Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Obama Prepares To Govern From The Left

$
0
0

Gay rights, climate, and gun control! “A much more muscular form of liberalism,” says Begala.

Image by Pool photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images/MCT

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's determinedly progressive second inaugural speech — a rallying cry to his party and a thumb in conservative eyes — lays the foundation for a fast, hard push on a new set of priorities that includes action against climate change.

The speech, perhaps more so than any of his presidency, was designed for history, to place Obama in the pantheon of his ideological heroes. It also reflected his vision of what the nation will look like decades and centuries down the line.

"The speech was both communitarian and combative," said former Clinton strategist Paul Begala. "Gone is the airy-fairy Kumbaya of Obama 1.0. ... He is advocating a much more muscular form of liberalism than he has in the past."

Progressive leaders also celebrated Obama's attempt to re-center American politics with a mixture of traditional rhetoric and contemporary values.

"President Obama's brilliance is to take progressive issues — gay rights, climate change, voting rights — and make them part of core American values of opportunity, freedom, and equality," Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden told BuzzFeed. "He also is able to make quintessential progressive values like community and obligations to each other part of moving towards America's future, not its past."

In five sentences Obama laid out that vision with forceful statements on gun control, voting rights, and immigration.

"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law — for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well," Obama said, going farther than ever before in support for gay marriage.

And the need for action to avert climate change, something Obama tried and failed to do in his first term and abandoned on the campaign trail, was the most prominent policy area of the president's remarks, taking up eight sentences of the 2,108-word speech.

"We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations," Obama said. "Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms."

The president also delivered an emphatic defense of the nation's entitlement programs, even as he expressed openness to reform, defending them from criticism like that of his defeated Republican rival Mitt Romney's "47 percent" line.

"The commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, these things do not sap our initiative, they strengthen us," Obama said. "They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great."

The president's decision to set clear, ideological targets surprised some allies.

"It was notably not just a high-minded tone poem to democracy and freedom — it was agenda-setting," said Jonathan Prince, a State Department official in Obama's first term.

But he said the words had a clear goal.

"It's of a piece with what occupies their thinking — how to have a purpose-driven second term," Prince said.

And that purpose seems closely tied to the issues that motivate Obama's most passionate supporters: gay rights, gun control, women's rights, and climate change.

"It made a strong case for a progressive, but inexorable, second-term agenda," said a Democratic operative close to the White House.

The speech also appeared aimed at resetting the center of the American conversation and culture, something that has shifted gradually, and unselfconsciously, left on a set of issues over the last decade. Notably, he included Stonewall — the site of an early gay rights conflict — in the same passage as a reference to the iconic civil rights battleground of Selma, a step he took once before at a commencement address at Barnard last year.

"His passionate embrace of gay rights, for example, definitely moves the debate, taking what was an ultra left-wing position just a few years ago, and bestowing it with equal status to African-American and women's equality," said Begala.


Al Roker Freaks Out After Meeting Joe Biden

Republicans Struggle To Say Nice Things About Obama's Speech

$
0
0

“The White House continues to be very confrontational,” complains Barrasso. Portman checks his watch.

Image by Benjamin Myers / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Republicans sought — and mostly succeeded, if only just barely — to avoid looking partisan or churlish on Inauguration Day Monday, but gave little reason to suspect that the truce will last any longer.

"I would have preferred a more bipartisan tone, hitting the reset button with Republicans," said Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, a conservative doctor who was one of the few in his party to openly criticize Obama's second inaugural address, and who spoke for many. "In spite of the words he spoke today, his White House continues to be very confrontational rather than cooperative in working with Republicans."

Barrasso's blunt assessment of Obama's second inaugural address came as most of his colleagues were doing everything they could to keep from saying what they were all clearly thinking: Obama had laid down a gauntlet.

Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn, who just a few months ago was the conference's attack dog on the campaign trail, bent over backward to be kind.

"I thought it was aspirational. It gives us something to shoot for," Cornyn said, declining to voice anything negative about Obama's mention of climate change and other hot-button issues.

"You know, I think any differences we have amongst ourselves on policy, the president gets a pass on his inauguration. It's all about him and this country … from my perspective, this is not a time to criticize the president," he said. "He appealed to our better angels and hopefully we can rise to the challenge."

When asked if he actually believed the speech would help that cause, Cornyn refused to answer and ducked inside his Capitol office.

Cornyn's rhetorical gymnastics were typical of Republicans, who were clearly looking to avoid a fight with Obama on his big day.

Sen. Tim Scott said he appreciated that the speech included "a lot of reflection on history" and that he liked the "carpe diem" themes that ran throughout. But when asked about climate change and other specific policies Obama mentioned, Scott demurred, declining to say much beyond "I'm sure we're going to be on completely opposite sides of the [climate] issue."

Sen. John McCain, who has been one of Obama's harshest critics since losing the presidential race to him in 2008, stuck to a review of the speech's mechanics.

"Excellent delivery. I'm sure Americans appreciated it," McCain said.

After the luncheon, Sen. Rob Portman noted the "positive buzz" from the bipartisan event. "How long does that buzz last?" a reporter asked. Portman checked his watch and laughed.

Others dismissed complaints outright, at least for today. Rep. John Kline, a Minnesota Republican, waved away the notion that Obama should have made an active effort to reach out to Republicans.

"He's got a lot of opportunities to do that. This was a speech to America. He is entitled to do any kind of speech he wants to do. I didn't see any sharp partisan lines in there," Kline said. He added, "It's an exciting day for America every time we do this … it was a wonderful, wonderful program. I thought the president gave a good speech."

Similarly, Sen. Orrin Hatch praised Obama's speech.

"I thought it was good. I thought there were some good things in it. I didn't agree with everything, but my gosh, he delivered it well, as only he can do. And I thought the thrust was about togetherness and working together, and I think that was a good thing."

But even Kline acknowledged Monday's "buzz" may not last long. "We'll see how long the spirit of cooperation lasts. But today is Inauguration Day, it's a day to celebrate."

Obama Makes LGBT Rights His Legacy, But Work Remains

$
0
0

With the campaign over and the speech done, LGBT advocates will expect tangible action from the White House.

President Barack Obama delivers his inaugural speech at the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., Jan. 21, 2013.

Image by Alex Garcia/Chicago Tribune/MCT

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's second inaugural address was the clearest example the nation has ever seen of a national leader tying his legacy to the achievement of LGBT rights.

Although other politicians of a lower stature have been steadfast supporters of LGBT issues, never before have people across the country been represented by a leader who would place the rights of "our gay brothers and sisters" in one of the two or three biggest speeches of his career.

By saying that "the love we commit to one another must be equal" — as Supreme Court justices sat a few feet away from where he stood — Obama reiterated his view that the law must treat gay and lesbian couples equal to straight couples, a question that the justices will be considering in March.

With the president's campaign over — indeed, with all his campaigns over — Monday's inaugural address was no longer one made by the partisan warrior staking out the Democratic Party's ground. He now was working to set the tone of the national discussion and shape his political legacy.

An out gay Latino poet wrote and read the inaugural poem, and the closing prayer came from an Episcopal pastor who spoke at length about ending prejudice.

But as Obama knows well from his first term, moving LGBT rights forward will take work.

It will take work to deal with a Republican Party that opposes many of the initiatives that he and advocates argue are necessary to stopping discrimination against LGBT people. It will take state-level work when federal intransigence is holding back LGBT people and state action is possible. It will take grassroots and community work as well, as cities from New Orleans to Washington have had to address questions about the way they treat LGBT people — particularly, trans people — in their cities.

It also will, advocates say, take more resolve from Obama. They see the action Obama will need to push forward from within the executive branch if he wants to ensure that his broad aims for equal treatment of LGBT people are to be realized.

Most notable, advocates are calling on Obama to ensure the Pentagon protects the rights of servicemembers' same-sex spouses. Over the past months, stories of same-sex spouses in the military being denied basic support from their service base communities have been highlighted throughout the media. Within the Pentagon, advocates also are going to be pushing the military to re-examine rules prohibiting transgender people from serving.

There is also the proposed executive order explicitly banning federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT employees, an order Obama has thus far declined to sign. With the House Republican leadership having opposed the federal legislation to address anti-discrimination more broadly, Obama will be expected to address this issue as soon as possible within the executive branch — whether through an executive order, or through support for action from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Finally, regarding marriage, there remains the question — which Obama may have answered in his inaugural address — of whether his administration is going to weigh in on the Supreme Court battle over California's Proposition 8 marriage amendment. Although Obama has said the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which bans the federal government from recognizing same-sex couples' marriage, is unconstitutional, he has not stated whether he believes state laws banning same-sex couples from marrying are, themselves, unconstitutional. He appeared to come close in Monday's address, but it remains to be seen whether the administration will formally take a position in the case.

In a December interview in conjunction with being named Time's Person of the Year, Obama said, "One of the things that I'm very proud of during my first four years is I think I've helped to solidify this incredibly rapid transformation in people's attitudes around LGBT issues."

In his his second inaugural address, Obama expanded on that and asked the country to make it part of his legacy.

All that remains is the work.

VIDEO: Barack And Michelle Obama Dance At Commander In Chief's Inaugural Ball

$
0
0

The President and First Lady dance to Al Green’s “Let’s Stay Together,” performed by Jennifer Hudson at the ball for the nation's servicemembers.

Obama Serves Cheez-Its At Inaugural Ball

$
0
0

Drink lines go dozens deep.

Source: pbs.twimg.com

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's Inaugural ball features gourmet food items like Cheez-Its crackers and stale pretzels, and the lines for drinks in the cavernous main space go dozens deep.

There are two Inaugural balls this year being held at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center and they are divided into three massive rooms. The main ball, to which more than 25,000 tickets have been distributed, spans the massive basement level and features more than a half-dozen acts. The Commander-in-Chief's ball, started in 2005 under President George W. Bush, includes about 5,000 members of the military and their guests.

A smaller off-shoot of the main ball is being held in a nicer room on a different level of the convention center, and has significantly more restricted press access as that is where many donors and celebrities will be celebrating.

The paltry food and drink offerings are in line with previous inaugurals, and are seen by many attendees as a small price to pay for a glimpse of the President and First Lady.

Source: pbs.twimg.com

Source: pbs.twimg.com


View Entire List ›

Anti-Hagel Group Targets Democratic Senators

The Internet Reacts To The Inauguration

$
0
0

This is supposed to be a respectful and solemn day for the country, so can we please try and take this seriously for just two seconds?!

President Obama gave a great speech.

President Obama gave a great speech.

Via: imgur.com

And Beyoncé and Michelle Obama were fierce as ever.

And Beyoncé and Michelle Obama were fierce as ever.

Source: conservativelolz.com

Ha ha, very funny.

Ha ha, very funny.

Source: reddit.com

Bill Clinton was having a pretty good morning too.

Bill Clinton was having a pretty good morning too.

Source: i.imgur.com


View Entire List ›


John Boehner Was Grumpy At The Inauguration

$
0
0

And there was no consoling him.

John Boehner learned something from Grumpy Cat at the inauguration.

John Boehner learned something from Grumpy Cat at the inauguration.

Image by Carolyn Kaster / AP

Image by Pool / Reuters

Image by Jim Bourg / Reuters


View Entire List ›

Joe Biden's Son Hopes His Father Will Explore White House Run In 2016

$
0
0

Beau Biden says his dad is solely focused on being a good vice president — at least for now.

View Video ›

Image by

The Single Best Piece Of Obama Swag In Existence

$
0
0

Behold, 1%. End of discussion.

Behold! The platinum Cadillac CTS-V COUPE

Behold! The platinum Cadillac CTS-V COUPE

'Forward Edition'

'Forward Edition'

Licence plate: Obama (Presidential Inauguration)

Licence plate: Obama (Presidential Inauguration)

You could see your reflection in it.

You could see your reflection in it.


View Entire List ›

The World Reacts To Obama's Inauguration

White House: Obama Still Thinks Gay Marriage Is A State Issue

$
0
0

No immediate action after a dramatic inaugural address.

View Video ›

Image by

WASHINGTON — White House Press Secretary Jay Carney repeated Tuesday that while President Barack Obama is personally supportive of civil gay marriages, he doesn't believe it should be a federal issue.

A day after the president uttered his strongest words yet on the rights of gay Americans to marry, the White House is trying to tamp down any expectations that he will push for more action to make his vision a reality.

"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law — for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well," Obama said in his second inaugural address from the West Front of the Capitol building.

But Carney referred back to Obama's comments on gay marriage from May 2012 when he "evolved" on the issue and expressed his personal support for gay marriages after opposing them for years in public life.

"The president's position on this has been clear in terms of his personal views," Carney said. "He believes that individuals who love each other should not be barred from marriage. And he talked about this not in a religious sense, but civil marriage. And that continues to inform his beliefs. We have taken positions on various efforts to restrict the rights of Americans, which he generally thinks is a bad idea. And you know his position on section 3 of DOMA."

Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act prevents the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages for the purposes of insurance benefits, Social Security payments, and immigration — major issues in the lives of some couples.

"But on the overall principle that we should not discriminate or treat differently gay or LGBT Americans is one he believes in deeply," Carney added.

Carney refused to take a position on the California gay marriage ban (Proposition 8) currently being challenged at the Supreme Court.

Carney rejected analysis of Obama's speech as particularly liberal, saying, "It was forceful and it was confident…I would reject that idea that this was an –ism speech, it was the opposite of that."

And Carney tried to pour cold water on any grand moves to attack climate change, even though it was a substantial portion of the president's address.

Obama Wouldn't Oppose Three-Month Debt Ceiling Hike

$
0
0

Crisis deferred.

Image by Kevin Lamarque / Reuters

WASHINGTON — White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday that President Barack Obama would not oppose a bill that the House will take up this week to raise the debt limit for three months and tie congressional pay to whether or not lawmakers pass a budget.

The measure, being pushed by House Republicans, would lift the debt limit until May 19 without raising it by a specific dollar figure. Additionally, lawmakers would have to pass a budget before April 15 or they would stop receiving paychecks under a "no budget, no pay" provision.

"He would not stand in the way of the bill becoming law," Carney said, though adding that there were some items that had to be worked out in Congress before enough support would be found to pass the measure.

Obama has consistently asked Congress for longer-term hikes to the debt limit as president, warning of dangers to the economy if the government goes from crisis to crisis.

The House of Representatives is set to vote on the bill on Wednesday.

The 27 Best Local Newspaper Front Pages About The Inauguration


Proposition 8 Supporters Tell Supreme Court To Keep Marriage Ban

$
0
0

“Our Constitution does not mandate the traditional gendered definition of marriage, but neither does our Constitution condemn it,” supporters of the marriage ban argue.

The fight over California's Proposition 8 is before the Supreme Court.

Image by Jonathan Alcorn / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court fight over California's Proposition 8 officially began in earnest Tuesday, as the proponents of the constitutional amendment initiative banning same-sex couples from marrying filed their opening brief with the justices.

Arguing that the case brought by same-sex couples seeking to marry was unlike past gay rights cases where the court struck down anti-gay restrictions and also unlike Loving v. Virginia, in which the court struck down bans on interracial marriage, the proponents of Proposition 8 argue that there is no historic reason "for invalidating marriage as it has existed in California for virtually all of its history, as it was universally understood throughout this Nation (and the world) until just the last decade, and as it continues to be defined in the overwhelming majority of States and Nations."

The lawyers for Proposition 8's proponents sum up their argument as such:

Our Constitution does not mandate the traditional gendered definition of marriage, but neither does our Constitution condemn it. This Court, accordingly, should allow the public debate regarding marriage to continue through the democratic process, both in California and throughout the Nation.

Opponents of Proposition 8 who filed the lawsuit and California state officials, as well as outside parties, will file a response to Tuesday's filing. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the arguments on the case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, on March 26. A decision is expected by the end of June.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Elected To Second Term Atop DNC

$
0
0

The congresswoman from Florida will serve as chair for at least two more years.

Image by Stephen Lovekin / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was elected to a second term atop the Democratic National Committee on Tuesday — but there wasn't much competition.

Indeed, after Democrats celebrated the Florida congresswoman with a highlight reel set to U2's "Beautiful Day," a chorus of voices shouted out support for Wasserman Schultz to reprise her leadership role, one in which she appears to have retained the confidence of the president despite some clashes with his campaign staff last year.

"All opposed?" Donna Brazile, one of the vice chairs on the committee, said, holding a hand to her ear to take in the silence in the hotel ballroom. "Good."

Wasserman Schultz's reelection was the main event at the committee's annual meeting, which was held at a hotel in northwest Washington.

"She is a Democrat from head to toe," gushed Andrew Tobias, the DNC treasurer, before the vote. The "toe part," he said, was Wasserman Schultz's pair of powder-blue New Balance sneakers emblazoned with the words "Vote Democrat."

Brazile even joked that Wasserman Schultz had diverted Hurricane Isaac from Florida last year.

"(Wasserman Schultz) said, 'Not now, not here,' and she stopped that hurricane," Brazile said.

But the event also laid the groundwork for the Democrats' national trajectory in the next few years.

In her victory speech, Wasserman Schultz indicated that path would adhere closely to the one outlined by President Barack Obama during his inaugural address Monday.

"The president has laid out a vision," she said. "We must give him the tools to succeed."

House Republicans Slam Administration For "Attacking" DOMA

$
0
0

In Tuesday Supreme Court filing, House Republican leaders defend the 1996 law defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) leaves after the public ceremonial inauguration for U.S. President Barack Obama on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol January 21, 2013 in Washington, DC. Barack Obama was re-elected for a second term as President of the United States.

Image by R-OH

WASHINGTON — The House Republican leadership Tuesday filed a brief in the Supreme Court urging the Supreme Court to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act as constitutional, arguing that the Obama administration "abdicated its duty to defend DOMA's constitutionality" in February 2011 and instead started "attacking" the law in court.

As to the law itself, the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group — controlled 3-2 by Republicans in light of their House majority — argued that the federal government had the authority to legislate in an attempt to ensure "national uniformity" regarding the provision of federal benefits. The House leaders argue that in addition to the federal reasons, the Congress could act for the same reasons many states have acted to ban same-sex couples from marrying. They wrote:

There is a unique relationship between marriage and procreation that stems from marriage's origins as a means to address the tendency of opposite-sex relationships to produce unintended and unplanned offspring. There is nothing irrational about declining to extend marriage to same-sex relationships that, whatever their other similarities to opposite-sex relationships, simply do not share that same tendency. Congress likewise could rationally decide to foster relationships in which children are raised by both of their biological parents.

Finally, the House Republican leaders argue that laws classifying people based on sexual orientation should not be scrutinized more closely by courts, as is done with other types of laws under the Constitution's equal protection guarantees, because "the histories of discrimination based on race, ethnicity, sex, and legitimacy are different."

The leaders summarize their argument as thus: "In the final analysis, the democratic process is at work on this issue; there is no sound reason to constitutionalize it."

The Obama administration and Edith Windsor, the widow who filed the lawsuit challenging DOMA's prohibition on the federal government recognizing same-sex couples' marriages, will respond to Tuesday's filing in February. The Supreme Court justices will hear oral arguments on the case on March 27, the day after the court hears arguments about the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8 marriage amendment.

House Will Vote On Short-Term Debt Limit Suspension Wednesday

$
0
0

Suspension would last until May 19. Sequester and a continuing resolution to fund the government remain in flux.

Image by Susan Walsh / AP

WASHINGTON — The House will vote Wednesday on whether to suspend the debt limit until May 19, House Republican leaders said Tuesday, a move that would address one of three fiscal threats facing Congress, if only temporarily.

Lawmakers will face off over the other two issues, the sequester and the continuing resolution to fund the government, within the next few weeks.

For the time being, the White House and the Senate indicated Tuesday that they would support the debt limit measure.

But the debt limit suspension would come with some strings attached: The measure would also suspend salaries for members of Congress if the Senate does not approve a budget.

"The last time they passed a budget, the iPad hadn't even been introduced," said Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy on Tuesday.

Technically, the Senate could pass a brief, non-binding budget resolution that does not include specific line items to satisfy the bill's budget requirement.

And, technically, members of Congress would still receive their pay — eventually.

The 27th Amendment to the Constitution prohibits salary changes for members of Congress from taking effect until the subsequent Congress. As such, House Republicans are proposing merely withholding current salaries until the end of the this Congress, at which lawmakers would receive their full pay.

Even so, at their press conference Tuesday, House Republican leaders trotted out the catchphrase, "No budget, no pay," which they also turned into a Twitter hashtag: #NoBudgetNoPay.

Looking ahead to the battles over the sequester and a continuing resolution to fund the federal government, Speaker John Boehner would not comment on whether closing tax loopholes would be part of deficit-reduction discussions, as during fiscal cliff talks at the end of last year.

"We will not raise taxes on the American people," Boehner said simply, before he moved on to another topic.

But the speaker indicated that Republican leaders will aim for a balanced budget in even less time than the span proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan's budget plan, two to three decades.

"It's time for us to come to a plan that will in fact balance the budget over the next 10 years," Boehner said. "It's our commitment to the American people, and we hope the Senate will do their budget as they should have done over the last four years."

Former RNC Co-Chair Says She Knows Nothing About Washington

$
0
0

Republican Rep. Ann Wagner may be a freshman in Congress, but she was a co-chair of the Republican National Committee. For four years.

View Video ›

WASHINGTON — Freshman Rep. Ann Wagner is new to Capitol Hill — and, she claimed Tuesday, new to the ways of Washington.

"I'm a freshman," Wagner said during a press conference with House Republican leadership Tuesday. "I'm new. I was sworn in just three weeks ago as a member of the 113th Congress."

"I don't know how they do things in Washington, DC," she added.

But beginning in 2001, Wagner served as co-chair to the Republican National Committee for four years. She also served as the ambassador to Luxembourg for four years after that — a position that requires a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation.

Wagner was elected in November to succeed former Missouri Rep. Todd Akin in Congress after he vacated his seat to run for Senate.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images