Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

John Kerry: 15 To 25 Percent Of Syrian Opposition Are "Bad Guys"

$
0
0

More than John McCain said several months ago.

Secretary of State John Kerry testifies at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Syria at the Rayburn House Office Building, September 4 2013 in Washington, D.C.

Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press / MCT

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State John Kerry estimated the number of "bad guys" in the Syrian opposition as between 15 and 25 percent on Wednesday.

Under questioning by Rep. Mike McCaul during a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, Kerry said that McCaul's estimate for how many of the Syrian opposition were extremists was too high.

"I just don't agree that the majority are al-Qaeda or bad guys, that's just not true," Kerry said. He estimated the total number of members of the opposition at between 70,000 and 100,000.

Out of those, "15 to 25 percent might be in one group or another that we would consider bad guys," Kerry said.

The number is higher than Senator John McCain's estimate from earlier this year. McCain said in April on CNN that out of 100,000 fighters in Syria, roughly 6,000 were members of the al-Nusra Front.

Other than this, Kerry and the other officials charged with carrying the Obama administration's message on Syria to Congress have mostly emphasized the moderate opposition and argued that the jihadist elements are only a small proportion of the overall resistance to Assad.

"The opposition has increasingly been defined more by its moderation, more by its breadth of membership," Kerry told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday.


New Syria Strike Authorization Headed To The Full Senate

$
0
0

A newly drafted resolution passes out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “I worry that we have now committed ourselves to a level of support that we’ll have to endure past the fall of Bashar al-Assad,” said Sen. Murphy.

From right to left, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member, Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, and Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

WASHINGTON — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed a revised resolution authorizing a strike in Syria on Wednesday.

In a vote of 10-7, with Democratic Sen. Ed Markey voting "present," the new language drafted by Chairman Bob Menendez and Ranking Member Bob Corker narrowed the scope of the administration's proposed resolution. It explicitly prohibited ground troops in the country and defined the length of time the president could approve air strikes in the country.

Two Democrats — Sens. Chris Murphy and Tom Udall — joined Republicans Jim Risch, Marco Rubio, Ron Johnson, John Barasso, and Rand Paul in voting against the resolution. Corker, along with Sens. John McCain and Jeff Flake, approved the resolution.

The new resolution will now go to the full Senate for a vote, and congressional leaders hoped the new tightened language would help bring on support for the measure. But the close committee roll call shows just how divided Congress is over the potential military strikes, and passage is far from guaranteed. An even more skeptical House is also expected to take up the measure next week when they return from the August recess.

The approval of the new resolution came a day after Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel appeared before the full committee, giving an often muddled message as to why the United States was obligated to strike.

McCain had indicated earlier Wednesday he might vote against the resolution because he found it too narrow in scope. After a long closed-door briefing in the morning, McCain emerged saying he would support a strike if new language was included to clearly state the U.S would like to see a "change the momentum" on the ground in the country in Syria and that Congress supports arming "vetted" rebels. Those amendments passed by voice vote in the committee.

But after the vote, Murphy said that he could not support the resolution — especially in its revised condition — in part because it went further than he was comfortable with.

"I simply believe that the risks of action today outweigh the risks of inaction. Second, given that this resolution also for the first time commits congressional support for arming the Syrian rebels I worry that we have now committed ourselves to a level of support that we'll have to endure past the fall of Bashar al-Assad," he said.

Udall, the other Democrat voting no, said the U.S had not made a strong enough case internationally and believed the resolution would "move the United States toward greater involvement in Syrian civil war."

"As I said yesterday, our attention should be on the source of Assad's ability to continue to ruthlessly kill his own people, and that is support from nations including Russia and China, which are cynically trying to hold the high moral ground," Udall said. "The full force of international rage should come down on those nations that are refusing to allow the U.N. to act and find a solution."

Marco Rubio, a potential 2016 contender, has been openly supportive of intervening in the crisis in Syria for years, but said he ultimately believed that the administration was taking the wrong approach and has been far too slow in responding.

"While I have long argued forcefully for an engagement in empowering the Syrian people, I have never supported the use of U.S. military force in this conflict and I still don't," he said. "I remain unconvinced the use of force proposed here will work. the only thing that will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons in the future is for the Syrian people to remove him from power."

15 Types Of People Who Show Up To A Congressional Hearing

$
0
0

We’re gonna have a problem here.

Confused interns picking their noses.

Confused interns picking their noses.

Congressmen playing Candy Crush.

Congressmen playing Candy Crush.

And Jungle Run.

And Jungle Run.

And taking some creep-shots.

And taking some creep-shots.


View Entire List ›

What It's Like To Be Anthony Weiner

Watch Rumsfeld React In Disbelief As He Learns Obama Said He Didn't Draw The "Red Line" On Syria

$
0
0

“You’re kidding me. He didn’t say that. I can’t imagine him saying that he didn’t draw the red line. But, he did draw a red line. We have ears.”

"This president has tried to find a way to blame everybody or anybody for everything and leadership requires that you stand up and take a position, provide clarity, and take responsibility," former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld told Greta Van Susteren on Fox News.

youtube.com

Earlier on Wednesday, President Obama told reporters in Sweden, "First of all, I didn't set a red line. The world set a red line" on Syrian President Bashar Assad's use of chemical weapons.

The full 16-minute interview from Fox News:

Was Mitt Romney Right About Everything?

$
0
0

From Russia to Mali to Detroit, Romney’s biggest fans say they’ve been vindicated. “Obviously, it would have been nice if any of these incidents would have occurred during the campaign.”

Romney pauses as he addresses supporters during his election night rally.

Mary Altaffer / AP

Ten months after Mitt Romney shuffled off the national stage in defeat — consigned, many predicted, to a fate of instant irrelevance and permanent obscurity — Republicans are suddenly celebrating the presidential also-ran as a political prophet.

From his widely mocked warnings about a hostile Russia to his adamant opposition to the increasingly unpopular implementation of Obamacare, the ex-candidate's canon of campaign rhetoric now offers cause for vindication — and remorse — to Romney's friends, supporters, and former advisers.

"I think about the campaign every single day, and what a shame it is who we have in the White House," said Spencer Zwick, who worked as Romney's finance director and is a close friend to his family. "I look at things happening and I say, you know what? Mitt was actually right when he talked about Russia, and he was actually right when he talked about how hard it was going to be to implement Obamacare, and he was actually right when he talked about the economy. I think there are a lot of everyday Americans who are now feeling the effects of what [Romney] said was going to happen, unfortunately."

Of course, there is a long tradition in American politics of dwelling on counterfactuals and and re-litigating past campaigns after your candidate loses. Democrats have argued through the years that America would have avoided two costly Middle East wars, solved climate change, and steered clear of the housing crisis if only the Supreme Court hadn't robbed Al Gore of his rightful victory in 2000. But a series of White House controversies and international crises this year — including a Syrian civil war that is threatening to pull the American military into the mix — has caused Romney's fans to erupt into a chorus of told-you-so's at record pace.

In the most actively cited example of the Republican nominee's foresight, Romneyites point to the candidate's hardline rhetoric last year against Russian President Vladimir Putin and his administration. During the campaign, Romney frequently criticized Obama for foolishly attempting to make common cause with the Kremlin, and repeatedly referred to Russia as "our number one geopolitical foe."

Many observers found this fixation strange, and Democrats tried to turn it into a punchline. A New York Times editorial in March of last year said Romney's assertions regarding Russia represented either "a shocking lack of knowledge about international affairs or just craven politics." And in an October debate, Obama sarcastically mocked his opponent's Russia rhetoric. "The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War's been over for 20 years," the president quipped at the time.

That line still chafes Robert O'Brien, a Los Angeles lawyer and friend of Romney's who served as a foreign policy adviser.

"Everyone thought, Oh my goodness that is so clever and Mitt's caught in the Cold War and doesn't know what he's talking about," O'Brien said. "Well guess what. With all of these foreign policy initiatives — Syria, Iran, [Edward] Snowden — who's out there causing problems for America? It's Putin and the Russians."

Indeed, earlier this summer, Moscow defiantly refused to extradite National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to the United States, prompting Obama to cancel a meeting he had scheduled with Putin during the Group of 20 summit. Russia has blocked United Nations action against Syria. And on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told lawmakers that Russia was one of the countries supplying Syria with chemical weapons.

To Romney's fans, these episodes illustrate just how unfairly their candidate was punished during the election for speaking truths the rest of the country would eventually come around to.

"The governor tried to enunciate how to deal with these very hard, tough issues, and we were met with slogans," O'Brian lamented. "And now the real world is exposing the slogans as being totally trite."

Admirers point to other examples of Romney's unrewarded wisdom, as well.

During a foreign policy debate in October, the candidate briefly expressed concern over Islamic extremists taking control of northern Mali — an obscure reference that was mocked on Twitter at the time, including by liberal comedian Bill Maher. Three months later, France sent troops into the country at the behest of the Malian president, bringing the conflict to front pages around the world.

On the domestic front, Obamacare — which Romney spent more time railing against on the stump than perhaps any other progressive policy — is less popular than ever, while the federal government struggles to get the massive, complicated law implemented. (One poll in July found for the first time that a plurality of Americans now support the law's repeal.)

And while the unemployment rate has, in the first year of Obama's second term, gradually fallen to post-crisis lows, the still-ailing U.S. economy, which served as the centerpiece for Romney's unsuccessful case against Obama's reelection, was given a potent symbol earlier this summer when Detroit became the largest American city ever to declare bankruptcy.

The Motor City became a symbolic battleground during the election, with Romney proudly touting his father's ties to the auto industry, and the Obama campaign relentlessly attacking the Republican for a Times op-ed he had written years earlier headlined "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt."

"The president took the title of that op-ed, which of course was written by editors of the New York Times, and used it to say Gov. Romney was being insensitive about his own home city," complained former campaign spokesman Ryan Williams. Romney's article argued that beleaguered automakers should consider going through a managed bankruptcy instead of taking a bailout but, Williams said, "the president's campaign intentionally tried to blur the lines. It worked. And several months later, the city is going bankrupt because of liberal democratic officeholders."

Referring to the bankruptcy, Putin's posturing, and the Mali conflict, Williams added, "Obviously, it would have been nice if any of these incidents would have occurred during the campaign to vindicate Romney. You would never want to see the bankruptcy of a major U.S. city, or the president embarrass himself on the world stage like he has, but Gov. Romney did discuss these potential outcomes."

Romneyites are processing these feelings of vindication in different ways. The campaign's chief strategist, Stuart Stevens, said he has been disappointed to see their central message — that Obama would be unable to restore America's strength — turned out to be so accurate: "If there is a part of the world in which America is stronger, it's hard to find. What's the president doing? Attacking a talk radio host. He has criticized Rush Limbaugh with more conviction than the leaders of Iran... We can only hope it improves. "

And Jennifer Rubin, the conservative Washington Post blogger who became Romney's most outspoken advocate in the press, accused members of the news media of failing to take the Republican's arguments seriously, while allowing the incumbent skate through the race untouched.

"As for the media, they are the least self-reflective people I know," Rubin said. "The left-leaning media has carried the president's water faithfully, eschewing the least bit of critical analysis. Now they don't like the result?"

For Zwick, perhaps the closest thing to a true Romney loyalist on the campaign last year, the belief that his candidate turned out to be right offers little comfort.

"It's frustrating because there's no way to correct it," Zwick said. "We don't do what they do in the U.K. and lead the opposition party when you lose. When you lose there is no way to sort of be vindicated. There's no way to say, 'OK, well, I didn't win the presidency but I'm going to continue to fight.' There's no fighting. There's no platform to do that. Fifty million Americans voted for the guy and yet it's all for nothing."

"I wish he'd run again," Zwick added. "He's not going to. But if he did, I'd be right there."

The NYPD's Muslim Spying Targets Speak Out

$
0
0

“We are scared of NYPD.”

Steinway Café and Billiards

Via yelp.com

ASTORIA, NEW YORK — The New York mayor's race and its political class have spent a year reckoning with the revelation that the New York Police Department spied for years on their Muslim neighbors.

But for many Muslim businesses and organizations, the news — revealed in more detail this week in Enemies Within, a book by AP reporters Adam Goldman and Matt Apuzzo based on their Pulitzer Prize-winning reporting — came as a shock when a reporter visited them this week.

"I have trouble with this one word," said Syed Moustafa, the owner of Arrow Tours and Travel, as he read the NYPD report on his business.

The word was "devout"; I explained its meaning to him.

"What?" he exclaimed. "They can tell someone's religion based on appearance? They are saying they can tell what religion I am because of how I look. Unbelievable."

"I had no idea," he said of the spying. "We are upset over this. We are a part of this community. We are a part of this country. These people have this theory in their mind we are not. Their theory that 100% of us are terrorists are wrong."

Moustafa, who has been in business since 1995, offers round-trip tours for Muslims making the hajj every year for just under $7,000.

"I travel back and forth a lot between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, because I am a travel agent. I have to travel with groups because I'm a tour leader," he said.

In the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, the NYPD, under the leadership of Commissioner Ray Kelly, put in place an a system of undercover police officers and paid informants they called "rakers" and "mosques crawlers" to compile data and trawl through ethnic neighborhoods. Rakers would hang out in local businesses and write reports on goings-on.

The NYPD joint tasked with "raking" communities, and the focus of Enemies Within was known as the Demographics Unit, a part of the NYPD's Intelligence Division that grew exponentially after Sept. 11 under the direction of former CIA New York Station Chief David Cohen. If a patron, business owner, or employee mentioned reading radical literature, it would find its way into a report. If a patron spoke sympathetically about United States enemies, it would probably make its way into a report.

"Mosque crawlers" were paid informants who trawled mosques to tell the NYPD what an imam said at a sermon. Crawlers oftentimes provided police lists of those who attended despite them not being suspected of many crimes.

On Wednesday, BuzzFeed visited all of the businesses in the Astoria section of Queens listed in documents released by Apuzzo and Goldmanas as having been targeted by the NYPD. Some were shocked. Some understood. Many had closed or moved. Several weren't open or couldn't speak without the manager or owner present. Only a few wanted to be quoted by name.

The woman at Yasmin Travel seemed frightened when she learned the NYPD had visited her business undercover.

"We are peaceful people on the corner," she said, fearing that participation in this story would bring retribution from the NYPD. "We are scared of NYPD."

At U.S. Furniture, a store listed on NYPD documents as a "place of interest" and where this reporter bought the couch for his apartment, the manager appeared dumbfounded to discover his business had been looked at.

"I've worked here for nine months and never heard of that," he said of NYPD spying.

"Oh shit," said the man at the front desk of Webmate U.S. internet café when he learned the business had been visited and put into a report.

"It's an internet café, so a lot of people come through here," he then said, seeming to understand why the NYPD would want to look into the business.

At El-Khayam Café, the friendly employees and patrons said they had never heard of NYPD spying on Muslim businesses or mosques.

The NYPD listed their business as a location "Egyptian owned," frequented by "Egyptians, Palestinians, Syrians, Moroccans, Algerians and Lebanese," and as a location for "international soccer viewing."

A portrait of Hosni Mubarak hung near the register as an employee offered to let a reporter speak with patrons about NYPD spying.

"The spying doesn't bother me," said café patron Hassan as he smoked his hookah. "They do everything they have to do for the safety of America."

"This feeling of sadness," he said of Sept. 11, "it is with us too."

El-Khayam is one of the favorite hookah spots on the block and was even included in a 2005 New York Times profile of New York City's Egyptian community and a New York Daily News story on the debate over Mubarak at the café.

The Times described the business place as "a friendly spot that often attracts outside visitors on weekends."

Employees of the Al-Iman mosque, a Sunni house of worship and Astoria's largest mosque, also feared retaliation from the NYPD for participation in a report. The establishment was listed as a "mosque of interest" in NYPD documents.

"We don't care about nothing. We don't say nothing," said a man who worked at Al-Iman mosque. "We don't participate in reports. They all came — CNN, ABC — a few years ago. We don't say nothing and the NYPD leaves us alone. You have businesses that talk to reporters and they say and something and all of sudden."

"We don't care about the spying unless they break the mosque," he added.

A woman working the bar at Steinway Café-Billiards was shocked. She said she had never heard of NYPD spying on Muslim business.

"What? I had no idea," she said.

NYPD documents said the café was frequented by "Albanians and Egyptians."

Another "mosque of interest," El-Ber of Astoria, was likewise unaware of NYPD spying on their mosque.

I "was not aware," a patron said. He said the imam would not have been aware as well and invited me to come back to speak with him another time when he was not out.

The NYPD's spying reportedly never lead to a single lead or terrorism case.

El-Ber Mosque

El-Ber Mosque

Via macaulay.cuny.edu

Al-Iman Mosque

Al-Iman Mosque

Via macaulay.cuny.edu


View Entire List ›

25 Things John Kerry Looked Like At The Syria Hearings

$
0
0

Oh, sure, I can see that.

Lumiere.

Lumiere.

Getty / Via Courtesy of Walt Disney Company

An eggplant.

An eggplant.

Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press / MCT

New Hampshire's former Old Man of the Mountain.

New Hampshire's former Old Man of the Mountain.

Alex Wong / Getty Images

An Ent from Lord of the Rings.

An Ent from Lord of the Rings.

Jason Reed / Reuters


View Entire List ›


Feinstein: DVD Containing Evidence Of Chemical Weapons Use In Syria Will Be Sent To Congress

$
0
0

After a briefing on Syria, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said that a DVD containing evidence of victims subjected to chemical weapons attacks will be sent to every senator and possibly members of the House.

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Sen. Dianne Feinstein said that a DVD created at her request by the CIA containing evidence of chemical weapons strikes in Syria will be sent to every Senator and possibly members of the House.

According to Feinstein, the DVD will show images of victims of the attacks and provide context about why it is believed chemical weapons were used. She said recipients of the DVD would be able to go through the images "at their leisure."

The Senate Intelligence Committee, which Feinstein chairs, watched the DVD at a closed-door meeting Thursday morning.

"It's horrendous," she said in a press briefing following the meeting.

Feinstein said she saw evidence that the regime used chemical weapons between 11 and 14 times before, though on a smaller scale than the Aug. 21 massacre outside Demascus. She said it looked like the smaller instances were test runs leading up to the big attack.

Though Feinstein has said she will vote to use military force in Syria, she wouldn't confirm if she was actively trying to convince Senators who are still on the fence to join her.

"They can certainly be undecided up to the vote, but you know there is a moment of truth in all of this," she said.

Biden On Romney In 2012: "Ready To Go To War" With Syria

$
0
0

He offered no specifics. Assad “will go.”

View Video ›

During the presidential election last year Vice President Joe Biden attacked Mitt Romney for being "ready to go to war" in Syria. He offered no specifics.

"He said it was a mistake to set an end date for our warriors in Afghanistan and bring them home. He implies by the speech that he's ready to go to war in Syria and Iran," Biden said Sept. 2, 2012 speaking in York, Pennsylvania.

"He wants to move from cooperation to confrontation with Putin's Russia. And these guys say the president's out of touch? Out of touch? Swiss bank account, untold millions in the Cayman Islands. Who's out of touch, man?"

Biden more clearly defined his own Syria position in his vice presidential debate with Rep. Paul Ryan. He was asked why the need to intervene in Syria was not the same as in Libya where it was justified to prevent further massacres. (At that the time the death toll in Syria was 30,000. It has now passed 100,000 deaths.)

"Different country. It's a different country," Biden said. "It is five times as large geographically, it has one-fifth the population, that is Libya, one-fifth the population, five times as large geographically.It's in a part of the world where they're not going to see whatever would come from that war. It seep into a regional war."

"You're in a country that is heavily populated in the midst of the most dangerous area in the world. And, in fact, if in fact it blows up and the wrong people gain control, it's going to have impact on the entire region causing potentially regional wars," Biden added.

Biden said the Obama Administration was working with allies in the region to identify people to takeover in the "when" Assad fell.

"We are working hand and glove with the Turks, with the Jordanians, with the Saudis, and with all the people in the region attempting to identify the people who deserve the help so that when Assad goes — and he — there will be a legitimate government that follows on, not an Al Qaida-sponsored government that follows on."

Ryan and Biden said they agreed upon the Obama Administration's "red line" against chemical weapons.

Al Gore Group Defends Climate Change Strategy In Internal Memo

$
0
0

“AG and climate change are one of the favorite piñatas for media and easy targets for headlines,” Stiles tells employees in response to a report by BuzzFeed.

Saul Loeb / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — In an internal memo sent to employees Wednesday, Al Gore's climate change organization said it stands by its digital strategy and assured staffers that the former vice president and his CEO, Maggie Fox, "are unwavering in their support of each of you and our strategy."

The memo — headed with the subject line, "Buzzfeed and the piñata" — responds directly to a BuzzFeed report Wednesday on Gore's group, the Climate Reality Project. According to a wide range of interviews and a review of the organization's tax filings, the nonprofit Gore built to revolutionize the climate change movement has diminished in size and scope since its founding seven years ago.

The memo was written by Dan Stiles, the Climate Reality Project's chief operating officer and the main spokesman for the group in the article, and sent by email to staffers Wednesday, according to a source close to the organization. BuzzFeed obtained a copy Thursday.

"AG and climate change are one of the favorite piñatas for media and easy targets for headlines," Stiles said in the memo, referring to Gore by his initials.

Stiles, calling Gore the "fearless leader" of "our fearless non-traditional efforts," did not address specific points made in the article, but did assure employees that the group's digital strategy is one they're sticking with.

"AG and Maggie have both read the article and are unwavering in their support of each of you and our strategy," wrote Stiles. "As are the Climate Leaders and others who have weighed in the comment section to the article already."

The memo says BuzzFeed agreed to "join" Gore's group for "the launch of an innovative carbon too[l]." Stiles and another staff member from the organization invited two BuzzFeed reporters to attend an upcoming Climate Reality Project event in New York, and the reporters said they would consider covering it.

A spokeswoman for the Climate Reality Project did not respond to questions about Gore's response specifically, but did clarify when asked that Stiles had "no intention of characterizing any sort of partnership with BuzzFeed as no such partnership exists."

The full text of Stiles's email reads as follows:

Subject: Buzzfeed and the piñata


Good morning/mid-day,

I am sure many of you have read the article Buzz Feed published today about our fearless leader and our fearless non-traditional efforts. I thought I would share a few thoughts that, of course, did not make it into the article.

As many of you already know, AG and climate change are one of the favorite piñatas for media and easy targets for headlines. Always have been and always will be. In that stead, this particular piece was written with a narrative that the reporter had no interest in changing despite both GPG's and my efforts to educate them on the great work of this team. You would think Buzzfeed, of all places, would understand our approach to tackle this issue. But, alas, headlines are more important to and easier for them than writing about innovation and a community effort.

AG and Maggie have both read the article and are unwavering in their support of each of you and our strategy. As are the Climate Leaders and others who have weighed in the comment section to the article already.

So, when I invited Buzzfeed to join us this year, despite their viewpoint, to see our launch of bleeding edge digital tools like What I Love and join us again along with millions of others for 24 Hours of Reality and the launch of an innovative carbon too, I did it without any hesitation. And, they accepted.

This hasn't been done before and we're building something new together.

I can't think of anything more inspiring than the opportunity to prove a naysayer wrong. And, I hope you find that inspiring too as we head into an action packed fall.

Let's get out there and show them how its done!

Dan

This article has been updated to include a comment from the Climate Reality Project's spokeswoman.

Lawmakers Warn That Obama Is Fumbling Syria Strike Messaging

$
0
0

“The calls have been overwhelmingly against. We should have been called back immediately, there should have been a national address,” said New Jersey Republican Frank LoBiondo.

Smoke rises from buildings after an airstrike in Sarakeb, Syria, on Sept. 4, 2013.

Edlib News Network ENN / AP

WASHINGTON — Republicans and Democrats alike warned Thursday the White House's poor handling of its Syria messaging efforts has made it increasingly difficult to fall in line, threatening to doom efforts to build congressional support.

A lack of any sort of obvious, coherent game plan for convincing the public action needs to be taken against Syria and a decision to leave congressmen in their districts to be confronted by angry voters is making it increasingly difficult for members to back President Obama.

"The calls have been overwhelmingly against. We should have been called back immediately, there should have been a national address, New Jersey Republican Frank LoBiondo said Thursday.

"They made the decision, they are doing the best they can, the briefers are incredibly helpful but this is very difficult when Congress is not all here together. A matter of this magnitude, we should have been here so the president can explain to us and explain to the American people," LoBiondo said. "My constituents, I've never had an issue that's been so overwhelmingly against."

Since Obama announced late last week that he was putting the question of whether to attack Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's forces — but not calling lawmakers back to town for an immediate vote — House and Senate members have seen a deluge of negative responses from the public.

The recess "has had a tremendous impact on both Democrat and Republican members no question about it," Florida Democrat Alan Grayson said. "The public is not just against it, but vehemently adamantly against this and it's having an impact on members of the House. The calls have been 100 to one against this coming into my office," the ardent opponent of attacking Syria added.

Leaving a hot button issue to linger in public is something of a rookie legislative move — leaders in both chambers will routinely keep controversial bills under wraps until after a recess to avoid opponents from picking it apart and building a public outcry against it.

But rather than bring Congress back into the protective cocoon of the Washington echo-chamber where they would be insulated from direct constituent contact, and more amenable to agreeing to strikes, the White House has left them vulnerable to public opinion.

Sen. Carl Levin, who is voting for a resolution granting Obama authority to launch strikes, acknowledged that public opinion is a force, but insisted lawmakers shouldn't allow that to dictate their decision. "Public favor was very much in favor of going into Iraq. I voted not to go into Iraq, I thought it was a mistake. The phones were ringing off the hook. If I had followed public opinion then, I would have voted to go into Iraq. But in my judgment at that time it was a mistake," the Michigan Democrat said.

Still, lawmakers said public opinion is a major factor in how lawmakers are viewing the looming vote.

"I can tell you that back home in Hawaii going to the supermarket, at the gas station, people went out of their way to come and find me and talk to me to share their concerns and feelings on this issue, their opposition to the U.S. getting involved elsewhere," Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said.

"What that tells me, people all across the country and I've heard the same thing from many of my colleagues, people all across the country are paying attention to this conversation and have some pretty deeply held feelings on this and they are engaged."

J Street Undecided On Syria Position

$
0
0

The liberal pro-Israel advocacy group says it won’t know if it supports Obama’s plan for military strikes on Syria until next week.

President Obama speaks at a meeting with bipartisan Congressional leaders at the White House on September 3.

Larry Downing / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Liberal pro-Israel advocacy group J Street is waiting until next week to publicly take a position on the Obama administration's war plan for Syria, a spokesperson for the group said, even as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is launching a full-scale lobbying effort on behalf of the president's proposal on Capitol Hill.

"We have not taken a position on the President's request to Congress for authorization for the use of force," J Street spokesperson Jessica Rosenblum told BuzzFeed on Friday. "We are discussing that internally right now."

The group "won't have anything more until early next week," she said.

Rosenblum noted that the group had made two statements on the conflict. "We issued a statement condemning Assad after the chemical attack and urged that any action taken 'should aim to minimize the loss of civilian life, deter the further use of chemical weapons and avoid regional spillover,'" she said. "The previous one was in response to the first reports of chemical weapon use in April."

The Syria resolution comes at an awkward time for J Street, a group seen as close to the White House and that appeared back in the mix as Israeli-Palestinian peace talks resumed in July. And as J Street makes up its mind, AIPAC prepares to flood Capitol Hill with activists in advance of the Syria vote, Politico reported on Thursday.

The pro-Israel group is planning a "major mobilization" in support of the White House's Syria plan, an AIPAC source told Politico.

The Senate is expected to vote on a use-of-force resolution next week.

Did A Congresswoman Post A Photo Of The Shocker?

$
0
0

You can never be too sure with these things.

So this is 'The Shocker.'

So this is 'The Shocker.'

If you need an explanation you won't be getting it here.

This is 'The Pitchfork', an Arizona State school hand gesture.

This is 'The Pitchfork', an Arizona State school hand gesture.


View Entire List ›

Obama To Address American People On Syria Tuesday

$
0
0

The president promises to make a direct case for war to a skeptical public. Obama calls congressional debate over Syria “a heavy lift” for the White House.

Ria Novosti / Reuters

WASHINGTON — President Obama will make his case for military strikes on Syria directly to the American people next week.

At a press conference at the Group of 20 economic summit in Russia Friday, Obama promised to make an address back home in Washington Tuesday.

"I intend to address the American people from the White House on Tuesday," Obama said.

The promise comes amid widespread criticism from Congress about the administration's sales job on Syria so far. Members of Congress have said Obama should have made a prime-time public address before asking them to sign on to the war with an authorization.

Obama said his speech will focus on alleviating American concerns about mission creep in Syria.

"For the American people at least, the concern really has to do with understanding what we're describing here would be limited and proportionate and designed to address this problem of chemical weapons use in upholding a norm that helps keep all of us safe," Obama said. "And that is going to be the case that I try to make not just to Congress but the American people over the coming days."

Obama acknowledged his push for a strike authorization in Congress has been a tough sell on Capitol Hill, just as his call for military engagement with Syria has been met with public skepticism, according to public polling.

"I knew this was going to be a heavy lift. I said that on Saturday when I said we're going to take it to Congress," Obama said. "You know, our polling operations are pretty good. I tend to have a pretty good sense of what current popular opinion is."


Republican Congressman Fundraising Off Syria Stance

$
0
0

“Will you stand with me in opposing President Obama’s plan with a donation of $25 or more right now?”

Alex Wong / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Rep. Michael Grimm, a New York Republican, is sending out fundraising emails based on his decision to switch from supporting President Obama's Syria plan to opposing it.

Grimm's campaign list sent out the fundraising call on Thursday with the subject line "Oppose Military Action in Syria."

Today, I decided to withdraw my support from President Obama's proposal for a military strike against Syria. I have heard from many of you in Staten Island and Brooklyn, and it is clear to me that their is strong opposition to the strike. As your voice in Washington, I will continue to listen and take a stand for you.

Will you stand with me in opposing President Obama's plan with a donation of $25 or more right now?

When President Obama first announced his plan for strikes against the Syrian government for its alleged use of chemical weapons, my first reaction as a Marine combat veteran was to support immediate, targeted strikes. I now believe that the opportunity for such action has passed.

President Obama has failed to show strength at this critical moment in time. While the debate in Congress continues, our nation's credibility grows weaker and weaker. After much deliberation and prayer, I have decided to withdraw my support. I do not feel that our country has enough to gain by moving forward with this attack.

Stand with me today with a donation of $25 or more to strongly oppose military action in Syria.

Thank you for your support,

Michael Grimm

Grimm's website also included a fundraising page that has since been altered:

The page still exists on his website with "oppose action" in the URL, but references to Syria have been taken out of the page itself.

"The email was intended to be a message to supporters informing them of the congressman's withdrawal of support for a strike on Syria," said Carol Danko, Grimm's press secretary. "The dollar ask was included automatically by the vendor, and was never approved by the congressman. He is furious over this inappropriate inclusion and has taken appropriate actions to ensure that this careless error never happens again."

Danko said the page had also been an error. "It was part of the vendor's error in including fundraising links and changing the page and they corrected the error," she said.


View Entire List ›

Republican Congressman: If The House Had An Impeachment Vote It Would Pass

$
0
0

The impeachment drumbeat continues.

youtube.com

Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores said at a town hall forum Thursday that if the House of Representatives had an impeachment vote, President Obama would be impeached. Flores said such a vote would be futile because it would fail in the Senate.

"I look at the president, I think he's violated the Constitution," Flores said. "I think he's violated the law. I think he's abused his power but at the end of the day you have to say if the House decides to impeach him, if the House had an impeachment vote it would probably impeach the president."

The video was provided to BuzzFeed by former Obama campaign staffer Eric Aguirre, who shot the video last night.

"What's gonna happen next," Flores added. "It goes to the Senate and that's step one. Step two is, the Senate's got to have 67 votes. You've got 46 Republicans and 54 Democrats and independents. I'm not sure all the Republicans would vote for it and I know it's gonna be hard to get another 21 Democrats to vote for it."

"If you try and fail, are you willing to put Nancy Pelosi back in the speakership? I'm not," Flores concluded.

Flores joins a small choir of Republicans who have flirted with the idea of impeaching Obama at town halls throughout the summer, including Sen. Tom Coburn, Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, and Rep. Blake Farenthold.

Likewise, at a town hall on Aug. 28, Indiana Republican Rep. Todd Rokita reportedly said "impeachment is the answer" to President Obama, but the real solution was the ballot box.

"To be honest, impeachment is the answer, but that is a political problem," Rokita said. "Ultimately [impeachment] is a political process that is very hard to accomplish. It comes back to the people. The ultimate solution is at the ballot box. The last time we were simply out-voted."

Before Obama decided to go to Congress for a vote on authorization for action in Syria, a number of congressmen said they would bring up articles of impeachment in the president authorized strikes unilaterally.

"If a president on his authority and in direct contravention of the Constitution plunges our nation into war, if that's not impeachable, what is," asked California Republican Rep. Tom McClintock in an interview with a local Fox affiliate. "The Constitution does not require consultation. It does not require informing Congress. It requires Congress' specific act to authorize a war."

"A bill I put in said any president who bypasses the Congress to bomb another country without provocation, and this is actually in the Constitution, than they should be impeached," said Republican Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina to a local radio station.

When It's Time To Change Your Islamist Rebel Group's Name

Vulnerable Democrats Keep Their Distance From Obama On Syria

$
0
0

Democrats with tougher electoral prospects are not interested in signing on to the president’s war.

The Arizona Republic, Rob Schumacher / AP

WASHINGTON — Some of the Democrats least interested in lining up behind the president on Syria are the Democrats most likely to face a tough reelection campaign next year.

President Obama acknowledged Friday that convincing Congress to authorize a military strike on Syria has been "a heavy lift" for the White House so far. The normal anti-war coalition of liberals and libertarians is falling into place, and a more unlikely coalition partner of Republican hawks is joining them. For now, though, most members are on the fence. None more so than vulnerable Democrats, according to a study by the Republican opposition research firm America Rising.

Using the venerable nonpartisan Cook Political Report ratings of House races, the GOP group compiled a chart of undecided Democrats and found many on the fence are the same ones the Cook Report says are facing tough elections next year. A couple already oppose strikes.

Only one, West Virginia Rep. Nick Rahall (who Cook places in a "Lean Democratic" race next year), has pledged to support congressional authorization for strikes.

America Rising's chart includes whether the vulnerable Democrats signed onto either of the two bipartisan letters sent to Obama last month calling for Congress to weigh in on Syria. One was authored by Virginia Republican Rep. Scott Rigell, and the other was written by California Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee.

Obama gave the signatories what they wanted when he called on Congress to authorize his plan to strike Syria. But only a few of the vulnerable Democrats signed either of the letters, per the America Rising study. Some Democrats have hinted they'll wait to hear what Obama has to say in his White House address on Syria next week before making up their minds, but the Republicans at America Rising say the fact that Obama hasn't already earned the support of so many vulnerable members of his own party shows that they think his war will be a drag on them next year.

"Democrats who are facing tough reelections in 2014 are either in hiding or trying to run away from a president whose agenda is wildly unpopular with voters in their districts," said Tim Miller, executive director of America Rising.

America Rising's list of vulnerable House Democrats on Syria, shared with BuzzFeed:

America Rising's list of vulnerable House Democrats on Syria, shared with BuzzFeed:

Cory Booker Shows 15 Years Of Tax Returns

$
0
0

The campaign also announced Booker will step down from the board of Waywire, his digital media company.

Ramin Talaie / Getty Images

NEWARK — U.S. Senate candidate Cory Booker released 15 years of federal income tax returns Friday afternoon. The filings revealed an average effective tax rate of 26.29% and shed some light on the mayor's personal finances dating back to his first year as a city councilman.

Booker's tax rate for 2012 was 36.89%, the most he has paid since 1998, when he was first elected to the Newark Municipal Council. His tax rate has never fallen below 18%, according to the filings, which aides allowed reporters to view for several hours. The campaign will not be making the documents available for public viewing online.

The returns show Booker took in an average income of $261,476 per year, with much of that money deriving from paid speeches. The speeches supplemented an annual income from City Hall that ranged from a low of $83,000 in 2006 to a high of $152,000 in 2011. From 2000, when Booker started giving speeches, to 2012, he has made $1,317,715, after taxes, addressing audiences.

In that same time period, he has given $149,347 to charity. (Booker's campaign said in March that he has given roughly $620,000 in charitable donations since 2009 — an aide accounted for the difference with 2013 giving, which he said figures so far at $469,906.)

Although Booker kept the majority of the money he made from public speaking in the last 12 years, he told The New York Times in March that he kept almost none. "Even though I am entitled to keep it," he said, "after Uncle Sam takes his share and after I've given away hundreds and hundreds of thousands, I've kept very little of it, if any."

Booker's tax returns for 2012 did not disclose any information about his holdings in Waywire, a digital media company Booker founded last year. "There was no income that was derived from the holding, and it wasn't sold, therefore it doesn't have to appear on an income tax form," said Booker's communications director, Kevin Griffis. Before the special election primary in August, Booker came under scrutiny for his involvement in the website, which reportedly has struggled despite high-profile investments from the mayor's most prominent boosters.

The campaign told reporters in a memo that Booker "is stepping down from the Board of Waywire and that he will donate his shares in the company to charity," though they did not specify to what organization.

Documents provided by Booker's office earlier this year show that the mayor has given to the charity he himself founded, Newark Now, every year from 2009 to 2013.

The tax filings also show that Booker's accountant overpaid his taxes by $100,000 in 2007 — a "clerical error" Griffis says wasn't discovered until the campaign began reviewing his returns earlier this year.

The documents show that Booker also received roughly $21,000 from consulting work from 2000 to 2002; $25,000 from a teaching fellowship at Stanford University in 2003; and $688,500 from a buyout agreement from 2007 to 2012 with his old lawfirm, Trenk DiPasquale, in which he had an equity stake.

Booker's filings show limited investment activity. But the Newark mayor did make a perhaps ill-advised sale of 25 shares of Netflix stock in 2003 for a profit of $172.

In the memo to reporters, the campaign also called on Steve Lonegan, his Republican rival in the Senate race, to release years' worth of tax returns.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images