Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

The First Real GOP Debate Of 2016 Is About The Patriot Act

$
0
0

Expect the Senate floor to look more like a Republican presidential debate stage in the coming weeks, with candidates Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz facing off over the size and scope of the government’s domestic surveillance program.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The first real debate of 2016 kicked off in earnest on Thursday after a federal court ruled that the Patriot Act does not allow the National Security Agency to mass collect the phone data of Americans.

The debate over privacy and the size and scope of the 14-year-old post 9/11 law that vastly expanded government surveillance practices pits pits Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul in a fight against Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and his more hawkish allies in the Senate.

Expect the Senate floor to look more like a presidential debate stage in the coming weeks: The fight over how to tackle the Patriot Act will be front and center in Congress as portions of the law, including section 215 which allows the government to bulk collect metadata of phone records, are set to expire June 1st.

There are some differences between the announced Republican candidates in the Senate (Rubio, Paul, and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz) but nowhere are their differences clearer than over the Patriot Act.

Following the court ruling, Rubio joined Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Senators Tom Cotton and Richard Burr to offer a full-throated defense of the NSA and accused critics of the programs of lying.

"Why are we even having this debate other than the fact that it is expiring?" Rubio said. "It is because a perception has been created, includuing by political figures that serve in this chamber, that the United States government is listening to your phone calls or going through your bills as a matter of course. That is absolutely categorically false."

"The next time that any politician — senator, congressman, talking head, whatever it may be — stands up and says that the U.S. government is standing up and going through your phone records, they're lying."

Rand's statement could not have been more diametrically opposed to Rubio's.

"This is a monumental decision for all lovers of liberty," he said of the court ruling and called for Congress to "immediately repeal the Patriot Act provisions."

Paul has made his criticisms a central part of his platform for 2016. He tweeted last week that on "day one in the Oval Office, I will END the NSA's illegal assault on your rights."

Rubio supports a measure introduced by McConnell to reauthorize current law without any reforms or changes some members have been calling for. Paul last year helped kill legislation reforming elements of section 215 last year because it did not go far enough, much to the dismay of privacy advocates who saw the bill as their best chance to rein in the NSA.

McConnell has yet to schedule a debate on his Patriot Act bill, and it remains to be seen how Paul plans on responding. Making things even more awkward, McConnell has said he supports Paul's bid for the presidency. Sergio Gor, a spokesman for Sen. Paul, said in an email the senator plans "on introducing some items" but "stay tuned for details over next few days."

Rubio told BuzzFeed News that he thinks these programs are "important to our country."

"And if they find someone abusing those programs they should be prosecuted and put in jail. But these programs are critical and they need to be extended," Rubio said.

That leaves Cruz, who has signed onto a bill called the USA Freedom Act, a bipartisan piece of legislation that ends bulk collection of records and implements other surveillance reforms while keeping and extending key portions of the program.

"We need to vigorously go after terrorists and at the same time respect the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans," Cruz said last week. "There is no need for the federal government to seize and possess bulk metadata. USA Freedom Act protects our constitutional rights but also ensures that the government has the tools to go after terrorists. We need to walk and chew gum at the same time."

Cruz was adamant that he would not support a straight reauthorization of the Patriot Act. Following the court ruling, Cruz released a statement calling on Congress "to immediately pass the USA FREEDOM Act."

The programs expire at the beginning of June, but Congress is set to recess in two weeks for the Memorial Day holiday. It's unclear at this point, how McConnell will move forward.

Sen. John McCain, a supporter of McConnell's move on the Patriot Act, played down the divisions within the conference and was optimistic about reauthorization getting done.

"They're running for president and their agenda is their agenda. I don't think it hurts us, I think we'll find a way to come together."


Senate Passes Bill Giving Congress Authority To Review Iran Nuclear Deal

$
0
0

The bill would allow Congress to vote on blocking the White House from lifting sanctions against Iran. Speaker Boehner has said he will fight for quick passage of the bill in the House.

Sen. Tom Cotton

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The Senate Thursday overwhelmingly approved legislation giving Congress the authority to review any nuclear arms agreement between the United States and Iran.

Although the bill does not give Congress complete veto authority, as many opponents of the deal had wanted, the bipartisan compromise by Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker and ranking member Ben Cardin does allow for a possible vote blocking the White House from lifting sanctions against Iran.

The 98-to-1 vote came after leaders out maneuvered Iran hawks including Sens. Tom Cotton and Marco Rubio, who had sought to include so-called "poison pill" amendments to the measure.

Cotton's amendment would have required Iran to disclose it's nuclear arms development history, while Rubio's amendment would have made Iranian recognition of the state of Israel a condition for any agreement.

Cotton, the only member of the chamber to vote against the bill, slammed the legislation for providing the administration too much authority to put in place a deal with Iran.

"A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary — especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime — should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution. President Obama wants to reverse this rule, requiring opponents to get a two-thirds vote to stop his dangerous deal. But Congress should not accept this usurpation, nor allow the president any grounds to claim that Congress blessed his nuclear deal," Cotton said in a statement.

But while opponents of the deal will now turn to the House in an effort to strengthen the bill, Speaker John Boehner made clear leadership will aggressively push for quick passage next week.

"This important, bipartisan legislation will ensure that Congress has a role in reviewing any potential agreement regarding Iran's nuclear weapons program," Boehner said in a statement immediately following passage of the bill. "I applaud the Senate for passing this bill, and thank Sen. Corker and others for their hard work. I look forward to House passage of this bill to hold President Obama's administration accountable."

Peter King: Pam Geller Event Put "People's Lives At Risk For No Good Reason"

$
0
0

“I think that — listen, she has the right to do what she did. Just because you have the right to do it doesn’t mean you should do it.”

w.soundcloud.com

New York Republican Rep. Peter King said Pamela Geller's Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest in Texas was "provocative for no reason" and putting "people's lives at risk for no good reason."

The Long Islander is a national security hardliner who has been criticized for hearings he held as on American Muslims as House Homeland Security chairman and is a constant vocal supporter of the NYPD's past spying on Muslims.

"Yeah, it's provocative for no reason," King told AM970 on Wednesday, adding Geller was critical of his hearings on American Muslims because she thought "somehow that I was helping the Muslims" or "she said I didn't conduct tough enough hearings or whatever."

King said Geller had the right to put on the event at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas, where people where invited to draw the Prophet Muhammad where two gunmen opened fire outside the event and were killed, but that doesn't mean she should have done it.

"I think that — listen, she has the right to do what she did. Just because you have the right to do it doesn't mean you should do it," said King noting some of America's strongest allies were Muslim.

"It's needlessly provocative," added King, saying he thought the event was "insulting someone's religion."

"For instance, let's assume that all religions have, that there are good people of all religions and they have strong beliefs. I was offended as a Catholic when they had the crucifix in the jar of urine, when you had dung on the portrait of the blessed Virgin Mary. Obviously we don't resort to violence, but to me that's insulting someone's religion."

The New Yorker added he thought the event was "just inviting trouble" and was "putting people's lives at risk for no good reason."

"We want to insult and attack and ridicule Islamist terrorism, and that's fine. That makes sense, but to go after a religion in this way, you're just inviting trouble and there's no reason. Its one thing to be courageous if you're doing it for a valid cause, but for the cause of doing a cartoon of Mohammad to me that's, you're putting people's lives at risk for no good reason."

King added he thought the event was running "the risk of people being killed" with no purpose. He added Geller could have "had cops killed."

"Yeah, and nobody's saying anyone should back down, but if you're going to get into a fight, if you're into something serious like, have...almost something where there's an endgame, where it serves your purpose. Here, to be drawing cartoons and then run the risk of people being killed, you know, what? What have we gained by that? At the end of the day, what has Pamela Gellar gained by doing all this other than the fact that you could have had cops killed, and if that officer who put two bullets in their head - talk about being an expert shot - if he didn't do that, we could have...you and I could be talking about 150 people being massacred."

What Happened To Authorizing The U.S. Military To Fight ISIS?

$
0
0

It’s been almost three months since Obama asked for a new authorization for the use of military force and there’s been little movement on the issue “We’re going to do one thing at a time,” said Sen. Bob Corker.

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — It's been nine months since the United States began operations against ISIS and almost three months since President Obama sent a letter to Congress requesting a new authorization to continue to fight the terrorist group in Iraq and Syria.

But a full Congressional debate to give an authorization for the use of military force (AUMF) has for now been pushed to the wayside. Bipartisan legislation on an Iran nuclear agreement has taken center stage in the Senate (it passed 98-1 on Thursday), Congress is about to run-up against a deadline to reauthorize sections of the Patriot Act, and both chambers are fighting to move forward on legislation dealing with trade.

"We're going to do one thing at a time," said Sen. Bob Corker, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman, who added he was focused on getting the Iran legislation off the floor. "People are still having discussions about a way forward. We don't want to start the process unless we know we can finish it."

In a later interview, Corker told BuzzFeed News he was still having ongoing meetings about an AUMF and his committee would address it "soon."

"We obviously need to make a decision about it very soon. That and the state department authorization are the two next things that need to occur. We're not talking August, it's soon," he said.

The senators who have been calling for a new AUMF since the operations against ISIS began took to the floor on Thursday to again push for Congress to begin working on legislation.

"The silence of Congress in the midst of this war is cowardly and shameful. How can we explain to our troops, our public or ourselves this complete unwillingness of Congress to take up this important responsibility?" asked Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine.

After his speech Kaine said the time lag between the start of the military action and Congress even beginning to address a new authorization "creates a horrible precedent."

"We're very engaged in the discussion and we're very aware that this Iran bill needed time and it was time sensitive but we really think it's time to turn to [the AUMF]," he said. "We don't have a matter of such urgency other than this... I do feel like congressional action is a little bit like what we Catholics get in the confession — it can forgive some past missteps — so a congressional authorization that happens will be retroactive and will cover what's already been done as well as what's the strategy going forward. "

While Corker and others deal with the complicated task of crafting any sort of authorization that would receive bipartisan support, the Obama administration has already said they believe they have the authority to continue to conduct operations under the 2001 AUMF. There's a pocket of senators, like Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio, who have said they won't vote for an AUMF that constrains the president in anyway. Others like Kaine, and Arizona Republican Jeff Flake want to support an AUMF that ensures limits on the size and scope of an authorization.

Flake, who joined Kaine on the floor Thursday morning, was optimistic that the panel might be able to turn to an AUMF in the coming weeks.

"We're agitating for it," he said. "We've both talked to Corker and [ranking member Ben] Cardin and we've said, 'Let's do it right now. Take the success from the Iran bill and move ahead with this.' I'm hopeful that's what happens."

Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez, who served as Foreign Relations chairman in the last Congress, was able to pass a version of an AUMF along party lines, but that bill never made it to the full Senate floor. Menendez said his conversations with Corker led him to believe that there was little chance of the panel taking up a new AUMF in the near future.

"From what I've heard from the chairman's remarks and conversations I've had with him, I don't see that happening anytime soon," he said. "It's difficult if you want a bipartisan one because there's a balance to be struck between giving the president the wherewithal to fight (ISIS) but not giving him a blank check and finding that balance is critical." "

"I think for the chairman part of the problem is there are people on his side of the aisle who on this occasion would be happy to give the president a blank check," he added.

Senate Intel Chairman Mistakenly Says NSA Collects IP Addresses In Bulk Under The Patriot Act

$
0
0

According to the Director of National Intelligence, the National Security Agency ended the bulk collection of internet metadata in 2011. Sen. Richard Burr’s office told BuzzFeed News that the senator misspoke.

Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr

Alex Wong / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Sen. Richard Burr briefly set intelligence watchers abuzz Thursday when, during a speech on the Obama administration telephone surveillance program, he said the program also collects IP addresses of internet users potentially connected to terrorists.

"Now what's bulk data? Bulk data is storing telephone numbers and IP addresses — we have no idea who they belong to — that are domestic … [it] allows the NSA to collect in bulk telephone numbers and IP addresses with no identifier on it. We couldn't tell you who that American might be," Burr, who is chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said when discussing section 215 of the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act.

"Earlier today … Senate Intelligence Chair Richard Burr revealed that there is also an IP address bulk collection program," intelligence blogger Empty Wheel wrote following the speech.

But according to Burr's office, it was simple case of misspeaking. Burr spokeswoman Rebecca Watkins said the lawmaker conflated a separate internet data collection program that was started around the same time as the bulk telephone data collection program during the Bush administration.

"There is no bulk collection of internet metadata under the Patriot Act. The Senator conflated two programs: the telephone communications program and the internet metadata collection program, which expired in 2011. Both programs were acknowledged by the Director of National Intelligence in 2013," Watkins told BuzzFeed News in an email.

In a 2013 press release declassifying the existence of the two spying programs, the Director of National Intelligence said the program had been terminated in 2011.

"The bulk collection of internet metadata was transitioned to the authority of the FISA in July 2004 and was collected pursuant to section 402 of FISA. In December 2011, the U.S. Government decided to not seek reauthorization of the bulk collection of Internet metadata," the DNI said in the release.

Deval Patrick: The Man Who Isn't Running For President

$
0
0

The man who probably isn’t going to be the second black president was speaking at Selma’s Tabernacle Baptist Church one Sunday in March, recalling his days working for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

Deval Patrick has an unusually direct connection to the civil rights era for a man of the Joshua Generation: Back in 1985, he was the junior lawyer on the Alabama vote fraud case against Albert Turner, an old ally of Martin Luther King Jr., who had helped organize the march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge on Bloody Sunday; his wife, Evelyn; and another man named Spencer Hogue Jr. They became known as the Perry County Three, accused by the Justice Department of altering absentee ballots. If found guilty, each could have gone to jail for life.

He remembered his clients, he told the congregation, “as being old black people. In fact, they would now only be the age I thought they were then.” The crowd laughed at Patrick, who likes being referred to as still a relatively young man. “The scary thing is, I am now the age they actually were.”

Theirs, and others, was a legacy of resilience, Patrick said, and it served black folks well to remember that even in the face of all manner of injustice, including injustice related to police violence — “A grand jury can’t see in the videotaped strangling of Eric Garner what the rest of the world sees!” he said, also making reference to Michael Brown — that legacy was dishonored by declaring defeat. “The key it seems to me is to be as mindful and as determined as our forebearers to keep on marching whether we are desperate or comfortable — maybe especially if we are comfortable.”

The point about being comfortable recalled another line for Patrick: “Being first doesn’t mean a thing unless there’s a second.”

The crowd approved and applauded — and Patrick let that applause linger in the air, sharp and abiding as it had been at any point during his address.

Deval Patrick, the first black governor of Massachusetts and only the second black governor in U.S. history, did no public Hamlet act over whether he’d run for president. He did, however, consider it in private, he told BuzzFeed News in an interview. Top advisers to Hillary Clinton also eyed Patrick warily through much of last year. He was, in their view, one of the few Democrats with a path to beating her.

But Deval Patrick is not challenging Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination — he’s not running for president and he’s not going to follow Barack Obama. Instead, the former two-term governor of Massachusetts, a powerful speaker with a liberal record, works at Bain Capital, and complains from time to time that Hillary Clinton doesn’t have a strong enough challenger.

“If our forebearers had been defeated by the challenges around them, which were in many respects more profound, then we wouldn’t get to sit in a room like this,” Patrick recently said of that Selma speech, gesturing from the 41st floor of the Boston high-rise where he now works toward the state house, whose golden dome was beaming under the sunlight. “I wouldn’t have got to sit in a building like that.”

Sean Proctor for BuzzFeed News


It’s a unique bit of symmetry that Patrick’s new office at Bain Capital, the private equity firm intertwined with 2012 election where he will lead a new “social impact” investment fund, overlooks his old one. His new office is “not quite fitted out yet.” For now, it’s just two purple orchids and pictures of his family lined up in a row.

The nondescript space is a little like Patrick’s newly formed post-governorship life so far. He left office in January — and looks little changed from years past, a bit more trim, perhaps. He rocks a bit of closely cropped salt-and-pepper haircut, and is perpetually clean-shaven. And while the 58-year-old walks gingerly — the effect of hip replacement surgery in 2009 — Patrick’s appearance is not the evidence we all needed that black don’t crack, but he looks good. And now, he’s out of public life and back to near anonymity.

“One thing I have noticed about being a black man,” he wrote in his 2011 memoir, “if you’re dressed in jeans and a casual shirt with a cap on, people will often look right past you.” Earlier this year, a local high school hosted a panel on the legacy of civil rights with, among others, former Sen. William "Mo" Cowan and J. Keith Motley, the chancellor of the University of Massachusetts–Boston. Patrick showed up in a cap and sweater. “I look up and see him,” Motley said, “look around and realize, ‘My God, no one even realizes he’s here.’” His next-door neighbor, State Sen. Brian A. Joyce, spotted him — ball-cap clad and being assisted at the Apple Store's Genius Bar recently. “There was not a person who recognized him. I think he relished that.”

Even if Patrick relishes this anonymity, however, he occupies an unusual perch in the Democratic Party, at the intersection of three current centers of power: He is close friends with the president; he has a long, albeit less close, history with the Clintons; he shares a home state with the woman — Elizabeth Warren — who leaves progressives enamored and creates problems for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

And, at the end of the day, he could have run for president.

A true progressive who oversaw a major transportation consolidation project, helped implement the state’s health care insurance system, and signed into law criminal justice changes popular in the Democratic Party, Patrick was widely considered capable of winning a third term. The question of a presidential run indeed weighed on Patrick, too, last year. If some Democrats were looking for a real challenger to Hillary Clinton, why not him? Democrats could do worse than a two-term governor with name recognition in New Hampshire.

Last December, Obama called into Patrick’s monthly “ask the governor” radio show as a final good-bye. When Obama hung up, Patrick was asked about what it’s like for that kid — the kid from the South Side of Chicago — to field a personal call from the president of the United States. Patrick took a deep breath to collect himself. “I've had reporters asking me about another political job — even that political job,” Patrick said. “I know I’m supposed to keep a straight face and try to give the best answer I can, and an honest answer, which is, ‘I don’t have any plans.’ But it really blows my mind that people would ask a kid from the South Side of Chicago a serious question like that.”

He wrestled with the decision, one prominent Democrat said, and woke up daily for a time unable to say that he was not going to run. When told this, Patrick’s closest advisers downplayed how close Patrick got, given that there was a clear path — Obama’s path — to the nomination.

Sitting in the Bain office last month, Patrick acknowledged that he gave running for president some thought. But, he said, his personal obligations eliminated the slightest possibility. “I didn’t have to think about it very long,” he said. “I never ran for governor to be something else.”

“My sense is that he didn’t come as close as people think,” Joyce told BuzzFeed News. “I don’t know a governor or a U.S. senator who doesn’t take a close look at it — who doesn’t at least close their eyes and say, ‘Hey, I could do that.’

“He certainly has not issued any Sherman-like statements,” he added. “Would I rule him out in the future? Absolutely not.”

A close former aide who went to dinner with Patrick recently said politics didn’t come up once,. He is most upbeat when he begins to talk about his work at Bain Capital. “Oh, man!” he let out when asked what indication he had the work was going to be fulfilling. “The enthusiasm inside the building has been over the top.” The mission of social impact investing is one Bain Capital is trying to figure out how to be in, he said “and the field is exploding and that is a very hopeful thing.” He emphasized field and that like a politician who is trying to inspire.

Still, even Obama himself recommended Patrick for higher office. “Deval would make a great president or vice president. But I think based on me talking to him, it sounds like he’d like to take a little bit of a break,” Obama told a Boston cable news station. “He’s still a relatively young man.”

Asked if Obama asked him to consider a run, Patrick laughed. “That’s a nice try,” he said. “What’s your next question?”

Robert Spencer / Getty

The curious thing about Patrick — a man who is not running for president — is his seemingly incurable habit of talking about Hillary Clinton’s “inevitability” problem.

It started in early 2014, when Patrick was asked outright by a reporter if there was going to be a “Hillary-Deval ticket in 2016.” He looked bewildered before saying no, and began laughing.

In July, Patrick expressed doubt about what he perceived to be her inevitability. “I worry about the campaign,” he said then. “I don’t think it’s so much her.” He noted they’d spoken at a conference in San Diego — but he added, “It’s not like we’re pals.”

In September, he emphasized she was “fantastic and incredibly strong,” before saying that “the problem with inevitability is it’s sometimes interpreted as entitlement, and I think that voters want competition and they want their candidates to have to work for it.”

And again in November: "Secretary Clinton has been an extraordinary public servant and would be a terrific candidate for president," he said. "But I think the narrative that it's inevitable is off-putting to regular voters."

Patrick said, in the interview with BuzzFeed News, that he doesn’t mean that point he’s made — that Clinton’s inevitability reads to the general public like entitlement — as a criticism of Clinton so much as it was of the people she had around her, noting this time around that her campaign manager, Robby Mook, is “off the charts good.” Patrick said what he hungers for is authenticity. He also wants competition. “I think if she has a competitive primary, she will be a better nominee.” Asked if she was better now, Patrick said he saw her at a rally for Martha Coakley, the former attorney general who lost to Gov. Charlie Baker. “She was brilliant. She was fantastic,” Patrick said. “She really got to, sort of, the nub of people’s aspirations and anxieties. It was beautiful.”

That was last October. Clinton arrived in Boston to campaign for Coakley, speaking to a packed ballroom at the Park Plaza Hotel for a little less than a half-hour. People say Clinton and Patrick began with political chitchat. Patrick congratulated her on the new addition and before long, babies Gianluca and Charlotte were the main topic of conversation. Clinton and Patrick got a glimpse of the other's grandchild on their phones. It lasted about 15 minutes.

The former governor and the former first couple have a long history, dating back more than a quarter century. When the NAACP LDF sued to stop voting rights violations in Arkansas he befriended Bill Clinton, who saw Patrick work the room in a meeting that settled the lawsuit and observed, “He has a future as a politician.” In 1994, Clinton tapped Patrick to lead the Justice Department's civil rights division.

When Barack Obama entered the presidential equation, however, the relationship shifted a little. Then-Sen. Hillary Clinton had called in 2007 asking for his endorsement, he said in the interview last month. “I told her I was going to keep my powder dry,” he said. “I like the competition.” Then, in the summer of 2007, he told Obama he would endorse him on Martha’s Vineyard at a home Valerie Jarrett rented. Run like you’re willing to lose, run at the grassroots, and keep your rhetoric high-minded and positive he told Obama, according to his memoir, repeating the occasion in the interview. (When he recalled offering Obama to use his “just words” riff, Patrick briefly got emotional when he recalled giving the original speech on Boston Common. It was an especially rough time for "what they were trying to do to my family.") Patrick’s recollection now of telling Obama he’d endorse him is less than crisp. "We’ve had lots of Vineyard conversations,” he said.

If there is left-over angst from endorsing Obama years ago, a Democrat close to Patrick said he’s not interested in rehashing it. “He’s been a civil rights lawyer, a corporate executive, governor ... he’s worked in the Clinton administration and he’s close to Obama,” the Democrat said. “By virtue of his tremendous experience, you can’t put him in a box. It’s just not that simple.” When Obama appointed Clinton secretary of state, he signaled to the rest of the party that “Democrats have been tasked with showing a way forward. So when talking about the past, some of these issues are, like, who cares? Except with how it relates to moving forward.”

In 2015, the only criticism is that of “inevitability.” The source familiar with Patrick’s thinking reiterated that it’s not personal. “For him, talk of inevitability is off-putting because it’s self-defeating. It assumes that the voters don’t matter, that what they care about doesn’t matter, that there’s no value in engaging with them. He views that that’s a failure of politics and policy.”

The danger Clinton’s inevitability candidacy poses, Patrick noted, is that someone like, well, Deval Patrick could come along. “That was the view of the Democratic establishment in 2005 and 2006,” he said, referring to his Massachusetts primary victory over two members of the state party establishment in 2006. “If you’d asked a lot of people then — and maybe even me — about whether it was going to be a really competitive primary with this newcomer, meaning me, coming into the race, I think a whole lot of people would have been equivocal. Things happen in politics. People find their voice and their footing.”

“If there’s a political doctrine that consistently governs Deval Patrick's actions as a political player, it’s that if you want to know what he thinks, you can literally just listen to what he says,” said longtime ally and former campaign manager John Walsh. “He’s not the kind of guy who says things he doesn’t believe. His biggest asset in an election is his willingness to lose. I’ve never heard him say, 'What do I need to say here to win?'" Walsh said, in a way explaining his willingness to shake things up.

Behind the scenes, Patrick's been a little less resistant to the Clinton operation: On April 27, after attending the swearing-in of Attorney General Loretta Lynch that morning, he attended the so-called "road show" the Clinton campaign has embarked on in some cities as a way to brief her most ardent supporters. It was held at the law firm Foley & Lardner LLP, according to sources familiar with the meeting. Mook and Obama campaign vet Marlon Marshall held forth in a large conference room, with Mook telling the audience even if Clinton is the likely nominee, her staff wasn’t taking it for granted — and neither could they.

Other attendees included Clinton loyalists Beth Boland, a partner at Foley; Steve Grossman, former state treasurer and former DNC chair; Cheryl Cronin, a lawyer and fundraiser; and Shanti Fry, a wealthy Cambridge activist who was a former finance co-chair for Massachusetts Sens. Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren.

It wasn’t known by every attendee that Patrick would attend or who had invited him; Patrick’s comments in the press about Clinton’s inevitability and her need for a competitive primary, irked some who were present at the meeting and were said to be surprised by his appearance a third of the way into the presentation. He arrived in a suit and tie. When asked to speak, he did. He said that Democrats need to speak with conviction in this election about what they believe in, about the tough road that lay ahead and the importance that the Democratic nominee follows President Obama to the White House. “Democrats need to have conviction to make sure we actively explain to voters what we stand for,” he said, adding that voters are going to be have a clear choice in the election. Two people present at the meeting couldn't remember if he said anything about Clinton.

Even so, when asked in the interview about Clinton, Patrick remained almost noncommittal. Will he campaign for her?

“Within bounds,” Patrick said. “I mean, I’ve got demands on my time.”

Patrick said, even though she’s the likely nominee, “I’m going to be listening to all the candidates.”

Would he be helping her raise money? Patrick repeated himself.

“I’m going to be listening to all of the candidates, and we’ll see.”

His relationship with Obama is far less complex. The pair met in 1995 at the behest of Abner Mikva, the former congressman and former White House counsel who once told Obama to study preachers to cultivate his speaking style. Patrick, in the middle of his stint at the Justice Department, met Obama for coffee, remarking in his memoir he was immediately taken with his intellect.

Now, he says, he serves a slightly different role in Obama’s life.

“I may be one of the few people who called him every once in a while, or comes to see him without saying, ‘Do this differently,’ or ‘do that differently,’” he said. “It’s just, “How you doing?” It’s hard to have these jobs and know people who are just interested in you.”

Patrick says he’s pushed Obama to push the limits of his own bubble, well aware of how they can be debilitating. But increasingly, Patrick reiterated that while his relationship with Obama is of a personal nature, he does not see his role of defending the president as a defense of his friend but as a defense of visionary leadership. “The president can stick up for himself — he’s the president,” Patrick said. “My defense of the president is not just a defense of my friend, it’s a defense of visionary leadership, and that’s what I think we have in this president.”

When you speak with Democrats who worked for Obama or are friends with Obama, they emphasize his legacy; they talk about the importance of how he will be seen going forward, the cornerstones of his record, and what best will preserve that legacy — a Democratic successor.

Political surrogates with name recognition like Patrick’s are not easy to come by. His standing and political capital make him a serious and possibly indispensable surrogate for the Democratic nominee. And people around him say he does like campaigning, that he was eager to stump for Coakley last year and escape the grind of governing.

He will make speeches, he said, “when I have something to say.” And he does have plenty to say about the issues of criminal justice, police violence against the community, and mass incarceration — something the Clinton campaign has already signaled will be a part of her platform, and something the Obama White House has faced over the last year. If Patrick is interested in the defense of Obama, whose exit from the White House is actually inevitable, it may be on this subject that Patrick is seen out on the campaign trail.

After all, his message in Selma was connected to a legacy of black people who “faced their fears” and fought for civil rights.

The absentee ballots organized by the Perry County Three were about political power. “The charges were a response to growing black political power,” Patrick said.

And then, Patrick said if the heroes of Selma hadn’t been resilient, hadn’t fought to vote and exercised their political power — and gotten back up — that there would be no Barack Obama.

“Imagine if they hadn’t?”

Three Areas Where Hillary Clinton Is Running Against Her Husband's Legacy

$
0
0

The politics of immigration, marriage, and crime have changed a lot since the 1990s.

Craig Fuji / ASSOCIATED PRESS

Hillary Clinton called for changes to the criminal justice system last week in a speech at Columbia University that rejected the "tough on crime" agenda pushed by her husband and centrist Democrats and Republicans in the 1990s.

But that's not the only area where Clinton has moved to the left of her husband's legacy. Some of the shifts, like her position on same-sex marriage, reflect an overall shift in the Democratic Party — and in the country — but many of the issues were ones her husband used to win political battles during his 1996 re-election campaign and presidency.

Here's a look at three issues that Hillary Clinton's campaign is focused on that rejects policies her husband pushed and campaigned on.

About a week after he signed the Defense of Marriage Act, in September 1996, Bill Clinton signed an appropriations bill that included measures meant to reduce illegal immigration.

Among these were enhancements to border security, a 12-month deadline to submit asylum applications, and a rule banning undocumented immigrants who had spent over a year in the country from returning to the United States for 10 years after leaving or being deported. Bill Clinton said then that the bill "strengthens the rule of law by cracking down on illegal immigration at the border, in the workplace, and in the criminal justice system — without punishing those living in the United States legally."

The month before, the president had signed a welfare package that blocked some legal immigrants from receiving food stamps.

At the time, public opinion in much of the country was in line with these positions.

Clinton's campaign ad touted his signing of "a tough anti-illegal immigration law," his record-setting deportations, and the increase of border patrol agents during his first term:

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com


View Entire List ›

Ted Cruz Missed Armed Services Hearings For TV Appearances, CPAC Speech

$
0
0

“If you are making the point he can’t talk about such topics because he wasn’t at these two hearings that is utterly ridiculous,” a Cruz spokeswoman told BuzzFeed News.

Carolyn Kaster / AP

Republican Senator Ted Cruz skipped two Senate Armed Services committee hearings earlier this year in favor of speeches and TV appearances, a BuzzFeed News review has found.

On February 26, the Texas senator missed an Armed Services committee hearing about worldwide threats, which featured testimony from National Intelligence Director James Clapper. The discussion covered an array of national security issues, including the threat of the Islamic State and the Iranian nuclear talks.

Cruz mentioned many of the same issues when he spoke at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference that afternoon.

"If a candidate says that they oppose Iran acquiring nuclear weapons capability, fantastic. When have you stood and fought?" Cruz said in his speech. "Actions speak far, far louder than words."

During a Q&A following the speech with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Cruz criticized President Obama and the State Department's policy around the Islamic State. "We need to stop this bizarre Orwellian double speak. We cannot defeat radical Islamic terrorism with a President who is unwilling to utter the words radial Islamic terrorism."

"You know the State Department spokesperson just said recently, we can't win this by killing ISIS. We need to give them jobs. What utter and complete nonsense," Cruz continued. "That is precisely how we win this. We kill the terrorist leaders before they kill us."

In addition, Cruz appears to have missed a closed Armed Services briefing on March 17, entitled "Cyber, Space and Strategic Competition with China and Russia."

The meeting included officials from the U.S. Strategic Command and an Air Force Space Command. Sen. Cruz also serves as the chair of the Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness within the Senate's Commerce, Science and Transportation committee.

Earlier that morning, Cruz was a guest in New York on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," talking about his views on taxes, 2016, and his decision to sign a letter orchestrated by Senate Republicans to Iranian leaders about the nuclear deal. Cruz also appeared on "Late Night with Seth Meyers" the evening before.

Cruz's attendance at both committee hearings and in the Senate generally has come under criticism recently. Politico reported that Cruz missed 21 of the 135 roll call votes taken in the Senate this year. In addition, the same review noted that Cruz was present at 17 out of 50 public Armed Services committee meetings, and had "below average" attendance at his other committees.

"If you are making the point he can't talk about such topics because he wasn't at these two hearings that is utterly ridiculous," a Cruz spokeswoman said. "But I don't know what your point is because you have no question. Do I want to comment on whatever it is you have here? Sure, use the first sentence because I find this inquiry ridiculous. But if you have an actual question instead of just lining up a series of links and a bland ask for comment, ask it."

The spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a follow up about why Cruz prioritized the appearances over the hearings.


British Election Good News For Hillary Clinton, Cameron Aide Says

$
0
0

Messina touts a “progressive” victory.

Obama and Messina in 2013.

MANDEL NGAN/AFP / Getty Images

The former Obama aide who helped Britain's Conservatives stay in power Thursday told BuzzFeed News that Hillary Clinton, rather than U.S. Republicans, should be taking hope from the victory of Britain's right.

Prime Minister David Cameron is "a progressive leader" who "pushed for gay marriage and a world climate change deal and proposed to increase child care subsidies and cut taxes on the minimum wage," Jim Messina said in a telephone interview from London, where he said he'd just departed a celebratory tea at 10 Downing Street.

Messina served as a top adviser to the Conservative campaign, and spent the run-up to the election in London, and said he'd slept about an hour in the last two days. He helped steer a re-election campaign that combined intense attacks on Labour leader Ed Miliband with policies — from support for nationalized health care to intervention in the housing market — that would fit easily inside the U.S. Democratic Party. (Labour, which is well to the left of the Democrats, was advised by Messina's old boss, David Axelrod, who declined via email to comment on the lessons for Clinton from the U.K. election.)

But Cameron clashed with Miliband over the incumbent's relatively hawkish foreign policy and support for, and from, London's booming financial industry.

Messina said he'd learned from Bill Clinton that elections should always look forward, and said Miliband "was talking about going back to the '70s and '80s."

He declined to draw any direct lines between this election and next year's American presidential campaign.

"I don't think this election has anything to do with Hillary Clinton," he said.

But Messina said Clinton could take heart from the results.

"Cameron showed, again, that all presidential elections are about the future and Hillary is by far the right candidate in the U.S. to do that," Messina said.

He said Cameron would likely follow Obama's example in staying neutral in the U.S. election, as Obama did in Britain's.

He said he'd been struck by the difference between the electoral system — in particular, Britain's cap on spending, at just over £31 million per party, that means that election campaigns aren't dominated by television advertising.

"The very hard cap on spending was a very good thing," said Messina, who said it created an environment in which the press had more power than it does in the U.S.

Britain has a "way more partisan press corps than what we have in the U.S.," Messina noted, though he disputed the notion that the press had tilted toward the Tories.

Messina said he will return to continue to work for the super PAC Priorities U.S.A., which he co-chairs and whose relationship to Clinton's campaign has at times been complicated.

"I plan to do whatever else I can to help," he said.

Rand Paul Claims Middle Class Status In Attack On Clinton's Speaking Fees But Has Millionaire Net Worth

$
0
0

“I think their comment that they were nearly broke doesn’t ring very well with the rest of us in the middle class,” Paul said.

w.soundcloud.com

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky included himself as a member of the middle class during a radio appearance on Friday, a claim that doesn't mesh with his available financial data.

Paul made the comments while discussing the Clinton's income.

"Well you know I haven't been too worried about the Clintons not having enough money anytime lately," Paul told Boston Herald radio on Friday when asked if thought middle class America could relate to comments Bill Clinton made about needing his speaking fees to "pay my bills."

"I think their comment that they were nearly broke doesn't ring very well with the rest of us in the middle class," added Paul. "I think they're now worth a couple hundred million. He makes sometimes $500,000 an hour so the 'woe is me' kind of language from the Clintons won't go over very well."

Paul, however, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, had an estimated net worth over $1,300,000 in 2013. His net worth when he first began his campaign for Senate in 2009 was just over $800,000.

The Center for Responsive Politics also found "27 assets totaling $683,036 to $1,970,000 in 2013," according to their site "Open Secrets." A complete breakdown of his assets from his 2013 financial disclosure is here.

In addition to his yearly $174,000 Senate income, Paul received a $180,000 advance on his first book along with $90,000 advance for his second book, plus royalties.

The Associated Press reported in a 2010 profile of Paul's frugal lifestyle that he made a salary of $163,000 in 2009 and listed rental income of nearly $100,000 on his financial disclosure.

"Those earnings rank him among the wealthy in a state where the median household income is just under $42,000," the report said.

"As the Wall Street Journal reported, the Clinton's may be in the "top 1% of the 1%" which means that they are in the top 0.0001%. The Clintons in just a small handful of speeches make more then Senator Paul's entirely normal net worth," a Paul aide told BuzzFeed News. "It is pretty easy to see who Americans could most identify with."

Congressman And 2008 Clinton Campaign State Chair: "Clearly Better" If Hillary Had Used State Email Address

$
0
0

“I think it would have been better, clearly for her to use the government server for government emails and the personal for personal.”

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com

Rhode Island Democratic Rep. Jim Langevin, who served as the state chairman for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, declined to defend her use of a personal email server when asked about it in a local news interview.

Langevin was speaking with WPRI when he said it clearly would have been better for Clinton to use a government server.

"I don't know the level of security on her personal server," Langevin said, adding he thought it might have been secure.

"I'm not gonna defend the use," he added. "I think it would have been better, clearly for her to use the government server for government emails and the personal for personal."

Langevin was her Rhode Island state chairman in 2008 and a special adviser to Clinton during her failed 2008 run for president. He said earlier in the interview that he had spoken with the Clinton campaign and was advising them on issues for the current campaign.

Clinton herself acknowledged "it would have been better" had she used separate work and personal email accounts during her tenure as secretary of state.

Clinton turned over 55,000 pages of emails to the State Department in December of 2014 at the department's request. Clinton's office decided which emails were official records and which were personal in nature and turned over the official ones for preservation. Clinton's personal server was then wiped clean, her lawyer told the Benghazi Committee.

Here's the full interview:

youtube.com

HillaryClinton.net Redirects To Carly Fiorina's Campaign Website

$
0
0

Carly Fiorina has been asked 200 questions in the last week, and an adviser says the URL snafu has come up in almost every interview. But what about Hillary?

If you type in HillaryClinton.net, this is where you end up.

In the week since Carly Fiorina officially kicked off her presidential campaign, the Republican candidate has faced an onslaught of questions in media interviews about her failure to register the domain name for CarlyFiorina.org.

But type HillaryClinton.net into your browser right now and you'll be redirected to Fiorina's website.

The person listed as the site's administrator did not immediately respond to a request for comment from BuzzFeed News, and a spokesperson for Fiorina said they had nothing to do with the URL trolling.

But the Republican's campaign was quick to point to the dueling stunts as evidence of media bias. According to an adviser, Fiorina has answered "well over 200 on-the-record questions" this week, and in virtually every interview she was asked about CarlyFiorina.org. The site earned widespread attention after a critic purchased it and filled the homepage with 30,000 frowning emoticons to illustrate the layoffs she presided over as CEO of Hewlett-Packard.

The Fiorina campaign has been generally good-natured about its mistake, using it in fundraising pitches, and buying up the dot-org domain names for high-profile interviewers like Seth Meyers. On Sunday morning, when Meet the Press moderator Chuck Todd featured the site during his interview with Fiorina, the candidate and her supporters mocked the media's fascination with the stunt on Twitter by dubbing it #domaingate.

Amid all the coverage of Fiorina's web mishap, no one in the press seems to have noticed that Clinton failed to secure one of her own eponymous domain names. It's unclear when HillaryClinton.net began redirecting to Fiorina's campaign site — but the URL has been the stage of a conservative squat protest for some time now. According to the Way Back Machine internet archive, the site was prompting visitors to donate to the political action committee for Sen. Ted Cruz in January 2014.

Many of the website-related questions put to Fiorina have dealt with her business record, not just her domain name snafu. But to Sarah Isgur-Flores, Fiorina's deputy campaign manager, the contrast in coverage reveals a partisan double-standard.

"It's hard to be surprised anymore when Republicans get held to a different standard by the press than Hillary Clinton," said Isgur-Flores. "Of course, since Mrs. Clinton has only taken seven questions since April 12, they probably won't have a chance to ask her about it anytime soon."

A spokesman for Clinton did not respond to a request for comment.

The Most Awkward Interview Of This Presidential Campaign, So Far

$
0
0

Also: It took more than a week for anyone to notice.

On April 30, Bloomberg Politics' Mark Halperin interviewed Ted Cruz.

On April 30, Bloomberg Politics' Mark Halperin interviewed Ted Cruz.

The interview started out relatively normal, then Halperin began quizzing Cruz about his Cuban heritage, including questions "You got a favorite Cuban food, Cuban dish?" and "Do you have a favorite Cuban singer?" and asking him to welcome Bernie Sanders into the presidential race "en Español."

But nothing really happened after the interview! Besides Rush Limbaugh, no one on the internet seems to have noticed this happened for... nine days.

Nothing wrong with that. But then Halperin made it personal, and the interview careened into a ditch. He told Cruz that people are curious about his "identity." Then, the host asked a series of questions intended to establish his guest's Hispanic bona fides. What kind of Cuban food did Cruz like to eat growing up? And what sort of Cuban music does Cruz listen to even now?

I've known Ted for more than a decade and I could tell he was uncomfortable. But he played along, listing various kinds of Cuban food and saying that his musical taste veers more toward country.

I kept waiting for Halperin to ask Cruz to play the conga drums like Desi Arnaz while dancing salsa and sipping cafe con leche -- all to prove the Republican is really Cuban.


View Entire List ›

Insurers: The New Contraceptive Access Study That Politicians Are Citing Is Flawed

$
0
0

The health industry’s leading trade group is going after a new study that says insurers are violating Obamacare’s contraceptive coverage mandate.

Charles Dharapak / AP

Health insurers are attacking a new study that accuses insurers of not complying with the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate — the study, the insurers argue, is based on anecdotal evidence partly paid for by a drug company.

The source of the dispute is a study released last month by the National Women's Law Center, a nonprofit that advocates on women's issues. The report, which provided anecdotal evidence and a review of health insurance plans in 15 states, concluded that insurance companies were in many cases violating Obamacare's requirement that health insurers cover FDA-approved methods of contraception at no cost to the patient.

The report has had a big impact: Lawmakers in New York are already talking about changes to the state's coverage requirements, while on Capitol Hill, a number of senators have written the Department of Health and Human Services, calling for clarifications about Obamacare's contraceptive requirement.

But health insurers say the study is flawed and too strongly weighs a wider range of contraceptive options and brand-name contraceptives — things that drug companies want — with ramifications that involve, insurers say, more money needlessly spent on expensive contraceptives, when there are more cost effective, and medically legitimate, methods available

The insurers also take issue with the methodology behind the National Women's Law Center report. The anecdotal evidence in the report was acquired, in part, through the center's "Cover Her" hotline — a service that offers guidance to women who are still paying out-of-pocket for contraceptives. That service is partly funded by grants from Bayer Healthcare, a drug company that makes a variety of brand name contraceptives.

The insurers say the interests of Bayer — promoting its brand-name products — is a problem. In a statement to BuzzFeed News, a representative for America's Health Insurance Plans, the industry's largest trade group, argued drug companies are trying to shift the conversation away from the prices of their contraceptive drugs while promoting more access to their products with no out-of-pocket fees for the patient.

"As prescription drug prices escalate, drug makers are looking for every opportunity to silence the debate on the impact these costs have for consumers," said Clare Krusing, director of communications for AHIP. "They are playing a shell game on patients by pushing proposals to change prescription drug coverage without addressing the price of these products and treatments."

An official with the National Women's Law Center told BuzzFeed News that the study's other funders more broadly support the hotline and the Center's advocacy efforts, and that neither the organization nor "Cover Her" endorses any Bayer products. A representative for Bayer confirmed their involvement in the "Cover Her" campaign to BuzzFeed News and said the company wants to promote access to contraceptives across the board.

If the pharmaceutical industry's intended goal is, as the health industry alleges, to shift the conversation away from drug prices in favor of promoting access to their products with no out-of-pocket costs, then at least for now, their efforts appear to be working.

In response to the report, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on Monday will introduce legislation that, if passed, will reinforce and expand on provisions in the Affordable Care Act designed to increase access to contraceptive care for patients with no additional costs.

The bill would, among other things, require health insurance policies in the state of New York to cover men's contraceptive treatment with no out-of-pocket costs, prohibit insurance companies from "medical management" review of contraceptive coverage, and allow for the dispensation of a year's worth of a contraceptive at a time.

Additionally, last Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Patty Murray, along with 38 other Senate Democrats, sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell requesting the department to issue clearer guidance on the mandate and proactively encourage compliance.

At the heart of this conflict is a significant disagreement between health insurers and women's health advocates over what the ACA's contraceptive mandate actually requires. The National Women's Law Center, as part of its report, argues that the law requires insurance companies to cover 20 different FDA-approved contraceptive methods at no cost to the patient. The organization has called on HHS to clarify their guidance.

Health insurers, on the other hand, often operate using a much narrower list of approved methods and contend that the law gives insurers leeway to use "medical management" techniques to control costs while providing care to their patients.

Rising drug prices and their effect on the cost of health care have long been a concern for health insurers and consumers alike. And while most Democrats who are talking about contraception coverage seem focused on increasing access, there is one prominent member of the party talking about controlling rising drug prices: Hillary Clinton.

"We need to drive a harder bargain negotiating with drug companies about the costs of drugs," Clinton said in Iowa earlier this year.

Hillary Clinton Adds Latina From Labor Department To Oversee Hispanic, Black, Women's Media

$
0
0

Xochitl Hinojosa, a senior aide to Tom Perez, is expected to join Clinton’s campaign as director of coalitions press. Hinojosa would be the third Latina to join Clinton in a high-profile campaign position.

John Locher / AP

Hillary Clinton has filled a major communications position in the campaign, tapping Xochitl Hinojosa as director of coalitions press, five sources told BuzzFeed News.

Hinojosa, who served at the Department of Labor under Secretary Tom Perez for almost two years and is the daughter of Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa, will oversee Hispanic, black, and women's media, among others.

Her last day in her current role is next week. The Clinton campaign declined to comment on the hire.

Democratic strategist Maria Cardona said Hinojosa has been in the mix as an early hire for a while. Cardona worked with Hinojosa on two projects with the Department of Labor and said she is someone who understands the nuances of the press landscape both in general media and Hispanic media.

"It's a rare mix to be able to get someone like her with experience, someone who can do it well and do it with grace," she said. "I was thrilled when they told me her name."

In her role, Hinojosa will not only work closely with the communications team but would also serve as a connection between field staffers organizing these coalitions on the ground — something that didn't always exist in the 2012 Obama campaign.

A former Obama staffer said that looking forward, you could envision a scenario where an organizer in Charleston, South Carolina, is working with a local hip-hop station to get information out to that neighborhood. A stronger link between coalitions on the ground and the national press team would "free up the opportunity for the field to communicate and leverage communications channels to send the most authentic message to voters they're working with," the Obama campaign veteran said.

Hinojosa also wouldn't be the person charged with, for example, doing the day-to-day work with black media. Hinojosa would have a team under her and there are plans to fill those roles as the campaign progresses.

Sources with campaign media experience said she will need a robust staff to ensure those coalitions aren't relegated to or feel like specialty media. For example, Univision, which is a top four network in the United States, regardless of language, doesn't want to be relegated to a secondary position in the campaign, said Jose Parra, a former senior adviser for Harry Reid.

Hinojosa's hire makes her the fourth high-profile Latino hire, and third Latina, along with Amanda Renteria, the political director and Emmy Ruiz, who returned to run the Clinton operation in Nevada. Jose Villarreal previously joined as campaign treasurer, as well.

The hiring continues the approach stressed by Clinton officials like Renteria of not just hiring, say, Latinos for Latino roles.

The early focus on strong Latino hiring and outreach operations has been repeatedly called for by Democrats who note that Clinton was popular among Latino voters in the 2008 primary against Obama, but must show she is serious about addressing their concerns during this campaign. Democrats have also worried that Republicans like Jeb Bush, who is fluent in Spanish and has a Hispanic family, and Marco Rubio, could compete for support from Latino voters.

Hinojosa followed very much in the footsteps of her father, Gilberto, who represented farm workers in class-action lawsuits "and made sure that the U.S. Department of Labor Employment Services Division provided farm workers with needed interstate employment services," according to the Texas Democratic Party.

She previously spent time at the Department of Justice's civil right division, as well as campaigns and senate offices before joining Labor, where she has been focused on issues like paid leave and the minimum wage.


Rand Paul Staffer Licks A Democratic Tracker's Camera

$
0
0

(“Trackers” follow around political candidates and record what they’re saying.) I would give this a clever headline, but… that’s basically all you need to know.

youtube.com

It starts out normally enough, with the staffer trying to block the camera:

It starts out normally enough, with the staffer trying to block the camera:

Then he goes away...

Then he goes away...

Comes back...

Comes back...


View Entire List ›

Rand Paul And Ron Wyden Will Fight The Reauthorization Of The Patriot Act Together

$
0
0

Aides in both offices confirm the two senators are coordinating their efforts to stop a straight reauthorization of the Patriot Act.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden and Republican Sen. Rand Paul are teaming up to fight a straight reauthorization of the Patriot Act in the Senate.

The two are coordinating their opposition to an extension of several provisions of the law that are set to expire at the end of June, aides for both senators said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has introduced an extension of the law, without any changes to some of its more controversial elements — like the bulk collection of phone data. Wyden and Paul, both long-time critics of the expanded surveillance practices, will work together to try to prevent that clean extension from happening.

Paul, an aide said, is ready to "work with anyone who supports our opposition." Wyden announced on Sunday that he intended to filibuster any short-term extension of the law "without major reforms like ending the collection of phone records," and an aide in his office said he was "closely coordinating" his efforts with Paul going forward.

"We will be filibustering. We will be trying to stop it. We are not going to let them run over us," Paul told the Union Leader of his efforts at a campaign stop in New Hampshire on Monday.

It's unclear at this point how McConnell will proceed, though the House is set to pass a bipartisan bill, dubbed the USA Freedom Act, that changes some of the more controversial elements, while extending the law itself. A companion bill in the Senate is supported by bipartisan group that includes Sens. Patrick Leahy, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz — but McConnell has not committed to bringing that bill up. Paul has said he would like to see the entire Patriot Act repealed, whereas Wyden is generally supportive of the USA Freedom Act but would like to see more done to reform surveillance programs.

This is not the first time the pair have worked together: In 2013 when Paul gave a 13-hour talking filibuster on the Obama administration's drone policy, Wyden was the lone Democrat to come to the floor to help.

LINK: The First Real GOP Debate Of 2016 Is About The Patriot Act

Ben Carson: "Probably Not" Helpful To Call Obama A Psychopath But It Was Accurate

$
0
0

“I said he looks like — he reminds you of one. And if anybody knows what a psychopath is, they would agree.”

Bill Pugliano / Getty Images

Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, who launched his presidential campaign last week, says people would agree with calling him calling President Obama a psychopath if they just knew what one was.

"Like most psychopaths," Carson said in a lengthy GQ profile when discussing Obama's State of the Union speech. "That's why they're successful. That's the way they look. They all look great."

Carson told local Concord News Radio Monday that if people knew what a psychopath was, they would agree with him — though he said it was probably not helpful for the political process.

"Uh, probably not and that was an off-the-record comment that was put on the record," Carson said, when asked whether the comment was helpful. "I said he looks like — he reminds you of one. And if anybody knows what a psychopath is, they would agree. But when you say certain things, people can't look at what you're saying they just hear the word and that's not helpful. So I agree."

Here's the audio:

w.soundcloud.com

The First Lawsuit Of The 2016 Campaign Comes From Team Clinton

$
0
0

Battleground: Ohio. Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, Marc Elias, joined Ohio lawyers in filing Monday’s lawsuit fighting Ohio’s early voting and other rules.

Marc Elias

Bruce Bisping / AP

WASHINGTON — On Monday, Hillary Clinton's lawyer, Marc Elias, filed a lawsuit in Ohio — setting the stage for 18 months (or more!) of litigation surrounding the 2016 elections.

"Since the November 2012 elections, Ohio's Republican-controlled General Assembly and Republican Governor have enacted several changes to the state's voting laws that have the effect of burdening, abridging, and/or denying the voting rights of all of Ohio's citizens," the complaint alleges.

Elias, a partner at Perkins Coie, joined longtime Democratic Ohio election law lawyer Donald McTigue and others in suing Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted and Attorney General Mike DeWine on behalf of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative and individuals, including a student at The Ohio State University and a pastor at an African Methodist Episcopal church in Akron, Ohio.

Among other directives and laws, the lawsuit challenges the directive limiting early in-person absentee voting hours due to the impact of the rule on a law that allows only one early in-person absentee voting location per county.

Here's that claim:

Here's that claim:

Husted came out swinging against the lawsuit, issuing a statement noting that prior election litigation was just recently settled.

"Ohioans don't want politically motivated, legal lap dogs messing around in our elections, this nonsense creates more confusion and discourages voting by undermining voter confidence," Husted said in the statement. "I suspect Mrs. Clinton's attorney may have filed his suit in the wrong state as Ohio has ample early voting hours. Perhaps he intended to sue Hillary's home state of New York where they have no early voting days or hours."


View Entire List ›

Georgia Says "Cloudy" Execution Drug Was Just Too Cold, But Expert Gave A Second Possible Cause

$
0
0

In March, Georgia postponed an execution after they discovered the drug had particles floating in it. “It looked more like clumps of cottage cheese floating in the solution.”

Georgia's pentobarbital on the day it was to be injected into Gissendaner.

Georgia Department of Corrections

Earlier this year, Georgia stopped an execution at the last minute — there were particles floating in the syringe that officials planned to use.

The state's outside expert who inspected the drug found two possible causes for the problem. When state officials announced the experts' findings, however, they only reported the cause the expert found to be "most likely" — not mentioning the other possible cause cited by the expert.

"The most likely cause of this precipitation was that the drugs were shipped and stored at a temperature which was too low," Corrections spokesperson Gwendolyn Hogan said in announcing the state's findings. This gave the state an easy fix: don't store the drug at as cold a temperature in the future.

But Hogan left out the expert's other listed possible cause: an error in how the pharmacy mixed the drug.

"An additional possible cause could be if the pharmaceutical solvent used to dissolve the pentobarbital sodium had absorbed some amount of water or evaporated during the preparation process," Dr. Jason Zastre, a professor at the University of Georgia said in his affidavit. "This may result in a lower concentration of solvent, ultimately impacting the solubility of the drug, which increases the possibility of precipitation."

Zastre ultimately recommended that the state address both issues: storing its drugs closer to room temperature — and assuring that the drug maker take steps to address the water absorption concerns.

Zastre declined a request to speak with BuzzFeed News, citing his hiring by the state as an expert. The Georgia Department of Corrections did not respond to an interview request.

The process for creating the drug compounds used in executions is secretive and not publicly transparent. In Georgia, state officials do not actually mix the drugs, nor do they purchase the drugs from a manufacturer — a compounding pharmacist performs the act, behind closed doors. Compounding pharmacies are regulated mostly by individual states and their drugs have a significantly higher failure rate and much shorter shelf life than those made by manufacturers.

Several states have turned to compounding pharmacies to create their execution drugs because they are unable to get ahold of manufactured versions.

Testing labs that inspected Georgia's drug found that it was indeed pentobarbital and that it had not been adulterated, meaning there wasn't another substance in the drug. Instead, Zastre says, the drug precipitated (meaning that solid versions of pentobarbital appeared in the solution). Pentobarbital's product label and the Food and Drug Administration's guidelines say drugs that have precipitated should not be injected.

"I think I would have characterized the drug differently than 'cloudy,'" Dr. Larry Sasich told BuzzFeed News. Sasich has testified as an expert against lethal injection schemes in numerous states. "It looked more like clumps of cottage cheese floating in the solution."

"The first thing that came into my mind when I saw the pictures was the acidity of the product," he said. "And when I read through the testing lab results, I noticed that they didn't report the pH of the solution."

Sasich said it's difficult to say what the drug would do to a person if its pH level was dramatically off, because "nobody tests substandard drugs on human beings."

Georgia has indefinitely postponed its executions while it sorts out what went wrong. Inmate Kelly Gissendaner's attorney argues that his client can't be executed, because she "endured hours of unconstitutional torment and uncertainty" while the state decided whether or not to use the drug. Although the state decided to not use the drug, Gissendaner's attorney refers to it as a botched execution.

Georgia has pushed to have the suit dismissed, arguing that they will implement new safeguards to prevent this situation from happening again. The judge has not yet weighed in.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images