Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Christie's First Democratic Challenger Announces Her Candidacy

$
0
0

And it isn't Cory Booker. State Senator Barbara Buono, a progressive candidate, says she's filed her papers to run for New Jersey governor.

N.J. state Senator Barbara Buono announces her bid for governor in a YouTube video.

Via: youtube.com

While the political class makes guesses about Newark Mayor Cory Booker's potential run for governor — or Senate — progressive state Senator Barbara Buono announced her candidacy for the 2013 race in a YouTube video Tuesday morning.

Buono has long been an expected challenger to incumbent Governor Chris Christie. She attended to the annual meeting of the Democratic Governors Association in California last week, shortly after a job posting appeared online from one of her staffers — "A progressive Democratic gubernatorial candidate is seeking an experienced campaign manager for an aggressive campaign plan," read the posting.

"Today I want you to be the first to know that I'm running for governor," Buono says in the video. "I filed my papers, and I'll make a formal announcement early next year. I'm not gonna run a conventional campaign, and I won't be anointed by the political bosses."

Buono singles out marriage equality and protections for Planned Parenthood as key to her campaign platform. Democratic state officials say she may have the support of the progressive women's advocacy group EMILY's List, but will not pose a serious challenge to Booker should he choose to run.

"It's unclear to me how much organizational support she would garner," said a Democratic source. "She's positioning herself as a progressive candidate and is in it for the long haul no matter what."


Democrats Troll Republicans To The Edge Of The Fiscal Cliff

$
0
0

Frontiers in Twitter politics.

WASHINGTON — Democrats are turning to one of the internet’s most time-honored traditions in their efforts to break Republican unity over the fiscal cliff negotiations: they’re trolling the GOP.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Tuesday launched their new @MidClassHostage twitter handle as part of their broader effort to hammer the GOP over Republicans opposition to tax hikes for the wealthy, and promptly began trolling Republicans by name.

“We’ll use every method we can to get out the message that House Republicans are holding the middle class hostage to their demands of more tax breaks for millionaires,” DCCC spokesman Jesse Ferguson said.

“This new twitter account gives voice to the middle class who want House Republicans to give up their hostage taking and protect them from the fiscal cliff.”


View Entire List ›

Glenn Beck Turns Joe Scarborough's Attack On Him Into An Ad For FreedomWorks

$
0
0

While listening to the Glenn Beck radio program, sometimes it's hard to tell if you're hearing a news segment or the most sophisticated form of product placement known to man.

This video runs at just over 10 minutes, but it's totally worth it to watch this master salesman in top form:

View Video ›

Conservatives Are Already Fund-Raising Off Hillary 2016

$
0
0

The PAC ActRight, which is run by National Organization for Marriage chief Brian Brown, thinks it's time to start the campaign against Hillary Clinton. “The time to start planning for the defeat of Hillary Clinton is right now.”

Group Of Billionaires Backs Higher Estate Tax

$
0
0

Another tax in flux as the fiscal cliff approaches.

Abigail Disney.

Image by Andrew Harrer / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A group of billionaires voiced support Tuesday for hiking the federal tax on inheritances, among those taxes currently being discussed as part of a "fiscal cliff" deal.

Policies on federal taxes and spending have so far played prominently in the negotiations to avert the austerity crisis that could result from a rash of tax hikes and spending cuts set to take effect at the beginning of next year.

But as lawmakers have publicly and repeatedly debated the merits of letting income tax rates go up for the wealthiest two percent of taxpayers, another looming tax change has gone largely unmentioned.

As part of the fiscal cliff, the federal tax on inheritances, or the estate tax, will revert back to its 2001 rate should Congress fail to reach an agreement by Jan. 1.

On Tuesday, a group of billionaires spoke out in support of an estate-tax rate in line with that being proposed by most Democrats, which would fall roughly between the old and new rates.

Robert Rubin, a former Treasury secretary and current co-chair of the Council on Foreign Relations, said a strong estate tax "can contribute substantially and constructively to our economic well-being" and could do so "without any adverse economic effect."

Republicans and some Democrats have opposed a higher estate tax as particularly harmful to farmers and small businesses, although supporters reject those claims.

On a conference call, Rubin noted that heirs often save much of an estate, whereas the government would spend 100 percent of estate tax money, thus driving the economy.

"Some days I just don't get it why this isn't clear to everybody, including people with wealth," said Richard Rockefeller of the benefits of a higher estate tax. He added, "As the grandson of John D. Rockefeller, I'm perfectly happy that the wealth he made goes with each succeeding generation toward the estate tax."

As part of the Bush tax cuts, the estate tax sunk to a rate of 35 percent on estates exceeding $5 million; on Jan. 1, it is set to climb to 55 percent on estates larger than $1 million.

Now, many Republicans hope to keep rates at their current level, while President Barack Obama supports a tax of roughly 45 percent on estates larger than $3.5 million.

On Tuesday, the group of billionaires roughly backed the president's proposal, calling for a 45 percent rate on inheritances exceeding $4 million.

"I and anyone who dies with an estate that qualifies can afford it," said Abigail Disney, the granddaughter of Roy Disney. She added, "The current state of affairs is absolutely counter to my deepest values as an American."

The group of billionaires also included John Bogle, the founder and former CEO of the Vanguard Group, and Bill Gates, Sr.

George Romney Opposed "Right To Work" Laws

White House Dodges Questions On Supreme Court Taking Up Gay Marriage Cases

$
0
0

Press Secretary Jay Carney ends the daily briefing after three questions on the subject.

Source: youtube.com

Israeli Ambassador: Netanyahu "Went To Extraordinary Lengths" To Stay Out Of U.S. Election

$
0
0

He and the president have frequent phone chats, Oren says.

Image by Amir Cohen / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, said on Tuesday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had gone to great lengths to avoid being involved in the American elections, contrary to a wide perception that he favored Republican Mitt Romney.

"Prime Minister Netanyahu went to extraordinary lengths not to be dragged into the U.S. presidential elections," Oren said during a lunch with reporters at the Hay Adams Hotel in Washington.

"It was all in accordance with protocol," Oren said. "There was no attempt to interfere with the political process here."

Netanyahu, who has known Mitt Romney since the late 1970s, appeared in the U.S. with him during the election but not with Obama, with whom he has had a less-than-warm relationship. Oren said that President Obama had met with Netanyahu nine times during his term and that the two frequently speak on the phone — "three times in the last few weeks."

Oren also defended Israel's announcement of plans to build more housing in a contested area, dismissing the area east of Jerusalem labeled "E1" as a "strip of highway less than 2 miles long" and a "barren desert," and denying contentions that the expansion would impede internal transportation in a Palestinian state.

After the Palestinians' move to upgrade their status at the United Nations, Oren said, Netanyahu "wanted to send a message, a calibrated message that we could also take unilateral actions."

He painted a dark picture of Israel's current situation, saying that the country faced "unprecedented challenges." He quoted the beginning of Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities as descriptive of the challenges that face Israel, but said, "Let me just invert that quote — it was the worst of times."


Fiscal Cliff Messaging Battle Shifts From Taxes To Spending

$
0
0

Public cat fights bely slow progress being made behind closed door.

Image by Carolyn Kaster, File / AP

WASHINGTON — With an increase in taxes for the wealthy becoming increasingly likely, the rhetorical battle over the fiscal cliff Tuesday was moving into spending territory as Republicans and Democrats traded accusations over who was making what proposal.

Its become a familiar scene of the negotiations: one side accuses the other of refusing to come to the table with a "serious" plan, the other rejects that notion publicly, and all the while staff are behind the scenes slowly working out a basic structure for a final deal.

"We’re still waiting for the White House to identify what spending cuts the president is willing to make,” Speaker of the House John Boehner said from the floor Tuesday. “The longer the White House slow walks this process, the closer our economy gets to the fiscal cliff.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney essentially claimed Boehner was not telling the truth, calling it a "a simple fact" that Obama had produced the most detailed plans to cut the deficit on both the spending and revenue sides.

The truth lies somewhere in between the partisan rhetoric.

Obama put forward a deficit reduction plan to the so-called super committee last fall, a plan that was quickly ignored my members of the committee, which itself failed to reach agreement. Carney pointed to "pages 17 to 45" in Obama's recommendation to the committee as outlining Obama's plans for a fiscal cliff deal. Except Obama is backing away from at least one cost-saving proposal in the plan, and it only covers a fraction of the spending cuts likely to be included in a final deal.

In 2011 the White House proposed $577 billion in savings, by its own calculations, in "mandatory savings" and "health savings" from cutting agricultural subsidies and raising fees on general aviation aircraft to raising the Medicare Part B deductible.

The White House also points to Obama's budget, which calls for $835 billion in spending cuts, with overlap between the two proposals. But the White House is walking away from nearly $100 billion of those proposals — from adjusting the way the federal government determines the amount it will contribute to Medicaid — after the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare.

A Boehner spokesman acknowledged that Obama had put forward spending proposals, but said they were not "balanced," using a term Obama employs to call for tax increases on the rich.

"Specific, meaningful cuts that would make a plan “balanced,” the Boehner spokesman replied when asked for what constitutes an acceptable plan from the White House. "$1.6 trillion in revenue and $400 billion in cuts is nowhere in the neighborhood of balanced."

White House aides say if Boehner wants more cuts than Obama has proposed, he should put them on the table.

Supreme Court Asks If It Can Even Consider Case Challenging DOMA

$
0
0

A Harvard Law School professor will argue that the Obama administration's actions opposing DOMA mean the court can't hear the appeal.

Edith Windsor is challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Image by Eduardo Munoz / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Tuesday that it will be hearing arguments from a Harvard Law School professor about whether the court even has the ability to hear a case challenging the Defense of Marriage Act.

Specifically, the court asked Harvard law professor Vicki Jackson to argue that the Department of Justice's position in earlier proceedings in the case that DOMA is unconstitutional "deprives this Court of jurisdiction" to hear the appeal. Additionally, Jackson is to argue that the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), controlled by the House Republican leadership's majority in the group, does not have standing in the case.

The procedural questions relate to the U.S. Constitution's limits on the court's cases to those involving actual "cases" or "controversies." The court is considering whether the Obama administration's decision to agree with the plaintiff suing the government that the law is unconstitutional makes this no longer an actual controversy. Likewise, the court is considering whether BLAG — as a part of the legislative branch — has the constitutional ability to present an argument as a party to the case.

The move came days after the court announced it would be hearing the appeal about the federal definition of marriage contained in the 1996 law, at which point it noted that it was considering this jurisdictional question.

Tuesday's appointment of Jackson, however, takes a dispute that has been taking place on the sidelines of the case up to this point and makes it a central issue in the coming months.

Jackson, the Thurgood Marshall Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, is the co-author of the 2008 book, Inside the Supreme Court: The Institution and Its Procedures. She also is the author of an essay, "Gender Equality and the Idea of a Constitution: Entrenchment, Jurisdiction and Interpretation," contained in a 2009 book about comparative constitutional law.

Tuesday's Supreme Court Order

Tuesday's Supreme Court Order

In Last-Minute Switch, House Democrats Find A Woman For Ways And Means Committee

$
0
0

Rep. Linda Sanchez will fill a slot on the powerful committee. A scramble for diversity.

Image by Alberto E. Rodriguez / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — After privately scrambling last week to avoid sending an all-male contingent to the powerful Ways and Means Committee, House Democrats have decided to name California Rep. Linda Sanchez to the panel.

She will assume the post after Rep. Chris Van Hollen, who was expected to take the slot, agreed to withdraw from consideration. Sanchez was the first Latina to sit on committee when she won a spot in 2009, but was among the Democrats booted from the panel when Republicans retook the majority in the House.

“I am very excited to re-join the House Ways and Means Committee, especially as we work toward solving the critical issues our country currently faces," Sanchez said in a statement provided to BuzzFeed. "I greatly appreciate Leader (Nancy) Pelosi and Congressman Van Hollen helping me secure a spot on this crucial committee and recognizing that my experience and perspective as a woman and a Latina will provide a voice for these two constituencies on the Ways and Means Committee.”

Van Hollen, who is also the top Democrat on the Budget Committee, "decided to step aside so the committee could be more diverse," one House Democratic aide confirmed. At one point, Sanchez and Van Hollen shared a private conversation about the switch on the House floor.

Had the committee's Democratic contingent consisted entirely of male lawmakers, it might have complicated House Democrats' message of caucus diversity, which has been a chief party talking point since the election, and weakened their attacks on the Republican conference for its homogeneity.

Cognizant of those optics, particularly on such a high-profile committee, Van Hollen made his decision last week to back Sanchez, according to one Democratic strategist.

"This is a smart, strategic move by Van Hollen that shows he's a team player and understands the importance of making sure women serve on key committees," the strategist said.

The decision is a huge boon for Sanchez, who has "been working for practically the entire two years" since she lost her seat on the committee to find a path back, said another Democratic aide. She lobbied the House Democratic leadership regularly and was considered to be next in line after Van Hollen.

Sanchez will fill the seat on the committee being vacated by Rep. Shelley Berkley, who was the sole Democratic woman on the committee and is set to leave Congress after having lost a race for the U.S. Senate against Dean Heller.

"Rep. Sanchez will offer immense insight to the Ways and Means Committee next Congress," said Bridgett Frey, a spokesperson for Van Hollen. "Rep. Van Hollen looks forward to working with her and the entire Democratic Caucus on the important fiscal issues facing our nation."

Van Hollen, who has been in touch with the White House as House Democrats' lead negotiator during talks to avert the fiscal cliff, will maintain his spot on the budget committee.

Lesbian Wife Denied Membership To Military Spouses Group

$
0
0

Officer's wife excluded for lacking a military ID card. The Pentagon's nearly 15-month review on benefits changes after “Don't Ask, Don't Tell” now in the spotlight.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks at a news conference on Nov. 29, 2012, at the Pentagon.

Image by Jose Luis Magana / AP

WASHINGTON — A group for military spouses in North Carolina is facing questions of exclusion and discrimination after telling a female servicemember's lesbian wife that she wasn't allowed to join the group.

Ashley Broadway published a letter Monday at the website of the American Military Partner Association stating that, despite being married to Army Lt. Col. Heather Mack, she was told by a representative of the Association of Bragg Officers' Spouses that she did "not qualify" for membership.

The group's official reason for barring Broadway from joining was her lack of a military ID card — something only available currently to opposite-sex military spouses. But a review of the group's previously published bylaws, provided to BuzzFeed, contains no mention of an ID requirement. And it wasn't until after Broadway published her letter that the group added any mention of an "active ID card" requirement to its website.

Broadway told BuzzFeed that the different treatment made no sense to her and said it especially stung given how long she had to keep her relationship a secret under the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

"I think when I heard those words — I feel like I've been discriminated against for the 15 years that I've been with Heather because I met her, and she was in the Army," she said. "I had to lie for so long, almost live two different lives. I could never really tell people, I couldn't get married."

She hoped that her November wedding, coupled with the military's policy change allowing out gay service, would put an end to the couple's hardships.

"I've been discriminated against because of the military, because of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' but I just really had in my heart, had in my mind, that people were moving on from it," she said, adding, "I was so proud to finally say, 'We're married.'"

Although organizations like OutServe-SLDN have repeatedly asked the Pentagon to expand benefits to include ID cards for same-sex spouses of servicemembers, the government has taken no action on the issue since the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" nearly 15 months ago.

LGBT rights advocates have noted that even the Pentagon working group assigned to handle the issue has said dispensing ID cards to same-sex couples would not run afoul of the Defense of Marriage Act.

In June, outgoing Defense Department General Counsel Jeh Johnson acknowledged that "[t]he repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' exposes certain inequalities between similarly situated couples in the military community," adding that it "troubles many of our leaders." Addressing the ongoing review of which benefits could be extended to gay and lesbian couples, he told this reporter, "It's coming along. We'll get it done."

Broadway says that, though she isn't sure of the association's motives for denying her membership, she is seeing one of those "inequalities" at work.

"It's probably hard to understand to someone who's not in my shoes, but when they use those words, 'you're denied because you do not have a military ID,' you've pierced our hearts," Broadway said. "I really felt like I was second-class when they told me that."

Allyson Robinson, the newly appointed executive director of OutServe-SLDN, said Tuesday afternoon that she intended to reach out to the commanding officer at Fort Bragg, Lt. Gen. Daniel B. Allyn, to address the matter.

"The facts here are simple: there is no legal need or justification for any spouse to be excluded from a group like this, which exists to provide support to the spouses and families of our military men and women and the communities they serve," Robinson said. "Though the organization operates on Ft. Bragg with permission from the Commanding General, the group is not formally affiliated with the military and is not required to bar membership to Ashley."

She added, "In the absence of a reply from the Association, we are left with no option but to reach out to the base’s leadership. General Allyn needs to know if there is discrimination happening against the military families in his community."

The Association of Bragg Officers' Spouses did not immediately respond to BuzzFeed's request for comment on Tuesday evening. The association has, however, made multiple changes to its website in recent days — including removing the last names of board members on Tuesday. The honorary president of the association, now listed simply as Debbie, is Debbie Allyn, the wife of commending officer Allyn.

Pentagon spokespersons also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Fiscal Cliff Is Boring Washington To Death

$
0
0

Once more, without feeling.

Reporters sit in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol waiting for news on the federal budget on April 8, 2011, in Washington, DC.

Image by Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A year and a half ago, I was lying on the floor of the Capitol Rotunda just outside House Speaker John Boehner’s office, my head propped on a stack of notebooks, running with other reporters through the possible resolutions to a gut-wrenching budget battle gripping Washington, Wall Street, and the American public.

We waited for a negotiator to try to slip past us to the bathroom, and speculated. Boehner could buckle and back off the spending cut he was demanding; President Barack Obama could give; or the Tea Party could really win the debt standoff, force a downgrade of the nation’s credit rating, and perhaps trigger another recession.

The stakes were high and real, and there was a sense of urgency to a battle that represented a broader struggle between the two parties for the right to map out the country’s path.

Eighteen months later comes another alleged fiscal crisis — this one a “cliff,” not a “ceiling.” And we Capitol Hill denizens are officially bored out of our minds. Yes, Washington is again marching through the paces of an epic struggle between Boehner and Obama over spending. Dire warnings of economic collapse are in the air, a deadline looms ahead. But this time, Washington reporters are standing around watching what most of us believe — even if you don’t see it in the headline — is an entirely predictable Kabuki dance.

This time, there’s little energy in the Capitol and even less interest amongst the public. So far, at least, reporters haven’t found themselves camped out on uncomfortable marble hall floors for hours at a time or called back to the Capitol at a moment’s notice. There have been no walkouts, few public recriminations. In fact, aside from the occasional “no progress” statements by either side, there’s been very little of anything at all.

“I keep thinking that the fiscal cliff is the most boring crisis I've ever seen, and then I remember ‘Speed 2,’” Slate's Dave Weigel tweeted Tuesday.

That’s not to say work hasn’t been going on — it has. Despite their periodic pronouncements, both sides have traded proposals, and the White House and Boehner have continued to narrow the likely parameters of a final agreement, people involved in the talks say.

That is probably good news for America. For Hill reporters grown used to edge-of-your-seat fighting, the fiscal cliff is like a bad blues cliché come to life.

“There really isn’t a lot of excitement,” one veteran Capitol Hill reporter said, chalking it up to simple politics fatigue. “People are sick of this after the election.”

Adding to that general election fatigue is the fact that official Washington has very much become the boy who cried wolf. Since the fight over extending the Bush tax cuts during the last lame duck Congress in 2010, the fiscal cliff is the fourth time the White House and Republicans have engaged in a game of political chicken with the fate of the nation’s economy on the line.

“People are sick of it,” one longtime operative said of the various episodes of brinkmanship that have been the hallmark of the 112th Session of Congress.

The insider eye-rolling, though, isn't matched by total public disengagement. In fact, a review of traffic on the BuzzFeed Network of hundreds of sites — from Huffington Post to Fox News — finds more readers paying attention at this point in the fiscal cliff fight than you were at the same time during the debt ceiling debate.

And if those trends continue, we’re likely to see a huge uptick in the coming days as Christmas and the end of the year approach. And that, in turn, could bring significantly more public pressure.

Still, House and Senate aides on both sides of the Capitol say there simply isn’t the organized interest now that there was in the debt ceiling. “People are tired,” a House aide said recently.

That exhaustion can certainly be felt here on the Hill, where this round has lacked the theatrics that marked the debt-ceiling debate. There have been no walkouts, no chilly meetings at the White House featuring Obama sparring with Majority Leader Eric Cantor. There haven’t even been any particularly long nights or weekends of closed-door negotiations with reporters hovering just outside.

The Washington Post, Politico, BuzzFeed, and other outlets have all reported on the basic outlines of the deal for weeks, and while the final details, as well as timing, are still up in the air, the threat of economic calamity simply isn’t hanging over Washington’s head like it has in the past.

That predictability has led to much eye-rolling in the press corps during press conferences where the standard “there’s no progress” and finger-pointing lines are repeated over and over.

Indeed, the canned lines from Boehner and others involved in the talks underscore an even bigger and more troubling reality of the fiscal cliff — unlike the debt-ceiling fight or government shutdown showdown before it, there’s actually very little new information coming out of either side.

“There’s a distressing amount of agreement between the White House and Speaker Boehner’s office about the need to keep the media — and by extension other lawmakers and the American public — in the dark about what exactly they’re discussing,” a longtime Washington reporter said Tuesday. “How about a little less post-election comity, guys?”

Both sides have been blunt about their decision to simply not tell the public what, exactly, is happening.

“Our interest is in seeing if we can reach an agreement and not trying to negotiate an agreement through the media,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday, adding that “we believe that it’s in the best interest of the prospects of getting an agreement to not read out the details of conversations that the president has with the Speaker, or other conversations that hopefully will make it possible to get an agreement.”

So stop worrying about whether President Obama and Speaker Boehner will be able to agree on a deal that raises your taxes and cuts your access to health when you’re old. And start worrying about another alarming fact: You — and your congressman or congresswoman — will likely have all of about 48 hours to look over it before it’s passed into law.

Ron Paul Will Charge $50,000 To Speak

$
0
0

The libertarian charges more than Mike Huckabee. Accepts fiat money.

Ron Paul will follow the well-trod path of hitting the paid speaking circuit after his retirement from Congress — and will charge $50,000 per appearance, BuzzFeed has learned.

Paul's fee is in addition to hotel, meals, and ground transportation in his origin and destination cities for two people. He's represented by Greater Talent Network Speakers Bureau.

Paul's rate puts him about in the middle of the field for former politicians. He's making more than John Huntsman, Mike Huckabee, and Joe Scarborough, but much less than Al Gore and Arnold Schwarzenegger, each of whom command six-figure fees.

Democratic Budget Chief Accuses Boehner Of Stalling Fiscal Cliff Deal To Protect Speakership

$
0
0

“I'm becoming increasingly worried that that's exactly what's going on,” Van Hollen says.

Image by Harry E. Walker/MCT

WASHINGTON — House Democratic budget chief Chris Van Hollen accused Speaker John Boehner on Wednesday of purposefully delaying an agreement on the fiscal cliff until the beginning of the year in the hopes of protecting his speakership.

"I'm getting increasingly concerned that one of the reasons the speaker is trying to string out these discussions is he wants to wait until Jan. 3 until the elections for speaker take place," Rep. Chris Van Hollen said at a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

"I hope he wouldn't avoid the tough decisions simply to take us into January after his swearing in," Van Hollen added, "but I'm becoming increasingly worried that that's exactly what's going on."

There has been some chatter on Capitol Hill, some unfounded, that Boehner could face a challenge to his speakership should he pitch an unpalatable fiscal cliff deal to his conference.

Democrats have even speculated, perhaps wistfully, that Boehner could pass a compromise package to avert the nation's looming austerity crisis without support from the majority of Republicans. But, Van Hollen conceded, such a move could prove politically perilous for Boehner.

"The risk for the speaker, of course, if he brings to the floor of the House a bill that doesn't have a majority of Republican votes, it could mean more churning in his caucus," Van Hollen said.

Boehner's office dismissed Van Hollen's idea as "nutty."

"That's nutty," Michael Steel, a spokesman for Boehner, wrote in an email. "The Speaker is doing everything possible to avert the fiscal cliff and protect American jobs right now. The White House just refuses to get serious about solving our country's spending problem."


CNBC Set Piece Attacks Former Romney Adviser

Mean Girls Of Capitol Hill

Republican Leadership Denies Asking For Permanent Extension Of Lower Tax Rates For Rich

$
0
0

“That's deliberately misleading White House spin,” says Buck.

Image by Carolyn Kaster, File / AP

WASHINGTON — A spokesman for Speaker of the House John Boehner is denying a reported White House claim that he asked President Barack Obama for a permanent extension of lower tax rates on the top two tax brackets in fiscal cliff negotiations.

Boehner replied to a White House offer on the fiscal cliff Monday with a counteroffer of is own on Tuesday, and spokesman Brendan Buck says it included a call for comprehensive tax reform, and not a permanent extension of tax cuts for the wealthy, as a White House official told ABC News' Jake Tapper.

"No, that’s deliberately misleading [White House] spin," Buck told BuzzFeed in response to Tapper's tweet." Our goal, as Boehner has made clear repeatedly and publicly, is a framework for comprehensive tax reform."

Buck added that asking for the permanent lower rates would be "moot" anyway, given Boehner's call for broader reform.

The back-and-forth is just the latest leak in a month-long negotiation, as both sides jockey for public positioning on the trillions in spending and taxing decisions due by the end of the year.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday that the administration would not be negotiating through the media, because it lessens the likelihood of a deal.

"These things are possible, but they're less possible if we try to negotiate them on an hourly or daily basis in the media," he told reporters.

A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tapper's report.

Five Businesses Who Say They Will Be Hurt By Taxes Going Up

$
0
0

Republicans warn that tax increases on the rich likely to take effect next year will hurt small business. The heads of some of America's mid-size franchise chains talked to BuzzFeed, about why tax increases, even, and sometimes especially on the top 2% of wage earners would be bad for their franchisees.

Donald Fox, CEO of Firehouse Subs

Donald Fox, CEO of Firehouse Subs

Donald Fox, the CEO of Firehouse Subs says he can afford to pay higher taxes himself, but some of the company's franchise owners can not. “For those franchisees that are trying to save with the rise in taxes some of them won’t be able to," Fox told BuzzFeed. The rise in taxes "is going to have a very real impact on those operators.” Fox was among a group of business owners who met with House Speaker John Boehner last week. He suggest letting the tax increase only hit those earning more than $1 million a year to not effect small business owners. Firehouse Subs has 562 locations.

Source: firehousesubs.com

Darin Harris, COO of Primrose Schools

Darin Harris, COO of Primrose Schools

Darin Harris, the COO of Primrose Schools says "many of our franchise have an income over $250,000 and it will have a negative impact on their ability to reinvest back into the system." Primrose school is a private school franchise which offers child care and preschool programs for children 6 weeks to 5 years. Primrose has more than 245 schools in 17 states, and is planning to grow to 312 schools by 2014. Harris, however, says tax increases might but a halt on the company's plan to expand. "We've got a lot of our business that are scared."

Source: fredericknewspost.com

Russ Reynolds, President and CEO of Batteries Plus

Russ Reynolds, President and CEO of Batteries Plus

Russ Reynolds, the President & CEO of Batteries Plus, says "for the first time ever we've seen franchisees deciding to not go into small business over the uncertainty in the economic future." Batteries Plus is the largest U.S. battery and light bulb franchise and has 530 retail stores in 46 states and Puerto Rico. Reynolds says "about 80% aren't gonna invest in a growth if their tax changes" citing an recent study. Reynolds says if revenue are going to go up then he would prefer if Washington used the money wisely to lower the deficit. "If taxes have to go up please show us you are good stewards of the money."

Source: sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net

Jeffery A. Wesley, CFO of Two Men And A Truck

Jeffery A. Wesley, CFO of Two Men And A Truck

Jeffrey Wesley is the CFO of Two Men And A Truck, a moving company with a headquarters in Lansing, Michigan that operates 200 franchises across 34 states. He says the biggest concern for small businesses is the current uncertainty. "The Fiscal Cliff is a concern and as well as the tax/regulatory uncertainty and lack of foresight on growth policies," Wesley said. "It certainly is a challenging world when DC is the biggest impediment to more success."

Via: Linkedin.com


View Entire List ›

Barbara Walters Asks Chris Christie If He's Too Fat To Be President

$
0
0

“That's ridiculous, I mean, that's ridiculous,” Christie said during a segment for Walters' Most Fascinating People special.

View Video ›

Walters: There are people who say that you couldn't be president because you're so heavy. What do you say to that?

Christie: That's ridiculous, I mean, that's ridiculous. I mean I don't know what the basis for that is.

Walters: I think they're worried about your health.

Christie: Well, I've done this job pretty well and I think people watched me for the last couple weeks and during Hurricane Sandy doing 18-hour days and getting right back up the next day and still being just as effective so I don't really think that would be a problem.

Via: abcnews.go.com

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images