Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Debate Commission Hits Back At Trump, Says They've Never Rescheduled For The NFL

$
0
0

John Moore / Getty Images

The nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates is pushing back on Republican nominee Donald Trump's claims that the debates were intentionally scheduled during NFL games to reduce viewership.

"The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) started working more than 18 months ago to identify religious and federal holidays, baseball league playoff games, NFL games, and other events in order to select the best nights for the 2016 debates," the commission said in a statement on Sunday.

The statement continued, "It is impossible to avoid all sporting events, and there have been nights on which debates and games occurred in most election cycles. A debate has never been rescheduled as a result."

Trump tweeted on Friday that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats were trying to "rig" the debate schedule by putting two of the debates up against NFL games. The debate schedule was finalized in the summer of 2015.

Trump also claimed in an interview over the weekend that the NFL sent him a letter complaining about the debate schedule. The NFL denied they sent him a letter.

The debate commission noted that there are only four general election debates out of approximately 1,000 NFL Games.

"The CPD selects the debate dates a year in advance in order for the television networks to have maximum lead time and predictability in scheduling these extremely important civic education forums," the statement read.

"The CPD believes the dates for the 2016 debates will serve the American public well."

LINK: NFL Denies Trump’s Claim They Sent Him A Letter Complaining About Debate Schedule



Charles Koch Lays Out Future Plans, Says It's "Blood Libel" To Say He'll Support Clinton

$
0
0

Tomohiro Ohsumi / Getty Images

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — The political operation affiliated with the Koch brothers might be sitting out of the presidential, but Charles Koch made the case to donors at a gathering on Saturday that their involvement is crucial beyond the 2016 race, laying out a plan for the group's future.

"First thing, I want to do is correct a rumor that the media keeps stimulating, and that is that I'm probably going to support Hillary," he said at a mountain resort on the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. "That is a blood libel. At this point, I can't support either candidate, but I am certainly not going to support Hillary."

Koch laid out three main objectives for the group: focusing on electing the right candidates in the Senate and the House; pushing reform on the state level; and investing in other institutions, educational, and community organizations.

"My viewpoint is that we're facing a tragedy in this country. Everybody here is deeply concerned about this, which is why you're here and why I'm here," he said.

"To address the current political crisis, our first objective is to stop the worst federal policies regardless of who is the next president. We've got to remember that Republican presidents implement a lot of bad policies just like Democrats," he said.

"In this, our first priority is to preserve the country's financial future and to eliminate corporate welfare. Since it appears that neither presidential candidate is likely to support us in this effort, we're focused on maximizing the number of principled leaders in the House and Senate who will."

Koch also said it's important for the group to build on projects on the state level. "This includes continuing to push for state-based reforms. Now these two objectives are necessary. But they in my view are not sufficient."

"Our efforts are guided by the recognition that our country's problems...aren't caused by the government alone. But also by failures in the other key institutions," he said, stressing the importance of the First Amendment being taught at schools, communities "failing by not eliminating the barriers to opportunity and not keeping people safe" and businesses failing "by colluding with government to stifle innovation and competition."

BuzzFeed News was one of 11 news organizations to accept an invitation to cover the event after agreeing to a set of ground rules proposed by the Kochs’ political network, including not identifying the donors attending unless they agreed to an interview. With Democrats increasingly attacking the brothers for their political giving, the network has made an effort to be more transparent, opening up parts of their meetings — known as “seminars” — to a few reporters for the first time last year.

During his remarks to donors — who give at least $100,000 annually — on Saturday, Koch touted the network's past achievements. He discussed the network's role in constraining President Obama's agenda by blocking cap and trade and single-payer healthcare and helping Republicans take back the House and the Senate, as he argued that his group was the one that could be most effective in creating change.

"The real question is — and we should be asking ourselves all the time — is can we really do it? Can we really make a difference?," Koch said. "Given the magnitude of the obstacles of the challenges, can we make a meaningful difference? I am confident we can.

"In fact, I believe we are the best group to do so. Maybe the only group. Now why do I say that? Because we already have."

Closing his speech, Koch told donors, "So as you can see we've got our work cut out for us, but this is the only credible path I see to change the trajectory of our country and this is the only major group that's pursuing it."

Trump Boasted In 2014 Of Receiving Gift From Putin And Meeting His Advisers

$
0
0

youtube.com

On Sunday, Donald Trump denied that he had any relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin in an interview with ABC News.

Trump added his previous talk of him having a relationship with Putin was just the two saying nice things about each other.

"I don't know what it means by having a relationship," Trump added. "I mean, he was saying very good things about me. But I don't have a relationship with him."

In 2014, during a speech at CPAC Trump, though, boasted about meeting with Putin's advisers — even receiving a gift and personal note from Putin during the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow.

"You know, I was in Moscow a couple months ago, I own the Miss Universe pageant and they treated me so great," Trump said then. "Putin even sent me a present, beautiful present, with a beautiful note, I spoke to all of his people. You look at what he's doing with President Obama he's like toying with him. He's toying with him."

In 2013, Trump told MSNBC he had a relationship with Putin. Mother Jones posted video last week of Trump saying he talked "indirectly and directly" with Putin in a 2014 press conference.

Koch Network Briefs Donors In Private Meeting About Why They’re Not Backing Trump

$
0
0

Joshua Lott / Getty Images

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — The pitch to donors was optimistic: a discussion about “a brighter future for the country,” hosted by Charles and David Koch’s expansive political network, at a scenic mountain resort.

But, like everything else, part of the weekend ended up being about Donald Trump.

In his remarks to donors, Charles Koch repeatedly said this weekend that the network will back neither the Republican nominee, nor Hillary Clinton, disappointing a small but vocal minority of the 400 donors who hoped Koch — and the brothers’ political network — would ultimately back Trump.

In response, network officials and Charles Koch gave a presentation to donors Saturday morning in a private meeting on why the group wasn't backing Trump, according to several donors. They also made the case for their decision to focus on Senate races instead of playing in the presidential — a dramatic change from the 2012 presidential election when the network spent millions on behalf of Mitt Romney.

"They made a very good presentation about why it would not make sense for them to get involved," said Stan Hubbard, a major donor who is involved with a pro-Trump super PAC, in an interview with BuzzFeed News. "They don't want to take away from (the Senate) effort. That was reasonable. They did a lot of careful analysis. They sold me."

Hubbard said despite the divisions within the network, the donors who are supporting Trump are satisfied with group's approach and won't leave the network based on the decision to stay out of the presidential — a concern that some have expressed. "Everybody was satisfied," he said. "I don't see anybody complaining about anything."

Doug Deason, another pro-Trump donor from Texas, said he's not upset about the network's decision to sit out but still wants Charles Koch to meet with Trump to share his policy positions. "We just want Charles and Trump to meet," he said. "If (Koch) can just introduce a little bit of his policy, that would be great."

Koch’s aides have previously met with the Trump team, but there has not been a follow up.

Fred Klipsh, an Indiana donor who is close to the GOP vice presidential nominee Mike Pence, said he didn't make any personal pitches to donors to get on board with the ticket, but he thinks some could change their minds in the coming weeks.

"(Pence) is loved by this organization and is highly respected… Between now and the election, the more they talk about policy and a positive campaign, there's every opportunity for (donors) to change their minds,” he said in an interview.

Many donors also made the point that those who wanted to get more involved on the presidential level could give to other groups instead of pushing the Koch network. "I compare it to a shoe store — you don't try to buy a dress there," said Frayda Levin, another donor who is active in some of the network groups.

BuzzFeed News was one of 11 news organizations to accept an invitation to cover the event after agreeing to a set of ground rules proposed by the Kochs’ political network, including not identifying the donors attending unless they agreed to an interview.

In their explanation, network officials told donors they were making the best use of the group's resources by shifting the focus down to the Senate level because it was the logical choice, looking at the policy positions of the candidates and Trump's chances of winning.

"They talked to us today about their reasoning and it was impeccable," said Jim Von Ehr, a Texas donor and founder and chairman of Zyvex Technologies. "They made the point that we have to agree on some principles and candidates who support those principles, and if they lose their principles, they lose our support."

Donors met at the Broadmoor on the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, as Trump continued to make controversial statements about the parents of a Muslim-American soldier who died in the Iraq War.

"It absolutely makes it harder" to back Trump, said Chart Wescott, a Texas donor, referring to those comments. Wescott said he will make a "gametime decision" on who he decides to vote for, but didn’t think the comments were a nonstarter for others. "On the contrary, many donors are willing to look past that."

Barry Farah, a Colorado donor who said he will vote for Trump but not support him financially — a position many network donors have taken — also brought up those comments. But he said at the end of the day, Hillary Clinton “would be a worse candidate than somebody who tweets in the way that isn't always dignified."

Some donors also brought up Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson as a candidate they were considering supporting.

One of those donors Chris Wright of Colorado, who is CEO of an energy company, called Johnson the most freedom-oriented presidential candidate running this election. Although his son has contributed to Johnson, he's not fully sold yet. "I'm not sure. At the end of the day in politics, it's a very practical game."

"But we want to help grow the cause of freedom."

Hillary Clinton To Address Joint Black And Latino Journalist Convention

$
0
0

Jim Young / Reuters

Hillary Clinton will address the largest gathering of black and Latino journalists since 2008, multiple sources confirm to BuzzFeed News.

This year, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and the National Association of Black Journalists are holding a joint convention in Washington, D.C., and Clinton will make remarks Friday, sources said.

The format is up in the air at the moment and it is unclear if Clinton will take questions, according to a source familiar with the discussions.

In 2008, then Sen. Barack Obama addressed Unity, a convention which brought together 7,000 black, Latino, Asian, and Native American journalists together.

This year, Clinton won her primary on the strength of her support from a coalition of black, Latino, and older voters. In her general election matchup with Trump, her campaign hopes to turn out that same coalition of black and Latino voters to carry her to victory. Clinton spoke to the League of United Latin American Citizens in July.

The groups extended an invitation to Trump to speak as well, as many other Latino and black organizations have done in the lead up to the general election, but his campaign has not yet responded, sources said.

Koch Network Drops Million In Ads In Ohio, Nevada, Pennsylvania Senate Races

$
0
0

youtube.com

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo -- As the political network affiliated with Charles and David Koch highlighted its focus on Senate races at a retreat, its super PAC released three separate seven-figure ad buys in three Senate races.

The ads, shared first with reporters invited to cover the network's seminar this weekend, will go up in Nevada, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, bringing the total that the super PAC, Freedom Partners Action Fund, has spent up to $24 million.

The $1.2 million TV and digital ad buy in Nevada, once again is centered around attacking Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto over Uber. The $1.3 million ad buy in Pennsylvania accuses Katie McGinty of steering subsidies to a "favored few." And the $1.4 million ad in Ohio focuses on Ted Strickland's handling of the state budget during his tenure as governor.

The network has been active in two other Senate races in Indiana and Wisconsin so far.

youtube.com

“Whether it’s putting the special interests before taxpayers’ interest, or making tough times even harder with harmful tax-and-spend policies, it’s clear that Catherine Cortez Masto, Ted Strickland, and Katie McGinty would only continue the failed policies that rig the system for the well-off and well-connected," said James Davis, spokesman for the group.

"These policies represent everything that’s wrong with Washington and these candidates are promising more of the same.”

Rangel On Trump: “If He Didn’t Have Money We Would’ve Locked His Ass Up" Long Ago

$
0
0

Andrew Burton / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Rep. Charlie Rangel, a Democrat from New York, delivered a profanity-laden critique of Donald Trump on Thursday, apparently not realizing that his microphone was on and he was live on air.

In an interview with Joe Madison for SiriusXM Radio, Rangel said of Trump, “If he didn’t have money we would’ve locked his ass up a long time ago.”

"He's consistently crazy," Rangel said. "It's not like he had a bad day. Every day he tears his ass and reverses himself and contradicts himself."

Rangel, who has represented Harlem and Upper Manhattan since 1971, recalled meeting Trump various times during his public life, and mocked how Trump would always declare himself the smartest person in the world.

“Goddamn shit, and he, he’ll just tell ya that he’s so smart, that smart people just come to him!” Rangel said.

Rangel, who is retiring at the end the current congressional term, went on to warn of the potential harm a Trump presidency could do to the country.

“This man is about to kill the goddamn goose that’s producing these eggs,” Rangel said. “Poor folks are gonna get screwed anyway, but he’s taking down the country with him. I mean, he’s done more damn damage to the reputation of our country aboard just by threatening to pull out of NATO.”

It was only when Madison asked Rangel about Hillary Clinton that Rangel asked when their interview would start.

Madison told him they had already been recording live, before reassuring Rangel about his language.

“That’s okay, we’re SiriusXM.”

Trump Defends Making His Products Overseas: "I'm Doing The Market"

$
0
0

Carlo Allegri / Reuters


Donald Trump on Monday defended making many of his products overseas while attacking companies for doing the same thing, saying he is just following the market.

Trump made the comments on NewsRadio 1370 WSPD's Fred LeFebvre and the Morning News in the context of his attacking companies that choose to outsource.

"It's very easy, I'm just...all I'm doing is, I'm doing the market," Trump said, when asked how he would defend himself from Hillary Clinton on the issue. "But I want products to be made in our country and I'm gonna bring companies back so that we can actually buy products from our country, so that we do make televisions in the United States again. I buy thousands of televisions. So that we do make different products in the United States again.

"We have products that aren't even made here anymore, a lot of products aren't even made here anymore, because they're outsmarting us at the negotiating table, other countries."

Earlier, LeFebvre asked Trump if it was hypocritical for him to attack companies making products overseas and outsourcing when he does the same. Trump declined to directly answer the question, instead answering about products he purchases for his properties.

"A lot times, Fred, you can't buy products in this country," Trump said, citing televisions.

"They don't make them in this country, anymore, so many times. A lot of it is because various countries, China, in particular, Japan also, they manipulate their currency, they devalue their currency, and they make it impossible for our companies to compete. So when they make it impossible to compete, it's like, you go and you have to buy elsewhere. It's really makes it, a lot of businesses are being forced out of business."

Trump said he buys products from the United States when he can.

In an interview earlier on the same show, Trump's son Eric said it is impossible to make their products in the U.S. because the industry is gone and it would be too costly.

"Most of those products we don't even have anymore, but for whatever it's worth, the problem is you can't even make some of the products in the US anymore because the industry is literally gone," the younger Trump said.

"If you were to make them in the US, it's so cost prohibitive, because it's so much more expensive that literally your business would go out of business. It wouldn't work, you couldn't sustain it and that's why all the manufacturing is getting shipped overseas," he added.

Listen to the two clips below:

w.soundcloud.com



Donald Trump Praised Putin For Bashing The Term “American Exceptionalism” In 2013

$
0
0

View Video ›

video-cdn.buzzfeed.com

Donald Trump praised Vladimir Putin in 2013 for his New York Times op-ed in which he criticized President Obama's use of the phrase "American exceptionalism."

Speaking on Piers Morgan Tonight in September 2013, Trump said Putin “really put it” to President Obama over the phrase.

“You think of the term as being fine, but all of sudden you say, what if you’re in Germany or Japan or any one of 100 different countries? You’re not going to like that term,” said Trump. “It’s very insulting and Putin really put it to him about that.”

Trump has found himself under attack from both Democrats and Republicans for praising Putin, especially after Russia's suspected involvement in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's servers. Last week, Trump asked Russia to release Hillary Clinton’s emails, a comment he later claimed was sarcastic. On Sunday, Trump said Russia was not already in Ukraine despite the 2014 seizure of Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine. He also attempted to explain past comments about having a relationship with Putin.

Trump defended Putin's criticism of the term "American exceptionalism" on Fox News.

“When he criticizes the president for using the term ‘American exceptionalism,’ if you're in Russia, you don't want to hear that America is exceptional,” Trump said on On the Record. “And if you're in many other countries, whether it's Germany or other places, you don't want to hear about American exceptionalism because you think you're exceptional. So I can see that being very insulting to the world.”

“And that's basically what Putin was saying is that, you know, you use a term like ‘American exceptionalism,’ and frankly, the way our country is being treated right now by Russia and Syria and lots of other places and with all the mistakes we've made over the years, like Iraq and so many others, it's sort of a hard term to use,” Trump added.

“Other nations and other countries don't want hear about American exceptionalism. They're insulted by it. And that's what Putin was saying.”

In June, Mother Jones posted video of Trump saying he didn't like the term American exceptionalism.

Eric Trump: Clinton's Policies Cost Life Of Humayun Khan

$
0
0

John Moore / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Eric Trump defended his father's comments on the Khan family on Monday, arguing that the policies of Hillary Clinton were to blame for the death of Capt. Humayun Khan.

“If you look at her foreign policy as secretary of state, the destabilization of Syria, the destabilization of Libya, the destabilization of Iraq, I mean, they really bred ISIS based on failed foreign policy while at the same time costing our nation trillions and trillions of dollars and thousands and thousands of lives like Khan who is absolutely a hero," Eric Trump said on Wills & Snyder in the Morning on WTAM 1100 Cleveland radio. "So, you know, it’s convenient for media often to spin the messaging but it’s really, it’s about terrorism. It’s that simple. It’s about keeping America safe. It’s about terrorism.”

Humayun Khan died in Iraq in 2004, when Clinton was still the senator from New York. Clinton voted in favor of the war. Donald Trump running mate, Mike Pence, also voted in favor of the war.

Donald Trump has denounced those interventions during this campaign, but he supported the intervention in Libya and the invasion of Iraq at the times the decisions were made, as BuzzFeed News has reported.

After Khizr Khan, the father of Humayun Khan, gave a speech denouncing Trump at the Democratic National Convention, the Republican nominee responded by suggesting that his wife, Ghazala Khan, was silent because she is Muslim.

Eric Trump said that his father was not attacking Khizr Khan and had instead praised Humayun Khan as a hero.

“He didn’t go after him. In fact, he called him a hero," Eric Trump said. "What he was going after is radical terrorism and that’s been one of the keynotes of his campaign the entire time."

He went on to say, “His message isn’t about Sgt. Khan. There’s no question he’s a hero. Anybody who dies to defend guys like you and me and everybody else, there’s no question they’re heroes. This is about radical terrorism.”

GOP Sen. Jeff Flake: Trump Should Apologize To The Khans

$
0
0

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, a Republican who has declined to endorse Donald Trump, said on Monday that his party's nominee should apologize to Khizr Khan, the father of deceased US Army Capt. Humayun Khan.

"I would hope that he would just come out and just say, 'I am sorry. The statements I made against this man his family are inappropriate. I shouldn't have made them, I'm gonna move on,'" Flake said on WBUR's Here and Now. "Also, he has never apologized to John McCain for that statement, or to other POWs, or people who were captured. People that simply won't admit that they've made a mistake and move on, there's something wrong there."

Flake said earlier in the interview that Trump's comment are just another "in a long line, of very inappropriate statements that the Republican nominee has made."

"It seems to be consistent with what he said before about other groups," he said.

Trump had questioned in an interview if Khan's wife, Ghazala, had been prevented from speaking on stage at the DNC because of her religion.

"To respond the way that Donald Trump has responded is completely inappropriate," he added, saying Trump needed to learn to take criticism.

The Arizona said he believed Trump couldn't win with his current rhetoric, nor should he.

"I don't think he should win if he continues to say the things that he said," Flake said. "So, he's got to change direction, it's a little late in the game for him to do so, but hope springs eternal."

Federal Judge Refuses To Allow Mississippi To Enforce Anti-LGBT Law During Appeal

$
0
0

Rogelio V. Solis / AP

WASHINGTON — The federal judge in Mississippi who halted enforcement of the state's new anti-LGBT religious exemption law declined on Monday to put his ruling on hold while the state appeals the ruling.

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant had asked U.S. District Court Judge Carlton Reeves to issue a stay of his preliminary injunction order during the appeal. If granted, the state would have allowed the state to enforce the law during its appeal of the ruling against the law.

Bryant signed the bill, HB 1523, into law on April 5. The bill provided protections for individuals, religious organizations, and certain businesses who take actions due to their “sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions” to same-sex marriage — or any sex outside straight marriage. It also provided similar protections for those who object to transgender people.

In dismissing the state's argument for why a stay should be granted — and reiterating that he believed the plaintiffs would ultimately succeed in their challenge to the law — Reeves was abrupt.

"[I]ssuing a marriage license to a gay couple is not like being forced into armed combat or to assist with an abortion. Matters of life and death are sui generis. If movants truly believe that providing services to LGBT citizens forces them to 'tinker with the machinery of death,' their animus exceeds anything seen in Romer, Windsor, or the marriage equality cases," he wrote — referencing the U.S. Supreme Court's earlier gay rights cases.

"The motions are denied," Reeves wrote in Monday's order. "The baton is now passed."

Bryant already has asked the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to grant a stay of Reeves' order.

Read the order:

Trump Called Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine "So Smart" In 2014

$
0
0

View Video ›

video-cdn.buzzfeed.com

Donald Trump said in an April 2014 interview that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was "so smart."

“Well, he’s done an amazing job of taking the mantle," Trump said of Russian president Vladimir Putin in an interview with Fox News' Eric Bolling. "And he’s taken it away from the president and you look at what he’s doing. And so smart. When you see the riots in a country because they’re hurting the Russians, okay, ‘We’ll go and take it over.’ And he really goes step by step by step, and you have to give him a lot of credit."

"Interestingly, I own the Miss Universe pageant," Trump added. "We just left Moscow. He could not have been nicer. He was so nice and so everything. But you have to give him credit, that what he’s doing for that country in terms of their world prestige is very strong."

Trump's praise of Putin has earned him a steady stream of criticism, most recently from Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The recent attacks have been fueled by a hack into the Democratic National Committee's email system, which many suspect the Russians are behind, and a comment Trump made last week, when he called on Russia to find Clinton's 30,000 missing emails.

On Sunday, when speaking on ABC's "This Week", he at first said that Putin was "not going into Ukraine," before conceding that "he's there in a certain way." Trump also said in the interview that "the people of Crimea, from what I've heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were."

Those comments echo remarks Trump made in a May 2014 speech to the National Press Club.

“And another country, wants to come in and join—they love Russia," he said then. "They say—now we send in our pollsters, we say, ‘That’s not true.’ Well, you know, guess what? They want to form with Russia. How the hell are we involved? Okay, we’re involved in all of this. Isn’t Europe supposed to be involved in this?”

That April in a speech at the Freedom Summit, Trump argued that the pro-Russia movement in Crimea was real and not a "set up."

"Russia is, like, I mean, they're really hot stuff," he said. "And now you have people in the Ukraine, who knows, set up or not, but it can't all be set up. I mean, they're marching in favor of joining Russia. I mean, you know, you can send some people in."

Meanwhile, in another March 2014 speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference, Trump reiterated his praise for Putin's intervention in Ukraine, saying it was smart to do it right after the Olympics, which were held that year in Sochi.

“So he has the Olympics," Trump said that May. "The day after the Olympics, he starts with Ukraine. The day after. How smart? You know, he didn’t want to do it during the Olympics. Boom. The day after. So our athletes leave, we all leave, and the day after. And you know, when he goes in and takes Crimea, he’s taking the heart and soul because that’s where all the money is. I was surprised. I heard that the other day. They were saying, most of the wealth comes right from that area.”

"That's the area with the wealth," Trump continued. "So that means the rest of Ukraine will fall and it's predicted to fall fairly quickly. Because without the money, it's like this country. If we don't make this country great, it's gonna fall. It's gonna really fall. It's already falling. You go into our airports, you go look at our bridges, you look at our roadways, we're becoming a third-world country. So when you see what they're doing in Ukraine, it's just a question of time."

Trump: My Position On Keeping Terrorists Out Is What Bothered Khizr Khan

$
0
0

View Video ›

video-cdn.buzzfeed.com

In an interview with a local Ohio television station on Monday, Donald Trump said that Khizr Khan was really bothered by his position on border security — specifically his promise to keep radical Islamic terrorists from entering the country.

"Well, I was very viciously attacked, as you know, on the stage," Trump told Columbus's ABC affiliate ABC6, when asked about Khan's DNC speech. "And I was surprised to see it. And so all I did — I have great honor and great feeling for his son, Mr. Khan’s son. But, and as far as I’m concerned, he’s a hero."

When the interviewer brought up Trump's position on border security, Trump said, "It’s a very big subject for me. And border security’s very big. And when you have radical Islamic terrorists probably all over the place, we’re allowing them to come in by the thousands and thousands. And I think that’s what bothered Mr. Khan more than anything else.

"And, you know, I’m not going to change my views on that. We have radical Islamic terrorists coming in that have to be stopped. We’re taking them in by the thousands."

Trump lashed out at Khan, the father of a soldier who was killed in Iraq, late last week, after Khan delivered a rousing speech at the Democratic National Convention, calling Trump out for his rhetoric toward Muslims. In an interview over the weekend, Trump insinuated that Khan's wife was not allowed to speak onstage because of her Muslim faith.

Trump has faced backlash from Republicans and Democrats over his remarks but has continued to attack the Khans.

Dylann Roof Challenges Constitutionality Of Federal Death Penalty Law

$
0
0

Dylann Roof

Randall Hill / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Lawyers for Dylann Roof on Monday filed a motion challenging the federal government's intention to seek the death penalty in his murder trial, arguing that the penalty is unconstitutional.

"[T]his Court should rule that the federal death penalty constitutes a legally prohibited, arbitrary, cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by both the Fifth and Eighth Amendments," lawyers write in defense of Roof, who is charged with murder for the shooting deaths of nine people inside a historically black South Carolina church this past summer.

In the filing, the lawyers argue that the death penalty itself is unconstitutional, as is the federal death penalty law.

"[T]he [Federal Death Penalty Act] may have been designed with as much care as possible under the circumstances, the capital sentencing process that the statute provides is constitutionally inadequate in practice," the lawyers write. "The results of jurors’ good-faith grappling with the law – arbitrary, biased, and erroneous death verdicts – are intolerable as a matter of due process and proportional punishment."

The challenge is only being brought, the lawyers write, because the federal government is seeking the death penalty in Roof's case — a decision announced in May — after rejecting his offer to plead guilty and accept multiple life sentences without the possibility of parole.

The federal death penalty also is under challenge in other cases, the filing notes. Most notably, a federal judge in Vermont just recently finished a nine-day hearing over issues raised by Donald Fell's lawyers about the constitutionality of the death penalty in the federal system.

In addition to the two broad constitutional challenges, Roof's lawyers are also challenging the jury selection process referred to as "death qualification" — finding a jury willing to impose the death penalty. As the lawyers note, "conscientious objectors to the death penalty are systematically excluded" from such juries.

"Because the practice of death qualifying a jury has no constitutional or statutory underpinnings, distorts the jury function, introduces arbitrariness into capital sentencing and increases the influence of racism and sexism on the death determination, there is no justification for maintaining it," the lawyers write.

The lawyers are also challenging the use of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA) in the indictment as a predicate offense to another offense for which the death penalty is a possibility, noting that the hate crimes legislation considered including the death penalty as a punishment but ultimately rejected it.

"[D]espite Congress’s deliberate decision not to provide for the death penalty in HCPA prosecutions, the government has effectively amended the statute to permit a death sentence to be imposed," the lawyers argue.

The lawyers also raise several other challenges relating to the decision to seek the death penalty for Roof's charges, as well as to the sentencing procedures at issue in a federal death penalty trial.

Earlier, in July, the lawyers had asked the hate crimes law charges themselves to be dismissed and charges of obstruction of religion to be dismissed for — they argue — violating the Thirteenth Amendment and Commerce Clause, respectively.

Read the filing:


This Might Be The Lamest Interview With Donald Trump So Far

$
0
0

“You’re called all the time a really great television producer. Is that true?”

After the Republican National Convention, Mark Halperin of Showtime's "The Circus" conducted an interview with Republican nominee Donald Trump.

After the Republican National Convention, Mark Halperin of Showtime's "The Circus" conducted an interview with Republican nominee Donald Trump.

SHOWTIME

"Just tell me your overall view of how the week was for you personally. Not politics — personally."

"Just tell me your overall view of how the week was for you personally. Not politics — personally."

SHOWTIME

"Talk more specifically why your parents would be proud of this."

"Talk more specifically why your parents would be proud of this."

SHOWTIME


View Entire List ›

The Religious Right's Dangerous Bet On Trump

$
0
0

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

On July 17, 2015, Donald Trump received a caps lock–heavy campaign memo from one of his advisers containing instructions on how to communicate with a voter species that was especially exotic to the candidate at the time.

“The audience is CHRISTIAN SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES,” the Trump adviser wrote on the eve of the the 2015 Family Leadership Summit in Iowa. “They are open to your candidacy but NEED TO KNOW that their issues are IMPORTANT TO YOU.”

The document — along with several other internal Trump camp memos recently obtained by BuzzFeed News — illustrates just how tenuous the New York billionaire's connection was to his party's religious base at the outset of this election cycle. Throughout 2014 and 2015, Trump's small political team coached him on how to make himself more palatable to conservative Christians.

On the issue of abortion, one memo urged, "Unless you are specifically asked, it is not beneficial to state that you support the exceptions of life of the mother, rape, and incest." Another suggested that Trump "DEFLECT" any debate questions about school prayer by saying, "I employ thousands of individuals and make sure my employees have the freedom to express their faith however they see fit." If asked whether he believed in "creationism or evolution," an adviser suggested the candidate respond, "I believe in both" — and then added in a parenthetical, "(Mr. Trump — we may want to follow up on this.)"

For all his advisers' best efforts, of course, Trump never did master the language of the religious right — but it has hardly held him back. Not only has Trump succeeded in capturing the Republican nomination, but according to a recent Pew survey, he is also currently polling better among white evangelicals than any GOP nominee on record. This success has dismayed many of Trump’s Christian critics, who have spent much of this year fretting that a biblically illiterate adulterer was fleecing their fellow believers.

But in fact, some devout detractors argue, the real threat Trump poses to the conservative Christian movement may be in just how many of his god-fearing supporters know exactly what they’re getting. Never before has the Republican Party nominated a standard-bearer so nakedly illiterate on religious matters — and so unwilling to even pretend.

Eric Teetsel, who served as a faith adviser to Marco Rubio, noted that during the GOP primaries Trump performed best with evangelicals who did not regularly attend church, and tended to repel more religious voters. Since Trump clinched the nomination, that distinction has all but vanished.

“Those Bible-reading evangelicals may be somewhere on a scale of enthusiastic support to almost devastated resignation...but they really are mostly voting for Donald Trump,” he said.

Teetsel, who stood outside protesting Trump's meeting with conservative Christian leaders in June, said that the evangelical establishment has set a dangerous precedent with its willful surrender to a nominee who pays only the most perfunctory lip service to its agenda. “Donald Trump is a liar. That’s who he is. … He’ll burn us like he has burned everyone else in his life.”

Such skepticism is not entirely unwarranted. Trump's reinvention as a social conservative took place less than five years before he cannonballed into the Republican presidential race. Early in 2011, Trump delivered a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in which he casually papered over a long history of socially liberal statements.

"Just very briefly," he said 12 minutes into his remarks, "I'm pro-life, I'm against gun control, and I will fight to end Obamacare." (In interviews shortly thereafter, he declared himself an opponent of same-sex marriage as well.)

Nick Everhart, a Republican consultant whose firm briefly advised Trump around this time, was taken aback by the brazenness of the flip-flops.

"To be so craven about changing what he believed is absolutely unprecedented in American politics," said Everhart, who has advised numerous evangelical clients. "It's like being a Republican was the college degree and becoming pro-life was a General Education class he could check the box on quickly his first semester in school."

Trump's 2011 conversion to social conservatism immediately caught the attention of evangelical powerbroker Ralph Reed, and the two became fast friends. They spoke frequently that year as Trump flirted with a presidential bid, and according to two sources close to the businessman, Reed privately agreed to run Trump's campaign if he decided to enter the 2012 race. The alliance would have made for a head-scratching headline if it had ever come to fruition, and likely would have drawn accusations of opportunism from some of Reed's Christian cohorts.

Reed declined to comment specifically on his private conversations with Trump. But he said he sees no reason now for evangelicals to withhold their support for the thrice-married GOP nominee.

"Evangelical voters are far more forgiving and ready to extend mercy to others than the predominant cultural stereotype," Reed said, adding, "On the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, religious freedom, support for Israel, the appointment of judicial conservatives to the Supreme Court and other federal courts, and opposition to the Iran nuclear deal, Donald Trump shares the public policy views of evangelical voters, and they believe his commitment to these issues is genuine."

While it's true that Trump has, however haltingly, found his way into alignment with the religious right this year, it's less clear how many of those voters are actually convinced of his "genuineness." At times, Trump's pitch to evangelicals has had an almost winking quality to it — particularly during the early primaries, when he could be seen brandishing a Bible during speeches, or swaying to "Amazing Grace" at church services, or grandly doling out giant cardboard charity checks onstage alongside his holy-rolling super-surrogate Jerry Falwell Jr.

While pundits snickered at the ham-handed pandering, many failed to recognize that his evangelical supporters were in on the joke.

Outside a Trump rally in Davenport, Iowa, just days before the January caucuses, Greg Cromer shrugged off questions about the candidate's religiosity. "Yeah, so he doesn't know what 2 Thessalonians is ... If that were the only thing the electorate cared about — which one's more moral? — I'd go with Ted [Cruz]. But Donald has the skill set we're looking for. So yeah, we'll put our blinders on."

Chuckling a bit sardonically, Cromer added, "God has used worse people."

Even Trump's earliest and most enthusiastic evangelical surrogates — a motley crowd of televangelists and prosperity preachers — have embraced this message as they vouch for the candidate.

"Is Donald Trump able to lead anyone's congregation? Absolutely not," said Pastor Mark Burns, a South Carolina-based minister who delivered a prayer at last month's Republican convention. "Is Donald Trump the Bible-totin', scripture-quotin' Christian? To me, that's irrelevant. We're not voting for the next pastor of the United States, we're voting for the next president ... [Trump] himself knows that he has not been the churchgoing choirboy, and he admits to his former lifestyle."

Of course, such campaign-season rationalizations have become common to the point of cliche among conservative Christians. "This kind of willingness to make convenient exceptions to the moral code is not new," said Michael Wear, an evangelical and former faith adviser to President Obama. "But Trump is new because he has never even asked for forgiveness. Trump is, in evangelical parlance, an unrepentant sinner."

With Antonin Scalia's sudden death earlier this year, control of the Supreme Court has become a popular justification for supporting Trump. Wear said the candidate won over many evangelicals looking for an excuse to vote for him when he released a list of potential nominees in May. His selection of Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, a mainstream social conservative, as his running mate also helped. But Trump's greatest advantage in wooing the religious right, Wear said, is probably his opponent.

"It's saddening to many who have built this movement to see it prop up someone like Donald Trump," he said. "But disliking Hillary Clinton is basically a supplement to the Nicene Creed for many evangelicals."

Republican Congressman Publicly Declares He's Voting For Hillary Clinton

$
0
0

View Video ›

facebook.com

US Rep. Richard Hanna, a three-term Republican, declared Tuesday, that he would be voting for Hillary Clinton because his own party's nominee, Donald Trump, was "unfit to serve our party and cannot lead this country."

Hanna, who represents New York's 22nd Congressional District, became the first congressional Republican to publicly say he was voting for Clinton.

In an op-ed for Syracuse.com, Hanna said, "If I compare the life stories of both candidates I find Trump deeply flawed in endless ways."

Hanna, who had previously said he could never support Trump, wrote that he decided to vote for Clinton after Trump attacked Khizr and Ghazala Khan, the Muslim parents of a slain American soldier. Khizr Khan gave a moving speech at the Democratic National Convention where he said Trump had "sacrificed nothing and no one." Trump said he felt "viciously attacked" by Khan and told ABC News that he had “made a lot of sacrifices” by creating “thousands and thousands of jobs.”

Trump also said that Ghazala Khan, who stood by her husband during his DNC speech, "had nothing to say," adding, "Maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say, you tell me."

Khizr and Ghazala Khan at the DNC.

Alex Wong / Getty Images

Hanna told Syracuse.com that he was "stunned by the callousness" of Trump's comments. "I think Trump is a national embarrassment," he said. "Is he really the guy you want to have the nuclear codes?"

While several GOP leaders, including Paul Ryan and John McCain, criticized Trump's comments about the Khans, none of them withdrew their endorsement for him.


"For me, it is not enough to simply denounce his comments: He is unfit to serve our party and cannot lead this country," Hanna wrote in his op-ed.

The congressman, who is set to retire at the end of the year, said the Republican Party is "becoming increasingly less capable of nominating a person who is electable as president." He said the party had ignored the fact that "we have largely alienated women, Hispanics, the LGBT community, young voters and many others in general."

Hanna said that he found Trump "profoundly offensive and narcissistic but as much as anything, a world-class panderer, anything but a leader." He also called him "unrepentant" and "self-involved."

"I do not expect perfection, but I do require more than the embodiment of at least a short list of the seven deadly sins," he wrote.

Hanna said that while Clinton had "issues," she stood for "causes bigger than herself for a lifetime."

"While I disagree with her on many issues, I will vote for Mrs. Clinton," Hanna wrote. "I will be hopeful and resolute in my belief that being a good American who loves his country is far more important than parties or winning and losing. I trust she can lead. All Republicans may not like the direction, but they can live to win or lose another day with a real candidate. Our response to the public's anger and the need to rebuild requires complex solutions, experience, knowledge, and balance. Not bumper sticker slogans that pander to our disappointment, fear, and hate."

A representative for Hanna told BuzzFeed News the congressman was not available for comment Tuesday.

Several people supported Hanna's decision, praising his "integrity" in comments on his Facebook page.

Several people supported Hanna's decision, praising his "integrity" in comments on his Facebook page.

Facebook: reprichardhanna

Some hoped that other GOP members would follow Hanna's lead in taking a stand against Trump.

Some hoped that other GOP members would follow Hanna's lead in taking a stand against Trump.

Facebook: reprichardhanna

Many also criticized Hanna's decision.

Many also criticized Hanna's decision.

Facebook: reprichardhanna

LINK: Read Hanna's op-ed here

LINK: John McCain Slams Trump For “Disparaging” Fallen Muslim Soldier’s Parents

LINK: Republican Leaders Say They Stand By Family Of Fallen Muslim Soldier


Former Bush CIA Chief: Military Won't Obey Illegal Orders From Trump

$
0
0

View Video ›

video-cdn.buzzfeed.com

Retired Gen. Michael Hayden, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency under President George W. Bush, says if Donald Trump follows through as president with some of the military actions he has promised as a candidate, many people in the military will simply refuse his orders.

The former spy chief, speaking on NewsMaxTV's The Hard Line on Monday, said such a scenario would create a civil-military crisis.

Trump has advocated for the use of torture and said that he would kill the families of terrorists.

"All of us in uniform give great deference to the elected officials of the United States," Hayden said. "We want to follow their orders, but, there are some cases and I'm afraid, Mr. candidate Trump has suggested some cases, where if he did those things as president, that he said he would do while he was a candidate, there would be a lot of people in an American military uniform, myself included, who would simply have to say, 'that's not just gonna happen, sir. I'm sorry. We won't do that.' And that would create torque, that would create that crisis in civi-military relations."

Hayden added, "I do recognize the tension that would be created if a President Trump governs the way a candidate Trump has spoken."

Still, Hayden said he didn't foresee an "insurrection."

"I don't think we're anywhere near an insurrection," Hayden said.

Donald Trump Kicked A Crying Baby Out Of His Rally

$
0
0

“I love babies. … Actually I was only kidding you can get the baby out of here.”

"Actually, I was only kidding, you can get the baby out of here," Trump said. "That's alright. Don't worry. I thinks she really believed me that I love having a baby crying while I'm speaking. That's ok. People don't understand. That's ok."

"Actually, I was only kidding, you can get the baby out of here," Trump said. "That's alright. Don't worry. I thinks she really believed me that I love having a baby crying while I'm speaking. That's ok. People don't understand. That's ok."

ABC News

😭😭😭

😭😭😭

Evan Vucci / AP


View Entire List ›

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images