis of race in education, did not say how we know when there is such a violation."

Indeed, Henry Wolff, a spokesperson for the New Century Foundation, a tax-exempt group that funds American Renaissance — which has warned of "The War On White Heritage" — said the group had no problem with the tax authorities.

"They're going after groups with obvious-sounding names," he said. "Ours is innocuous."

New Century Foundation, which lacks "patriot," "tea party," "9/12" or any of the other words and phrases used by the IRS to trigger extra paper work. NCF has had tax exempt status of "several years," Wolff said.

"We haven't received any extra scrutiny," he said.

Other racist — they call themselves "racialist" — are openly political groups, and thus aren't eligible for non-profit status; and yet others typically don't apply, said Heidi Beirich, intelligence director at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

"They basically never apply," she said. "We did a search after the IRS business became public and there are basically no tax exempt organizations coming out of the militia movement."

"The antigovernment folks, like the militias, already hate the IRS and the government so they basically weren't surprised," she said.

A scan of racist groups' websites doesn't turn up much mention of the IRS scandal. There are a couple of aggregated articles about the scandal on the far-right VDare — which focuses on race and immigration — for example, but regular contributor John Derbyshire wrote he "doubt[s] that President Obama knew what was going on."

The group's regular "E-Dispatches" have offered little mention of the IRS scandal since it sparked up.

The actual Nazis, however, find some vindication in the story; Capt. Brian Culpepper, leader of the 4th Regional Command for the Detroit-based National Socialist Movement, a Nazi group, said in an email that the "alleged wrongdoing and abuse of power is mind boggling."

Outside the racist right, the government rarely invokes public policy exceptions to deny groups non-profit status, though tax agents may have raised it in examining pro-Israel groups that oppose U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Eight GetEqual Activists Arrested During Sit-In At Speaker John Boehner's Office

$
0
0

Calling on the House speaker to hold a vote on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would ban LGBT discrimination in employment, eight activists with GetEqual were arrested Thursday.

Via: Chris Geidner/Buzzfeed

WASHINGTON — Eight activists with GetEqual were arrested Thursday outside House Speaker John Boehner's office as part of a protest demanding the speaker hold a floor vote on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would ban anti-LGBT job discrimination.

"I'm here today because in Texas this past legislative session we fought long and hard to get the Fair Employment Act passed, which is the Texas version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Even though 76 percent of registered Texas voters supported it ... we still couldn't get it out of committee," Tiffani Bishop, the first of the eight arrested, said prior to the action in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill.

"This is very personal for me," Bishop said of difficulties she has faced and is facing in finding employment. "Eight of us drove 30 hours in a van to ask Speaker Boehner to represent the people."

Once in Boehner's office, Sean Watkins — who is a constituent of Boehner's and lives in Middletown, Ohio — led the group, first by asking to speak with Boehner or a staffer about ENDA.

After several of the GetEqual activists told their stories of discrimination — or, in one case, a mother's story about discrimination faced by her daughter — they then demanded that Boehner commit to holding a vote on ENDA in 2013. When told that their message would be taken to Boehner but no commitment was given, the activists began a sit-in in Boehner's office.

After Capitol Police told the protesters that they could not yell or sit in Boehner's office without the office's permission, they went into the hallway. At that point, they sat down again and began chanting until officers began making arrests.

Those arrested included Watkins and Corey Phillips of Ohio and mother and daughter Cindy Candia and Kaya Candia-Almanza, Koby Ozias, Carey Dunn and Erin Jennings of Texas.

First, They Spoke To Staff In Boehner's Office:

Source: youtube.com

Then, They Protested Inside Boehner's Office:

Source: youtube.com


View Entire List ›

FBI: NSA's Domestic Monitoring Could Have Prevented 9/11

$
0
0

During a hearing on Capitol Hill, FBI Director Robert Mueller used the events of September 11, 2001 as an example of why the National Security Agency’s monitoring of all Americans communications are critical.

View Video ›

Via: mediaite.com

Don't Worry MSNBC, Cable News Ratings Will Soon Be Irrelevant

$
0
0

The metric of the future will be web traffic, and the sooner the cable news networks realize it, the better.

MSNBC president Phil Griffin.

The ratings funk that MSNBC has been experiencing recently got much worse in May with the cable news network hitting a six-year ratings low, dropping to 4th in the Neilsen TV ratings horserace behind courtroom spectacle specialists HLN. Even Rachel Maddow, consistently the network's highest rated host, posted some of the poorest numbers since her show debuted four years ago.

Luckily for them, the days of Nielsen TV ratings serving as the end-all, be-all metric for cable news success are numbered.

As a younger demographic increasingly customizes its media consumption — moving away from TV and onto the internet — they will expect live news video to be streaming on their laptops and mobile devices, or else. And as that happens, the four-way cable news wars will continue to give way to a much broader competition on the web, pitting CNN against the Washington Post, Fox News against Breitbart, MSNBC against ThinkProgress, and so on.

All three of the biggest cable news networks are seeing growth online but they're preparing in very different ways for web traffic's inevitable rise as the Holy Grail of audience metrics.

MSNBC has a few major obstacles in its online future, most notably The Huffington Post's growing web-only cable-like video network HuffPost Live, but the network has been making moves that could position them very nicely in the progressive political news scene.

Because of the split between NBC News and Microsoft, traffic for MSN.com, MSNBC.com and NBCNews.com will be inaccurate and confusing for a while, and when all is settled we will see MSNBC.com's traffic numbers drop dramatically. But MSNBC's unabashed move to progressive political news and opinion means the network, with its corporate war chest and NBC connections, could dominate the the left-of-center world of online politics.

Starting with hiring Richard Wolffe as the site's executive editor in 2012, MSNBC began to telegraph its plans to overhaul its online presence. Their recent hiring spree that saw the network poach Mother Jones reporter Adam Serwer, Talking Points Memo's Benjy Sarlin, and The Washington Post's Suzy Khimm, proves that, unlike Fox, MSNBC has the intent to lure proven online journalists away from well-known ideological blogs and publications. Add the fact that MSNBC plans to assign these writers to particular show blogs, ala Steve Benen of the successful Maddow Blog, along with the opportunity to contribute on-the-air reporting and analysis to those shows, and you can see a future where MSNBC continues to chip away at their financially hamstrung progressive competition.


View Entire List ›

Thanks To The Supreme Court, Angelina Jolie's Breast Cancer Test Might Become More Affordable

$
0
0

Companies were patenting certain gene mutations. They lost in the Supreme Court Thursday. Here’s everything you need to know.

You might know who Angelina Jolie is.

You might know who Angelina Jolie is.

Jolie underwent a preventive double mastectomy after learning that she was at high risk for breast cancer because of an inherited gene. The test for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes that she took actually costs $3,000 because a company called Myriad Genetics owns a patent on the mutated gene and therefore, a monopoly on the test.

Via: Sean Gallup / Getty Images

Myriad Genetics was sued and the case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously that isolated human genes can not be patented.

Myriad Genetics was sued and the case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously that isolated human genes can not be patented.

In the opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that, "Myriad did not create or
alter either the genetic information encoded in the BCRA1 and BCRA2 genes or the genetic structure of the DNA. It found an important and useful gene, but groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant discovery does not by itself satisfy the inquiry."

Via: Dana Verkouteren / AP

The ruling means other companies will legally be able to offer tests to find the breast cancer genes.

The ruling means other companies will legally be able to offer tests to find the breast cancer genes.

“I think there might be some blustering or saber rattling, but I would be really surprised if they sue anybody for patent infringement for a diagnostic test,” Robert Cook-Deegan, a research professor at Duke University’s Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, told The New York Times.

Via: American Cancer Society / AP

All was not lost for Myriad Genetics -- the justices ruled that artificial genes can be patented.

All was not lost for Myriad Genetics -- the justices ruled that artificial genes can be patented.

Complementary or cDNA can be protected by patent, since something new is being created. This is the case with cloned genes. Justice Thomas wrote, “cDNA does not present the same obstacles to patentability as naturally occurring, isolated DNA segments." The Utah-based company's stock price was up about 10 percent in early trading, a sign that investors didn't see the ruling as a complete loss.

Via: myriad.com


View Entire List ›

Republicans Plan To Sue The Government Over NSA Spying

$
0
0

The details of the proposed legal action are still a little nebulous.

WASHINGTON — Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and a group of conservative House members announced plans to bring legal action against the government for large-scale surveillance the National Security Agency has been conducting at a press conference on Thursday.

Paul was accompanied at the Capitol Hill Club by libertarian Reps. Thomas Massie and Justin Amash, Rep. Louie Gohmert, and Rep. Mick Mulvaney, as well as the director of the Washington legislative office of the American Civil Liberties Union and a representative from the Campaign for Liberty, his father Ron Paul's group. Newly re-elected Rep. Mark Sanford was also there, standing off to the side, but left early and didn't speak. An aide to Paul said that Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat and ally of Paul on civil liberties issues, had considered coming but had decided not to at the last minute.

Paul specified that the suit would focus on the court order that allows the government to pull all Verizon phone records for calls made in the United States and between the United States and abroad.

"We're here today to announce that we will be challenging the constitutionality of a court order that collects all Americans' cell phone data all of the time," Paul said, calling the order "clearly beyond the scope of the Fourth Amendment."

"If anyone with a cell phone wants to be part of the lawsuit, go to RandPac.com," Paul said, waving his cell phone. He said over 250,000 people had signed up already to be a part of the legal case.

"I want to catch terrorists as much as any American," Paul said. "But what separates us from them is the rule of law. What makes us different from them is that suspects are not beaten to death with tire irons or strung up from the nearest tree."

Paul was hazy on the specific details of the proposed suit.

"The mechanics may not be all completely determined at this point," Paul said. "To marry 250,000 people and I hope millions of people to a lawsuit will be a lot of work."

"I need help and assistance from attorneys to explain to me whether or not and how you can have a lawsuit with this many people," Paul said.

Asked how people could have the standing sue if they couldn't prove their phones had been monitored — for example, if they weren't Verizon customers — Paul referred the question to Laura Murphy of the ACLU.

"We don't have to project that we think this data has been turned over to the government," Murphy said. Because of the Verizon court order, "we can project that we know the data has been turned over to the government."

"It could be and I'll have to see if that works with them," Paul said when asked if his suit would simply piggyback onto the ACLU's lawsuit. The ACLU's suit, ACLU vs. Clapper, is built as a lawsuit on the ACLU's own behalf because it is a Verizon customer.

"Right now we are a portal for people to come and collect and say 'we are unhappy with what the government is doing to our privacy, we would like to join a lawsuit if we can,'" Paul said. He said it would take him a little longer to figure out the specifics.

Paul didn't comment specifically on the secrecy of the FISA court, which issued the Verizon order and which has become a flashpoint for people arguing that the decision-making behind surveillance programs should be more public.

"I think the whole debate should be more public," Paul said. "By looking at that court order, I don't think it tipped off anybody, I think most people suspected this was going on."

Paul said the suit would likely be brought against the government in general.

"We're going to sue over the constitutionality of the FISA court order, I would assume that would be a suit against the government," he said.

The rhetoric of the press conference was mostly subdued save for a brief interjection by former Reagan Administration lawyer Bruce Fein, a fixture at Paul family events, who compared the current government to the days of Caligula in the Roman Empire.


Nevada Congressman's Son: Obama Is Only Good At "Spear Chucking And Rock Skipping"

$
0
0

Rep. Joe Heck’s son Joey has made several racist, homophobic, and sexist remarks on Twitter. “I apologize to everyone he may have offended,” the Congressman tells BuzzFeed.

WASHINGTON — Nevada Rep. Joe Heck's teenage son has repeatedly used racist, homophobic, and sexist slurs on twitter to lash out at targets ranging from President Obama to the "Mexican security monitor" in his school.

Heck apologized for his son's twitter outbursts in a statement to BuzzFeed.

"I am extremely disappointed in my son's use of the offensive and inappropriate language on twitter: that type of language has never been permitted in our home," Heck said.

"I apologize to everyone he may have offended. My son also apologizes for his insensitive behavior. My wife and I have addressed this family matter directly with him and he has learned from it."

A review of tweets by Joey Heck, 16, dating to August of last year shows numerous examples in which Heck used words like "faggot" and "nigga." For instance, on Sept. 11 Heck tweeted "Fanny pack = fag bag," and on August 23 he retweeted a tweet that read, "There are gays everywhere. Maybe that's gods way of thinning out the population because faggots can't have babies."

Heck's twitter feed also included numerous racial slurs. During a Sept. 16 Jets football game, the younger Heck tweeted "[Mark] Sanchez can hop the border faster than he can throw the ball."

During the Oct. 16 presidential debate, Heck took issue with the performance of moderator Martha Raddatz, ABC's Senior Foreign Affairs Correspondent. "This is why men need to be moderators," he wrote.

He also wrote that Mitt Romney "raped" Obama and made him his "slave" during a debate.

In an exchange with a friend during the debate on October 3rd, Heck asked rhetorically, "I would like somebody to tell me one good thing Obama did in these past 4 years…. I got nothing." Later in the conversation he said "yeah like spear chucking and rock skipping. The sports they do in his home country…"

Heck's political comments are particularly jarring, since his twitter feed clearly shows his active engagement not only in national politics, but his father's reelection race last year. He repeatedly argues his father's job as a congressman gives him an inside understanding of politics: For instance, during the Oct. 16 debate he tweeted "Obama didn't make the call to kill Osama… That was the intelligence committee #iwouldknow."

Additionally, at one point he bragged that his mother got him a well paying job with "some company for like voting stuff."

Heck joins the ranks of other children of lawmakers who have used social media sites as a platform for making insensitive and offensive comments. Sen. Jeff Flake's son Tanner used highly offensive language on Youtube and Twitter. Sen Flake apologized for his son's behavior earlier this week.

Steve King: Aliens Invaded My Office

$
0
0

The “brazen,” “illegal alien” variety, he tweeted.

Iowa Rep. Steve King, no stranger to controversial comments, announced on Twitter today that his office had been invaded by aliens.

Iowa Rep. Steve King, no stranger to controversial comments, announced on Twitter today that his office had been invaded by aliens.

Via: AP

King, who previously compared immigrants to dogs in comments that made it to YouTube, has been staunchly anti-illegal immigration and opposes the bipartisan "Gang of 8" immigration reform legislation being debated in the Senate.

This is who showed up to his office. They were activists from United We Dream, protesting his sponsoring of a bill to cut funding for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, enacted by the Obama administration.

This is who showed up to his office. They were activists from United We Dream, protesting his sponsoring of a bill to cut funding for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, enacted by the Obama administration.

Via: @maricelaguilar


View Entire List ›

Marco Rubio Veers Right On Gay Issues

$
0
0

After previously taking care to avoid personal positions on several LBGT issues, the Florida senator got personal on same-sex couples’ immigration rights and “special protections” in the workplace.

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) addresses the Faith & Freedom Coalition Road to Majority Conference Kickoff Luncheon in Washington June 13, 2013.

Via: Gary Cameron / Reuters

WASHINGTON — In a departure from his recent attempts to present a moderate face of the Republican Party on LGBT issues, Sen. Marco Rubio Thursday took aim at same-sex couples' protections in immigration reform and attempts to pass workplace protections for LGBT people.

On immigration reform, where Sen. Patrick Leahy has filed an amendment that would give same-sex married couples the same immigration rights as opposite-sex married couples, Rubio put his opposition in more personal terms than he previously has expressed.

"If this bill has in it something that gives gay couples immigration rights and so forth, it kills the bill. I'm done," Rubio was quoted by Yahoo News Thursday as saying during an interview on the Andrea Tantaros Show. "I'm off it, and I've said that repeatedly. I don't think that's going to happen and it shouldn't happen. This is already a difficult enough issue as it is."

Then, Think Progress reported Rubio's likely opposition to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, a bill that would bar most employers from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Asked if he would be supporting the bill, Rubio said, "I haven't read the legislation. By and large I think all Americans should be protected but I'm not for any special protections based on orientation."

At a BuzzFeed event in February, Rubio refused to take a specific position on ENDA and said only that debate over including same-sex couples in immigration reform would "make it harder to get it done." Rubio also has said he opposes a proposed federal amendment to ban same-sex marriage, saying "that's an issue that states are deciding."

Rubio on ENDA:

Source: thinkprogress.org

Intelligence Committee Chair: Court Order Not Needed To Search Metadata

$
0
0

Also says Congress will push for legislation to limit how much access contractors have to classified information.

Via: Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Senator Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Thursday she doesn't believe a court order is needed for the government to search through the metadata it collects.

Feinstein also said that Congress would push for legislation that "restricts contractor access to highly classified material," an issue that has been thrown into the spotlight after it was revealed that Edward Snowden was a Booz Allen Hamilton employee.

Speaking to reporters after a closed session of the Intelligence Committee in which members were briefed by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and NSA Director Keith Alexander, among several others, Feinstein said it was her "understanding" that a court order issued by a judge was not necessary to search the database.

"To search the database you have to have reasonable articulable cause to believe that individual has a connection to a terrorist cause," Feinstein said. "Then you can query the numbers. There's no content. You have the name and the number called. That's all you have."

"If you want to collect content, then you get a court order," Feinstein said.

Pressed for specifics on the number of attacks that the government thinks has been thwarted by the NSA's surveillance program, Feinstein said it was "more than you think."

Marco Rubio Still A Favorite Among Social Conservatives

$
0
0

The Florida senator has recently been the target of some friendly fire on the right, but at the start Faith and Freedom Coalition conference, he’s the star of the show.

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) addresses the Faith & Freedom Coalition Road to Majority Conference Kickoff Luncheon in Washington June 13, 2013.

Via: Gary Cameron / Reuters

WASHINGTON— At the kickoff of a three-day conference for social conservatives, Marco Rubio was clearly among friends.

Rubio, the Florida Republican who has taken a significant amount of heat from conservatives for his role in helping craft a comprehensive immigration reform package, emerged from a Faith and Freedom Coalition luncheon as the clear star of the show. Rubio was the final speaker at the lunch, following Sens. Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, and Mike Lee.

In his speech, which cited the fifth chapter of Matthew, Rubio sermonized about America's greatness and the need for Christian conservatives to continue to speak up for their causes and be "a light in the world" and said they had been called to "preserve something that is valuable."

He spoke of the greatness America, and "the issues we hold dear, such as marriage or the value of every life or compassion towards our fellow man, we are called to preserve those things."

"This call for us to silence ourselves and stop speaking about the values we know work is a big mistake," he said.

Rubio has been hit hard by conservatives for his work on immigration: As recently as Wednesday, the Heritage Foundation released a graphic of Rubio with the tagline "Amnesty? Guaranteed. Border Security? Not so much." But amongst the audience at Faith and Freedom, there was no animosity on display. Ralph Reed, the group's founder, has been supportive of Rubio's work and called the Senate immigration bill "a good start."

The audience peppered his speech with shouts of "Amen!" and gave him a rousing standing ovation following his speech.

"He's the best speaker," said Joseph Byrd, a 19-year-old from Augusta Georgia. "He's very captivating."

Rubio only briefly mentioned his work on immigration reform, and acknowledged that there were those that were "conflicted and divided" even among his supporters.

But ultimately he made the appeal to the Christian right in the room that the work was about "compassion."

"At the essence of our immigration reform is compassion. Is the idea that not only do we believe that people of all walks of life can succeed if given the opportunity, we actually want that," he said. "We want to be the place where they can succeed. Now clearly through an orderly process, through a legal process, but we believe these things. And we are motivated in that regard by our compassion."

As the luncheon ended and attendees waited for buses to bring them to Capitol Hill for several hours of lobbying, people gushed over his message.

"If Republicans want to be competitive they have to get over these issues, they have to stand up and get immigration reform done," Esteban Carrillo, a 24-year-old who cited ending abortion as the issue he cares most about. "I think Rubio is going to be able to do that."

LGBT Members Of Congress Push President Obama On Workplace Protections

$
0
0

Representatives Maloney, Polis, Takano and Pocan offer their thoughts on ENDA, President Obama and the executive order LGBT advocates are hoping he’ll sign.

Via: Evan Vucci, File / AP

WASHINGTON — As President Obama is due to greet an audience of LGBT advocates and supporters at the White House Thursday afternoon, out LGBT members of Congress are pressing him to act on an executive order to bar federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT employees.

Here's what four of the six out House members had to say:

Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney: "The President is right that Congress should do its job here, but since Speaker Boehner is unwilling to take on his Tea Party caucus and call a vote on basic workplace protections for hardworking Americans, then it is understandable that our community looks to the President for leadership. President Obama had it right when he said "we can't wait.'"

Rep. Jared Polis: "There's currently no explicit federal law that protects LGBT Americans in the workplace and it's perfectly legal to be fired just because of who you are or who you love in more than half the country. We should be doing everything we can to prevent this type of discrimination. I've called on the president to issue an Executive Order to protect LGBT employees of federal contractors while we work to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act in Congress."

Rep. Mark Takano: "President Obama has moved the conversation on LGBT rights forward at an unbelievable rate, and has proved himself to be an unshakable ally to the movement, but because of the failures of Speaker Boehner and House Majority Leader Cantor, Congress has not taken action on employment discrimination. As a result, I strongly encourage the President to take action and issue an Executive Order to protect LGBT Americans who work for Federal agencies or contractors. This way, thousands of Americans who live in states without nondiscrimination protections can finally be treated equally in the workplace."

Rep. Mark Pocan: "It is unconscionable that under today's laws, too many people go to work fearful they may be fired or discriminated against because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Our federal government has a responsibility to set the standard on the issues of equality and justice. That is why I joined with more than 100 of my colleagues and urged the President to sign an executive order that protects LGBT employees of federal contractors, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to pass the bipartisan, comprehensive Employment Non-Discrimination Act."

John McCain Jumps The Gun By Announcing That Obama Will Arm The Syrian Rebels

$
0
0

Oops.

"The president also will announce that we will be assisting the Syrian rebels by providing them with weapons and other assistance. I applaud the president's decision."

View Video ›

"It's my understanding that the president has not made the final decision on arming but he has made the decision that chemical weapons have been used."

View Video ›


White House Says Syrian Regime Used Chemical Weapons, Military Plans No-Fly Zone

$
0
0

The Assad regime used chemical weapons to kill more than 100 rebels.

Via: Evan Vucci / AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration estimates that 100 to 150 people have died from chemical weapons attacks in Syria. The White House blames the Syrian government for the attacks and says the casualty data is likely incomplete. It says it has no reliable, corroborated information to suggest that the Syrian opposition in the country's civil war has acquired chemical weapons.
The White House, in a statement issued late Thursday, says the use of chemical
weapons "violates international norms and crosses clear red lines."

On the Senate floor soon after the announcement, John McCain announced that the United States would provide arms to the Syrian rebels.

On the Senate floor soon after the announcement, John McCain announced that the United States would provide arms to the Syrian rebels.

Via: Muzaffar Salman / Reuters

“The president also will announce that we will be assisting the Syrian rebels by providing them with weapons and other assistance. I applaud the president’s decision.”

View Video ›

Via: dorsey


View Entire List ›

U.S. Will Provide Military Support To Syrian Rebels

$
0
0

U.S. has concluded Assad used chemical weapons, but no details yet on the specific military support that will be provided.

Syrian Army soldiers stand near a Syrian Army tank as they prepare for an offensive in Aleppo's countryside on Thursday.

Via: George Ourfalian / Reuters

WASHINGTON — National Security Council deputy advisor Ben Rhodes announced Thursday that the United States believes chemical weapons have been used in Syria and that the U.S. is weighing further action, which may include military options.

The decision comes after two years of conflict that has claimed 90,000 Syrians and after the U.S. concluded that chemical weapons had been used by the Assad regime against its people, which President Obama had described as the "red line" that would cause the U.S. to intervene.

According to the New York Times, the intelligence community estimates that between 100 and 150 Syrians have died in chemical attacks.

"The president has made a decision" about what kind of additional support will be provided to the rebels, Rhodes said. It will be "direct support to the SMC [Supreme Military Command] that includes military support."

"We have not made any decision to pursue a military operation such as a no-fly zone," Rhodes said. The Wall Street Journal reported today that the military is proposing a no-fly zone.

"Our intelligence community assesses that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year," Rhodes said. "The use of chemical weapons violates international norms and crosses red lines that have existed in the international community for decades.

Rhodes said "several allies" have already been briefed on the findings, as well as the United Nations and Russia.

Rhodes said the red line had been crossed.

"He has said that the use of chemical weapons would change his calculus and it has," he said. "We've prepared for many contingencies."

"We are going to make decisions about further actions on our own timeline," Rhodes said.

Rhodes said the U.S. had already increased the "types" of support it has provided, which will now include direct assistance to the SMC, which "we are comfortable working with."

"I'm not going to be able to detail every single type of support we are providing, but suffice it to say that it is both the political and military opposition that is receiving U.S. assistance," Rhodes said. The new assistance will be different from what the U.S. has given before, Rhodes said, while remaining vague about the specifics.

Rhodes cited "potential military options" and described the current situation in Syria as "particularly urgent right now" as Hezbollah has helped the Syrian regime make critical gains on the rebels.

Before the conference call, Senator John McCain said that the administration had decided to arm the rebels while speaking on the Senate floor. Shortly afterwards, he said that the president had not yet made a decision.

McCain later released a joint statement with Senator Lindsey Graham which called for the rebels to be armed.

"A decision to provide lethal assistance, especially ammunition and heavy weapons, to opposition forces in Syria is long overdue, and we hope the President will take this urgently needed step," the statement read.

Cato Scholars Defend NSA, Libertarians Revolt

$
0
0

“I doubt the authors speak for most others at Cato and they certainly don’t speak for the broader movement,” says one unhappy libertarian.

Two Cato Institute scholars came to the defense of the NSA's domestic surveillance program Wednesday in a Chicago Tribune op-ed, drawing outrage from libertarians baffled that such work would be promoted by their ideology's premiere think tank.

In the op-ed, titled, "NSA surveillance in perspective," Roger Pilon and Richard Epstein, both of whom are associated with Cato, argue that the security provided by the NSA program outweighs any violation of privacy it might cause, which they say is "trivial."

"The critics miss the forest for the trees," they write. "Yes, government officials might conceivably misuse some of the trillions of bits of metadata they examine using sophisticated algorithms. But one abuse is no pattern of abuses. And even one abuse is not likely to happen given the safeguards in place."

The op-ed, which was also posted to Cato's website, prompted a fierce debate on Facebook about whether the scholars' article undermined the think tank and its libertarian mission.

Adam Thierer, a former Cato employee, was among the critics.

"Generally speaking, most libertarians are pretty skeptical of the highly deferential 'just-trust-your-government' attitude on display in that essay," Thierer told BuzzFeed. "I doubt the authors speak for most others at Cato and they certainly don't speak for the broader movement, which is deeply concerned about the sweeping scope of our government's surveillance powers."

David Boaz, Cato's executive vice president, said, "Each of our scholars speaks for himself or herself. You'll find a number of Cato scholars' commentaries on this topic on our homepage and our blog."

The dispute reflects a broader divide among libertarians in the debate surrounding the NSA's domestic spying program and the man who revealed it, Edward Snowden. While most agree that the implications of the NSA's broad surveillance program are troubling — and even terrifying — libertarian members of Congress have hesitated to heap praise on the source of the leak.

What Is — And Is Not — Likely To Happen In Syria

$
0
0

A national security expert listened in on the White House’s Syria call Thursday. Here are her takeaways. “We didn’t get any closer to a no-fly zone today.”

Via: Muzaffar Salman / Reuters

WASHINGTON — On Thursday, the White House announced the red line had been crossed in Syria. President Bashar Assad's regime has used chemical weapons, National Security Council deputy advisor Ben Rhodes told reporters on a conference call, and that means "military support" for the Syrian rebels.

What does "military support" mean, exactly? Rhodes was vague about what the phrase entailed for the U.S.. But experts and politicians have been kicking around ideas for how to use the American military in Syria for quite a while now, and the crossing of President Obama's red line by Assad leads to several likely options, they say.

One of those experts, National Security Network executive director Heather Hurlburt, listened in on Rhodes' call and gave BuzzFeed a readout.

There are several ways to provide military aid, Hurlburt said. The first is by providing access to training and technology, which can change the dynamics on the battlefield without providing weapons or ammunition.

"There's lots of categories of things that are not by themselves lethal but that make you a better and more lethal soldier," she said.

U.S. allies England and France have said they're willing to provide arms to the Syrian rebels. Military assistance from the U.S. could entail American training in military tactics and use of the arms.

"There's been rumors that some of that was already going on," Hurlburt said.


View Entire List ›

A "Mellower" Anthony Weiner Rejects His Reputation As A Bad Boss

$
0
0

The former congressman defends himself against a damaging New York Times article. “That’s the other thing about the story. I don’t do salads.”

Via: Mary Altaffer / AP

At a forum for mayoral candidates in Harlem, Anthony Weiner shrugged off an unfavorable New York Times article, published in Thursday morning's paper, that cast the former congressman as an inordinately demanding boss who accomplished little in Washington, D.C.

Weiner said he spent his time in Congress as an advocate on behalf of his constituents, and suggested that the story was not as damning as believed.

"I think the article did a pretty good job of contradicting the headline," he said Thursday before the start of a forum sponsored by the Grand Council of Guardians, a group representing black police officers.

"I'll tell you this," he said later during the forum, "That New York Times story was right about one thing. I'm an impatient person. I don't want to wait. I'm not going to wait four years to do a contract. I'm not gonna wait 24 hours to change the policies. I am like a lot of New Yorkers are — they don't slow down at yellow lights if you know what I'm saying."

Weiner argued, as an example, that he was "ahead of the game" during the city's mayoral race eight years ago between current mayor Michael Bloomberg and the opposing Democratic nominee, Fernando Ferrer.

"I tried to deny Mike Bloomberg a second term when I ran in 2005, and I united our party behind Fernando Ferrer because I knew how important it was even then."

"If you're not impatient when you're the mayor, there's something wrong with you — you don't have a heart," Weiner added, standing beside three fellow Democratic candidates for mayor: Comptroller John Liu, Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, and Rev. Erick Salgado. "So if you want to know what kind of guy I am, I am what I am."

Weiner also said he has become more "mellow" since leaving Congress in 2011, when he was forced out in the aftermath of his infamous Twitter scandal.

When asked about one particularly notable anecdote in the Times piece — in which Weiner, during his 2005 mayoral campaign, "threw a salad against the wall, then left the room as the dressing slowly dripped, leaving a stain" — the mayoral hopeful seemed confused about whether or not the incident had occurred.

"I was talking to Josh about the salad in the car," he said, on his way out of Harlem's state office building on 125th Street, referring to a friend and former body man who worked on the 2005 campaign. "The salad story's apocryphal."

Weiner added, in his own defense, that he's just not a salad kind of guy.

"The way Josh tells it — and he was on the campaign at the time — is the door opened and there was a salad on the wall," he said. "First of all, I don't do salad. That's the other thing about the story. I don't do salads."

"Look, I'm impatient for change, and I fight hard for the middle class and those struggling to make it, and I make no apology about that," Weiner said. "I mean, I'm a much mellower person than I was when the salad did or did not wind up on the wall."

On Weiner's way out of the building, as heavy sheets of rain hit 125th, an aide handed his boss his own umbrella — a smaller one, apparently, than the one Weiner had brought himself but did not have on hand.

"I had this great big umbrella," Weiner said.

"I know, that's my umbrella," the aide responded, his arm still outstretched. "I can go get your big one."

He rushed into the rain, to the campaign car waiting outside, and came back with the larger umbrella for Weiner in hand.

"This way now neither one of us gets wet," Weiner said. "See I'm impatient, but now he's not gonna get wet."

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images