Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Virginia School Board To Seek Supreme Court Review In Trans Student's Case

$
0
0

Win Mcnamee / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A case challenging the Obama administration's interpretation of existing civil rights laws as providing protections from discrimination for transgender people will be headed to the Supreme Court this summer.

Because the court is soon recessing for the summer, however, the earliest the court could hear the case — if it decides to take it up — would be sometime late this year or early 2017.

The Virginia school board that passed a policy restricting students to restrooms reflecting their "biological gender" announced in a filing on Tuesday that it will be asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a case brought against the policy by a transgender student.

Gavin Grimm sued the Gloucester County School Board over the policy, backed by lawyers from the ACLU, claiming, among other arguments, that the policy violates Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The Obama administration has told school districts repeatedly that Title IX's sex discrimination protections include protections against anti-transgender discrimination. At the appeals court level, the Justice Department weighed in on Grimm's behalf.

In mid-April, a three-judge panel of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a 2-1 decision that "the [Education] Department’s interpretation of its own regulation ... as it relates to restroom access by transgender individuals, is entitled to … deference and is to be accorded controlling weight in this case." The 4th Circuit announced in late May that it would not be reviewing its earlier ruling.

On Tuesday, lawyers for the school board wrote in a filing at the 4th Circuit, "The School Board intends to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court within ninety (90) days of this Court’s entry of judgment."

As such, the lawyers are asking the appeals court to put its ruling on hold while the petition to the Supreme Court is pending. A stay would keep the case on hold — and the Gloucester County School Board's policy in place — while the Supreme Court decides whether to hear the case.

The filing notes that the ACLU opposes the stay request and will be filing a response to the request.

After the response is submitted, the 4th Circuit will issue a ruling on the stay request. The court has, in accordance with its rules, issued a temporary stay of the mandate pending a ruling on the stay request. If denied, the school board likely would ask the Supreme Court to grant a stay pending its decision on whether to grant certiorari.

Because of the timing of when the filing will be coming in, the earliest the justices will consider whether to hear the case would be in late September in advance of the start of the court's next term — and after the start of the next school year.

Meanwhile, several other cases addressing similar questions are pending in other federal courts. Five lawsuits relating to North Carolina's HB 2 are pending in various federal courts in the state, and Texas, joined by 10 other states, filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration over its Title IX and other policies interpreting existing civil rights laws as providing protections for transgender people.

Read the filing:



Susan Collins: "Very Difficult" To Back Trump After His Attack On Federal Judge

$
0
0

“The comments like the comments Trump made about the judge make it very difficult for me. It makes the decision a hard one.”

Astrid Riecken / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who has said previously she suspected she'd back Donald Trump as the Republican nominee, now says Trump's attack on the ethnicity of a federal judge makes it difficult to ultimately get behind him.

"I was watching Donald Trump on one of the Sunday shows, and I heard him say that this judge, because of his ethnic heritage, couldn't possibly rule fairly on the case. And then he doubled down on the remark in response to a question and said that would apply to a Muslim judge as well," Collins told News Radio WGAN. "Those kinds of comments are very serious to me. They are completely unacceptable, and what they indicate — which is why I think this is so serious — is a lack of respect for our judicial system and for the separation of powers doctrine that is enshrined in the Constitution."

"So, in my view, these latest comments are of a different magnitude from the terrible and gratuitous insults that Trump has offered up before because they speak to his view of our government," she continued. "The three branches of a government and a complete lack of respect for judges."

Collins said she will continue to withhold her endorsement of Trump in hopes that he will change his demeanor.

"The comments like the comments Trump made about the judge make it very difficult for me. It makes the decision a hard one," Collins said.

"This is discouraging because it is so serious in what it says about his worldview," she added. "Now there have been many other issues where I've disagreed with Donald Trump, but this speaks to how he would approach the separation of powers doctrine if he were president and that's an issue that I care deeply about."

Paul Ryan: I Don't Think Trump's A Racist In His Heart

$
0
0

“I’m not saying what’s in his heart because I don’t know what’s in his heart and I don’t think he feels that in his heart.”

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Paul Ryan on Tuesday expanded on his remark that Donald Trump's attack on a federal judge was the "textbook definition" of racist, saying in a radio interview that he didn't believe that Trump was racist "in his heart."

In an interview on Fox News Radio's Kilmeade and Friends, the speaker of the House said that he didn't mean to say that Trump was a racist.

"I'm saying that comment was," Ryan said. "I don't know what's in his heart. I can't speak to that whatsoever. What I'm saying is to suggest that a person's race disqualifies them to do their job is textbook. That's what I'm saying. I'm not saying what's in his heart because I don't know what's in his heart and I don't think he feels that in his heart. But I don't think it is wise or justifiable to suggest that a person should be disqualified from their job because of their ethnicity."

Asked by host Brian Kilmeade if he would have re-thought his endorsement of Trump last week had the presumptive Republican nominee made the comments earlier, Ryan said there was no point in re-visiting the decision.

"Well, I won't get into — there's no point of looking back into the past," Ryan said. "Hindsight's a 20/20 thing. I do believe that if the alternative is Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, I know for certain that Hillary Clinton is not going to work with us on this agenda. I know for certain that Hillary Clinton is promising four more years like the Obama years and that is the wrong path for this country. And I do know for certain, from my lengthy conversations with Donald Trump that this agenda, these ideas, these principles have such a better chance of making into law — I do know that he is going to work with us to take these principles and these policies and make them law. And I know for certain that Hillary Clinton will not do that."

Senate Republicans Now Either Pleading With Trump To Behave Or Giving Up

$
0
0

Alex Wong / Getty Images


WASHINGTON — Top Republicans' hopes for Donald Trump to change his rhetoric and act more presidential are slowly fading.

Senate Republicans have been pushing — and basically publicly pleading with — Trump to focus more on issues rather than personal attacks. Now they're losing patience after the party's standard bearer doubled down on his criticism of a judge presiding over cases against Trump University because of his "Mexican heritage."

"Let's face it — 'meet the new Trump' is a lot like the old Trump," Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, who has said he won't vote for either Trump or Hillary Clinton, told reporters Tuesday afternoon in the Senate basement. "For those of us who had hoped we'd see the 2.0 version, I think the realization is coming that we got what we got. That's not somebody who can win the White House."

Flake went on to say that some Republicans, especially those in tough re-election races, may rescind their support in the wake of these comments, which House Speaker Paul Ryan on Tuesday called the "textbook definition of racism."

"Republicans want to win the White House," Flake said. "But obviously people are concerned about their own races."

South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham who is now calling on Republicans to un-endorse Trump said the party's presumptive nominee "has poured gasoline on every problem" the party had in the 2012 election. "I can understand not breaking now," he told reporters, "but if he continues this after everybody is literally begging him not to do this, then it really puts us in a spot about 2016 versus the future of the party."

Graham recently spoke on the phone with Trump, who had been trying to make inroads with Hill Republicans. When asked if it was still worth Republicans pushing Trump to be more presidential, he said: "I have no idea."

Illinois Sen. Mark Kirk became the first to un-endorse Trump on Tuesday, but for now, most vulnerable GOP incumbents are sticking to saying they will support the nominee. Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson and New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte did call on Trump to retract his comments. "It's wrong and offensive, and he should retract it," Ayotte said as she sprinted past reporters who pressed her on Trump-related questions.

Ayotte did not answer when asked if she would still vote for him if he didn't retract his comments.

Worried about losing control of the Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in a press conference Tuesday afternoon — during which he was repeatedly asked about Trump — that his advice to the billionaire continues to be to talk about the issues. "Get on message," he said. "He has an opportunity to that. This election is still winnable."

What exactly that message is remains somewhat unclear.

And despite everything, South Dakota Sen. John Thune said there continues to be an idea that Trump will position himself for the general election. "I think there's an expectation that he's going to change his tone. If he doesn't, then this is going to be an ongoing problem for him. It will make the hill to climb for him much steeper."

Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker, whose name has come up as a potential vice presidential pick and who has met with Trump, said the party's presumptive nominee has shown "glimmers" of changing direction but then reverted to his old ways. He has only a few weeks before the convention to convince the party that he can be a general election candidate, Corker said, adding that Trump really "stepped in it" with his latest comments.

"I think he's got a period of time where he can assess and understand the incredible opportunity before him and change direction," he said. "If not, as we start moving close to the convention, it's very problematic."

"The primary process is over. Candidates that really want to lead a unified nation have to pivot in a very different direction."

Clinton Campaign Hires Black Veteran As Deputy Foreign Policy Adviser

$
0
0

Mike Blake / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton has hired Bishop Garrison, a former Defense Department and Homeland Security official, as deputy foreign policy adviser, a campaign aide told BuzzFeed News.

Garrison, an Obama 2012 veteran, will report to the campaign's foreign policy adviser Laura Rosenberger, a former high-ranking State Department official.

Garrison comes to the Clinton campaign from Homeland Security, where he was executive director of the Science and Technology Advisory Committee.

Via LinkedIn

Clinton has amassed a large foreign policy team for her presidential campaign. The campaign says Garrison's hire underlines both its commitment to national security and to diversity.

"He'll help coordinate our broad outreach on these issues, in addition to advising on full range of national security issues, with emphasis on defense, [veterans] and homeland security," a Clinton aide said.

In 2012, Garrison worked on veterans outreach on the Obama campaign in Virginia. He is the recipient of a pair of Bronze Stars for two tours of duty in Iraq.

Chuck Grassley: "I Disagree" With Trump's Attack On Federal Judge

$
0
0

“[Y]ou can’t have a religious or ethnic test to be a judge in America.”

Aaron Bernstein / Reuters

w.soundcloud.com

Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said on Tuesday that he disagrees with Donald Trump's attack on a federal judge's heritage.

Trump has said that federal judge Gonzalo Curiel, who is overseeing the civil fraud case against Trump University, could not be impartial in his case because of his "Mexican heritage."

"Well, I surely disagree with Mr. Trump on that point, and you can't have a religious or ethnic test to be a judge in America," Grassley said on Iowa News/Talk 1540 KXEL. "You to have to take the usual motions — well, let me start over. Every person's entitled to a person they think will be a fair judge, to give impartial justice. But if you think you don't have such a person, there are plenty of motions that you can make before the court to get a new judge or to change things. If that particular judge would disagree with you, you've got a right to appeal."

Grassley noted that he supported Curiel's nomination to the bench.

"I think it should be noted that I supported this judge, Curiel, I think his name is, both in committee, on the Senate floor, maybe that goes back five, six, seven years," Grassley said. "I can only tell what I would do, and I wouldn't say what Trump said and obviously, I just told you, I disagree with it. Although, I'm not informed of the facts of the case. But, just normally, if you think you can't get a fair trial, or a judge has bias, then you go through the process of motions, to get the judge removed."

Reagan’s Son: The Whole Family Is Insulted By Those Comparing Trump To My Father

$
0
0

“If my father were anything like Donald Trump, Nancy never would have married him, let alone vote for him.”

youtube.com

The son of late former President Ronald Reagan, Michael Reagan, says the entire Reagan family is insulted anytime Donald Trump is compared to his father.

"Oh absolutely. Absolutely insulted by people who compare my father to Donald Trump," Reagan told NewsMaxTV's The Hardline on Tuesday evening. "His grandchildren are, in fact, insulted that they would compare Donald Trump to their grandfather. The whole Reagan family is insulted by it. Donald Trump is no Ronald Reagan. I knew Ronald Reagan, he was a friend of mine, and Donald you're no Donald Trump — no Ronald Reagan."

"If my father were anything like Donald Trump, Nancy never would have married him, let alone vote for him."

Reagan added he didn't vote for Trump and his father wouldn't have voted for Trump.

"As a Reagan, I'm not gonna support someone who is so demeaning," he said.

Hearings In Trump University Cases Scheduled For Day After GOP Convention

$
0
0

John Moore / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — On the day after Donald Trump is expected to accept the Republican Party's presidential nomination, U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel is set to hold hearings in the two class-action lawsuits alleging that Donald Trump and Trump University committed consumer fraud and other corrupt practices.

Curiel — whose ability to be unbiased Trump has questioned because of the judge's "Mexican heritage" and membership in a Latino bar association — is holding a pair of hearings in the cases scheduled for the week of the Republican National Convention.

On July 22, Curiel is scheduled to be holding a hearing over several motions brought by Trump's lawyers in the case accusing him personally of having violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO. Specifically, the Cohen v. Trump lawsuit alleges that Trump "committed or aided and abetted the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity" — mail fraud and wire fraud — in conjunction with his creation of Trump University.

Among the motions from Trump's lawyers to be considered on that day — which was set in April for July 18 but later moved in May by Curiel to July 22 — is one seeking summary judgment in the case — a ruling that would mean there are no relevant facts in dispute and that the law requires a ruling in Trump's favor.

Trump's lawyers, from O'Melveny & Myers, argue that the case seeks "an unprecedented expansion of RICO law" and that, in any event, Trump "did not manage the operations of" Trump University so "therefore did not and could not have knowingly participated in a scheme to defraud."

Additionally, Trump's lawyers are asking Curiel to decertify the class-action status that the judge previously granted in the case. Also to be considered that day are several motions relating to pretrial issues, including requests to exclude certain witnesses and testimony at trial and to file documents under seal — meaning they would not be accessible to the public.

The final pretrial conference in the Cohen case is scheduled for Aug. 24.

In a Tuesday order, Curiel announced he also would hold a second hearing on July 22 — this one in the other case, the case alleging false advertising and violations of other California consumer protection laws, as well as those of New York and Florida. Trump and Trump University's lawyers asked the court on June 3 to permit them to renew a previous request in the case that the judge decertify the class. The hearing in Low v. Trump University is set to follow a briefing scheduled also set in Tuesday's order and will concern whether to allow Trump University to renew that motion.

After having first raised questions about Curiel's background and potential bias in February and ramped up those attacks in recent weeks, Trump said in a statement released on Tuesday afternoon that he will have nothing more to say about the pending lawsuits against Trump University. Nonetheless, he discussed the judge and case on Fox News on Thursday night.


The order in the Cohen case:

The order in the Cohen case:

The changed hearing date notice in the Cohen case:

The changed hearing date notice in the Cohen case:

The order in the Low case:

The order in the Low case:


Clinton Embraces History

$
0
0

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

BROOKLYN, New York — Women here had tears in their eyes as Hillary Clinton, eight years to the day after falling just short of “that highest, hardest glass ceiling,” finally made history, becoming the first woman to claim to a major political party’s nomination for president of the United States.

“Tonight’s victory is not about one person; it belongs to generations of women and men who struggled and sacrificed and made this moment possible,” Clinton said onstage at Brooklyn’s Duggal Greenhouse, where the venue’s glass ceiling set the backdrop for a sweeping victory speech late Tuesday.

“Tonight belongs to all of you.”

A crowd of 3,600 filled the hall, wrapped around the press risers, and spilled out into the outdoor patio in Brooklyn’s Navy Yard. Clinton, smiling wide, seemed in awe of the scene as she took the stage, raising both arms in the air. Signs popped up from the crowd. “Caution: Shattered Glass,” one read. Another simply spelled, “H-I-S-T-O-R-Y.”

The 18-minute speech, an optimistic call for a “big-hearted, fair-minded” country, positioned Tuesday’s benchmark as the next step forward in the long-fought women’s rights movement, starting with Seneca Falls in 1848, she said, “when a small but determined group of women and men came together with the idea that women deserved equal rights.”

The message then, and now: “Don’t let anyone tell you that great things can’t happen in America,” Clinton said, speaking softly and slowly into the microphone. “Barriers can come down. Justice and equality can win. Our history has moved in that direction, slowly at times, but unmistakably. Thanks to generations of Americans who refuse to give up or back down.”

The speech marked a milestone for a candidate who hasn’t always embraced the symbolic mantle that’s defined much of her career in politics.

Still, Clinton’s gender has always shaped, defined, and complicated her life in public service — from the '70s, when she drew criticism for declining to take her husband’s last name; to the 1992 presidential race, when she dismissed the thought of staying home to bake “cookies” and make “tea”; to the 2008 election, when, at the advice of her campaign advisers, she downplayed her potential to make history as the first woman president.

Only in her concession speech, delivered on June 7, 2008, at the National Building Museum in Washington, did Clinton acknowledge the full significance her candidacy carried for the country’s women and girls.

Eight years later, calling back to that speech, Clinton did not hesitate to speak in historic terms about her candidacy. “You are writing a new chapter of that story,” she told her supporters. “This campaign is about making sure there are no ceilings, no limits on any of us, and this is our moment to come together.”

She framed the general election against Donald Trump as one that goes beyond traditional partisan terms — or even normal elections. This race, she said, is "really is about who we are as a nation. It’s about millions of Americans coming together to say, We are better than this. We won’t let this happen in America."

When rebutting Trump's famous slogan — "Make America Great Again" — Clinton has often argued that America is already great. On Tuesday, she told supporters instead that what Trump really means is "Let’s take America backwards," to a time when "opportunity and dignity were reserved for some, not all," including economic promises she said he can't deliver.

Addressing people she's met over the past year, Clinton said she'd learned about the "persistent problems and the unfinished promise of America" for many.

"So many of you feel that you are out there on your own, that no one has your back," she said. "Well, I do. I hear you. I see you. And as your president, I will always have your back."

Ahead of Tuesday’s primaries, Clinton officials said they had secured more than 13 million votes, a popular vote lead of more than 3 million, along with 1,809 pledged delegates.

Early Wednesday morning, Clinton was declared the winner of California, beating Bernie Sanders 56 to 43, and adding to a lead of 289 pledged delegates — already three times
larger, aides noted, than Barack Obama’s lead of 106 when he clinched the nomination in 2008.

The Associated Press called the race on Monday, a day earlier than anticipated, marking the end of a long and bitter Democratic primary that, at points, has felt like a slog to participants, marred by the controversy over Clinton’s personal email server, her dropping favorability numbers, and a tighter-than-expected race against Sanders.

In her speech Tuesday, Clinton congratulated Sanders for his “extraordinary campaign” and praised his commitment to “progressive causes and principles,” prompting cheers from the hall. “He’s excited millions of voters, especially young people,” Clinton said, acknowledging one of her weakest points in competing against the Vermont senator this year.

“Let there be no mistake,” she added. “Sen. Sanders, his campaign, and the vigorous debate that we’ve had about how to raise incomes, reduce inequality, increase upward mobility, have been very good for the Democratic Party and for America.”

After 14 months — with 419 rallies, roundtables, and town halls in 42 states and territories — the weight of the moment started to hit staff and supporters over the weekend, as Clinton and her husband finished a five-day swing through California, logging roughly 40 combined rallies and retail stops.

“We have done this for 14 months: rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat,” said Nick Merrill, a campaign spokesman who has traveled alongside Clinton to nearly every one of her campaign events. “While we all intellectually understood that winning the nomination would be a big deal, I think the history of it is setting in among the staff and the candidate.”

“It’s a really, really big deal — and we’re going to treat it as such,” Merrill said.

During her first run for president, under the counsel of many of her advisers, Clinton approached her status as the potential first woman president almost like a liability, particularly with white male voters, a key slice of the electorate in the fight against Obama.

In a study, two university researchers tracked Clinton’s speeches, ads, and campaign literature, looking for mentions of the historic nature of her campaign. The professors, Melody Rose of Portland State University and Regina Lawrence of Louisiana State University, concluded that Clinton had taken a “gender neutral” approach.

Patti Solis Doyle, a longtime adviser who served as campaign manager in 2008, described Clinton as torn over the issue: “It was a battle between heart and mind for her. Her heart was saying, ‘This is a big deal.’ She knew it, we knew it, women on the campaign knew it, women across the country knew it. But her mind — the polling, the data, the strategists — was telling her not to. It was a real battle for her.”

Eight years later, Clinton has been far more willing to talk up her potential to make history. Last summer, she starting using a regular stump line from 2008 — “I’m not asking people to vote for me because I’m a woman” — but this time with a new addendum: “I’m asking people to vote for me on the merits. And I think one of the merits is, I am a woman.”

Last summer, after using the line at a town hall in New Hampshire, Clinton acknowledged the small but significant shift. “I think the country is more ready today to think about what it would mean to have a woman as president and commander-in-chief,” she told reporters. “The public acceptance and even interest in embracing that potential has become obvious to everyone. So I want to be explicit about it.

“I want to entertain questions about it, and I want to inspire not just young girls and women, but young boys and men as well, to think about making history again.”

On Tuesday, in the final lines of her speech here, Clinton came back to her own family history, recalling the story of her late mother, Dorothy Rodham, who was abandoned as a child but ”somehow managed not to become bitter or broken."

It’s because of Rodham, Clinton often tells voters, that she decided to undergo a second presidential campaign.

This past Saturday, June 4, would have been Rodham's 97th birthday. “On the very day my mother was born in Chicago, Congress was passing the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. That amendment finally gave women the right to vote,” Clinton said as the greenhouse filled with the sound of cheers.

“I really wish she could be here tonight. I wish she could see what a wonderful mother Chelsea has become and could meet our beautiful granddaughter, Charlotte.

“And, of course,” she said, “I wish she could see her daughter become the Democratic Party’s nominee.”

Jeff Flake: There Is "Fear And Loathing" Of Trump Among My GOP Senate Colleagues

$
0
0

“There’s some resignation and some mixture of fear and loathing to think about what the next couple months will bring given the statements that he has made.”

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona says there is "some mixture of fear and loathing" of Donald Trump among his Senate colleagues.

Flake, who has said he will not vote for his party's presumptive nominee, criticized Trump for appealing to what he called white "identity politics."

"Donald Trump did not receive a lot of — well, I guess there was one endorsement from the Senate prior to his claiming the nomination or being the presumptive nominee, just one," Flake said on KTAR's Bruce St. James and Pamela Hughes on Tuesday. "It's not as if a lot of senators were clamoring to support him during the process. In fact, many had supported one of the other candidates or hadn't supported any at all. So, there's not a lot of enthusiasm. There's some resignation and some mixture of fear and loathing to think about what the next couple months will bring given the statements that he has made."

"Some of this, let's face it, you can do it in the primary and you can get some support for some extreme statements," continued Flake. "Translating that into a general election victory is difficult."

Flake remarked that Trump's racial appeals went against the Republican Party's history.

"To have somebody from the party of Lincoln play with the identity politics that he's been playing with, basically saying that if you are descendant of Mexican heritage that you're disqualified to sit in judgement with someone who might disagree with your positions. It's just wrong. It's just wrong."

Rep. Duncan Hunter Compares Judge Curiel To An Iraqi-American Judging Chris Kyle

$
0
0

“Here you have Chris Kyle, who’s killed a whole bunch of bad guys in Iraq. Would that be a fair trial for Chris Kyle? If you had that judge there? Probably not.”

Win Mcnamee / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter on Tuesday likened the federal judge overseeing the civil fraud case against Trump University to an Iraqi-American presiding over a case involving "American Sniper" Chris Kyle.

The California lawmaker told Sean Hannity on his radio program that he thought it was a mistake for Trump to bring up Judge Gonzalo Curiel's "Mexican heritage," arguing that Trump should keep his business matters separate from his presidential campaign. Hunter said it was "bigger deal" that the law firm in the class action case paid the Clintons to give a speech in 2009. Still, Hunter decided to try out a thought experiment.

"What I like to do is take these arguments out to their logical extremes," Hunter said on Sean Hannity's radio program. "So let's say that Chris Kyle, the American sniper, is still alive and he was on trial for something, and his judge was a Muslim-American of Iraqi descent. Here you have Chris Kyle, who's killed a whole bunch of bad guys in Iraq. Would that be a fair trial for Chris Kyle? If you had that judge there? Probably not. And Chris Kyle could probably say, 'This guy's not gonna like me.'"

"You could look at the O.J. trial too — was that fair?" asked Hunter.

Hunter said he supports Trump, even though he doesn't agree with everything he says.

Ed Rendell: Warren Is Not Ready To Be Commander-In-Chief, Shouldn't Be VP

$
0
0

“I think Elizabeth Warren is a wonderful, bright, passionate person, but with no experience in foreign affairs and not in any way, shape, or form ready to be commander-in-chief.”

Robin Marchant / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said on Wednesday that Hillary Clinton should not pick Sen. Elizabeth Warren as her running mate, citing Warren's lack of foreign policy experience.

I know Secretary Clinton pretty well," Rendell said on 1210 WPHT Philadelphia radio. "I'm not an insider in the campaign but I know her pretty well. I think she will not pick somebody that she feels in her heart isn't ready to be president or commander-in-chief and I think Elizabeth Warren is a wonderful, bright, passionate person, but with no experience in foreign affairs and not in any way, shape, or form ready to be commander-in-chief."

Rendell, the chairman of the Philadelphia Host Committee for the Democratic National Convention, later called the station back to clarify that he didn't mean to single Warren out.

"I didn't want it to leave it hanging out there about Elizabeth Warren," he said. "Elizabeth Warren's problem would be the same problem I'd have. Let's assume someone said consider Governor Rendell for vice president. I have no experience militarily, no experience in foreign affairs, and would be a difficult choice because if anything happened in week one and I became president, I would be lost."

In his first appearance on the show, Rendell offered his advice to Bernie Sanders in the wake of Hillary Clinton clinching the Democratic presidential nomination. Sanders' goals, Rendell said, would be best served by dropping out and endorsing the presumptive nominee.

"If Bernie wants to speak on prime time, he would have to suspend his campaign before we get to Philadelphia and I think that's likely what he's going to do," Rendell said.

Rendell continued, "The danger of having his name placed in nomination and fighting to the bitter end, the danger is that could embitter some of his own supporters as opposed to Bernie standing up next week and saying, 'Look, we fought hard, we did amazing things, we went from 1% in the polls to almost winning, we've accomplished a lot, we've got a lot of roads to go down together, I'm gonna keep my PAC in operation supporting progressive candidates, but right now the person who's most likely to get the type of action that we wanted to see is Secretary Clinton.'"

Rendell suggested that Sanders tell his supporters, "'Get over your disappointment. Get out there and vote for Secretary Clinton.' He can do that and he can do it very credibly."

w.soundcloud.com


View Entire List ›

Never-Trump Republicans Start To Make Last-Ditch Plans For Cleveland

$
0
0

John Moore / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — First, anti-Trump Republicans thought they could beat Donald Trump outright in the primary.

Then, they thought they could hold him under the required threshold number of delegates and beat him in a floor fight at the convention.

After that went out the window, some of the most ardent Trump opponents floated the idea of a third-party conservative option. But the only person who seemed like he really might do it, National Review writer David French, bowed out before it could become a reality. It seemed as though the never-Trump crowd was finally out of options.

However, this week, there has been renewed talk of stopping Trump at the convention — but it's a very, very tall order.

"Everyone is looking at options available right now," said one anti-Trump Republican strategist. "The momentum seems to be on the side of fixing this in Cleveland. The last 3 days has been active, based on the past 3 weeks of what it's like for him to be presumptive nominee."

One of the principal ideas being discussed would be to find a way to make delegates free to vote for whomever they choose. The RNC's Rules Committee, which has 112 members, meets before the convention starts, and they could in theory hold a vote to unbind the delegates.

"The RNC Rules Committee should amend the rules to allow each delegate to make an objection of conscience to Trump on the first ballot," Tim Miller, former Jeb Bush spokesman and adviser to the anti-Trump Our Principles PAC, tweeted on Tuesday.

"I definitely think the conversation is resurfacing," Miller said in an email. "The change needed would be, while obviously extremely significant, simple to accomplish. The Rules Committee would need to only add a single line giving the delegates some kind of freedom."

Even conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt, who remained neutral throughout the primary, blasted Trump on his radio show on Wednesday and called for the party to find a way to stop his nomination in Cleveland.

Trump's disastrous past week, in which his racist comments about the judge in the Trump University case have intensified the Republican civil war over his nomination, seems to have re-energized the discussion of whether there is a way to stop him from becoming the nominee, including possible rules changes at the convention.

Some are arguing this wouldn't even require a rules change. Former Iowa Republican Party chairman A.J. Spiker forwarded BuzzFeed News a link to Unbound, a book by North Dakota rules committee member Curly Haugland that posits that delegates are not in fact bound on the first ballot.

"There’s a long history in the Republican Party of delegates voting their conscience," Spiker said. "There is a path for the party to go in a different direction than Trump. The delegates are the ultimate authority of the Republican Party." Spiker tweeted on Tuesday that "the Republican Party needs a patriot to step forward, challenge Trump, work delegates and win the GOP nomination for president in Cleveland." On Wednesday, he told BuzzFeed News he thought he most viable scenario would be a former candidate who has suspended their campaign un-suspending. Technically, candidates can un-suspend their campaigns after suspending them and re-enter the race. The former candidate who has the most delegates behind Trump is Ted Cruz.

"I would say if you have a candidate or two candidates who step forward, Donald Trump will not be the nominee," Spiker said.

(Spiker also proposed another route, which is delegates abstaining.)

In a post on Medium on Wednesday, Never Trump PAC strategist Rory Cooper wrote that there needs to be a "mechanism" by which delegates can vote for an alternative.

"The Rules Committee have it within their power to install a mechanism whereas if a potential nominee crosses a line or embarrasses the party to an extraordinary degree, delegates can vote for an alternative candidate," Cooper wrote. "Many in the party believe Trump has already crossed that Rubicon."

It isn't clear yet whether there could be real momentum behind this idea or whether it will turn out, like the David French moment, to be dead on arrival.

"The method to do it is very clear, it’s just changing some rules at the Rules Committee," said Doug Heye, a former spokesman for Eric Cantor and longtime Republican operative who opposes Trump. "But that doesn’t mean that it’s an easy thing to do mechanically or for what he party would have to go through."

And making an eleventh-hour move to take the nomination away from Trump could throw what will already be a tense convention into chaos, and permanently alienate Trump's supporters, Heye argued.

Trump "won fair and square, and that can’t be denied," Heye said. "Can the nomination that he’s earned be denied him, and what would the repercussions be for doing so?"

Donald Trump Calls CNN Chief Jeff Zucker His "Personal Booker," Says Joe Scarborough

$
0
0

Scott Morgan / Reuters

CNN President Jeff Zucker and Donald Trump are so close, according to MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, that Zucker personally handles Trump's appearances on the cable network.

Scarborough revealed to Politico's Glenn Thrush that Trump calls Zucker, with whom he has a longstanding relationship with dating back to Zucker's days as a NBC executive, his "personal booker" and laughs every time the CNN chief calls him.

“He and Zucker are very close. Zucker personally calls Trump and books Trump,” Scarborough said on "Off Message," a podcast by Politico. "And Trumps laughs and calls Zucker ‘my personal booker’ because Zucker will call Trump. He hasn't said that publicly, but he's said it. I've said it publicly now. Trump will laugh every time Zucker calls.”

A CNN spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump's relationship with Zucker has drawn criticism from observers, who believe the personal ties were behind CNN's wall-to-wall coverage of the presumptive Republican nominee last year and into early 2016. The relationship doesn't seem to prevent Trump from attacking the network, tweeting Sunday, "I am watching CNN very little lately because they are so biased against me. Shows are predictable garbage! CNN and MSM is one big lie!"

Zucker has publicly defended CNN's coverage of Trump. He told TheWrap in May of the criticism: “People see everything through the prism that they want to see it. Some people think that we give too much attention to Donald Trump. Some people think that we’re too hard on Donald Trump."

He added, “I think what this proves is that you’re never going to satisfy everybody. That means we’re doing it right.”

Scarborough has himself been criticized for what many saw as a cozy relationship between the Morning Joe hosts and Trump. However, the morning show host has been critical of Trump as of late, saying on Wednesday that Trump is acting like a bigot.

Mitch McConnell: Republicans Running With SCF Like Getting "A Ticket On The Titanic"

$
0
0

“I think any candidate who signs up with the Senate Conservatives Fund has to wonder whether that’s a smart strategy.”

Joshua Roberts / Reuters

w.soundcloud.com

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blasted the Senate Conservatives Fund (SCF) this week, saying they had an "outstanding" record of defeat in elections.

McConnell compared running with the SCF, a group that often backs grassroots Republicans in primary races, to buying a ticket on the Titanic.

"The Senate Conservatives Fund has been endorsing people who, if they win in the primary, can't win the general," McConnell said on KNUS radio. "We lost three seats in 2010. One there in Denver, with candidates who were unable to appeal to a broader audience in November. We lost two in 2012, in Indiana and Missouri, with candidates who were unable to appeal to the larger audience. And so, in 2014, we took a different strategy and competed with the Senate Conservatives Fund everywhere they backed a candidate, and defeated them in every primary in 2014. And that's why we have a new majority."

"It reminds everybody, that the only way you can make policy is actually win the elections," he continued. "So the nominating process, in order to work for us, needs to produce nominees who can actually win in November. Otherwise you've wasted your time."

Citing the defeat of Marlin Stutzman, McConnell said the organization's record was of defeat.

"In Indiana, about a month ago there was a primary between a Senate Conservatives Fund nominee and Congressman Todd Young, the other candidate," he said. "And the candidate of the Senate Conservatives Fund tried to make me an issue in the Indiana Senate primary. He lost by 34 points. I think any candidate who signs up with the Senate Conservatives Fund has to wonder whether that's a smart strategy."

"They have an outstanding record of defeat. You've got to wonder whether any candidate who is running a smart campaign would want to sign up with those guys. It's sort of like a ticket on the Titanic."


Supreme Court Orders Recusal Of Judges With "Significant" Involvement In Cases As Prosecutors

$
0
0

Chris Geidner/BuzzFeed

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday held that the Constitution requires a Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice to recuse himself from a death row post-conviction appeal because the state judge's prior involvement as a prosecutor overseeing the case amounted to "significant, personal involvement" that created "an unconstitutional risk of bias."

The case centers around Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald Castille, who had been the district attorney whose office prosecuted Terrance Williams in the 1980s. Decades later, Castille refused to recuse himself from a post-conviction appeal at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court relating to Williams' death sentence.

The U.S. Supreme Court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy writing for the court's 5-3 majority, vacated the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision upholding Williams' death sentence. The state high court had overturned a trial court's ruling that had ordered a new sentencing hearing for Williams, who had been convicted of the murder of Amos Norwood in 1984.

"The Court now holds that under the Due Process Clause there is an impermissible risk of actual bias when a judge earlier had significant, personal involvement as a prosecutor in a critical decision regarding the defendant’s case," Kennedy wrote for the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday.

Williams had successfully convinced a trial court that allegations of prosecutorial misconduct at his trial required courts to stay his execution and order him to be re-sentenced.

Pennsylvania officials, though, sought to proceed with his execution and asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to vacate the stay of execution. Castille refused to recuse himself from consideration of the request, despite having been the district attorney who had personally approved the decision to seek the death penalty in Williams' case. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, with Castille concurring in the majority's decision, subsequently reinstated Williams' death sentence.

Williams sought review on the recusal question from the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard his case in February.

"When a judge has served as an advocate for the State in the very case the court is now asked to adjudicate, a serious question arises as to whether the judge, even with the most diligent effort, could set aside any personal interest in the outcome," Kennedy wrote for the court in Thursday's decision.

Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Clarence Thomas wrote opinions dissenting from the decision tossing out the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision.

The case now goes back to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, from which Castille retired in 2014.

Chris Christie Comments On Attractiveness Of Women Tennis Players

$
0
0

“I liked Martina,” the New Jersey governor said.

Matthew Cavanaugh / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Chris Christie commented on the attractiveness of women tennis players during a four-hour-long appearance on sports talk radio on Thursday.

Co-hosting the show Boomer & Carton on WFAN radio, Christie sang along to "Tainted Love," interviewed Yankees first baseman Mark Teixeira, and discussed his opposition to the suspension of Maria Sharapova with regular host Craig Carton.

"They're all in phenomenal aerobic shape," Carton said.

"Yes, she is," Christie agreed of Sharapova, who failed a drug test.

"At the end of the day, tennis needs that," the host went on.

"We need Sharapova," Christie concurred.

The host continued, "You need attractive European tennis players so that you have something to do other than watch the... Listen, I love the Williams sisters; they're American and they win all the time. But for the sport, you need some of—"

Christie cut the host off, saying, "You need Wozniacki," referring to Danish star Caroline Wozniacki.

Christie, however, drew the line when the host suggested that he would "go right to Victoria's Secret and put a tennis racket in their hands."

"No, see, that's not right," the New Jersey governor said.

Later, Carton rattled off a list of women's tennis players he found attractive.

"We watch women's tennis and we fell in love with Chris Evert and we loved Anna Kournikova, and Maria Sharapova, and Tracy Austin, and for a small time, Jennifer Capriati," he said. "You know why? Because they looked good and they were great tennis players. There's nothing wrong with that."

"I liked Martina," Christie said, referring either to Martina Hingis or retired star Martina Navratilova.

w.soundcloud.com


View Entire List ›

Obama Endorses Hillary Clinton For President

$
0
0

Then-President-Elect Barack Obama (left) shakes hands with Secretary of State-designate Sen. Hillary Clinton in 2008.

Charles Dharapak / AP

President Obama on Thursday officially endorsed Hillary Clinton to be his successor, days after she clinched the historic status of being the first woman to become the presumptive presidential nominee of a major party.

In a video posted by Clinton's campaign, Obama cited her skills on the campaign trail and her long record of public service, including her time as his secretary of state.

"Look, I know how hard this job can be — that's why I know Hillary will be so good at it," Obama said. "In fact, I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office."

Watch the endorsement video here:

youtube.com

The endorsement was made public shortly after Obama's much publicized White House meeting with Clinton's main Democratic rival, Bernie Sanders, who has yet to concede the race.

Speaking to reporters after the meeting with Obama, Sanders vowed to take his campaign to Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, but said he looked forward to joining with Clinton to defeat Republican presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

“I look forward to meeting with her in the near future to see how we can work together to defeat Donald Trump and create a government that represents all of us and not just the 1%,” he said.

Vice President Joe Biden, who was speaking at the American Constitution Society in Washington D.C., also aired his support for Clinton.

"Whoever the next president is, and in my view, god willing, it'll be Secretary Clinton," Biden said in his comments.

Biden made the comment while addressing the current vacancy in the supreme court, and urging congress to hold a vote on Obama's nominee Merrick Garland.

The comment was met with applause.

Both the President and Vice President have kept from endorsing either of the two remaining Democratic candidates for the nomination, but weighed in on the political fight Thursday after Clinton earned enough delegates to become the presumptive nominee earlier this week.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a darling of the left after being elected in 2012, also endorsed Clinton’s presidential bid Thursday in an interview with the Boston Globe.

Warren, 66, also has not ruled out running as Clinton’s vice president if she is asked — though she is not currently interested in the job, Reuters also reported, citing several sources close to the senator.

For his part, Obama said he has seen Clinton's judgement, toughness, and work ethic in person, which is why, "I’m with her."

In fact, he plans to be with her Wednesday at a rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin, the campaign announced.

"I am fired up and I cannot wait to get out there and campaign for Hillary," Obama said.

LINK: Bernie Sanders Vows To Defeat Trump Alongside Clinton In Upcoming Elections

LINK: Never-Trump Republicans Start To Make Last-Ditch Plans For Cleveland

LINK: Clinton Embraces History


Peter King Offers Trump Advice: Think "Before You Say What's On Your Mind"

$
0
0

He also said Trump’s remarks about a judge “could” be considered racist, but weren’t meant to be.

Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

w.soundcloud.com

Rep. Peter King of New York says Donald Trump should think before he speaks.

"He's gotta get a campaign structure in place, and he's got to learn how to not be making over the shoulder, off the top of his head – I'm mixing all sorts of metaphors here – just these comments really that he has not thought through," King said Thursday on WRHU radio. "He doesn't realize the consequences of saying this. It's great to say, 'you should say what's on your mind.' But before you say what's on your mind, you should think about what you're saying."

Earlier, King said Trump's remarks on a judge's heritage "could be racist" in the context in which they were used.

"One on one, he's a great guy. I don't believe he's a racist or a bigot in anyway, but he says things like there's not filter at times. The whole remark about the Mexican judge, obviously he was born in this country, but him referring to him as a Mexican. It's things like that we don't need. Even while, the expression itself used in that context could be racist, I don't think Donald Trump meant it that way. Instead, we wasted a week now talking about that."

Trump Super PAC Chair: Trump Doesn't Have The Money To Self-Fund

$
0
0

“Now he certainly doesn’t have the resources or, says he doesn’t have the resources to self-fund the rest of the way. So, it’s a scramble to get the money and get resources together.”

Fox Business Channel

w.soundcloud.com

Ed Rollins, a co-chairman of a super PAC backing Donald Trump, said this week that Trump does not personally have the resources to fund his campaign.

"The Trump campaign at this point is playing catch up," Rollins said this week on Kilmeade and Friends when asked how they planned to respond to attacks on Trump. "Both his campaign — the dilemma was you talk about self-funding his campaign. Now he certainly doesn't have the resources or, says he doesn't have the resources to self-fund the rest of the way. So, it's a scramble to get the money and get resources together."

"We'll get — it's just right at this particular time we're not prepared to counterattack."

One of the dilemmas that Trump now faces is how to support the infrastructure for a general election presidential campaign — something that requires massive amounts of fundraising in a quick manner. During the primary, Trump repeatedly loaned himself millions of dollars (in addition to taking in some small donations online), and boasted that he was the only candidate not beholden to big donors and special interests. Since becoming the presumptive nominee, he's reversed his fundraising stance while a number of super PACs have been set up to support his candidacy.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images