Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Huckabee Bewildered By "Out Of Left Field" Vatican Statements On Kim Davis

$
0
0

Huckabee says Davis’ lawyer told him that the Vatican invited Davis for a personal meeting with the Pope.

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com

Republican presidential candidate and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee says reports that Pope Francis regrets meeting with Kentucky clerk Kim Davis in Washington D.C. last week were surprising and "coming out of left field," citing his own conversations with Davis' attorney.

"Yeah, that's very interesting because that seems to be coming out of left field. Here's why: I talked to Mat Staver, Kim Davis' attorney," Huckabee said on NewsMaxTV Friday.

"He confirmed with me just this morning, the Vatican invited Kim Davis and it was a private meeting," he said. "It wasn't that she was in a long line of people who just went by and shook hands. It was a private meeting with no one but she, her husband and the pope and one of his personnel."

A Vatican official told Reuters there was "a sense of regret" the Pope met with Davis, who became a national news figure after she refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, citing religious freedom.

In a statement, the Vatican said the Pope didn't talk about the details of Davis' situation and the meeting wasn't an endorsement of her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

"The Pope did not enter into the details of the situation of Mrs. Davis and his meeting with her should not be considered a form of support of her position in all of its particular and complex aspects," the Vatican said in a statement.

Huckabee said the Vatican sent a car to take her to embassy.

"In addition to that, they sent a car to come pick her up and take her over to the Vatican embassy," he added. "He affirmed with her, her right to religious liberty. And then on an airplane between Philadelphia and Rome he told ABC's Terry Moran that he believed that religious liberty was a human right that transcended all law."

"So, you know, I don't know what this spokesperson said, but I know what the pope said to Terry Moran and I don't think Terry Moran is out there trying to shill for Kim Davis."


Missouri Governor Commutes Death Sentence Of Inmate Facing Execution

$
0
0

Kimber Edwards was set to be executed on Oct. 6 for hiring a hit man to kill his ex-wife, until Gov. Jay Nixon commuted his sentence to life without parole. The killer now says he framed Edwards to avoid the death penalty.

Missouri Department of Corrections

On Friday, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat who has helped set a record pace of executions in the state, commuted the death sentence of a man facing execution next week.

Kimber Edwards was sentenced to death for hiring a hit man to kill his ex-wife in 2000. The case relied on the testimony of the killer, who has since recanted his story that Edwards hired him, as well as a confession from Edwards himself.

In an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the killer said he framed Edwards to help himself avoid the death penalty.

Edwards' lawyers claim that police coerced his confession, and that Edwards has a form of autism.

"After a thorough review of the facts surrounding the murder of Kimberly Cantrell, I am convinced the evidence supports the jury's decision to convict Kimber Edwards of first-degree murder," Nixon said in a statement Friday.

"At the same time, however, I am using my authority under the Missouri Constitution to commute Edwards' sentence to life without the possibility of parole," Nixon continued. "This is a step not taken lightly, and only after significant consideration of the totality of the circumstances. With this decision, Kimber Edwards will remain in prison for the remainder of his life for this murder."

The move is unusual for Nixon, who during his time in office has overseen the executions of 79 inmates — 20 during his tenure as governor and 59 during his 16-year tenure as attorney general.

Hillary Clinton Calls For "National Movement" On Gun Control To Match The NRA's

$
0
0

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

The day after the shooting that killed 10 people at Oregon's Umpqua Community College, Hillary Clinton called for a "national movement" strong enough to rival the National Rife Association, which she described as "an intense, dedicated group" of gun lobbyists who "scare politicians and say, 'We will vote against you.'"

Clinton, who has made new gun restrictions a regular feature of her speeches on the campaign trail, addressed the shooting at a rally in Florida on Friday.

In other recent appearances, Clinton has advocated specifically for universal background checks on gun-buyers — an initiative that failed in Congress under President Obama.

The deaths in Oregon on Thursday amounted to the 45th school shooting this year, according to the gun control group Everytown. At her campaign event in Florida, Clinton invoked past mass shootings, saying, "People should not have to be afraid to got to college like this one, or go to the movie theater, or go to bible study."

"What is wrong with us that we can’t stand up to the NRA and the gun lobby and the gun manufacturers that they represent?" she said to cheers from the crowd.

"Here's what the other side counts on," Clinton said. "They count on really having an intense, dedicated group that scare politicians and say, ‘We will vote against you.’" Republicans, she told supporters, "put the NRA ahead of American families."

Clinton promised that, if elected, she would "never relent" in trying to pass new gun measures. She acknowledged that passing new measures — which Obama was unable to do even in the aftermath of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School — would be what she called "a political mountain to climb."

"But you don’t get anything done in this country if you don’t start by calling it out," Clinton said. "We need to make every politician who sides with them to look into the eyes of parents whose children have been murdered and explain why they listened to the gun lobbyists instead."

What Democrats need, she said, is a "national movement" to pass "new, effective gun control measures," like her husband President Bill Clinton's in the '90s. "There are a lot of ways for us to have constitutional, legal gun restrictions. My husband did. He passed the Brady bill, and he eliminated assault weapons for 10 years. So we’re gonna take them on. We took them on in the '90s. We’re gonna take them on again."

Jeb Bush Said "Stuff Happens"— Here Are His Full Comments And The Context

$
0
0

Asked at a press conference on Friday to respond to comments made by Jeb Bush on gun control, President Obama said, “I don’t even think I have to react to that one.”

On Friday, in South Carolina, a voter asked Jeb Bush about how prayer is no longer allowed in schools, but the first thing that happens after a mass shooting or similar event, is a prayer vigil.

On Friday, in South Carolina, a voter asked Jeb Bush about how prayer is no longer allowed in schools, but the first thing that happens after a mass shooting or similar event, is a prayer vigil.

Sean Rayford / Getty Images

We're in a difficult time in our country, and I don't think more government is necessarily the answer to this. I think we need to reconnect ourselves with everybody else. It's just — it's very sad to see. But I resist — I had this challenge as governor. We had — look — stuff happens — there's always a crisis. The impulse is to do something, and it's not always the right thing to do.

Here is the video:

youtube.com


View Entire List ›

Michelle Alexander, Angela Davis Join Dream Defenders Advisory Board

$
0
0

Florida-based Dream Defenders announced an inaugural ten members of its advisory board Friday.

Brad Barket / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — One of the most prominent organizations in the Black Lives Matter movement announced that Michelle Alexander and Angela Davis are among the multicultural advocates joining its advisory board.

The Florida-based social justice group Dream Defenders announced the addition of 10 members to the group's advisory board Friday, saying that it's important for the broader public to know how the group is growing and that board reflects the the deep connections to a broad set of communities the organization has fostered since its inception three years ago.

"We're doing everything on purpose right now," communications director Steve Pargett told BuzzFeed News. "And we're being very careful and taking the necessary time to build the organization that we, our community, and subsequently our supporters deserve."

"Since Dream Defenders started we've been carried by so many people around the country who have faith and hope we're as great as we think we can be. And in an effort to do things the right way over a period of time these are the people we trust, admire and respect to help us do that, " he said.

The board announcement came amid an abrupt, organization-wide reboot for the group, which has been highlighted publicly by a two-month fast from social media. The announcement of the social media "sabbatical" caused a stir inside pockets of the Black Lives Matter movement.

"Social media does not, and never will, take the place of building deep relationships which are at the core of organizing," Selah said in a series of tweets explaining the sabbatical. "To change our communities, we must have power, not just followers."

Dream Defenders said it's pushing back at the notion that a social media-driven movement takes the place of actual organizing. "People actually think we've gone crazy," Pargett said.

Along with other activists, on Sept. 16, Dream Defenders Executive Director Umi Selah attended a meeting at the White House to discuss the work of the president's 21st Century Task Force on Policing. It was attended by Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett and Roy Austin, the president's deputy assistant to the president.

In addition to Davis, the activist and scholar, and Alexander, an associate professor at the Ohio State and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, Elijah Armstrong, a Dream Defenders organizer; Keron Blair, national director of Alliance to Reclaim our Schools; Alana Greer, attorney and co-founder of Community Justice Project, Inc.; Pastor Michael McBride of The Way Christian Center in Berkeley, California; Rafael Navar, National Political Director for the Communication Workers of America; Linda Sarsour, the executive director of the Arab American Association of New York; and Ed Whitfield, co-managing director of the Fund for Democratic Communities.

"I'm honored to learn with and from Dream Defenders; I've long admired you from afar and am excited to join a team of young people that I believe will advance the liberation movement," Davis said in a statement.

Dream Defenders said it will be ending its social media black out in November.

Lindsey Graham: Russia And Iran “Slapping” Obama “In The Face”

$
0
0

“Here’s what Russia and Iran are saying to Obama: ‘You’re weak.’ They’re slapping him in the face – they have no respect for the man, they have no respect for the United States.”

Andrew Burton / Getty Images

In an interview Friday afternoon, Republican presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham tore into President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry in the wake of Russia's stepping up its role in the ongoing conflict in Syria – calling the former "incompetent" and the latter "delusional" with regard to the politics of the Middle East.

"Number one: Our biggest problem is that our commander in chief is incompetent, and our secretary of state is delusional, regarding the politics of the Mid-East, Putin, Iran, and just the entire situation over there," said the South Carolina senator during an interview on the Fox News Radio show Kilmeade and Friends.

"Our president, quite frankly, is weak, he is indecisive, and what does it mean for America?" Graham went on. "With Assad being propped up by Russia and Iran, it means the war [in Syria] never ends."

Graham said that Obama views Putin as a "Bush-type figure" who is going to get himself trapped in Syria, but said that Putin was actually making a "bold play."

"The president believes that Putin's kind of a dummy, he's sort of a Bush-type figure that's blundered his way into Syria and he's gonna get in a spot where he can't get out," the senator continued. "Obama's writing him off as sort of some kind of cowboy, and what Obama doesn't understand is that Putin's making a bold play, a smart play from the Russian point of view, but a nightmare for us."

"What Barack Obama doesn't understand is that he's making the job of the next president exponentially harder," said Graham. "He's, in his own way, delusional about the way the world is working."

Graham added that Russia and Iran are sending a message to Obama that he's "weak."

"At the end of the day, Russia and China have been given a pass by Obama, because they wanted a deal with Iran so badly – they had to have Russia and China's support," Graham said. "Here's what Russia and Iran are saying to Obama: 'You're weak.' They're slapping him in the face – they have no respect for the man, they have no respect for the United States."

Here's the full interview:

w.soundcloud.com

Hillary Clinton Pitches Her Would-Be Presidency To LGBT Advocates

$
0
0

Chris Geidner/BuzzFeed

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton on Saturday spoke to the staff, board, and volunteer leaders of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest LGBT rights organization, to make the case that she is the best candidate to represent LGBT Americans when President Obama leaves office.

Explaining that she understands the “indignities” and "injustices" that LGBT Americans still face, Clinton told the crowd in a ballroom at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. that she is "running for president to end them once and for all.”

Clinton talked about the successes of the LGBT movement in recent years and noted her campaign headquarters in Brooklyn has a map showing where same-sex couples can now marry in the U.S. (it's all colored in now). She thanked marriage case plaintiffs — including Jim Obergefell, who was in attendance, and Edie Windsor — and their lawyers for working to achieve that end.

"You’ve helped change a lot of minds, including mine," she told the group.

The speech was not, however, simply a marriage equality celebration; Clinton laid out several legislative and policy goals, in addition to broad statements about the need for continued vigilance against pushback on LGBT rights.

Calling the ongoing legality of discrimination in some areas of the country "outrageous," Clinton highlighted her support for the Equality Act, the legislation introduced this spring to ban LGBT discrimination in a variety of areas, including employment, housing, credit, and education. She added that she hoped that some of the people in the room on Saturday morning would be with her when, she said, "I sign it into law."

Joshua Roberts / Reuters

With regards to the military, Clinton said she supported upgrading the status of discharges of former service members who had been dismissed for being gay.

She also backed the administration's review of the ban on military service by transgender people. "That is an outdated rule, especially since you and I know there are transgender people serving now," she said, adding that she hoped the U.S. would "join other countries" and end the ban.

Reiterating a point about drug prices that she raised earlier in a Facebook Q&A, Clinton criticized Turing CEO Martin Shkreli, whose company raised the price of the drug Daraprim, which can be used by people with HIV, from $18 to $750.

She said “every day that he stalls" on lowering the price of the drug meant people with HIV were suffering.

Pointing to her time as secretary of state, Clinton talked about the continued importance of Americans working to advance international LGBT rights.

Saying that the U.S. must address violence against transgender people, Clinton noted the killings of many trans individuals — "primarily women of color" — just this year.

Clinton made a broad case for transgender inclusion throughout her speech, noting how important it is to say that "transgender people are valued."

"They are loved," she said. "They are us."

Joshua Roberts / Reuters

Later, when discussing her Republican opponents, she raised the issue again. "See if you are in a forum with them if you can get them to even say the word 'transgender,'" she said.

A line that drew some of the loudest applause from the crowd was also one of the few times Clinton directly mentioned an opponent by name: "Ted Cruz slammed a political opponent for marching in a pride parade," she said. "He clearly doesn't know what he's missing."

Clinton is not the only politician slated to address the group on Saturday. At the group's annual dinner on Saturday evening, a much larger affair, Vice President Joe Biden is slated to give the keynote address.

Clinton, the New York Times reported, turned down that spot in order to appear on the evening's episode of Saturday Night Live.

LINK: Hillary Clinton To Address Nation’s Largest LGBT Rights Group In October

LINK: LGBT Issues, Racism, Immigration: Hillary Clinton Pitches Herself As A “Fighter” For All Occasions

Clinton In 2008: Federal Government Trying To Impose "Blanket Rules" On Guns Doesn't Make Sense

$
0
0

“What might work in New York City is certainly not going to work in Montana. So, for the federal government to be having any kind of, you know, blanket rules that they’re going to try to impose, I think doesn’t make sense.”

Steven Senne / AP

Hillary Clinton has argued strongly for gun control during this election cycle, calling for a "national movement" to take on the National Rifle Association and universal background checks for gun-buyers.

"There are a lot of ways for us to have constitutional, legal gun restrictions," Clinton said on Friday. "My husband did. He passed the Brady bill, and he eliminated assault weapons for 10 years. So we're gonna take them on. We took them on in the '90s. We're gonna take them on again."

Amid a heated moment in the 2008 Democratic primary, in a debate against then-Illinois senator Barack Obama that April, Clinton argued that "having any kind of blanket rules" set by the federal government on guns "doesn't make sense."

Clinton made the comments in response to a question from moderator Charlie Gibson regarding whether she favors the licensing and registration of handguns.

"What I favor is what works in New York," she said. "You know, we have a set of rules in New York City and we have a totally different set of rules in the rest of the state. What might work in New York City is certainly not going to work in Montana. So, for the federal government to be having any kind of, you know, blanket rules that they're going to try to impose, I think doesn't make sense."

In the 2008 debate, George Stephanopoulos challenged Clinton's answer, alluding to her support for a national gun registry during her 2000 run for Senate in New York.

"I was for the New York rules, that's right," Clinton said. "I was for the New York rules because they have worked over time. And there isn't a lot of uproar in New York about changing them, because I go to upstate New York, where we have a lot of hunters and people who are collectors and people who are sport shooters; they have every reason to believe that their rights are being respected."

Stephanopoulos had previously asked Clinton her view of the ban on handguns in Washington, D.C., which has since been struck down.

"I want to give local communities the opportunity to have some authority over determining how to keep their citizens safe," Clinton answered, before further saying she supported "sensible regulation that is consistent with the constitutional right to own and bear arms."

She suggested that "a total ban" "might be found by the court not to be" constitutional, but admitted, "I don't know the facts."

"I don't think that should blow open a hole that says that D.C. or Philadelphia or anybody else cannot come up with sensible regulations to protect their people and keep, you know, machine guns and assault weapons out of the hands of folks who shouldn't have them," she added.

The debate happened less than a week after Clinton attacked her rival Obama's remark that people in "small towns in Pennsylvania" "get bitter" and then "cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them."

Clinton responded by saying that "Obama's remarks are elitist, and they are out of touch." She also touted her own sharpshooting credentials, saying that her father "took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught me how to shoot when I was a little girl."

Adding that guns were "part of culture," she said, "People enjoy hunting and shooting because it's an important part of who they are. Not because they are bitter."

Obama subsequently mocked her for "talking like she's Annie Oakley."

During her husband Bill Clinton's presidential administration, Hillary Clinton was a vocal proponent of the federal ban on assault weapons and the Brady Bill, which mandated federal background checks on firearm purchases. Earlier during her first campaign for president, in October 2007, Clinton said "I support the Second Amendment," adding that "law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns," but arguing that she also believed "strongly in smart laws that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists."

Reached by email, Clinton spokesperson Jesse Ferguson suggested that BuzzFeed News had misunderstood Clinton's comments in the 2008 debate, but did not offer clarification about the nature of the misunderstanding.

Here's the video:

youtube.com


Hillary Clinton Wins Support From Nation's Largest Labor Union

$
0
0

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

The board of the nation’s largest labor union, the National Education Association, voted on Saturday to support Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, concluding an endorsement process the NEA’s president described as “hotly discussed and debated,” leaving some members and state leaders divided between Clinton and her strongest challenger, Sen. Bernie Sanders.

At the request of the union’s president, Lily Eskelsen García, Clinton appeared before the 175-member board on Saturday in Washington, shortly before the vote on the endorsement. “There were a lot of undecideds when she started that conversation,” Eskelsen García said in an interview later that afternoon.

Eskelsen García, who had already conducted a videotaped sit-down interview with Clinton and the other candidates as part of the NEA endorsement process, believed that undecided board members would benefit from hearing from Clinton directly. Clinton, said Eskelsen García, was more than willing. “She said, ‘I’ll be there.'"

Clinton faced an hour of questioning. When it came time for the vote, she secured support from 75% of the NEA's board members — clearing the 58% needed.

Eskelsen García noted that all three candidates vying for the NEA’s endorsement — Clinton; Sanders; and Martin O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland — were well in line of the teachers union on the issues. But Eskelsen García said Clinton's lifelong commitment to public education "set her apart," citing her work for the Children’s Defense Fund and her 1993 effort to pass a universal health care plan.

“I think what happened is that after she left the room today, they were sure,” said Eskelsen García. “They said, ‘She’s the candidate who has made our cause the cause of her career.’”

The 175 people who sit on the NEA’s board work for public schools, colleges, and universities across the country, and include teachers, librarians, and bus drivers, said Eskelsen García. At the board meeting on Saturday, Clinton answered questions on “with precision,” said Eskelsen García. Clinton “could talk chapter and verse” about topics ranging from special education law to historically black colleges, she said. “People looked at each other and said, ‘She gets it. She understands it.’”

The vote comes as several other major unions have delayed an endorsement. Some labor leaders have said they would like to wait until Vice President Biden decides whether or not to get in the race. (Biden’s decision is expected this month.)

Those unions include the Service Employees International Union, and more recently, according to a report in the New York Times on Friday, the International Association of Fire Fighters, or the IAFF. A Clinton aide would not confirm the details of the Times story, which reported that the IAFF recently called Clinton’s campaign manager to withdraw an expected endorsement. The endorsement had never been guaranteed and remains on the table, a Clinton aide said on Saturday.

“As a lifelong fighter for children and families,” Clinton said in a statement on Saturday, "I am deeply honored to have earned the endorsement of the National Education Association and their nearly 3 million members."

The NEA represents a significant block of voters, totaling 3 million members and 5 million when including spouses and families. The endorsement follows the early support Clinton received in July from another leading union, the American Federation of Teachers, headed by a longtime Clinton backer, Randi Weingarten.

The NEA has made endorsements in every presidential race since the 1976 election, with the union participating in only some presidential primaries. In 2008, as Clinton competed against Barack Obama, the NEA opted out of a primary endorsement. The union’s decision to make an endorsement in the 2016 primary came only after a “powerful” debate among its members, said Eskelsen García.

From there, the NEA invited 24 candidates, including Democrats and Republicans, to participate in the union’s endorsement process. Only Clinton, Sanders, and O’Malley responded, completing a questionnaire and sitting for the videotaped interview with Eskelsen García.

In recent months, some NEA leaders have voiced support for Sanders, including in his home state of Vermont, where the union’s local chapter made an endorsement in June. “We want to let the whole country in on what we in Vermont have long known,” the state NEA president said at the time. O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland, is also close to the union and its members, winning the NEA’s Greatest Education Governor Award in 2010.

“It’s accurate that there are very passionate supporters on all sides,” said Eskelsen García, when asked about a rift in the NEA’s membership. “This was hotly discussed and debated... We understand that our members are going to have their hearts with certain candidates.”

On Thursday, the NEA’s political action committee, the NEA Fund for Children and Public Education, voted by 82% to recommend the Clinton endorsement. On Saturday, the board took that proposal up, issuing the 75% affirmative decision.

On Saturday afternoon, following the NEA vote, Sanders released a statement boasting the support of “hundreds of thousands of members of the National Education Association and trade unionists all across America,” he said.

“We are going to win this nomination and the general election because of support from grassroots Americans. We are on track to do just that.”

Biden Shows Up At LGBT Rights Gala With A Focus On The Future

$
0
0

Leigh Vogel / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Speaking to a room of nearly 4,000 supporters of the nation's largest LGBT rights group, Vice President Joe Biden was a person focused on the challenges of the future — not merely celebrating the successes of the past.

Summing up his view of why the LGBT movement has seen so much success in recent years, Biden told the attendees of the Human Rights Campaign's national dinner on Saturday night, "You showed up." And Biden, who is expected to soon decide whether to run for president, made the case that he has shown up for LGBT people in the past — and that much more remains to be done.

He ended his speech, in fact, by telling a story about a question the current president of HRC, Chad Griffin, asked him to prompt a discussion about marriage in April 2012: "What do you think of me?"

Biden described how the question struck him at the time, but, on Saturday night, the question also was Biden's path to the future: "My answer as to what will constitute success is when, under no circumstances, no gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender person ever, ever has to ask the question, 'What do you think of me?'"

The other question — whether Biden will run — was unavoidable from the opening words of his nearly 24-minute speech: "A number of you have said to me over the past three or four years—"

"You should run!" a member of the audience shouted loudly.

"No, they didn’t say that," Biden replied, laughing — and losing his focus for a moment. "Anyway," he continued. "What was I saying?"

Speaking 10 hours after Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton addressed the group, Biden reflected on what has happened during the Obama administration.

That was not, however, the focus of his speech. Biden focused instead on detailing the way he views the LGBT community, describing his work for LGBT rights, and advancing a vision for what remains to be done — including several goals, particularly legislative ones, unlikely to be advanced in the current administration.

The vice president opened by discussing praise he has received for the Meet the Press interview when he endorsed marriage equality in 2012. Biden quickly pivoted the focus back to the audience, however, saying this June's marriage equality ruling "is not because of any national figure who spoke out," but is instead because of the people in the room and thousands of others "who have had the courage to stand up and speak, to speak their hearts and minds."

He continued: "You left the Supreme Court absolutely no choice, no choice whatsoever — I mean that — but to recognize the simple proposition my father taught me 50 years ago," which, he had earlier said, was, when the Bidens saw a gay couple kissing on the street when the vice president was growing up, "They're in love with each other, it's that simple."

Biden went on from there, praising the contributions of LGBT people throughout history, from Harvey Milk's constant call for hope to the work of actress Ellen Page — who was being honored at the dinner — to advance LGBT rights today. "By
the way Ellen, you won that debate at the Iowa State Fair," he added, referencing when she confronted Sen. Ted Cruz, who is running for president, over LGBT issues at the fair.

Less than halfway into his speech, Biden moved to the work ahead. "The remainder of the work — and much work has to be done — I promise you will come more quickly and more shrewdly," he said.

"I strongly support the Equality Act, and it will pass. It will pass. It may not pass this Congress, but it will pass because it's simple and it's straightforward," Biden said, echoing Clinton's morning remarks, and going on to discuss what work he believes will be needed to get it passed into law.

Biden then raised transgender issues — a prominent focus of Clinton's speech as well — by noting that he said last year that "transgender equality is the civil rights issue of our time." He discussed his support for an end to the ban on out transgender military service, noting that Defense Secretary Ash Carter said this summer that being transgender should not prevent someone from serving in the military.

Biden also said that Obama and he were working to ensure that "all those who were dishonorably discharged because they were members of the LGBT community should have their discharge papers changed from dishonorable to honorable" —another point raised by Clinton 10 hours earlier.

On international LGBT rights, he said, "There is no cultural justification for prosecuting, persecuting, putting in jail the LGBT community in any country anywhere in the world."

Biden also detailed several other LGBT issues that he sees a need for action: LGBT youth homelessness, difficulties still faced by LGBT immigrants, the "unconscionable practice of conversion therapy," and HIV treatment needs in black and transgender communities.

Toward the end of Biden's remarks, he spoke about one issue outside of LGBT rights — gun violence — and noted that even though universal background checks are not likely to pass this Congress, he would keep speaking out about the issue until such legislation passes.

Hillary Clinton Did A Donald Trump Impression On Saturday Night Live

Republican Candidates Work To Win Over Mitt's Mormon Army In Nevada

$
0
0

Photo illustration by BuzzFeed

LAS VEGAS — Rand Paul has quoted Mormon scripture in an op-ed. Jeb Bush has surrounded himself with Mormon surrogates and fundraisers. And Marco Rubio's backers are touting the candidate's childhood in the church to claim he could be "the first Mormon president."

Four years after Mitt Romney dominated Nevada's crucial presidential caucuses by marshaling an army of right-leaning Latter-day Saints, top 2016 Republican candidates are quietly but aggressively courting the state's Mormon vote — and many believe the small religious constituency will not only decide the winner in Nevada, but reshape the national race at a pivotal moment in next year's primaries.

"Whatever campaign is able to successfully organize and turn [Mormons] out for their candidate in this cycle will win Nevada," said Todd Cranney, a Mormon who served as deputy political director for Romney's 2012 campaign. "I do believe some of the campaigns recognize this fact, and are working hard to turn out LDS voters. That's a very smart strategy."

Mormon voters are not generally accustomed to wielding much political clout in national elections. Though polls suggest the overwhelmingly Republican members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are more politically engaged than most voters, they still represent a relatively tiny portion of the American electorate, and are most heavily concentrated in deep-red Western states like Utah and Idaho — far away from election-year battlegrounds. Even as their religion was endlessly dissected and debated in the political sphere during Romney’s two campaigns, rank-and-file Mormon voters have never before had the sort of influence that leads presidential candidates to genuflect before them. Until now.

GOP strategists attribute this change to the Romney campaign’s unprecedented success in organizing and energizing the state’s LDS voters. While Nevada is only about 5% Mormon, members of the church made up a whopping 25% of the Republican caucuses in both 2008 and 2012.

At the time, pundits chalked up the disproportionate turnout to tribal enthusiasm for the prospect of a Mormon president. But the surge of LDS voters was also the product of a much more sophisticated effort on the part of the Romney campaign, according to several former staffers. "Obviously Mitt was very attractive to [Mormons] for lots of reasons," said one former Romney adviser, "but the methodology of how Mitt went about going after them, it wasn't scattershot. It was very systematic; it was very organized." It was also, by necessity, largely under the radar.

The strategy began with understanding the Mormon church's unique organizational infrastructure. Unlike most religious sects, the church is structured like a top-down corporation, and every congregation in the world reports back to headquarters in Salt Lake City. Mormons are each assigned to a geographically determined "ward" of about 200–300 people, and each congregation distributes a directory of its members' addresses and contact information, to be used for coordinating visits to needy families, or organizing church picnics. Members are expressly prohibited from using the lists for political or business purposes, and while there were isolated rumors of abuse in 2012 by overzealous partisans, Romney himself was adamant that his team not violate the church's rule.

Instead, between 2008 and 2012, Romney's operatives in Nevada methodically, and discreetly, built their own vast database of Mormon Republicans in the state — simply by asking every donor and volunteer they encountered to share their contact lists with the campaign. This is common practice in politics, and often people respond by sending along their Gmail groups or Outlook lists. For Mormons, those lists typically included their ward directories — and Romney's team became skilled at quickly sorting out the LDS contacts from the others by scanning for hints like an individual's church assignment or title listed by their name. To fill in the gaps, they rounded up contact information from other Mormon-heavy organizations, like local Boy Scout groups.

"Our approach to the LDS vote was the same as any other coalition," said a Romney adviser. "You organize the way they're organized."

The difference is that, unlike other politically influential religious groups such as evangelical homeschoolers in Iowa, Nevada's tightly networked Mormon community didn't have the same established network of longtime political activists and appointed power brokers. Romney was, to a large degree, building it from the ground up.

By the end of 2012, one former campaign aide boasted, he had accumulated the contact information for "a very large percentage" of Nevada's LDS population.

"There's no other coalition in Nevada that comes even close — not even libertarians," said a former Romney campaign strategist. "I don't care what anyone says. In terms of organization, engagement, turning out at the caucuses, the Mormons are a country mile away. ... That is valuable gold for any campaign, and they all want to find a way to tap into it."

And while many on Romney's 2012 Nevada team have gone to work for Bush, some have broken ranks and joined rival campaigns, and still others remain free agents — leaving it unclear who has access to the best intel.

It is possible, of course, that Mormon turnout could drop at next year's caucuses without a co-religionist for them to vote for. But most political observers in Nevada expect them to remain a potent force in the Republican contest. "The Mormon influence in that universe will be substantial," Jon Ralston, the dean of the state's political press corps, wrote recently.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

What's more, the absence of an LDS candidate in 2016 means the caucuses's most valuable voting bloc is up for grabs — and at least three candidates are competing seriously to seize command of Mitt's Mormon army.

The candidate with the most obvious claim to the community is Rubio, who was baptized Mormon as a child and attended the local church with his family in Las Vegas for a few years before eventually moving to Miami and returning to Catholicism. During his brief time in the faith, Rubio joyfully immersed himself in Nevada's Mormon culture — frequenting LDS youth groups, taking family road trips to nearby Brigham Young University, and even forming an amateur singing group with his cousin and sister to perform their favorite Osmond Brothers songs.

In his 2012 memoir American Son, Rubio wrote, "All in all, the Mormon church provided the sound moral structure my mother had wanted for us, and a circle of friends from stable, God-fearing families. When we left the church a few years later, mostly at my instigation, we did so with gratitude for its considerable contribution to our happiness in those years."

But while Rubio may have parted ways with the faith long ago, his backers in Nevada are now eagerly playing up his ties to the church in Mormon circles. One former Romney fundraiser said he had heard several Rubio donors claim the candidate will be "the first Mormon president" if he wins next year. (By the church's standards they are technically right: As of 2012, Rubio had never formally requested to have his name removed from LDS records, according to a spokesperson for the senator. That means the church is likely still counting him as a member.)

Rubio himself has looked for more subtle ways to invoke his unique experience with the faith that don’t come off as blatant pandering. When Nevada's LDS Lt. Gov. Mark Hutchison hosted a meet-and-greet at his home for Rubio in July, the candidate addressed the mostly-Mormon audience from a backyard basketball court adorned with the BYU logo — but he chose not to mention his childhood conversion.

Many of Rubio’s strongest ties to the state are inextricably tangled up in Mormonism. The church's local Spanish-speaking community is filled with members of his extended family, including Democratic state Sen. Mo Denis, a cousin who holds a leadership post in the church. And the old Mormon chapel Rubio used to attend still holds Sunday services in his childhood neighborhood — a gritty, working-class suburb a few miles off the Las Vegas Strip that he routinely describes in speeches to invoke his humble roots.

"It's not just that he has roots in the church," said one Republican strategist describing the potential potency of Rubio's Mormon appeal. "He has roots in the church in Nevada. … That could be very powerful.”

Scott Olson / Getty Images

Rand Paul’s pitch to Mormons has been somewhat more philosophical. In 2012, his father’s presidential bid received a boost in Nevada from a feisty grassroots group called Mormons for Ron Paul. They marched across the state passing out buttons emblazoned with the message, “Mormons don’t let Mormons vote for Mitt Romney,” and blitzed the news media with soundbites about how much better the libertarian platform aligned with their faith. The elder Paul ended up with a solid third-place showing in the caucuses, and Rand hopes to build on his father’s base in Nevada by drawing more Latter-day Saints into the libertarian fold.

Rep. Raul Labrador, a Mormon congressman from Idaho who serves as Paul’s western states campaign chair, described a “leave-us-alone” libertarian streak that has run through Mormonism since the church’s 19th-century founding.

“If you look at the history, the church was persecuted by the government,” said Labrador. “It was driven out of various states until [Mormon pioneers] finally found a place in Utah where they could thrive by telling the federal government to stay out of our lives and out of our business.” He added that Paul has studied the church’s “history of persecution and what the federal government did to the LDS faith. And it’s something that I think resonates with his point of view.”

But in practice, Paul’s attempts at courting Mormon have so far been hit or miss. For example, he has repeatedly argued in private conversations with LDS politicos across Nevada that his support for changes to the criminal justice system and softer drug sentencing should resonate with Mormons who believe in Christ-like compassion. Recent polls on the issue suggest he is probably right, and last year the church-owned Deseret News published an editorial arguing for rolling back mandatory minimum drug sentences. But the issue remains a delicate one for members of a church whose strict health code includes prohibitions ranging from illicit drug use to iced tea — and Paul has left some here with the impression that he is too lax about the danger of drugs. One Mormon fundraiser who had multiple phone calls with the candidate said he ultimately passed on joining the campaign because he couldn’t stomach “drug legalization” — something Paul doesn’t actually support.

On the other hand, Paul has distinction of being the only Republican in the 2016 field to employ a Mormon dog whistle in his political rhetoric. In June, he wrote an op-ed for Time magazine arguing, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s marriage equality decision, that the government should “get out of the marriage business altogether.” What caught the attention of Mormon readers was a line that bore remarkable resemblance to a passage of LDS scripture: “The Constitution was written by wise men who were raised up by God for that very purpose.”


The comparison quickly went viral in the LDS Twittersphere and so-called “bloggernacle,” as Mormons debated whether or not the allusion was intentional. (A Paul aide confirmed that it was.) While the most orthodox social conservatives in the church may have been skeptical of Paul’s distinctly libertarian proposal to end the marriage debate, many were still overtly flattered by sight of a high-profile presidential contender cribbing from Doctrine and Covenants.

Bush's campaign, meanwhile, hired the same team of veteran Nevada consultants that engineered Romney's back-to-back blowouts in the state’s 2008 and 2012 contests, and is working now to tap into the Mormon fundraising network that was supercharged by the former nominee. One Romney adviser in the state said Bush's establishment credentials could appeal to Mormon Republicans, who generally tend to prefer polite mainstream candidates over bomb-throwing insurgents. They are also less likely than most conservative voters to be bothered by Bush’s moderate immigration record, in part because so many of them have spent two years serving missions in Latin America.

Several sources noted that Mormon voters have long shown a special affinity for George W. Bush. When Bush's poll numbers were cratering toward the end of his presidency, Utah remained one of just four states where he maintained positive approval ratings. Jeb’s team hopes to capitalize on that goodwill.

Ethan Miller / Getty Images

But another former Romney adviser predicted Bush would struggle to win over Nevada's Mormons, pointing specifically to his support for Common Core education standards, which many conservatives view as a dangerous federal power grab designed to indoctrinate their children.

"In the LDS community, Common Core is gonna kick the crap out of Jeb," the Romney adviser said. "Any time you take any kind of power away from the parents, you lose LDS people. They want to feel like they're in charge of their children. ... I just don't know how I could get a bunch of Mormons excited to vote for Jeb."

Ryan Erwin, the strategist leading Bush's campaign in Nevada, said his team had already demonstrated their "winning formula" for the state's caucuses. "We have the support of leaders of many faiths including the support of some strong Mormon leaders. Having said that, it is important to understand that this isn't a church function — it is about voters," Erwin said, adding, "Caucuses tend to draw only the voters paying the most attention ... that means those voters require individual communication."

Even as multiple campaigns work to rally LDS voters in Nevada, it remains unclear how much they will coalesce around a single candidate. (It's highly unlikely that anyone will get close to Romney's 88%.) It does, however, seem likely Mormons will present a united front in at least one cause: ensuring the defeat of a certain Baptist minister.

"When Mike Huckabee announced, I got literally 30 messages saying we need to destroy him," said a former Romney adviser. "There is as strong an anti-Huckabee movement as there is a pro-Romney movement here. He has no chance of winning Nevada."

Texas Appeals Court Halts Scheduled Execution Amid Misconduct Claims

$
0
0

The Nov. 3 scheduled execution of Julius Murphy is on hold indefinitely.

Julius Murphy

AP Photo/Texas Department of Criminal Justice

WASHINGTON — The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Monday indefinitely halted the upcoming scheduled execution of Julius Murphy, in the wake of new claims of prosecutorial misconduct raised by Murphy's lawyers.

Murphy had been scheduled for execution in Texas on November 3 after having been convicted of murder in the 1997 shooting death of Jason Erie.

On September 24, however, Murphy's attorneys — including the D.C. law firm of Hogan Lovells — filed a new request for relief with the court, alleging that the two key witnesses who testified in Murphy's 1998 trial were threatened with prosecution if they did not testify against Murphy — facts never disclosed to Murphy's lawyer at the time or since.

Additionally, the lawyers argued that a new sworn statement from one of those two witnesses acknowledges that he lied at trial, not admitting that another man, Murphy's co-defendant, pulled the trigger in Erie's death.

Finally, the lawyers argued, more broadly, that "Texas's death penalty no longer is constitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution."

In Monday's ruling, the court did not explain which one or more of the reasons presented in the September filing led to its action, with the order simply listing all three issues raised by Murphy's lawyers and then ordering, "Applicant's execution is stayed until further order of this Court."

In a statement, Murphy's lawyer, Catherine E. Stetson of Hogan Lovells, said, "The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals was correct to stay the execution of Julius Murphy today. Mr. Murphy's conviction and death sentence were procured through prosecutorial misconduct. Jurors considered evidence from two key witnesses while the prosecution unlawfully concealed the fact that those witnesses were pressured into testifying with threats of prosecution and promised leniency if they testified. And one of the witnesses has now identified Mr. Murphy's co-defendant as the true shooter."

From the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decision:

From the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decision:

LINK: Read the full order.


View Entire List ›

Hillary Clinton Taunts Donald Trump Outside Trump's Hotel

$
0
0

Evan McMorris-Santoro / Via BuzzFeed News

LAS VEGAS — Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a large group of union picketers outside the hotel bearing Donald Trump's name here Monday that Trump's rhetoric on the presidential campaign trail is "unacceptable behavior."

"Some people think Mr. Trump is entertaining," Clinton said at a protest hosted by the Culinary Workers Local 226, which is locked in a contract battle with the Trump casino over wages and health care benefits. "But I don’t think it’s entertaining when somebody insults immigrants, insults women."

Clinton made a somewhat surprise appearance at the rally, with local press in Vegas getting word of her arrival shortly before she appeared at the rally. National press, in town for Tuesday's Democratic Party debate, eventually showed up too, and Clinton spoke before a slew of TV cameras.

She told the workers she was there to show "solidarity" with their cause and to push back on Trump.

"I think you have a right to organize, you have right to safe working conditions, you have a right to a living wage," she said. "And you have to say yes to all of that and you have to say no to efforts to prevent you from organizing to prevent you from having the kind of working conditions you deserve."

"And that means saying no to Donald Trump," she added.

The Culinary Workers union is among the most powerful organization in Nevada Democratic politics, representing tens of thousands of hospitality workers in a state where tourism is a major part of the economy. The battle over the union's endorsement was a bitter one, and a fight that Clinton ultimately lost to President Obama.

Clinton is not the first Democratic presidential candidate to visit the Culinary Workers at one of their protests at the Trump in the current presidential cycle. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley appeared at a similar rally in August, and has been in regular contact with the union ever since, according to his campaign.

The president of the Culinary Workers local 226, Geoconda Arguello Kline, told the crowd all the presidential candidates have been invited to appear at the union's rallies.

Justices To Address If Juvenile Sentencing Ruling Applies To Old Convictions

$
0
0

Carolyn Kaster / AP

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court is due to hear arguments in one of the potentially biggest criminal law cases of its new term, considering whether a 2012 ruling that ended automatic life sentences for juveniles applies retroactively to those sentenced, in some cases, decades before the court's 2012 decision.

In the case of Henry Montgomery — who was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole automatically when convicted in Louisiana for a murder he committed at 17 — the issue before the court is both direct and tediously complex: Was the Supreme Court's decision to end automatic life without parole sentences for juveniles a substantive decision, which would be retroactive, or a procedural one, which would not be retroactive?

In a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Louisiana, Michigan's lawyers note that the decision could affect many inmates across the country. "While federal prisons hold only 37 such prisoners, more than 2,000 criminals who committed murder while teenagers are currently incarcerated in state prisons," the lawyers wrote on behalf of Michigan and 15 other states.

Also Tuesday, the court will be hearing a case addressing whether Florida’s system of allowing a judge to override the jury’s sentencing recommendation in a death penalty case, which itself need not be unanimous, is constitutional.

The cases are two of several criminal law cases on the court's docket that could, depending on the outcomes, lead to a term that dramatically alters the safeguards in place regarding some of the most severe punishments available under criminal law.

In his brief before the court, Montgomery, sentenced to life in prison without parole more than 40 years ago, argues that the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. Alabama must be seen as a substantive ruling, which would mean that he — now almost 70 years old — must be re-sentenced.

“The determination that a particular sentence, at least for a particular class of defendants, is ‘cruel and unusual’ is an inherently substantive determination,” Montgomery’s lawyers wrote in their arguments to the court.

Louisiana, on the other hand, focuses on “the fact that Montgomery could receive the same sentence today for the same conduct.” The Supreme Court, in other words, only said that automatic life sentences without parole for those juveniles convicted of murder is prohibited, not an individualized sentence of life without parole for such a juvenile. Because of that, Louisiana argues that the 2012 decision must be seen as a procedural one.

“Because Miller only requires a sentencing procedure and does not deny the government power to impose a category of punishment, Miller does not qualify as a substantive rule under [the Supreme Court’s standards],” the state wrote in its arguments to the court.

The Obama administration has weighed in on behalf of Montgomery in the case, siding with the criminal defendant and arguing that the 2012 decision is “not essentially procedural” because, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. wrote, “Miller changes not only the process of sentencing, but also the range of sentences that are available.”

Three side issues also could be at play in the case. The first is whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the case, which is an appeal of a decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court, at all. The court raised this question itself and, since all of the parties think the court can hear the case, appointed an outside lawyer to argue that the court does not have jurisdiction.

The second is whether, if the court decides the ruling was procedural, the ruling was a “watershed rule” that nonetheless should apply retroactively. While Montgomery argues that, if necessary, the court should rule that it was, the Obama administration did not join Montgomery in arguing that point.

Finally, and most dramatically, a friend-of-the-court brief submitted by Harvard Law School professor Charles Ogletree and several leading criminal justice scholars argues that the court should take this opportunity not to decide the issues before it but instead, more broadly, ask the parties to brief a bigger question: Whether — more than just automatic sentences of life without parole for juveniles being unconstitutional — all sentences of life without parole for juvenile offenders should be held to be unconstitutional. Although that is an unlikely outcome of Tuesday's hearing, the American Bar Association, which also filed a brief supporting Montgomery, previously took a similar position, arguing after Miller that states should "[e]liminate life without the possibility of release or parole for youthful offenders both prospectively and retroactively."

Although much of the talk last week when the Supreme Court began its new term focused on high-profile cases that have been in the news for months or longer, the heavy focus on criminal law rules in the new term — with all decisions expected to be handed down by the end of next June — could loom large as decisions begin to be handed down.

Already this term, the court is scheduled to hear three issues addressing various questions relating to the procedures surrounding sentencing people to death, including the case being heard Tuesday and a set of cases heard last week involving what instructions juries need to be given by a trial court before deciding whether to impose a death sentence. The third issue, to be heard in November, addresses questions about the use of race by prosecutors when selecting a jury in a capital case. The fact that the court is hearing all three of these issues, in addition to the Montgomery case, means that the court could be taking a closer look this year at sentencing practices associated with some of the most harsh criminal sentences.

Additionally, a case added to the court’s docket when the justices returned to start the new term raises the question of whether a former prosecutor who signed off on an individual’s capital prosecution can later sit as a judge in a case on the state supreme court when it reviews that individual’s case.

Among the highest-profile cases the court has agreed to hear this term are the affirmative action case out of the University of Texas at Austin; the case addressing the future of the court’s “one person, one vote” standard, also out of Texas; and the case challenging public union dues requirements, involving California’s teachers. Two other issues expected to be heard by the court this term involve whether the accommodation for nonprofits with religious objections to the Obamacare contraception mandate is sufficient to protect their religious interests and whether restrictive abortion provider regulations, challenged in cases out of Mississippi and Texas, are constitutional.


Ben Carson: Same-Sex Marriage Leads To Plural Marriage, "And On It Goes From There"

$
0
0

“If you change the definition of marriage for one group what defense do you have for the next group that comes along and wants it changed.”

Paul J. Richards / AFP / Getty Images

Ben Carson says he believes the acceptance of same-sex marriage could to lead to the definition of marriage changing to allow more than two partners and said more changes could follow.

Carson also told radio host Eric Metaxes on Friday that he'd "yet to hear," what position a person who believes in traditional marriage but "has nothing against gay people" could take that is acceptable to gay people.

"The other thing you have to recognize and this is a very important issue," said Carson. "If you change the definition of marriage for one group what defense do you have for the next group that comes along and wants it changed. Can you say, 'no we're just changing it this one time and it will this way for forever.' Well, how is that fair? I mean, it doesn't make any sense."

When Metaxes said allowing same-sex marriage would open up debate on the idea that marriage has to between two people, Carson said, "That's the natural next question and on it goes from there."

Carson said allowing same-sex marriage would mean the "word of God" would be changed on other things besides marriage too.

"Effectively what it does is it takes away from the tradition of family that we've known for thousands of years but also it negates an important part of the word of God," said Carson. "If you can do that with one part of the word of God you can do with the rest of it too. Toss the whole thing in the garbage."

w.soundcloud.com

Cruz: Senate Democrats Support Releasing "Illegal Aliens" Who Are "Murderers And Rapists"

$
0
0

“It does not make sense to be releasing murderers and rapists and yet sadly Senate democrats are willing to stand in pure party line vote in support of doing just that.”

Charlie Neibergall / AP

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz blasted Senate Democrats on Monday, saying they are "willing to stand in pure party line vote" in support of releasing undocumented immigrants who are "murderers and rapists" to protect the president.

"The Democrats are getting more and more open that they are the party of illegal immigration," he said. "They support amnesty. They support releasing criminal illegal aliens."

Cruz made the remarks to Iowa radio host Simon Conway while explaining a law he introduced that Cruz said cuts off federal funding to sanctuary cities that fail to enforce federal immigration law and sets a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison for those who illegally reenter the country with an aggravated felony conviction.

The Texas senator praised Republican leadership for bringing the bill to a vote, but said he anticipated that "virtually every Senate Democrat will vote party line in support of sanctuary cities, in support of allowing violent criminal illegal aliens to go free."

He added that, while he hoped the bill would make it to the president's desk, thereby forcing a veto, he thought Democrats would use the filibuster to prevent that from happening.

The Republican presidential candidate then made a slightly revised version of a claim he's made in the past, saying that in 2013 "the Obama administration released to the public over 103,000 criminal illegal aliens," including "196 murderers and "nearly 400 illegal aliens with sexual assault convictions."

"It does not make sense to be releasing murderers and rapists and yet sadly Senate Democrats are willing to stand in pure party line vote in support of doing just that," he concluded.

w.soundcloud.com

Mike Huckabee: "War On Cops" Is Causing Surge In Crime

$
0
0

Huckabee blames “anti-cop riots” in Baltimore and vilification of the police for upticks in crime.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican presidential candidate and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee says a "war on cops" and "anti-cop riots" have led to a surge in crime across the country.

"Newton's third law of physics says that for action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," Huckabee said on his daily podcast, The Huckabee Exclusive. "So is anyone surprised that the recent war on cops that's led to vilifying police, politicians tying cops hands, or police being told to stay out of certain areas has led to a completely predictable reaction, a surge in crime?"

Huckabee linked protests against cops to rising crime.

"Crime had been dropping since the 80s, but Breitbart reports that Chicago just had it's deadliest month in 13 years, with shootings up 50 percent over last year," Huckabee continued. "Since the April anti-police riots in Baltimore, homicides there are up 39 percent. In St. Louis the murder rate is up 60 percent last year. Breitbart notes, the situation has been made worse for the Obama Administration's failure to enforce immigration laws, which has led to the release of 347,000 criminal convicted aliens."

Huckabee said protestors were getting what they wanted: easing of prison sentences for non-violent drug crimes.

"But this should help ease everyone's minds: Protestors are finally getting what they want," Huckabee said. "In response to the protests that too many people were sent to prison for too long, the Justice Department announced that starting at the end of the month, they will start releasing 6,000 federal prison inmates. The ACLU celebrated that it was a great victory for justice because many of the inmates were given harsh sentences for non-violent drug crimes like selling crack cocaine."

Huckabee questioned the claim that such sentences were racist.

"That's now depicted as racist sentencing that targeted African Americans, even though the sentences were originally made harsher because African American leaders complained that crack dealers were destroying their neighborhoods," Huckabee said.

Huckabee also linked the tough on crime sentencing to the 1994 crime bill signed by President Bill Clinton. While the 1994 crime bill included some penalty enhancers, many tough drug laws had already been in place for years before the signing of that bill.

"The 'tough on drug' crime policy started under Bill Clinton, with Hillary's full support," said the former Arkansas governor. "She now says they went too far and she backs lighter sentences and early prison releases. She also supports putting camera's on every cop, so their actions are all recorded. After all, in the name of transparency, the public has a right to see records of all actions taken by public servants to make sure they are obeying the law. Seriously? Lets just hope the cops don't erase half the videos before they turn them over."

High Court Split On Whether It Even Can Hear Juvenile Sentencing Case Now

$
0
0

Much of the time in Tuesday’s arguments in Henry Montgomery’s case — which challenges a mandatory life sentence he received for a murder he committed at 17 — was spent on arguments over whether the justices could even hear the case.

People gather outside the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on June 26, 2015 after its historic decision on marriage equality. The court began its new term earlier this month.

Mladen Antonov / AFP / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court may not ultimately decide whether its ruling in 2012 that ended automatic sentences of life without parole for juveniles applies retroactively to cases fully decided before the ruling was issued.

When the Supreme Court agreed to hear Henry Montgomery's case — which raises the question of whether its 2012 ruling in Miller v. Alabama applies retroactively to his case, decided in the 1960s — the justices also asked the parties to respond to a question about whether the court even had authority to hear the case, which is an appeal from the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

All parties believe the court has the authority to hear it, so the court appointed a lawyer, Richard Bernstein, to argue against the court having jurisdiction. On Tuesday morning, his 15 minutes leading off the arguments ended up taking over a significant, if not majority, of the court's 75 minutes set aside for the consideration of the case.

Louisiana courts had decided to apply a federal rule — detailed in another earlier Supreme Court decision in Teague v. Lane — when deciding whether the Miller ruling applied retroactively to Montgomery, which, if so, would mean he now, after more than 40 years in prison, needs to be re-sentenced.

Generally speaking, under Teague, if a criminal law ruling is substantive, it applies retroactively; if procedural, it does not.

When it considered the issue, Louisiana's Supreme Court decided that the Miller ruling was a procedural one, which, under Teague, meant Miller did not apply retroactively to Montgomery and he would not have the chance to be re-sentenced.

On Tuesday in Washington, the debate turned on whether the Louisiana court's decision meant that it had actually issued a ruling about federal law or if it merely had applied federal court cases when making its own determination, under its state Constitution, of whether Louisiana courts should give Miller retroactive effect.

If it was a decision about state law, generally the Supreme Court would not have jurisdiction to hear the case. If the court could not hear the case from the Louisiana Supreme Court, it was noted repeatedly, Montgomery could still bring a federal court challenge to Louisiana's decision not to apply Miller retroactively to him.

Even if it was a decision about state law, however, that doesn't necessarily settle the matter, some justices suggested. If the state decided to "self-commit" to following the U.S. Supreme Court's Teague ruling, as Justice Elena Kagan said happened here, is that enough to create the federal court jurisdiction needed for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case?

When Kagan asked that question of Montgomery's lawyer, Mark Plaisance, he said that he agreed that would be sufficient to create jurisdiction. Others like Justice Antonin Scalia, however, questioned whether that would potentially create an advisory opinion, which the U.S. Supreme Court cannot issue, since the Louisiana Supreme Court could get the U.S. Supreme Court's decision and then say, as Scalia put it, "Now that we see what they say, we choose not to follow Teague."

Going back and forth with Plaisance, Scalia noted that, if the Louisiana Supreme Court later decided not to follow the U.S. Supreme Court's analysis on retroactivity, "Wouldn't that make us look foolish?"

When Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben got up, he noted a federalism argument for why the Louisiana Supreme Court's ruling should be seen as a federal one, justifying the court taking jurisdiction of the case. He explained the Louisiana Supreme Court decision to follow Teague could be seen as a decision made because it knows that the federal courts — under habeas corpus claims — eventually would use Teague to decide whether Miller should apply retroactively. As such, applying Teague to its state rules on retroactivity, Dreeben reasoned, allows a state to get the "first crack" at addressing the issue — before having federal courts do so on habeas corpus grounds.

While the outcome of the debate on the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over the Louisiana Supreme Court decision was not clear, the debate on the primary question of whether Miller should be given retroactive effect was similarly unresolved Tuesday.

The state argued that the decision was a procedural one because only a "categorical bar" on a punishment — meaning if the court barred all juvenile life without parole sentences and not just automatic ones — can be seen as a substantive ruling. Montgomery and the Obama administration argued, as Dreeben put it, that the ruling had to be seen as a substantive one because Miller "compelled states to adopt new sentencing options." There was no obvious alignment of a majority of the justices on either point.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote could prove to be the key one on both issues, spoke up only a few times during the argument, signaling some discomfort with the position that the court lacked jurisdiction in the case but not betraying any real clues as to his position on the retroactivity question itself.

Poll: Do You Know Who This Man Is?

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images