Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Obama On A Trump Presidency: "It's Not Hosting A Talk Show"

$
0
0

“I have a lot of faith in the American people,” President Obama said during a news conference on Tuesday, explaining why he does not believe Donald Trump will be elected president.

Speaking during a news conference in Rancho Mirage, California, on Tuesday, President Barack Obama said Americans still see the presidency as "a serious job" and that he does not believe Donald Trump will be elected.

Speaking during a news conference in Rancho Mirage, California, on Tuesday, President Barack Obama said Americans still see the presidency as "a serious job" and that he does not believe Donald Trump will be elected.

Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images

"It's not hosting a talk show or a reality show, it's not promotion, it's not marketing, it's hard. It's not a matter of pandering and doing whatever will get you in the news on a given day," Obama said.

In addition to his remarks about Trump, Obama criticized all the Republican contenders for the White House, saying that they have taken troubling positions on matters such as climate change and Muslims in America.

"[Trump] may up the ante in anti-Muslim sentiment but if you look at what the other candidates have said, that’s pretty troubling, too," Obama said.

youtube.com

Trump responded to Obama's comments during a campaign event in South Carolina calling it "a great compliment" and adding the president is doing a "lousy job."

Trump responded to Obama's comments during a campaign event in South Carolina calling it "a great compliment" and adding the president is doing a "lousy job."

Spencer Platt / Getty Images


Donald Trump: Apple Should Open Up San Bernardino Shooter's iPhone

$
0
0

On Tuesday, a court ordered the company to help the FBI bypass an iPhone security feature. Apple is refusing.

youtube.com

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Apple should comply with a court order demanding the company assist the FBI in unlocking the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters.

"I agree 100% with the courts. In that case, we should open it up," Trump said on Fox and Friends. "I think security overall. We have to open it up, and we have to use our heads."

"To think that Apple won't allow us to get into her cell phone — who do they think they are? No, we have to open it up," Trump continued.

The cell phone, belonging to Syed Farook, is password protected and encrypted. The FBI has been unable to access the phone's encrypted data. A judge on Tuesday ordered Apple to turn over software that would allow the FBI to get around the phone's security features. Apple has said they will not comply with the order, calling the implications "chilling."

"The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically," Apple said in a statement. "This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by 'brute force,' trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer."

Trump said this is one case where federal authorities should be able to access the phone.

"Apple, this is one case, and this is a case that certainly we should be able to get into the phone and we should find out what happened, why it happened, and maybe there's other people involved, and we have to do that," he said.

Jeb Says Trump's Profanity Is An "Underreported Story" That Will Hurt Him

$
0
0

“Those aren’t South Carolina values.”

View Video ›

Jeb Bush says Donald Trump's continued use of profanity is an "underreported story" that is harming his standing with South Carolina voters ahead of the primary there.

"Donald Trump's profanity has been one of the underreported stories, here in South Carolina. My experience is people find it repugnant that he would use foul language in crowds where children exist," the former Florida governor told Newsmax Prime on Tuesday evening. "Those aren't South Carolina values."

Trump has used profane language several times at his rallies. At the most recent Republican debate, he promised he would no longer use such language.

Trump: "Weak" Senate GOP "Starting To Crack" On Supreme Court Confirmation

$
0
0

“I’ve been hearing, here we go again, that the Republicans are starting to crack on this whole thing with the judge, you know, with Obama appointing the judge.”

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Senate Republicans are "starting to crack" on their pledge to block President Obama's nominee to replace Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.

"I've been hearing, here we go again, that the Republicans are starting to crack on this whole thing with the judge, you know, with Obama appointing the judge," Trump said on The Tara Show on South Carolina radio. "And I don't know if you've been hearing it too. But I've been hearing that the Republicans are starting to crack, like he may get the choice. That some of the Republicans are weakening."

Following Scalia's death on Saturday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the Senate should wait to confirm a replacement until after the presidential election, but on Tuesday Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said he would wait until a nominee is appointed to decide whether or not to hold hearings before the Judiciary Committee.

On the radio on Wednesday, Trump said the so-called "weakening" was "ridiculous."

"I mean, this is just ridiculous," he said. "What happened with the budget a month ago and what's happening now with this. I've just been hearing this as of last night. And you know, where there's smoke there's fire and you and I have been watching it too often where the Republicans get sent there and they're so weak."

In the interview, Trump addressed his plan to deport the undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States, suggesting that many of them would have to leave on their own.

"They're here illegally, they have to go," Trump argued. "What's going to happen is, you're going to start moving them out, others are then gonna leave. You know, it's not like you're gonna move 11 million — others are gonna leave."

Trump also discussed his own philosophical shift towards conservatism, though he disputed that he was ever "a liberal as such," saying he held "a couple of liberal concepts."

"I've become more conservative over a period of time," he said. "And I notice that happens to people, to many people, they become more conservative. They see what's going on. And I was never a liberal as such. I had a couple of liberal concepts, I guess. But again, as a businessman, it was not something you really talked about."

The businessman went on to compare his political views to those of Ronald Reagan, saying that Reagan wasn't a "true, hardline conservative."

"I think I'll be a common-sense conservative too," he said. "You know, I know some conservatives where they can't think properly, they're — I think I will be a great conservative. But I think it will be a conservative with common sense. Ronald Reagan wasn't a hardline conservative. Ronald Reagan was — I don't know if you know — Ronald Reagan approved abortion bills in California that people were shocked at."

Trump continued, "He wasn't a true, hardline conservative. But he was a conservative person, a conservative president. He was a great president."

Georgia Executes Man For Killing Fellow Navy Sailor

$
0
0

(Georgia Department of Corrections via AP, File)

Georgia executed Travis Hittson Wednesday evening for the 1992 murder a fellow Navy sailor.

The U.S. Supreme Court denied Hittson's request for a stay of execution at a little past 7 p.m. Wednesday.

Hittson, 45, was stationed with Edward Vollmer and Conway Utterbeck in Pensacola, Florida in 1992. According to court filings, Hittson and the two other men went to Warner Robbins, Georgia while Vollmer's parents were out of town.

Vollmer and Hittson went out to several bars one night, leaving Utterbeck at the house. While they returned, Vollmer, Hittson's supervisor, told Hittson that Utterbeck planned to kill them both and they needed to "get" him first. Vollmer gave Hittson an aluminum bat, and they found Utterbeck sleeping in a recliner.

Hittson beat him with a baseball bat, and then shot him in the head.

The two cut up Utterbeck's body and buried some of his remains in Georgia and the rest in Florida. Hittson received the death penalty, and Vollmer received a life sentence. According to the Associated Press, Vollmer was denied parole in 1999 and again last year.

Hittson's attorneys argued that he was manipulated by his supervisor, and that a state psychologist should not have been allowed to testify. But Tuesday, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles denied Hittson's request for clemency.

On Wednesday, the Georgia Supreme Court denied a request to stay his execution. Hittson had asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, which it declined to do.

Hittson's execution was the second this year for Georgia. The stay of execution request was the first to reach the U.S. Supreme Court since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

The state's past two executions have been marked by struggles with inserting the IV. The last two executions took roughly an hour each. In an execution two weeks ago, executioners resorted to setting a femoral line — near the inmate's groin — to get access. The protocol says that is to be done if the IVs cannot be set in the arms.

LINK: Georgia Executioners Struggled To Set IVs In Recent Lethal Injections

Read Hittson's petition to the U.S. Supreme Court:

Read the state's opposition:


Cruz Invites Donald Trump To Sue Him In Lengthy Press Conference

$
0
0

Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images

SENECA, S.C. — Ted Cruz revealed that Donald Trump has threatened legal action over one of the Cruz campaign's ads and challenged Trump to sue him in a long press conference — complete with props — on Wednesday.

Speaking in a conference room at a Hampton Inn from behind a table where he had laid out Trump's cease-and-desist letter, Cruz blasted Trump and Marco Rubio for a solid 25 minutes before taking questions from reporters. The conference escalated the messy fight over who is lying that has characterized the Republican primary in South Carolina so far, with Cruz litigating at length the accusations that have been made against him by other campaigns.

"Donald, I would encourage you, if you want to file a lawsuit challenging this ad claiming it is defamation, file the lawsuit," Cruz said.

The Trump campaign's cease-and-desist letter centers around an ad the Cruz campaign made that shows clips of Trump talking about being pro-choice in a 1999 Meet the Press interview that has made the rounds several times already in this campaign.

The letter from Trump's lawyer Jeffrey Goldman states that the ad is "completely disingenuous" and "replete with outright lies, false, defamatory and destructive statements and downright fabrications which you fully know to be untrue." Trump himself has accused Cruz several times of being a "liar."

"The operative words in that ad come from Donald Trump’s own mouth," Cruz said.

"In the ad we don’t say Donald is pro-choice," Cruz continued. "We simply play video of him saying he is very pro-choice, and he is pro-choice in every respect."

Cruz appeared to relish the idea of litigation with Trump, saying, "One of the things I look forward to most of all is deposing Donald Trump" and that "I may take the deposition myself."

Cruz listed several points he said would provide a defense against Trump's defamation claims, including the fact that Trump has suggested his sister, a judge who is pro-choice, would be a good Supreme Court nominee, and the fact that Trump has donated to Democrats.

During this part of the press conference, Cruz displayed a poster board listing Trump's donations to Democrats.

A few minutes into the conference, Cruz pivoted to Rubio, saying that both Trump and Rubio have frivolously accused him of lying.

"Marco Rubio is behaving like Donald Trump with a smile," Cruz said. The Rubio campaign has accused the Cruz campaign of dirty tricks such as controversial "push polls" and a fake Facebook post attributed to Rubio supporter Rep. Trey Gowdy that claimed Gowdy was switching his endorsement to Cruz.

While Trump holds a double-digit lead in South Carolina, second place is competitive between Cruz and Rubio. Cruz is currently leading Rubio by 1.8 points in Real Clear Politics' most recent poll average.

Cruz said the Rubio campaign was "falsely attributing misconduct to us with no basis whatsoever."

"It's unfortunate, his campaign has not gotten the traction he wanted," Cruz said of Rubio.

Rubio supporters did not let the attacks go unanswered.

"I think [Cruz is] not willing to defend his record by actually looking at the points that have been made and responding to them," said GOP Rep. Darrell Issa, a Rubio supporter who is in South Carolina this week and went to some of Cruz's events on Wednesday.

"If the evidence is building against you and you want to obfuscate it by accusing the other side of lying, that works for a little while, but it’s long way to Super Tuesday, and eventually I think Sen. Cruz is going to have to answer specifics about where he stood on these issues, particularly about these things like false accusations about Carson that’s already caught up with him," he continued.

And regarding the fake Gowdy Facebook post: "As long as you can determine who they benefit and who they hurt, you can be 99.9 percent accurate that they do come from where they appear to come from," Issa said. "Actions follow who they benefit."


Despite the litany of complaints about his rivals, Cruz said "from the beginning of this campaign we’ve taken the high road. I’m not insulting anybody here, I am responding with simple facts."

After the press conference, Cruz staffers handed out packets to reporters that contained the Trump campaign's cease-and-desist letter and their lawyer's response.

In the response written by the Cruz side's lawyer Chris Gober, the campaign promised not to back down.

"Your client has no legal basis to demand that our campaign cease airing the ad, and your demand for 'prompt written assurances' that we have pulled the spot will not be forthcoming," Gober wrote. "To the contrary, we now plan to air the ad with greater frequency."


Trump Campaign Manager: Assad "Keeping Things In Check" In Syria

$
0
0

Trump can see the future, says Corey Lewandowski.

Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Donald Trump's campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, said in an interview on Tuesday that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is "keeping things in check" in the war-torn country.

The conflict in Syria, which has been ongoing for four-and-a-half years, has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Syrians, and created a refugee crisis in the region. Trump has said he wants to work with Russia on Syria to defeat ISIS and opposes overthrowing Assad.

Appearing on the John Fredericks Show, Lewandowski, defending Trump's position, said, "He is very, very bad individual, but he is an individual who, in his country, is keeping things in check because he is such a bad guy they're afraid of him."

A September Time article noted Assad controlled only 25% of Syrian territory.

Lewandowski said ISIS would only become stronger if Assad is removed from power, adding that the U.S. government was funneling money to a number of rebel groups, with none of them being a clear successor to Assad.

In the interview Lewandowski declared Trump a prophet on foreign policy.

"You have someone with Donald Trump who has vision to predict what will happen in the future because he's done it so many times," he said. "He predicted Osama bin Laden in one of his books in the early 2000s and that he would be a major factor and what he's saying here is very clear: if Russia wants to go and bomb the hell out of ISIS, why would we not want that to happen. We don't even know – so many of these elected officials say, 'well if we go and do that we're gonna go destabilize Syria and we're gonna put somebody else in and we're gonna get get rid of Assad.' Who? Who is the question."

LINK: Assad’s Strategy Is To Create Refugees


View Entire List ›

Bernie's Test: Can He Add Nevada's Young Latinos To His Coalition And Win?

$
0
0

Adrian Carrasquillo / BuzzFeed

LAS VEGAS — The day after Bernie Sanders dominated the New Hampshire primary, two Bernie volunteers set up a table — with a speaker — in what’s known as the free speech zone on the UNLV campus.

“Still D.R.E.” blared as student after student walked up and grabbed a signup form for this Saturday’s caucuses in the state, where Sanders and Hillary Clinton are locked in another battle.

The speaker was the work of Kyle Lozier, a Chicagoan who hails from a black and Hispanic family. After learning his political views aligned most with Sanders from an ISideWith quiz, the 20-year-old Lozier was hooked, and started volunteering for the campaign.

They’d already collected 100 names by the time Tim Clyne, 18, walked up. Clyne comes from a family of Republicans, and the family position is that Clinton is "sketchy" — but Sanders’ call to legalize marijuana made him start paying attention, and he’s liked what he’s heard since. So he signed up. Zack Pinion, 20, came up on skateboard and announced that he wanted to give the campaign all of his family members’ contact information.

Free tuition, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants, demilitarizing the police force, not shooting unarmed people — these are the reasons young minority voters are into Sanders, Lozier, whose brother works for Sanders in Austin, Texas, said.

"The Democratic Party is freaking out thinking 'Our girl Hillary is probably not going to be president,'" he said.

This kind of enthusiasm among young people has powered Sanders to 84% of voters 17-to-29 in Iowa and 83% in New Hampshire, two mostly white states. For a campaign looking to establish itself as a serious threat to win the Democratic nomination, minority voters were always going to the necessary next step, and Nevada — and its large Latino population — serves as its first challenge.

These voters have repeatedly been described as a "firewall" for Clinton, but a January Pew report offered an important opening for Sanders: 44% of Hispanics across the country are millennials, defined as those who are 18-to-35 years old. In Nevada, the number is half of all Latinos. UNLV’s campus is 55% nonwhite.

But while it's easy to make parallels between Barack Obama's successful 2008 campaign against Clinton and Sanders’s insurgent 2016 go, Obama didn't have to rely solely on youth turnout to beat her. Once Obama was viable, he was able to count on black support across all ages. Sanders path to victory is narrower: He will have to turn out young people, including minorities, to win.

Whether the enthusiasm on display the next day — down the road at the College of Southern Nevada (CSN) in Henderson, at a Voto Latino event — for instance, turns into votes is unclear.

Laura Sida, 21, supported Clinton before she learned about Sanders, but now feels he better relates to the concerns of working-class people. Her friend, Ivonne Garcia, 21, learned about him on Tumblr and likes that he's against big corporations. But asked if they knew where their caucus site is and whether they planned to caucus for him, they grew quiet.

"I'll try to," Sida said. "I need to find out where it is."

"I have to do student teaching, I don't know if I can," Garcia added.

Tick Segerblom, the first Nevada elected official to support Sanders, counts it as a good sign that when he sees the young crowds at rallies he doesn't recognize anyone, but said the question is "whether that core can become the 50,000 we need."

But here, the Clinton campaign has significant organizational advantages — and people working to earn the votes of the young, minority voters that Sanders needs. The Clinton campaign isn't just rolling over and ceding the support of young people in Nevada.

The campaign touched down in April whereas the Sanders campaign didn't make hires until the fall. As a result, the Clinton campaign has programs it might not have in other early states; they’re counting, for instance, on a group of 30 high school volunteers to help it win in the predominantly Latino and black East Las Vegas area.

Those young students are led by two bilingual top field organizers, Vanessa Valdivia and Natalie Montelongo, themselves in their late 20s. In addition to working with the students, and calling local Nevadans to support Clinton, the pair started a group within the campaign for women who want to discuss the issues that matter to them called, Mujeres in Politics.

The connection that has been forged with the students — Valdivia helps them with their chemistry homework and Montelongo said she had one of the high school kids' scooters in her car — is a personal one. It started with a barbecue last summer and the young staffers met the high school students’ parents, who want to see their kids involved civically. They went to high schools early on and met with teachers, before recruiting students. But now, months later, it's all for the campaign.

"We're going to win the East side because of the students," Montelongo said. "They're the ones who have been helping with the phones and in the streets. East side people are working-class and the youth is turning out the vote there."

The Clinton campaign can point to its own youth enthusiasm too, like a University of Nevada, Reno student and super volunteer named Courtney McKimmey, who has completed the most volunteer shifts in the state. At CSN, there was Gabriela Torres, 19, who attended the Voto Latino event in a bright pink t-shirt and jeans. She’s ready to caucus for Clinton and explained that her mother is a big supporter of the Clinton family. (Torres is admittedly a rarity, a politically engaged teenager who has worked for local elected Latino Democrats and The Ramirez Group, which is run by a veteran Democratic strategist.)

Dave Damore, a political scientist at UNLV, who has studied Nevada’s growing Latino community, said this younger generation of Hispanics is much more politically engaged — they aren't the ones being socialized by grandparents or parents into becoming involved in politics, as has traditionally been the case.

"In the Latino and Asian community, you’re seeing it work the other way around," he said. "The DREAM Act and immigration have become a unifying issue for that generation."

Latinos nationally routinely list the economy and education as issues more important to them than immigration, but Nevada's Hispanic community is unique. According to Pew Hispanic, 7.6% of the Nevadan population is undocumented, the highest rate in the nation. The state has highest share of undocumented immigrants in its labor force — 10.2%.

That means that Nevada also has something else important: One of the highest rates of mixed-status families. A young voter might be a U.S. citizen, for example, with an undocumented parent and a sibling benefitting from Obama's DACA program, which allowed them to remain in the country and obtain work authorization for two years. Immigration policy matters in Nevada: Of those who are undocumented in the state, 52% would be eligible for Obama's programs, according to Pew.

Erika Andiola, Sanders's Latino press secretary, said the campaign has caught up in Nevada. "We have the most offices of any presidential candidate, we're covering tons of ground now," she said. "It’s a very different approach. For us it's important to mobilize the grassroots and get young people to work with us."

But the Clinton campaign believes the work it started early on and has continued over the last 11 months will help it win with Hispanic voters in the state. And if Clinton wins the nomination, she may find a silver lining with young voters, or at least young pro-Bernie Latinos — the political engagement doesn’t end here.

"I don't want to tie my hands and say I would support her," said Kyle Lozier, the Sanders volunteer. "But having a Democratic president would be much better than a Republican one."

His fellow volunteer, Antonio Mila, cited both candidates’ support for "LGBT rights, immigration reform, and raising the minimum wage.” He would "support Hillary 100%" if Sanders doesn't win.

"Even though it wouldn't be a revolution, we would be better off than with any Republican candidate," he said.


Britney Spears Should Be Spanked And Other Comments John Kasich Made As A Fox News Host

$
0
0

As the host of Heartland and a frequent fill-in for Bill O’Reilly between 2001 and 2008, the current Ohio governor and presidential candidate offered his take on subjects such as Viagra, celebrity breakups, airports, and spanking celebrities.

Stephen J. Boitano / Associated Press

"Let's talk about Brit Spears."

"Let's talk about Brit Spears."

"Let's talk about Brit Spears. And I'm not sure whether — you know, with her behavior, I'm not sure whether she should be spanked or her parents should be spanked or all of them can be spanked," Kasich said on the O'Reilly Factor on Nov. 10, 2006.

"I mean, she marries this total loser, this total dancing loser. Right? What is the story with this young girl? She had it all and she just flushed it all down the drain."

He later added of Spears, "Forget about her. I've written her off."

David Duprey / AP


View Entire List ›

Cruz Says He Wouldn't Vote To Confirm Sri Srinivasan To Supreme Court

$
0
0

Joshua Roberts / Reuters

SENECA, S.C. — Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz said at a press conference Wednesday that he would not vote to confirm D.C. Circuit judge Sri Srinivasan to the Supreme Court if Srinivasan is nominated this year.

Cruz has called Srinivasan a friend, clerked with him, and voted for his confirmation to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2013, but when asked if he would vote to appoint him the nation's highest court, Cruz said, "I would not."

"I have been very clear that the Senate should not confirm any nominee in a lame duck session. It’s been 80 years since the Senate has confirmed a Supreme Court nominee who was nominated during an election," Cruz said. "And particularly when the court hangs in the balance, it makes no sense whatsoever to give Barack Obama the power to jam through a judge in the final election year."

"Voting for a candidate for the DC circuit is very different from confirming someone to the US Supreme Court," Cruz added.

Srinivasan is considered to be among the Obama administration's leading candidates for a Supreme Court nomination. Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly last week, leaving a vacancy on the court.


Florida Congressman Is Using An Online Poll To Decide His Superdelegate Vote

$
0
0

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

Democratic Congressman Alan Grayson, in an interview with BuzzFeed News on Wednesday, said he is letting his supporters decide which candidate will receive his superdelegate vote because he's disturbed by the Democratic Party's leadership ignoring the voices of its base.

Grayson, who is currently running for the Democratic Senate nomination in Florida, announced earlier today that he would let his supporters decide his superdelegate vote through an online poll on his campaign website.

“There is a divide between grassroots Democrats and establishment Democrats,” Grayson said. “It’s troubling. There’s a negation of the popular will when you say that a block of delegates can vote regardless of what voters want.”

Grayson’s decision comes after Bernie Sanders beat Hillary Clinton by 22 points in the New Hampshire Primary, but both are expected to leave the state with 15 delegates each due to the overwhelming number of superdelegates who have announced their support for Clinton.

Clinton currently has a 350-delegate lead over Sanders due to super delegates.

In November, the Clinton campaign named Grayson to her Florida Leadership Council, but he released a statement clarifying he didn’t officially endorse her, and has said positive things about Sanders, including that he’s a “strong candidate” and “national treasure.”

“The whole system causes me concern, the idea that if all the super delegates line up behind one candidate, the other has to win by, 59 to 41 in order to have a shot at the nomination, their candidate has to win by 18 points.” Grayson said, “so, that’s intrinsically undemocratic.”

In an email sent to his supporters on Wednesday, Grayson instructed them to go to GraysonPrimary.com to state their preference, Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton, as well as why he should vote for the person.

Grayson said he hasn’t decided when he will cut off the voting, but that it would be before Florida’s March 15th primary, and that, if the comments are persuasive enough, he won’t just vote for the candidate at the convention, he will fully endorse them as well.

“I imagine I will find people’s arguments persuasive.”

Liberal groups MoveOn.org, Democracy for America, and the Working Families Party have held similar online votes so that supporters could decide whom they should endorse, and Sanders won each handily, with 78% of MoveOn voters, 88% of Democracy for America voters, and 87% of Working Families Party voters.

Grayson dismissed the idea that he could be giving an outsized voice to a vocal minority of Democrats.

“All I’m saying is I want to let the people decide. I think that the way to win this election is to choose the candidate that has the support of the people, that, by its definition is the most electable candidate.”

“The point of this is very simple: the point is power to the people,” Grayson said, “We’re not gonna let the politburo decide this one.”

He concluded that he hoped other superdelegates would follow his lead.

“I’m hoping this will set an example for other people.”

There Are People Who Know Ted Cruz And Like Him, Documents Show

$
0
0

Cruz received glowing reviews as a law professor, documents obtained by BuzzFeed News show.

Christopher Furlong / Getty Images

Ted Cruz is not the most well-liked person in the Republican presidential race.

His Senate colleagues have been outspoken in their disdain for him, several of his Princeton classmates described him as "creepy," and Cruz himself said he might not be the guy you'd want to get a beer with.

Documents obtained by BuzzFeed News through a public records request, however, show that Cruz was universally well-received by at least one group of people: law students he taught at the University of Texas.

"Great Class. Extremely fun and I learned a lot," one student reviewer said. "This was the most useful, applicable and interesting class I've taken. Great class," said another.

"This is among the best courses I've taken in law school. The information will be invaluable," read one student's review.

Cruz also received a number of positive references for the job in 2004.

John C. Eastman, who at the time was a law professor at Chapamn University, wrote about Cruz's qualifications, including his time at Harvard, his law clerkship for Chief Justice Rehnquist, and work as the as the solicitor general of Texas.

"I have no doubt that Ted will combine these experiences into a highly educational course offering. Moreover, his outgoing personality will, I think be quite well-received by students. Congratulations on considering such a well-qualified candidate for your adjunct faculty.

Richard Garnett, who was an associate professor of law at the time and said he was a "friend and former colleague of Cruz's wrote, "I am writing to offer my unreserved and enthusiastic support for Ted's application. In my judgement, Ted would enrich the School and the experiences of its students."

Nicole Garnett, who was an associate professor of Notre Dame Law School at the time of writing the letter wrote and identified and as a "close friend" and colleague of Cruz's wrote "I've come to admire Ted as a person of the highest moral character. Your students would be lucky to have him as a teacher."


View Entire List ›

Cruz On San Bernardino iPhone Question: “Of Course We Should Unlock Their Phones”

$
0
0

Apple is refusing a court order to to help the FBI bypass a security feature on one of the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone.

Alex Wong / Getty Images

Leading presidential candidates took different stances on whether Apple should assist the FBI in unlocking one of the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone at a CNN town hall on Wednesday — with Ted Cruz answering most decisively that Apple should unlock the phone.

A judge ordered Apple on Tuesday to turn over software that would allow the FBI to get around the security features of the cell phone belonging to Syed Farook. The FBI has been unable to access the phone's encrypted data. Apple has said they will not comply with the order, citing concerns over privacy and the threat of hacking.

Cruz said that no one has the right to defy legal search warrant.

"Any time you're dealing with issues of security and civil liberties, you got to balance them both," Crus said. "And I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can protect ourselves from terrorism and also protect our civil rights."

Cruz added, "We ought to be using every tool we can to ascertain who else they might be in contact with, if there's a broader cell, so of course we should unlock their phones and find out who they're talking to, what texts they're sending, and that's a basic matter of keeping this country safe."

Avoiding a direct "yes or no" answer on what Apple should do, Rubio said the issue is complicated and that he doesn't have a "magic solution."

"I think we're going to have to figure out a way forward by working with Silicon Valley and the tech industry on this," Rubio said. "There has to be a way to deal with this issue that continues to protect the privacy of Americans but creates some process by which law enforcement and intelligence agencies could access encrypted information. I don't have a magic solution for today, it's complicated, it's a new issue that's emerged in the last couple of years."

Rubio acknowledged that creating a backdoor would create a vulnerability to hacking, and said that after the appeals process, Apple would ultimately have to comply with what the court decides.

"It's not as simple as people think it is," he said. "Now Apple is under court order. I'm sure they're going to appeal it. They need to follow whatever the court orders eventually."

Carson also did not offer a yes or no answer to the question, but said Apple would need to get over their distrust of government in the face of terror threats.

"I think that Apple, and probably a lot of other people, don't necessarily trust the government these days," Carson said. "And there's probably very good reason for people not trust the government. But we're going to have to get over that because right now we're faced with tremendous threats, and individuals, radical jihadists, that want to destroy us. And we're going to have to weigh these things, one against the other."

Carson said he believed a public-private partnership was needed to address cyber security threats.

"I believe that what we need is a public-private partnership when it comes to all of these technical things and cyber security because we're all at risk in a very significant way," Carson said. "So it's going to be a matter of people learning to trust each other, which means Apple needs to sit down with trustworthy members of the government, and that may have to wait until the next election, I don't know, but we'll see."

Earlier on Wednesday, Donald Trump said Apple should comply with the court order and open up the attacker's iPhone.

LINK: Donald Trump: Apple Should Open Up San Bernardino Shooter’s iPhone

LINK: Apple Says It Will Fight Order To Break Encryption On San Bernardino Shooter’s iPhone


View Entire List ›

Trump Dodges When Pressed On His 2000 Claim That Iraq Was Developing Nukes

$
0
0

“I didn’t know. If you would have watched you would have probably thought they did but I didn’t know.”

View Video ›

SCARBOROUGH: I need to follow-up on the 9/11 comment there because I don't know if it's the same book but we talked about it this morning on the show. In 2000, you also said that you thought that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. What happened between 2000 when you wrote that --

TRUMP: So we were told they had weapons of mass destruction --

SCARBOROUGH: Right.

TRUMP: But he didn't have weapons of mass destruction. Now, the only question is did the government know he didn't? Why did they go in -- look, Iraq did not knock down and the Iraqis did not knock down the World Trade Center --

SCARBOROUGH: Right.

TRUMP: OK? So we attacked Iraq but they didn't knock down the World Trade Center. We attacked them for a reason. They didn't knock down the World Trade Center --

SCARBOROUGH: Did you believe in 2003 in March when we went to war that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction --

TRUMP: I didn't know. If you would have watched you would have probably thought they did but I didn't know. But the government should have known and they didn't have. And we attacked a country and destabilized the entire Middle East.

"The fact is, if we practiced a principled and tough policy toward this and other outlaw states, we wouldn't be in this situation. Even when we finally decide to go after a rogue state, we often stop well short of finishing the job. Consider Iraq. After each pounding from U.S. warplanes, Iraq has dusted itself off and gone right back to work developing a nuclear arsenal," Trump wrote in his book "Six years of tough talk and U.S. fireworks in Baghdad have done little to slow Iraq's crash program to become a nuclear power. They've got missiles capable of flying nine hundred kilometers— more than enough to reach Tel Aviv. They've got enriched uranium. All they need is the material for nuclear fission to complete the job, and, according to the Rumsfeld report, we don't even know for sure if they've laid their hands on that yet. That's what our last aerial assault on Iraq in 1999 was about."

Taking Iraq mission "to its conclusion" might not be crazy Trump wrote, saying they had an incentive to attack us.

"Saddam Hussein wouldn't let UN weapons inspectors examine certain sites where that material might be stored. The result when our bombing was over? We still don't know what Iraq is up to or whether it has the material to build nuclear weapons. I'm no warmonger. But the fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don't, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us."

Trump also repeated a his new excuse for why there is a lack of evidence that he opposed the Iraq War prior to the invasion. After saying in September he could provide "25 different stories" he was against Iraq before it began, Trump, said the lack of coverage of his opposition to Iraq was because he was merely a businessman.

A detailed search by BuzzFeed News in September (and other news organization in recent days) has produced zero evidence Trump opposed the war before the March 2003 start.

Watch Trump Ding Reagan For Driving Up The Deficit

$
0
0

In the early 90s, Trump criticized Reagan while praising a Bush.

View Video ›

Donald Trump has, on several occasions this election cycle, likened himself to Ronald Reagan, invoking the conservative icon to explain away past liberal positions and casting himself as the next great conservative president.

As recently as Wednesday, Trump was presenting himself as an heir to Reagan, saying, "he wasn't a true, hardline conservative. But he was a conservative person, a conservative president. He was a great president."

As has been previously reported, Trump has not always held Reagan in such high esteem. In his book The Art of the Deal, published in 1988, the businessman wrote that Reagan "is so smooth and so effective a performer that he completely won over the American people. Only now, nearly seven years later are people beginning to question whether there's anything beneath that smile." That same year, Trump took out ads in national newspapers criticizing U.S. foreign policy under Reagan.

In a 1991 interview with Joan Rivers, Trump, while expressing confidence in President George H.W. Bush, criticized Reagan for driving up the country's deficit.

"It just amazes me, it amazes me. I think George Bush is gonna be a great president," Trump told Rivers. "I feel very strongly about it."

"When, when?" interjected Rivers. "We're sitting in the toilet. It started with Reagan and we're crushing now."

Trump responded, noting Bush had a lot to fix and citing the deficit driven up under Reagan.

"In fairness, if you look at Reagan this country went $200 billion a year behind and somebody's gonna have make up the difference and better be made up awfully quickly."

Trump also called tax policy changes passed under Reagan in 1986 a "disaster."


Donald Trump Now Has Beef With The Pope

$
0
0

What a world.

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

During a news conference Thursday held during his flight from Mexico back to the Vatican, the pope answered a question about whether Catholics should vote for Trump, saying, "A person who only think about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian."

The pope said he wouldn't advise Catholics on who to vote or not vote for, but repeated, "I say only that this man is not Christian if he said things like that. We must see if he said things in that way and in this I give the benefit of the doubt."

Trump responded, saying "if and when" ISIS attacks the Vatican, the pope would have wished he were president.

Trump continued:

For a religious leader to question a person's faith is disgraceful. I am proud to be a Christian and as president I will not allow Christianity to be consistently attacked and weakened, unlike what is happening now, with our current president. No leader, especially a religious leader, should have the right to question another man's religion or faith. They are using the pope as a pawn, and they should be ashamed of themselves for doing so, especially when so many lives are involved and when illegal immigration is so rampant.


View Entire List ›

Jeb Bush: "I'm Sure It Will Help" Rubio To Have Nikki Haley Endorsement

$
0
0

Bush says he thinks the support of the South Carolina Gov. will help his rival in the days leading up to the primary.

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Jeb Bush said on Thursday that he was surprised and disappointed that South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley endorsed Marco Rubio, adding that he thought Haley's support would give Rubio a boost in the coming days.

"She's a great person and so I'm sure it will help Marco to have a popular governor campaigning with him over these last few days. It doesn't stop me from making my case that I can be commander-in-chief from day one," Bush said, noting that he campaigned for Haley when she was running for governor and saying he thinks he "raised more money for her out of state than anybody else."

In the interview on the Hot Talk Morning Show on South Carolina radio, Bush, who was considered in the running for Haley's endorsement prior to the state's primary on Saturday, reiterated that he was surprised and disappointed in the governor's choice, describing the race as a "dead heat for 2nd place."

"I was surprised because a) we're in a dead heat for 2nd place between Ted Cruz, and myself, and Marco Rubio," the former Florida gov. said. "Nikki Haley is an extraordinary person, great governor, and normally governors like to have people with executive experience and Marco Rubio is a gifted politician but he has nothing in his experience that would suggest that he could make a tough decision. He might be able to, but there is nothing in his past that would suggest it, whereas governors as you know have to make tough decisions each and every day."

Bush continued, "So we're moving on, we're fighting on, I was disappointed that she made this choice because she's a very competent and capable leader."

Jeff Sessions: Obama Guilty Of "Utter Hypocrisy" On Supreme Court Nomination

$
0
0

“I don’t want to hear any crocodile tears from Barack Obama, and Chuck Schumer, and Patrick Leahy,” said Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions. “This is a big deal with me. And we’re not moving this nomination.”

T.j. Kirkpatrick / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions said on Wednesday that President Obama was guilty of "utter hypocrisy" for joining in the filibuster of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's confirmation in 2006 but objecting to Republican plans to block his nominee this year.

"He voted to block one of the great justices on the court, not to give him an up or down vote in the United States Senate," Sessions said on the Matt Murphy Show on Alabama radio. "This is utter hypocrisy."

Sessions sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which would conduct hearings for anybody nominated by Obama to replace Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said on Wednesday that the president now "regrets" his approach to Alito as a senator.

Though Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chair of the Judiciary Committee, has said he would wait for the nomination before deciding whether to hold hearings, Sessions argued in the radio interview that it would be "perfectly within the history of the court and the Senate that we not bring up a nominee at all."

"It's perfectly within the history of the court and the Senate that we not bring up a nominee at all, so they shouldn't be brought up," he said. "That's what the Democrats would do, I guarantee you. That's exactly what they would do and that's what we should do."

He noted in the interview that Democrats were first to use the filibusters "systematically" to block judicial appointments.

"Some people say the Republicans are as bad as the Democrats, but in truth I've been there for 19 years, I've seen this, they started the politicalization of the court," he said. "We've used filibusters since they used them systematically."

Sessions said that he didn't want "crocodile tears" from the president or other Senate Democrats over Republican plans to block confirmation of Obama's nominee.

"I don't want to hear any crocodile tears from Barack Obama, and Chuck Schumer and Patrick Leahy," he said. "This is a big deal with me. And we're not moving this nomination. And it's going to be decided by the next election."

Mark Sanford Says "The Handwriting's On The Wall" For Jeb Bush

$
0
0

“If it hadn’t happened by now, I can’t imagine it happening, but we’ll see.”

Pool / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Rep. Mark Sanford, a Republican from South Carolina, says the writing is on the wall for Jeb Bush.

Asked on Wednesday by South Carolina radio host Jay Harper if he was surprised Bush wasn't doing better, Sanford said, "It does, simply because the Bush family in general has a lot of history in this state, it's liked."

"I've not endorsed him," he continued. "I'm spectating in this particular election. It's interesting again, as a political phenomenon, to see somebody with all that money, all that organization, all those things supposedly going for him, he just hasn't broken through. And I don't believe he will. I believe the handwriting's on the wall. If it hadn't happened by now, I can't imagine it happening, but we'll see."

In South Carolina, Bush Fans And Undecided Voters Worry About Jeb's Electability

$
0
0

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Jeb Bush brought his brother to South Carolina and took off his glasses. He wants voters here to reset the race for the Republican nomination, and politely asks them them to do so — along with their prayers — at every campaign event.

But Bush hasn’t really reset his pitch to voters, and those voters — his supporters and undecideds considering him — have begun openly talking about a specific concern with Bush just days before the make-or-break primary: electability.

As the numbers pile up — a sixth-place finish in Iowa, fourth-place finish in New Hampshire, WSJ/NBC polling put him at 4% nationally, CNN has him polling at just 1% in Nevada — Bush’s message remains the same. At a campaign stop on Wednesday, voters went as far as to give him advice on how he could change it up, but that only flustered the governor more.

Rejecting any talk that his campaign was running out of money ahead of the primary, Bush stayed on script at a town hall Thursday, as his campaign manager insisted to reporters they were in it for the long haul.

Addressing voters fewer than 48 hours before polls open, Bush, again, went back eight years to talk about his record as governor of Florida as he makes the case that in this chaotic GOP primary, he’s a conservative leader with “servant’s heart” and a “steady hand.”

On the stump with his brother former President George W. Bush in North Charleston and in town halls at barbecue joints, a convention center here and under bright lights on a stage in Aiken, Bush repeatedly points to national security experts who have endorsed his campaign — including South Carolina’s own Sen. Lindsey Graham, who has been introducing him at events (“I like the Bushes. Bush values are South Carolina values,” Graham likes to point out).

Bush usually then goes on to call for a unified, “unhyphenated” America and explains how as governor, he improved the economy in Florida, dealt with several hurricanes in a 16-month period, and used the line-item veto to cut spending.

“I didn’t just talk the talk. I walked the walk,” he usually says of his conservative record.

“I’m a conservative that’s done it. Everyone else on the stage has talked about it."

And then somewhere along the way, Bush hits two of his opponents in the primary: Donald Trump and Marco Rubio. The contrasts and attacks continue to hinge on Trump’s “weakness” and rejection of conservative principles, and Rubio’s inexperience — an argument that did not convince Gov. Nikki Haley, who endorsed the Florida senator on Wednesday evening. As Bush continues to struggle, his attacks on Trump and Rubio have become more aggressive.

Overall, it’s a pitch that resonates with voters in the room — even supporters of other candidates say Bush has experience and a real record. But it fails to dispel the concerns about whether he can actually win now hanging over Bush’s events, even among his own supporters, based on interviews with more than two dozen attendees.

At a forum in Aiken on Tuesday evening, an undecided voter, Katherine Wright, 58, said she took Bush off her list because of concerns about “if he can actually succeed in the election.”

"He’s just been too slow coming out the gate,” she elaborated. "Too nice. He needs to be more aggressive. I know he’s kind, but we need someone who is strong, as well."

Chris Page, a 39-year-old general contractor, who heard Bush at the same event said he has always been fond of the Bush family — but he is currently leaning toward Trump. "His record in Florida was good. He’s a Bush. I love George W. Bush. But I don’t think Jeb has the charisma like (his father and brother) do.”

"He just doesn't come across as a leader in command of the situation," said John Montague, 73, another undecided voter at a Bush town hall in Columbia Thursday morning, who is still considering the governor. "I don't know if I want to support someone who is at the bottom of the pack."

Lowering her voice at the town hall at Shealy's BBQ, Sheryl March, a teacher from neighboring Augusta, Ga. said: "I’m afraid Jeb might not make it." Marsh wants to vote for Bush during her state’s March 1 primary but is unsure her favorite candidate will make it past South Carolina.

While Bush’s backers are still trying to stay optimistic about South Carolina, one Bush bundler said Wednesday that donors are waiting for the outcome in the state, where the campaign brought in "the big guns" and spent a lot of resources, before putting pressure on Bush to drop out.

"If he underperforms badly in South Carolina, a lot of people are going to talk to him and basically say, 'Look, you are serving guacamole when the people want salsa.'"

The bundler said Bush needs to either win the establishment lane or be within a few percentage points to ease donor concerns for a little bit longer. "There isn't a sense of anger at Jeb or the campaign," he said of donors. "But if the electorate is in the mood for something different, then there's nothing we can do about it."

John Massie, 72-year-old, retired, undecided voter also brought up electability after hearing Bush in Aiken. "I think Gov. Bush is a good candidate, but I don’t think he’s electable because of his last name. I think we need to choose someone who can win. I think he’s unfortunately dug himself a in a hole that he can’t get out of. His only hope is a brokered convention, and all bets are off then anyway."

Another undecided voter, Kevin Reeley, explained he’s considering Cruz and Rubio, but when asked about Bush, like most others at these events, he had nothing negative to say — just that he didn’t think Bush had a shot at the nomination.

"I’m secretly hoping he’s going to surge to tell you the truth,” he said after a pause.

It’s hard to describe the reasoning against Bush, said Michael Hertzberg, another retired Aiken resident who is undecided and heard Bush make his pitch Tuesday evening.

The best Hertzberg could come with to explain: "I just don’t think he’s got the stuff, you know, to be president."

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images