Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Supreme Court Halts Enforcement Of New Abortion Restrictions In Texas

$
0
0

The 5–4 decision means several abortion clinics will remain open while the high court considers whether to hear the case.

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday announced that Texas will not be able to enforce new restrictions on abortion providers while the justices decide whether to hear an appeal filed against the new rules.

Earlier this month, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the restrictions, which require abortion facilities in Texas to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), where outpatient surgery is performed. Under the new rules, doctors who perform abortions must also have admissions privileges at a nearby hospital.

In the brief order on Monday, the Supreme Court — over the objection of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito — put the recent decision of the 5th Circuit on hold while the abortion providers ask the Supreme Court to hear their appeal.

The decision means that several clinics unable to meet the new restrictions will remain open at least until the Supreme Court decides whether it will hear the appeal.


Ted Cruz: John Roberts "Put On An Obama Jersey," Justices Should Resign If They Want To Write Legislation

$
0
0

“He knows full well that what he did in both of those decisions was not faithfully applied the law but it was to alter the law, to change the law in order to achieve a policy outcome.”

w.soundcloud.com

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said Monday that while Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has been a friend for 20 years who he likes and admires, Roberts "put on an Obama jersey" in writing the majority opinion in the last two landmark court cases on Obamacare.

When asked directly by BuzzFeed News about whether Roberts should resign, Cruz said he thought that if "members of the court want to write legislation or rewrite it they should resign from the court and run for the Congress."

"The chief justice's decisions and opinions in the two Obamacare decision last week and three years ago, were profound disappointments, and they were disappointments because John Roberts is an incredibly talented lawyer," Cruz said in a sitdown interview on Monday.

"He knows full well that what he did in both of those decisions was not faithfully applied the law but it was to alter the law, to change the law in order to achieve a policy outcome."

Cruz noted that Roberts, at his confirmation hearing, "famously said, "'The role of judge is to be umpire, calling balls and strikes,'" but in his Obamacare decisions "he put on an Obama jersey."

"What the chief justice did that was wrong is he did not play the role of an umpire, he joined a team, he put an Obama jersey and rewrote the law in order to force Obamacare on millions of people who hurting because of it," said the Texas senator.

Cruz added that he himself "gave passionate speech on the Senate floor where I said 'Listen, if members of the Supreme Court want to write or rewrite federal legislation they should resign from the court and run for Congress because the Constitution gives Congress the authority to --."

Asked directly if he thought Roberts should resign he repeated, "As I said, if members of the court want to write legislation or rewrite it they should resign from the court and run for the Congress."

Cruz noted earlier that Robert was someone he'd known for 20 years and "he's been a friend and I liked and admired him." Cruz noted he and Roberts were both pallbearers at Chief Justice William Rehnquist's funeral and both had clerked for Rehnquist.

BuzzFeed News noted last week during Roberts' confirmation hearings in 2005, Cruz, as Texas solicitor general, spoke highly of Roberts, emailing his staff to say Roberts was a role model for how to "carry out our craft" and he was "the best Supreme Court litigator in the nation."

In 2005, Cruz said he had been one of those who helped recruit Roberts to help with the Bush v. Gore recount in Florida.

Alabama Chief Justice's Comments Cause Confusion For Marriage Equality In The State

$
0
0

Some probate judges in Alabama had started issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in the wake of this past week’s U.S. Supreme Court marriage equality ruling. [Update: Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore backtracked later Monday on comments to AL.com that the state court’s order meant no same-sex couples could marry currently.]

WASHINGTON — Three days after the U.S. Supreme Court marriage ruling, there is confusion in Alabama.

First, some same-sex couples were issued marriage licenses in some counties in the state on Monday morning. Then, the state's Supreme Court issued an order in the afternoon and the state's chief justice, Roy Moore, commented on it (despite not being one of the judges issuing the order) — a move that launched confusion, including in the media, about what happens now.

In March, the Alabama Supreme Court ordered probate judges — who can issue marriage licenses in the state — to stop issuing such licenses to same-sex couples. At the time, some probate judges in Alabama had begun issuing the licenses after a federal district court ruled the state's marriage ban was unconstitutional — despite Moore's attempt, as the state courts' administrator, to stop the probate judges from doing so.

Since the state Supreme Court's March order, in which Moore did not participate, there were no marriages for same-sex couples in Alabama. After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee marriage bans in Obergefell v. Hodges on Friday — a ruling that creates a national decision on the issue — some probate judges in Alabama began issuing licenses again on Monday.

On Monday afternoon, the Alabama Supreme Court issued an order that asks for input from the parties to the March case as to "the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell on this Court's existing orders."

The reference to "existing orders" suggests the court's view is that the March order that banned probate judges from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples remains in effect. On Monday, the court did not, however, explicitly direct probate judges to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Additionally, the Alabama Supreme Court noted that the parties to the Obergefell case have 25 days to ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling — a step that appears unlikely given that state officials in each of the four states have said they will adhere to the ruling.

Although the court did not order probate judges to stop, Moore — despite not participating in the orders in the state case — told AL.com that the Supreme Court's opinion is "[b]asically ... not in effect" during the 25-day period, absent a ruling to the contrary from the Alabama Supreme Court.

Moore's views on the issue, however, are well known. He has spoken out often in opposition to the marriage claims made by same-sex couples. He presumably has recused himself from the case before his court because he had issued his own memorandum, as the administrator of Alabama courts, attempting to stop same-sex couples from marrying in the state in advance of the federal trial court's order there taking effect in February.

AL Congressman: If You Get An Expensive Illness With Obamacare "You're Gonna Die"

$
0
0

“…the kinds of illnesses that threaten to kill people, that are expensive to treat, that’s where they’re gonna tell you to get your affairs in order because they’re not gonna provide coverage and you’re gonna die.”

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

Rep. Mo Brooks, a Republican from Alabama, says people who contract expensive-to-treat illnesses are going to die under Obamacare.

"I have to look at the big picture," Brooks told the Matt Murphy Show on Friday when asked about those who would lose insurance if Obamacare was repealed. "I have to look at both the pros and the cons for all Americans and the damage that's gonna be done to Americans and the number of Americans vastly outweighs the benefit that is being given to those people that are being subsidized."

Brooks said "ultimately, you're looking at a lesser quality of care—health care." He added that the 15-person board of health-care experts created under the law to control costs -- the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) -- is making decisions about "whether a group of people live or die."

Sarah Palin famously referred to the IPAB as "death panels." The board is currently inactive because health care spending is growing at a slower rate than the threshold needed to activate it.

"An example: the Independent Payment Advisory Board, that's gonna be the entity that decides whether a group of people live or die because that entity is gonna be the one that decides whether health care is going to be provided for certain types of illnesses," said Brooks. "Uh, health care that is now provided by the kinds of insurance—well, I'll say now, that used to be provided—by the quality of insurance that we previously had."

Brooks said this meant, "people are going to be dying because of Obamacare because they're going to be denied coverage." He cited other countries in the world with similar agencies to make his point.

"And so people are going to be dying because of Obamacare because they're going to be denied coverage," said the Alabama Republican. "And how do we know this? Because there are other systems around the globe that have this kind of system in place. And there are people who are dying. You get breast cancer or you want to have a mammogram to try to have early detection to increase your likelihood of being able to survive it. Well, the countries that have this kind of government-run health care system do not provide mammogram access anywhere near the degree that we do in the United States of America. And that saves lives, if you have early detection. You lose lives if you have later detection."

Brooks again stressed that this meant there would be "people dying as a result of Obamacare just as they die in other parts of the world." He said if you had expensive illnesses "you're gonna die."

"And that's what you're going to be looking at is people dying as a result of Obamacare just as they die in other parts of the world. Now, Obamacare and government-run health care systems generally, they're good for the routine stuff. You got strep throat? Great. They'll address it. You got a broken leg? Uh, they'll mend it, okay. For the routine things. But the kinds of illnesses that threaten to kill people, that are expensive to treat, that's where they're gonna tell you to get your affairs in order because they're not gonna provide coverage and you're gonna die."

Here's the audio, the comments come 5:07:

w.soundcloud.com

Bernie Sanders Wins The Killer Mike Primary

$
0
0

Rapper Killer Mike of Run the Jewels endorses progressive crusader Bernie Sanders for president.

Jason Kempin / Getty Images

Rapper Killer Mike of the duo Run the Jewels announced in a tweet Monday that he is supporting Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' candidacy for president, citing Sanders' support for voting rights as a deciding factor.

Killer Mike has been politically outspoken following the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, last August. Killer Mike recently attempted to run as a write-in campaign for a seat on the Georgia House of Representatives, but neglected to fill out the necessary paperwork.

Sanders, who is challenging frontrunner Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president, is a darling of the progressive left, but he is considered a longshot. However, he has recently risen in New Hampshire polls and is drawing large crowds at rallies.

"No Hillary 4 me bro," Killer Mike wrote in a follow-up tweet to a fan. "I cannot support another Clinton or bush ever."

"I am beginning to see American political families like monarchs and I have no affection for monarchs," Killer Mike continued.


View Entire List ›

Tea Party Caucus Chair: Left Wants Churches, Non-Profits, Schools To Accept Polygamy

$
0
0

“We’re talking about polygamy.”

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com

Rep. Tim Huelskamp, a Republican from Kansas and the chairman of the HouseTea Party Caucus, says "the left" will push churches, schools, and non-profits to accept polygamy following the Supreme Court's decision to strike down bans on same-sex marriage.

"It's the same old compromise with the left," Huelskamp said on "The Steve Malzberg Show" Monday, responding to comments from Ohio Gov. John Kasich this weekend saying, "the court has ruled, and it's time to move on."

"They're not about compromise they're about winning," Huelskamp added. "Imposing their will, that's why they go to courts, every time they can cause they know that they can win that there and nowhere else.

"We've got to stand up for marriage, we've got to stand up for First Amendment right of those who disagree," added Huelskamp. "There is no doubt we're already seeing it come out."

"They want to go after churches and educational institutions, non-profits, anybody that doesn't agree will be made to care and not only accepting same-sex unions but now we're talking plural unions, John Roberts mentioned that. We're talking about polygamy, he mentioned that as well., those kind of things that were unthought of is now ordinary. You must accept that from Washington D.C. and backing down as Kasich is suggesting is exactly how the left wins battle after battle."

Chris Christie Is Running For President

$
0
0

The New Jersey governor is the 14th Republican to enter the presidential race.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie announced Tuesday that he is seeking the Republican nomination for president in 2016.

"America is tired of hand-wringing and indecisiveness and weakness in the Oval Office. We need to have strength and decision-making and authority back in the Oval Office," Christie said at a rally at his old high school in Livingston, New Jersey.

"And that is why today, I am proud to announce my candidacy for the Republican nomination for president of the United States of America."

Christie — whose brash, take-no-prisoners attitude has earned him both praise and criticism — is focusing his campaign around his straight-talk style, saying in a campaign video that he will be "telling it like it is."

Earlier this year in New Hampshire, he unveiled his plans to address entitlement spending, an often risk-intensive political subject that many Republicans have spoken about over the last five years, but few have emphasized as a core part of their platform.

But the circumstances in which Christie launches his campaign are very different than they were even at the end of last year, when Christie seemed to be moving on from past scandals and on the road to political redemption.

Despite numerous investigations, no evidence had surfaced implicating the governor in the 2013 lane closures of the George Washington Bridge. (Two of his senior administration officials have since been indicted and another one of his key allies has pleaded guilty.) As chair of the Republican Governor's Association during the 2014 elections, Christie was applauded for his ability to raise large sums of money. Under his leadership, the number of Republicans governors increased from 29 to 31.

Things took a turn in February, when a New York Times report hit Christie for his lavish spending of taxpayer money while on official business. That same day, while on a trade visit to the United Kingdom, Christie found himself at the center of a controversy over vaccination when he said parents "should have some measure of choice" in making the decision to inoculate their child (there was an outbreak of measles across the United States at the time).

A Wall Street Journal poll in March found that 57% of likely Republican voters couldn't see themselves voting for Christie — the only candidate less desirable was Donald Trump. His popularity in his own state of New Jersey hasn't fared much better either.

Christie is the 14th Republican to enter the presidential race, with even more expected to join in the coming months.

Watch his announcement here:

youtube.com

State Department Releases Thousands Of Pages Of Clinton Emails


Court Rules NSA Data Collection Can Temporarily Continue

$
0
0

Despite new laws passed by Congress and signed by President Obama to end the NSA’s bulk surveillance of American phone records, a FISA judge ruled the NSA program can continue for 180 more days.

Patrick Semansky / AP

WASHINGTON — A federal court Monday approved the temporary resumption of the National Security Agency's controversial bulk telephone data collection program, despite the fact Congress and President Obama have technically made such collections illegal.

Under pressure from civil liberties groups Congress outlawed the bulk data collection earlier this year as part of its reauthorization of the Patriot Act. And while the administration has indicated it agrees with barring the program, Congress provided them with an additional 180 days to collect the data, even after the program had been rendered illegal.

In his decision, FISA Court Judge Micahel Mosman notes, "this application presents the question whether the recently-enacted [law] … ended the bulk collection of telephone metadata. The short answer is yes. But in doing so, Congress deliberately carved out a 180-day period following enactment in which such collection was specifically authorized."

Mosman seems keenly aware of the odd situation in which he finds himself, wryly opening his order with Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr's famous quote "Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose." "The more things change, the more they stay the same."

Significantly, Mosman also approved a motion by FreedomWorks to become an amici curiae party to the motion, marking the first time the normally secretive FISA court has allowed an outside group to play a role in the process of reviewing data collection requests.

The language authorizing the court to appoint FreedomWorks as an amici curiae is part of a set of transparency rules included in the bill by Sen. Ron Wyden and other proponents of reforming the law.

In a statement, Wyden questioned the need for a resumption of the data collection program. "I see no reason for the Executive Branch to restart bulk collection, even for a few months. This illegal dragnet surveillance violated Americans' rights for fourteen years without making our country any safer. It is disappointing that the administration is seeking to resurrect this unnecessary and invasive program after it has already been shut down. However I am relieved this will be the final five months of Patriot Act mass surveillance, thanks to the passage of the USA Freedom Act. It will take a concerted effort by everyone who cares about Americans' privacy and civil liberties to continue making inroads against government overreach," Wyden said.

Ted Cruz Knows How To Go Viral

$
0
0

Jon Premosch / BuzzFeed

Ted Cruz is a populist, so the first thing he does when he wakes up every morning is reach for the iPhone on his nightstand and scroll through his @ mentions on Twitter. The cascading column of messages directed at the conservative firebrand is not exactly a hallelujah chorus. There are tweets from adoring tea partyers, of course. But there are also strangers calling him "terrifying," and "disgusting," and "insane," and "a pathological liar," and "a religious zealot dancing to the paymasters" (to take just a few examples from Monday). He revels in the onslaught.

"I read every leftist attack," Cruz boasted in an interview with BuzzFeed News. "And actually my team will tell you, some of them — particularly the clever lefties — I laugh at." He maintains two Twitter accounts, one dedicated to his work in the Senate and the other to his presidential campaign, and he checks both frequently. Like any denizen of the internet, Cruz confesses that he sometimes has to ward off a nagging impulse to engage with the Twitter trolls hurling insults at him, but he remains committed to the morning ritual. Why? "I believe those in elected office should listen to the people," he said, "and social media is an avenue for doing that." He's also preternaturally good at it.

More than perhaps any other figure in American politics at the moment, Cruz has proven himself to be a true-blue native of the social web — a politician who thrives on GIFable theatrics, shareable spontaneity, and clickable appeals to the kind of raw emotion and visceral identity that dominates Facebook feeds. His unmatched ability to galvanize and command a right-wing army of avatars has already played a key role in his political ascent. But in a presidential race that will be fought largely on the battlefields of social media, Cruz's unique instinct for virality could be more disruptive than many realize.

Those instincts were on vivid display Monday, when Cruz visited BuzzFeed's New York headquarters as part of a promotional tour for his new book, A Time for Truth. The besuited candidate — perhaps best known for leading the conservative crusade to defund Obamacare in 2013 that culminated in a government shutdown — strolled breezily around the office. At one point, while posing for a photo, he spotted a life-size cardboard cutout of the Dos Equis "Most Interesting Man in the World" and pulled it into the shot with him, declaring, "We Latins need to stick together!" While recording a short video with some of BuzzFeed's producers, he was notably hands-on, tweaking the script on the fly to make the jokes his own, and tossing out self-deprecating ad libs. And when he sat down for a wide-ranging news interview that covered many of the day's most charged political debates, the senator reserved his most palpable excitement for recounting successful memes he had launched and hashtag wars he had won.

Cruz's knack for fostering buzz within the internet's various political villages has been well-documented, with a track record that ranges from small, self-aware gags (this hypnotic six-second video of Cruz waving an enormous American flag), to high-profile stunts (reading Green Eggs and Ham to his young daughters from the Senate floor), to dramatic, unscripted confrontations (getting booed off stage by a conference focused on Middle Eastern Christians after lamenting that some in the audience were "consumed with hate" and not sufficiently supportive of Israel).

Since entering the presidential campaign earlier this year, the fruits of these efforts have been borne out in a weekly report produced by Facebook that monitors how much discussion each 2016 candidate is generating on the platform. In an incredibly crowded Republican field — where candidates tend to see short-lived spikes in social media chatter when they kick off their campaigns, and then quickly fade into background noise — Cruz has sustained a consistently high level of attention. In one typical week earlier this month, he clocked over a million Facebook "interactions" and was overshadowed only by Jeb Bush (a top-tier candidate who had just announced his candidacy) and Donald Trump (a celebrity troll who would eat his own hair to provoke a reaction).

Cruz may only be polling in the middle of the 2016 pack, but on the internet a lot of people are talking about him.

So, how exactly does he pull it off? Cruz answered the question, as he often does, with a story. He recalled that once in 2013, a group of liberal activists were trying to organize a campaign to make the phrase "You Cruz, you lose" a trending topic on Twitter. When conservatives caught whiff of the plan, they began planning a counterattack, rallying the senator's supporters beneath the banner "Cruz to victory." This high-minded battle of ideas commenced as each side began furiously tweeting their respective slogans. When the dust settled, the winner was clear.

"By 6 p.m. that night the hashtag #CruzToVictory was trending worldwide — the second most tweeted thing on the planet," Cruz said proudly. And the liberal hashtag? "Didn't make the top 10 in the United States."

When Cruz finished the story, a BuzzFeed editor present for the interview marveled, "What a world."

Cruz grinned. "It's a wonderful world."

The moral of the story, Cruz went on to explain, was that effective viral movements can't be manufactured by "Soviet-style campaigns" with "politburos up top" handing out marching orders to obedient partisans. (Here, Cruz attempted a Russian accent and began sternly jabbing his index finger into the air, barking, "You do that! You do that!") To mobilize true believers on social media, he said, a candidate has to strike a personal nerve. "It wasn't our idea," he said of #CruzToVictory."We didn't push it. It was organic. But what happened is the activists said, 'Hey, they're coming after us, the conservatives and libertarians.' It was their battle. It wasn't about some politician in Washington. It was about their beliefs and values."

A poster made by a California street artist that the Cruz team started promoting on Facebook. "My wife calls this my prison body," said Cruz.

Indeed, one reason for Cruz's omnipresence in the social conversation is that he has fastidiously presented himself the walking embodiment of tea party conservatism. By refusing to stray even a millimeter from his hard-right positions and apocalyptic rhetoric, he has become a heroic champion to many on the right, and a magnet for animosity on the left. And in communities like Twitter and Facebook — which are still predominantly populated by younger, more secular users preoccupied with social justice causes — Cruz's increasingly successful deployment of right-wing memes is often treated like a hostile invasion that must be urgently denounced. Hashtags get weaponized, screeds fill status updates, and before long, Ted Cruz is going viral all over again.

Last week, as millions of Facebook users applied rainbow filters to their profile photos in celebration of the marriage-equality victory, Cruz gravely proclaimed that we were living through "some of the darkest 24 hours in our nation's history." Rhetoric like that was not entirely uncommon in the immediate right-wing reaction to last week's ruling, but Cruz distinguished himself by doubling down on both style and substance in his interview with BuzzFeed News — resisting the temptation other candidates might have indulged to water down his pitch in the interest of wooing a younger audience.

"I think for millennia, marriage has been defined as the union between one man and one woman, and I'm not convinced those definitions can be magically transformed," Cruz said. He flatly rejected the premise that generational trends in the marriage debate were irreversible, and blamed coastal elites for perpetuating the false narrative. "We do have a lot of folks in the mainstream media and Hollywood who are desperately trying to repeat, over and over again, 'The issue's decided! Everyone agrees! Everyone agrees!' You know, there are a couple of facts that are in somewhat tension with that."

He pointed to the largely unsuccessful track record of marriage equality on state ballot initiatives, and argued that conservative people of faith would not change their religious beliefs simply because of "five unelected lawyers." (In other interviews, Cruz has noted the absence of evangelical Christians in the Supreme Court as proof that the justices are out of touch with the country. But on Monday, he told BuzzFeed News that if he were president he wouldn't go out of his way to appoint an evangelical to the bench, going so far as to call the idea "absurd." He said he would only consider credentials and ability in making his selection, and that the court shouldn't be acting like a legislative body.)

Asked whether he believed his two young daughters would grow up to oppose same-sex marriage, Cruz said they had not brought up the issue yet — the girls are only 4 and 7 — but he added, "Heidi and I are Christians, and we are doing our very best to raise our daughters in a Christian household, where we teach our girls the Bible."

Cruz was similarly doctrinaire in his discussion of religious freedom issues, which he spent years tackling in federal court as a top-flight litigator earlier in his career. In the interview Monday, he decried the "liberal fascism" of those who would legally coerce Christian bakers and florists into providing services for same-sex weddings, and attempted to illustrate his point with a hypothetical. "Let's imagine you had a gay florist," Cruz said. "I know that's hard to imagine. But let's just assume you had a gay florist, and he didn't want to provide flowers to fundamentalist Christians. Now, he's got every right to say, 'That's contrary to my beliefs and I'm not going to provide flowers.'"

But the candidate dismissed questions about how far he would extend religious businesses' right to refuse service. Should an Orthodox Jew be allowed to deny a Muslim, or vice versa? What if an evangelical florist wanted to refuse service to a Catholic wedding? Finally, Cruz demanded, "Have you ever heard of that ever happening? It is a hypothetical that simply doesn't exist."

When affirmative action came up, Cruz argued vigorously against race-based admissions, and warned that de-prioritizing academic merit in selecting applicants would inevitably lead to unintentional injustices. As evidence, he pointed to Ivy League schools that used to enforce "negative quotas" to keep from accepting too many Jews. "We see it now with colleges in California ... negative quotas against Asian students because academically they're excelling."

Cruz, who attended Princeton and Harvard Law School, demurred when asked whether he thought he had personally benefited from affirmative action, saying it was "difficult to say." But, he added, "I can tell you one of the downsides of affirmative action, being a Hispanic man, is over and over again you have people, often supercilious liberals, who would suggest you're only here because of affirmative action." In his book, he writes about a fellow member of the Harvard Law Review who defended the use of affirmative action by claiming that without it, its staff "would be nothing but white, rich men." Cruz was outraged by the implication that he and his best friend, a Jamaican man, were only there to fill racial quotas. He recalled telling off the classmate: "I'm happy to pull out your transcript and my transcript, and let's go head-to-head, big boy. Because you're not going to win that battle."

Though Cruz is a gifted speaker and skilled polemicist, he has a habit of answering interview questions with recitations of his stump speech — a tic that once caused the Weekly Standard writer Andrew Ferguson, who found himself trapped in a car with Cruz droning on, to contemplate how many vertebrae he would damage if he "slipped the lock, opened the door and did a tuck and roll onto the passing pavement." The candidate has not entirely cured himself of this vice. Early in the interview on Monday, Cruz answered a single question about same-sex marriage with a sprawling, uninterruptible discourse that stretched on for almost seven minutes, and somehow managed to tie together Proposition 8, Citizens United, Ted Kennedy, and Fahrenheit 451.

But while Cruz's status as an ideological lightning rod may rely on such rigid rhetorical discipline, his talent for winning the internet depends on a completely different set of instincts. When his interview concluded Monday, Cruz's press secretary presented him with a script — prepared by BuzzFeed — in which he would audition to replace the voice actor behind The Simpsons. Neither the senator nor his aides had agreed beforehand to the stunt, and so the BuzzFeed News team vacated the conference room to let them discuss. From outside, Cruz could be seen hunching over the script, as though seriously thinking it over. But within a few seconds, his press secretary came out to inform us he was a go.

"He's just practicing," she said.

Obama Watched The Rainbow-Colored White House On TV From Inside The Rainbow-Colored White House

$
0
0

The one bummer from the president’s week.

When you're president, you can't always go outside when you want to. For President Obama Friday, that meant seeing the White House lit up in rainbow colors on a TV screen from inside the rainbow-colored White House.

When you're president, you can't always go outside when you want to. For President Obama Friday, that meant seeing the White House lit up in rainbow colors on a TV screen from inside the rainbow-colored White House.

MLADEN ANTONOV / Getty Images

The White House on Friday lit up in pride colors to celebrate the Supreme Court's decision to strike down same-sex marriage bans. In a press conference Tuesday, Obama explained that, due to security concerns, he had to watch the image on television.

"The only bad part about it was I couldn't go out and peek at it myself because then I would have had to clear out all the people, or the Secret Service would have," Obama said at a joint press conference with Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff Tuesday at the White House. "So I could only reflect on it from a television screen."

Crowds flocked to the White House Friday night after a Supreme Court ruling made marriage equality the law of the land. Obama said the moment moved him.

Crowds flocked to the White House Friday night after a Supreme Court ruling made marriage equality the law of the land. Obama said the moment moved him.

ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / Getty Images

"I did not have a chance to comment on how good the White House looked in rainbow colors," Obama said. "To see people gathered in an evening outside on a beautiful summer night and to feel whole and to feel accepted and to feel that they had a right to love, that was pretty cool. That was a good thing."


View Entire List ›

Chris Christie Launched His First Campaign On Assault Weapons Ban

$
0
0

“In today’s society, no one needs a semi-automatic assault weapon,” the latest Republican presidential candidate said in 1993.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

In 1993, now-New Jersey governor and GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie launched his first political campaign on a message at odds with many Republican primary voters: banning assault weapons.

At the time, Christie, a lawyer, was a long-shot primary challenger of the well-established New Jersey Senate Majority Leader John Dorsey, who had held the Morris County seat for 16 years. But with Republican efforts to repeal the state's assault weapons ban faltering, Christie tried to steal Dorsey's seat by casting himself as a critic of Dorsey's attempt to scuttle the ban.

"The issue which has energized me to get into this race is the recent attempt by certain Republican legislators to repeal New Jersey's ban on assault weapons," Christie said in a statement announcing his campaign, according to a Newark Star-Ledger story from April, 1993. "In today's society, no one needs a semi-automatic assault weapon."

Christie further argued that, "we already have too many firearms in our communities," and vowed to halt the "weakening" of gun regulations.

In the end, Christie's bid for the state Senate would be derailed by his failure to obtain the required number of signatures to run.

Christie became the latest Republican to enter the presidential primary fray on Tuesday, telling voters he is "tired of hand-wringing and indecisiveness and weakness in the Oval Office" and that he will be "telling it like it is."

Rick Santorum Defends John Roberts: He "Has Not Been A Disaster"

$
0
0

“Let’s just be honest. He’s no David Souter.”

Scott Olson / Getty Images

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum offered a defense of Chief Justice John Roberts on Monday, arguing that "with all things being equal, there are lot worse people you could have picked."

Speaking to radio host Hugh Hewitt, the former US Senator from Pennsylvania said that he would have preferred that President George W. Bush, who nominated Roberts, have nominated John Michael Luttig to the Court. Still, he contended that Roberts "has not been a disaster."

"John Roberts has not been a disaster as a Supreme Court justice," Santorum said. "Let's just be honest. He's no David Souter. So I mean, with all things being equal, there are a lot worse people you could have picked, and George W. Bush didn't do a bad job in picking Justice Roberts. He could have done, obviously from these cases, could have done a little better job. But you never, you can't know for sure how everybody's going to deal every case."

Santorum's comments stand in contrast to the scathing criticisms of many of his GOP adversaries, including Sen. Ted Cruz, who told BuzzFeed News in an interview that Roberts "put on an Obama jersey" in writing the Supreme Court opinions on the two landmark decisions involving Obamacare.

Santorum further said that even he and Justice Clarence Thomas "don't agree" on "some things," "so you can't have a perfect record."

"And there's probably cases that you know, that conservatives would rule one way and I might have--" Santorum said, before cutting himself off. "You know," he continued, "there's some things Clarence Thomas and I don't agree on in some of the rulings he makes. So you can't have a perfect record, because nobody's the same."

Here's the audio:

w.soundcloud.com

Mississippi Governor, Attorney General Split On Continued Marriage Ban Defense

$
0
0

In a filing Tuesday, the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office asks a federal appeals court to allow its lawyers to stop representing Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant.

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood

Alex Wong / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood's office is asking a federal appeals court to let its lawyers stop representing the state's governor, Phil Bryant, in litigation over the state's ban on same-sex couples' marriages.

The move comes after Hood's office announced he did not oppose a request from same-sex couples challenging the state's ban asking the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to end the state's ban formally. Bryant, however, "does oppose their motion."

The 5th Circuit, meanwhile, asked on Monday that "Bryant should state the reasons, if any, for opposition" to the same-sex couples' request by Wednesday, July 1.

In Tuesday's filing, the lawyers from Hood's office who are representing Bryant asked to withdraw as counsel for Bryant, writing, "Because [Hood and Bryant] have differing views regarding how to respond to the [same-sex couples]' motion and the Court's letter request," everyone — Hood, Bryant, and the lawyers — agrees that they "should withdraw as counsel for Defendant-Appellant Bryant, and proceed solely as counsel for Defendant-Appellant Hood going forward in this litigation."

Hood's office also filed a letter with the court urging the court to enter an order ending the state's marriage ban, in accordance with the Supreme Court's June 26 decision striking down marriage bans in four other states.

Via s3.amazonaws.com

Mississippi AG Hood's letter:

Mississippi AG Hood's letter:

Via s3.amazonaws.com


View Entire List ›

Top Senate Democrat: Don't Listen To What Iran's Supreme Leader Says About The Deal

$
0
0

“We do not expect the Iranians for local consumption to — they say things, we’re not too concerned about what they say,” said Sen. Ben Cardin. “We’re concerned about what the agreements say.”

w.soundcloud.com

Ben Cardin, the Maryland senator and top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said last week he's "not too concerned" about what Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says about the possible agreement with the West to limit Iran's nuclear program.

Speaking with WMAL on the radio last week, Cardin said comments Khamenei made which seem undermine the perimeters to which the negotiating powers agreed were purely "for local consumption."

"It's not what the Supreme Leader says, it's what in the agreement and how the agreements are enforced and the verification inspection regimes," Cardin said. "That's gonna be the critical factor."

Cardin said a deal would have enforcement and verification with consequences if they violated the agreement. Last week Khamenei, in one of several statements that seem to undermine the agreement, said sanctions need to be lifted before Iran dismantles any of its nuclear infrastructure and said there would be no freeze in Iran's enrichment of uranium.

"We do not expect the Iranians for local consumption to — they say things, we're not too concerned about what they say," said Cardin. "We're concerned about what the agreements say and how they're going to be enforced and how we're gonna have the inspect and verification regime that will be documented in writing and confirmed by actions we believe, including a U.N. resolution."

"So it will be pretty clear what the responsibilities of Iran will be and the consequences if they violate those commitments, not what the Supreme Leader says."

Cardin said earlier, "at the end of the day" for there to be a deal it would have to be clear Iran was giving up its desire to become a nuclear weapons state.

"I think it's pretty clear the perimeters in which we're negotiating. At the end of the day we need to know that Iran is giving up its nuclear ambition to become a nuclear weapons state. We won't trust whatever they say, so the agreement has to provide ample time and ample opportunities for us to inspect and verify so that if they are not complying with an agreement we can take steps to prevent them from becoming a nuclear weapons state. That's how it's going to be judged."


'Black Lives Matter' Set To Launch Online Recruitment Campaign

$
0
0

StayWoke.org is meant to link up would-be activists.

Ricky Rhodes / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Organizers in the Black Lives Matter movement are preparing to launch a digital platform designed to connect activists to broaden the movement that developed last year.

The project, StayWoke.org, uses a five-minute survey requesting information on an individual's background and capacity to participate in the work of organizing — research, collecting data, fundraising, or tracking legislation.

The effort, organizers say, has already produced 5,000 responses in just a few days.

The founders of the site believe there's untapped power in digital organizing, and want to expand the organizing potential beyond Twitter. Sustaining movements can be difficult without more centralized means of communication and organization.

Email responses by DeRay Mckesson, one of the platform's founders, made available to BuzzFeed News show, the organizers believe, a desire for increased activism even if there aren't specific plans yet. Many of the responses read like they're meant more for relationship-building collaboration than, at this stage, concrete plans.

"In preparing for the launch, I noticed that you wrote about the need to turn, 'Twitter influence into real-life influence' and I wanted to follow-up and learn more about what strategies you think might allow us, collectively, to do that well," Mckesson wrote back.

Another respondent caught Mckesson's eye: It was from a recruit who wrote about the "need to 'imagine + implement new, emancipatory/emancipated social relations.'" "I wholeheartedly agree — I'm writing because I'd like to learn more about what you've imagined and what your thoughts are for the possibilities given the current opportunities."

In another example, Mckesson himself asked outright how he personally could better accomplish what the survey was attempting to do.

"I noticed that you wrote about the importance of reaching and educating people 'who are not connected to advocacy networks,'" Mckesson wrote. "I'd love to learn more about how you'd suggest that we go about this.

"I think that you're right and we've been playing with ideas to make this possible and I'd love to learn from you."

Anti-Death Penalty Activists Are Winning The Fundraising Battle In Nebraska

$
0
0

In May, the state abolished the death penalty. Now, the fundraising race is on between groups trying to put the death penalty up for a statewide vote — or keep it off the ballot.

Neb. Gov. Pete Ricketts

Nati Harnik / AP

After the Nebraska legislature successfully abolished the death penalty in the state, an expensive battle has begun to bring it back. But so far, the side against the death penalty is winning the fundraising battle.

The money is all about the potential for a statewide vote on the death penalty.

In May, the state's conservative legislature narrowly overruled Republican Gov. Pete Rickett's veto of the measure that abolished the death penalty. Ricketts vowed there would be a referendum to give voters the option to bring it back. Nebraskans for the Death Penalty will need to collect 57,000 signatures by August to get the vote on the ballot. If they can manage to collect 114,000 signatures, the death penalty will remain on the books until voters weigh in.

The group estimates that it would need to spend about $900,000 to do so. So far, though, the group has been outraised by an organization opposing the death penalty referendum, according to campaign finance reports filed with the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission.

Nebraskans for the Death Penalty raised $259,744 — and more than 75% of that came from the governor's family. Ricketts and his father, the founder of TD Ameritrade, have given $200,000 to the group.

Another $10,000 was given to the pro-death penalty organization by an Omaha police union.

Nebraskans for the Death Penalty has spent almost all of the money it has currently raised in starting the signature collecting process. The group has $26,000 in cash remaining, but has $25,000 in unpaid legal and consulting bills.

On the other side, Nebraskans for Public Safety (an anti-death penalty group) has not yet filed its full campaign finance report as of Thursday evening. But the group has disclosed receiving a $400,000 contribution from a progressive organization called Proteus Action League. The group is a 501c(4), meaning it does not disclose its donors.

This isn't the first time Proteus Action League has spent money against the death penalty — the group spent more than $3.4 million on anti-death penalty efforts in 2012, according to an IRS filing.

The anti-death penalty group Nebraskans for Public Safety, which is affiliated with Nebraskans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty and the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, has spent some of the money on television ads urging voters to not sign the petition.

Regardless of the outcome, Ricketts believes he will still be able to carry out the executions of the 10 men on death row. In pursuit of that, his Department of Correctional Services has spent more than $50,000 on execution drugs from a seller based in India.

Since the drugs are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, the federal government says it intends to detain the shipment when it arrives.

Sidney Blumenthal Passed Clinton Messages From British Officials

$
0
0

Susan Walsh / AP

In addition to advising then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Libya matters, longtime Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal advised her about British politics in 2009, according to emails released by the State Department on Tuesday.

In some of those messages, Blumenthal claims to be passing on information directly from British government officials.

The emails about U.K. politics, many of which are very detailed, indicate that Blumenthal's attempts to advise Clinton on diplomacy and policy began early on in her tenure at the State Department, and went beyond the country of Libya.

Clinton's responses to him also seem to cut against her claim that his memos were "unsolicited": In several of the email threads, Clinton responds by asking Blumenthal to call her or when she can call him, or asking him a follow-up question.

Blumenthal has become a renewed source of controversy in recent weeks, as his under-the-radar intelligence-gathering operation on Libya and subsequent contacts with Clinton have become a key part of the maelstrom surrounding a House committee's investigation into the Clinton State Department's handling of the Benghazi attack. The State Department released a new batch of Clinton's emails sent to and from her personal email account on Tuesday night.

On Aug. 9, 2009, Blumenthal wrote to Clinton suggesting a Northern Ireland panel at the Clinton Global Initiative, telling her that then-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Shaun Woodward had "suggested a panel at CGI to be conducted by former President Clinton of British and Irish prime ministers, and perhaps leaders in NI, under the theme of 'Implementing Peace'" and that former President Bill Clinton had "conveyed to me his approval, contingent on approval of the State Department." Blumenthal attached a note from Woodward suggesting the panel.

Clinton forwarded the email to her close aide Huma Abedin, saying she thought it was a "good idea" and that she saw "no conflict"; Clinton also sent that email to Doug Band, a former aide to Bill Clinton.

The panel does appear to have taken place at the CGI Forum that year.

Blumenthal even passed on messages from the British prime minister himself. On June 14, 2009, Blumenthal wrote to Clinton about a conversation he had had with then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Woodward:

Gordon Brown called me today to convey his very best to you, etc, etc, taking the phone from Shaun, in the office they now work in together, right after Shaun briefed me that he and Gordon will be meeting with Martin McGuiness together on Wednesday and may want your help with Adams. I said that he and Gordon should let me know before Wednesday whether your involvement is essential and what they request. That is fine with them and Shaun will get back to me. Sid

(The "Adams" referred to there is likely Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams).

Blumenthal sent several emails to Clinton during 2009 giving her what he said was inside information on how those inside the Labour Party were responding to the European Parliament elections of that summer, in which Labour suffered a major defeat.

"Hillary: Spoke with Jonathan Powell. What we heard is accurate. More: Labour will suffer a large defeat in the European elections on June 4," Blumenthal wrote on May 22, 2009. Powell is a former diplomat and advisor to Tony Blair. The rest of the email details how Blumenthal was told that Brown, in order to draw attention away from their impending loss in the EU parliament elections, was planning a cabinet reshuffle.

"Tony sees the situation as terminal," Blumenthal wrote, presumably referring to Tony Blair. "Hope to speak with him soon. He is trying to become President of Europe if and when Lisbon treaty passes. Jonathan made an interesting and ironic comment about Colin Powell, given Tony's deference to him, that Powell's flaw was being too deferential to Bush. From bitter experience, Jonathan is wishing you well, be close to the president, and advance your ideas, too. There's more for when we can talk."

"Very sorry to read this confirmation," Clinton responds. "Email if and when it would be convenient to call you."

Blumenthal then proceeded to send Clinton multiple memos detailing who was up and down in the cabinet reshuffle.

On Oct. 31, 2009, Blumenthal sent Clinton a memo about how David Cameron, then the opposition leader, had "seriously damaged his relations. with the European leaders" by sending a letter to then-Czech President Vaclav Klaus asking him not to sign the Lisbon Treaty, a set of amendments to the treaties that formed the European Union. Blumenthal suggests this could help Blair's efforts to become President of the European Council.

"That is so revealing--and wacky--but it perhaps leaves a very small oipening for Tony. What do you think? Happy Halloween from Abu Dhabi!" Clinton responded.

Blumenthal was on the payroll of the Clinton Foundation starting in 2009, according to Politico, though it is unclear to what extent that overlapped with his advising on the U.K.

Spokespeople for Blumenthal and for Clinton did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Clinton Campaign: Hillary's Second Email Address Was Old Account

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton holds a press conference at the United Nations in March over the email account she used as secretary of state.

Yana Paskova / Getty Images

In the first installment of eight planned releases, the State Department published 3,000 pages of correspondence on Tuesday from “hdr22@clintonemail.com,” the personal account Hillary Clinton used to conduct government business.

Messages from 2009 show that she also received but did not send email through another address — which a spokesman described as Clinton’s previous account, set to forward mail automatically to the address she used as secretary of state.

The second address, "hr15@att.blackberry.net," is the account Clinton used as a U.S. senator, according to Nick Merrill, a spokesperson with her presidential campaign.

When she moved from the Senate to the State Department at the start of 2009, Clinton continued using the AT&T account for about two months. On March 18 of that year, she opened the "clintonemail.com" address — and the Senate account was set up as a forwarding address until the fall of 2009, Merrill said.

The cache of emails released on Tuesday includes correspondence from 2009. But future email releases, according to the State Department, may include additional messages from that year.

The available emails show that, for about six months, Clinton received messages sent to the old account — but responded from "hdr22@clintonemail.com." The last instance, in this release, of an email from the AT&T address was Sept. 20, 2009.

The "hr15@att.blackberry.net" account was shut off around that time. Clinton, as aides said earlier this year, no longer has access to those messages.

State Department / Via foia.state.gov

When the existence of the "clintonemail.com" address came to light this spring — setting off questions about whether the use of a personal account, as a cabinet official, was secure or sound — Clinton asked the State Department to publish her work-related correspondence.

“I want the public to see my email,” she wrote on Twitter.

Clinton had already sent the State Department her email — months earlier, in December 2014 — in response to a request that former secretaries submit their official correspondence for record-keeping. After a review process conducted by Clinton's attorneys to identify, remove, and ultimately delete, any messages deemed strictly "personal," aides submitted printed copies of 30,490 messages.

Republicans and open government advocates have argued that the public has no assurance, beyond Clinton's word, that she didn't omit emails that belong in the public record — or communicate through some other undisclosed account.

Earlier this year, when the State Department posted a preliminary batch of emails — about 300 related to Libya and the terrorist attack in Benghazi — it was later discovered that the set did not include 15 emails, or portions of those emails, sent to or from Sidney Blumenthal, a friend and outside adviser to Clinton.

The possibility of multiple accounts has been raised in particular this year by Trey Gowdy, the Republican congressman who, in his role as chairman of a House investigation into Benghazi, has demanded Clinton turn over her email server.

Gowdy pointed to another distinct email address — "hrod17@clintonemail.com" — that appears at the top of the documents Clinton has disclosed.

Merrill, the Clinton spokesman, has said the address was not registered until March 2013, one month after her departure from the administration. (Clinton was using the new account last year when she submitted her records — and the address "only appeared "on the copies as the ‘sender,’" Merrill said earlier this year.)

Aides have maintained since spring that Clinton — now almost three months into her campaign for president — only used one account as secretary of state.

Merrill also said on Tuesday that Clinton only used the "hr15@att.blackberry.net" as a senator. (The release on Tuesday also includes messages showing the address, "hr15@mycingular.blackberry.net," which is the same account, according to Merrill. AT&T and Cingular merged in the mid-2000s.)

In most messages from Clinton, her name is displayed as simply "H."

Several of the emails from the AT&T account show Clinton as "Senator." And in others, the "hr15@att.blackberry.net" appears in the recipient line as "H2."

The batch of emails, posted online Tuesday, amounts to about 7% of the total records due for release. For months, officials have been preparing to incrementally publish the 52,455 pages of email, spanning the four years of Clinton's tenure.

The last installment is scheduled for Jan. 29, 2016 — a goal set by court ruling.

"We’re glad to see the first batch of emails get released today," Merrill said in a statement. "Months ago, Hillary Clinton took the unprecedented step of asking that the 55,000 pages of her work emails be released into the public domain, and this is the beginning of that process. She’s proud of her record as secretary of state, and happy that the public has a window into her tenure."

Jeb Said Lack of "Financial Security" Kept Him From 2010 Senate Run

$
0
0

“So I consider it but the problem is right now In my life I need to attain some degree of financial security for my family and pursuits of ambition in politics is just not appropriate at this time for me.”

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush released 33 years of tax returns on Tuesday, the most by a presidential candidate ever, showing he currently has a net worth of between $19 million to $22 million and made, according to an analysis by Bloomberg $29 million in the years after he left office.

Bush left office in January 2007 after serving two terms as Florida governor.

In 2009, Bush was briefly considered as a candidate for Senate in Florida, a run he declined because of what he said was "the problem" that "I need to attain some degree of financial security for my family."

"I started as a skeptic about whether my DNA would be appropriate in the Senate, but frankly I got convinced that I could play a positive role in some way in Washington," Bush told Fox News' Sean Hannity in 2009.

"So I consider it but the problem is right now In my life I need to attain some degree of financial security for my family and pursuits of ambition in politics is just not appropriate at this time for me. I'll stayed involved in helping others and I'll stay involved in education reform for sure."

At the time, Bush had reported approximately $4 million in adjusted gross income after leaving office, per Bloomberg. In the years following, he reported $20 million in income, giving him the financial security to run for president. Bush cut lucrative ties to boards of companies in lead up to presidential run.

Bush's biggest earning year was 2013 when he reported more than $7 million in adjusted gross income and paid a 40.1% tax rate. He also gave more than $100,000 to charity that year.

The tax returns can be viewed on Bush's website here.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images