Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Advisers Urged Obama Early On To Release Comprehensive Benghazi Timeline

$
0
0

How Obama got tripped up by his lawyers.

Via: Pool photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images via Abaca Press/MCT

WASHINGTON — The White House Counsel's office advised senior Obama officials to keep quiet about the attack in Benghazi during the weeks preceding last year's November presidential election, according to two administration sources.

BuzzFeed has learned that key members of President Obama's national security team, including deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes, pushed to release a comprehensive timeline of events documenting the attack that would also synthesize the views of the various government agencies into one report. The CIA also wanted the White House to put out such a timeline, according to sources with knowledge of the situation.

Those plans were quashed, however, when the White House Counsel's office, which is led by Kathryn Ruemmler, advised the officials to not release any information to the public out of fear it could be used against them in any subsequent investigations and other legal complications.

The White House told BuzzFeed any suggestion that Ruemmler shot down the release of the Benghazi timeline was "off base" — but an official said the White House would not comment "on leaks out of purported internal deliberations."

BuzzFeed's sources said the legal advice proved frustrating for a number of officials in the president's orbit, who felt they would have better served to put to rest controversy that has lasted nine months.

"It was aggravating," one administration official said. "It comes back to Kathryn Ruemmler, Kathyrn Ruemmler, Kathryn Ruemmler. I hate to say it, as it sounds like piling on, but it's on her doorstep too."

Ruemmler has also come under fire this week for not making the president and others aware of the IRS investigation.

Rhodes and other officials believed that the best way to squash the controversy was to be as open and transparent as possible. From the beginning, Obama officials at the White House have maintained that they had nothing to hide, their moves were not politically motivated, and that there was no intention of misleading the U.S. public. The disclosure of emails between Rhodes and others that were released appear to back up this point of view—the massaging of talking points more an exercise in inter-agency bureaucracy than an a political plot, as Republicans in Congresss continue to allege. A senior administration official reiterated to BuzzFeed this week that White House officials provided access to emails detailing internal administration deliberations over talking points on the Benghazi attacks to Congress for review, negating Republican claims that the White House had something to hide.

After the attack on the American outpost in September 2012, the State Department and the CIA both put out separate timelines of the Benghazi attack. Behind the scenes, according to BuzzFeed's sources, as the administration came under increasing scrutiny heading into the final weeks of the presidential campaign, key officials felt they were getting unfairly hammered for their handling of the crisis. Rhodes and others would privately say that their hands were somewhat tied in the public response due to the fact that there was such a large CIA presence in Benghazi, but other than that felt the had nothing to hide in how they responded to the crisis, especially.

"What we were saying inside was what we said outside," says another senior administration, dismissing the Republican allegations of intentionally misleading the public. "We wanted to get a timeline out there."

Rhodes did not respond to an email from BuzzFeed about internal complaints about the White House counsel's office.

By October — a month before the election — sources say the White House were preparing to put out their own timeline, one that would take into account their own actions as well as others.

The counsel's office decision to advise against the released of a unified timeline may have seemed prudent at the time, but some White House officials feel that earlier public disclosures could have prevented the story from growing into the persistent irritant it has become in Obama's second term.


Anthony Weiner Is Running For Mayor Of New York

$
0
0

He’s back, despite “some big mistakes.” His pitch: Father of the year.

Source: youtube.com

Former Representative Anthony Weiner, whose career was derailed two years ago by the discovery of his raunchy online life, said in a YouTube video announcement that he is officially entering the New York City mayoral race.

The video features his wife, Huma Abedin, and his young son.

Here's Anthony Weiner Singing "If I Only Had A Brain"

$
0
0

In honor of his newly announced New York City mayoral campaign, we present you with this gem of a video from 2007.

Weiner delivered the performance at a sort of political talent show at the Queens Theatre in the Park.

IRS Official Refuses To Testify During House Oversight Hearing

$
0
0

“I will not answer any questions or testify here today,” IRS’ Lois Lerner tells House committee.

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 08: House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Committee Chairman Darrell Issa

Via: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The IRS official who first disclosed the service's targeting of conservative organizations refused to answer questions during a House oversight hearing Wednesday, insisting that she has not broken any laws.

During a House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee hearing, the IRS' Lois Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate herself, even as she insisted she had not done anything wrong.

"I have not broken any laws… I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee," Lerner said in an opening statement.

Earlier this month Lerner disclosed that the IRS had targeted conservative groups during the 2012 election. Lerner heads up the division of the IRS that conducted the extended reviews of Tea Party organizations.

Although Chairman Darrel Issa pressed Lerner to answer some questions, she repeatedly denied to do so and invoked her rights. But the fact that she gave an opening statement created some confusion: Issa and committee Republicans argued that it constituted testimony, and as such was a waiver of her Fifth Amendment rights.

But Lerner was unmoved and continued to refuse to testify further. "I will not answer any questions or testify here today," she told the committee.

Republicans were clearly frustrated. "That's not the way it works. She waived her Fifth Amendment right by giving an opening statement," Rep. Trey Gowdy argued angrily.


View Entire List ›

Koch Brother To Host A Fundraiser For Ken Cuccinelli

$
0
0

Oil billionaire David Koch is raising cash for the Republican candidate for governor of Virginia next week. Setting “the tone for the 2014 election.”

The billionaire conservative financier David Koch will headline a fundraiser next week for Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, the Republican candidate for governor in Virginia, according to an invitation for the event obtained by BuzzFeed.

The reception will take place at the home of Joe Ricketts, TD Ameritrade Chairman and a heavy GOP spender in last year's presidential campaign, best known for considering ad campaign that would plan on the image of President Barack Obama as a "metrosexual, black Abe Lincoln." The invitation lists former governor of New York, George Pataki, as a co-host.

An email to guests from Laura Van Hove, whose consulting firm is organizing the event, frames this year's Virginia gubernatorial election as a race that will "set the tone for the 2014 election."

Arrested Congressional Development

$
0
0

There’s always money in the House Ways and Means Committee.

George Bluth is Rep. Steve Southerland (R-FL)

George Bluth is Rep. Steve Southerland (R-FL)

Lucille Bluth is Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

Lucille Bluth is Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)


View Entire List ›

The Time Lois Lerner Failed To Investigate A Major Al Gore Fundraiser At The FEC

$
0
0

When heading the FEC’s enforcement office in the late 90’s, the beleaguered IRS official was accused of failing to investigate a Democratic fundraiser. “When it recommended not pursuing the allegations against Mr. Glicken, the FEC staff specifically cited his close ties to the Vice-President, Vice-President Gore,” Dan Burton (R-IN) said at the hearing.

Via: Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

The IRS scandal currently engulfing Washington isn't the only episode in which Lois Lerner, the embattled head of the agency's tax-exempt organizations office, has come under fire for playing partisan politics in a nonpartisan entity.

In 1998, while heading the Federal Election Commission's enforcement office, she was accused by the House Committee On Oversight and Government Reform of failing to investigate a fundraiser who had connections to then-Vice President Al Gore.

The committee alleged the FEC failed to investigate Democratic fundraiser Howard Glicken, who was accused of soliciting contributions from a German national named Thomas Kramer, because of his affiliation with Gore.

Kramer claimed he didn't know his contributions were illegal at the time and actually came forward to admit his wrongdoing. Kramer received heavy fines for his illegal contributions, but the FEC never looked further into it.

"When it recommended not pursuing the allegations against Mr. Glicken, the FEC staff specifically cited his close ties to the Vice-President, Vice-President Gore," Dan Burton (R-IN) said at the hearing.

In an e-mail obtained by Roll Call at the time, Lerner expressed her worry to then-FEC General Counsel Lawrence Noble about a possible investigation.

"(Director of the Elections Crime Branch Craig) Donsanto just called. They've seen the 'offending language.' While he was sure there must be more to the story than that he was Gore's friend, he wanted to know why this hadn't been referred to DOJ," the letter read. "He said the Task Force would be revving up an investigation unless he could provide them with something clarifying this."

Noble said there was no investigation because of a lack of resources and funding, which was a hot point of debate at the time.

Anthony Weiner's First Campaign Began With An Apology For "Race-Baiting"

$
0
0

“It was a screw up that I’m not proud of.”

Disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner launched his campaign for New York City mayor Tuesday night with a video in which he asked voters for a "second chance" two years after revelations emerged that he sent lewd texts to numerous women. "I've made some big mistakes, and I know I let a lot of people down, but I've also learned some tough lessons."

This isn't the first time Weiner has begun a campaign with an apology. In 1991, after securing the Democratic nomination for city council, the 27-year-old Weiner was forced to apologize for a bit of dirty politics — which some news organizations at the time described as "race baiting" — by his campaign.

Racial tensions ran high in 1991 in the heart of the district that Weiner wanted to serve. Just weeks before the September 1991 Democratic primary, the Crown Heights riots broke out bringing tensions between the district's African-American community and Orthodox Jewish community to a head. Weiner, in the weeks following, attempted to use the tensions for political gain.

In the week before the primary, Weiner's campaign sent out a mailer to some 10,000 households — anonymously — tying one of his opponents, Adele Cohen, to then-New York City Mayor David Dinkins and Jesse Jackson. Dinkins was extremely unpopular with voters in the district due to what they perceived as his purposefully delayed law enforcement response to the riots.

"Obviously, she agrees with the Dinkins/Jackson agenda," the flyer read.

Another opponent of Weiner's, Mike Garson, his campaign called "one of Brooklyn's dirtiest campaigners."

The New York Times hammered Weiner for the tactics in an editorial entitled "Smears and Fears" after the election.

"Mr. Weiner's hit-and-run tactics tarnish his come-from-behind campaign, and point to a gap in the state election law," the editorial read. "Federal campaign rules require that campaign literature disclose its source. New York voters deserve the same sound rule"

"Race bating," New York Magazine called it in a profile of Weiner.

Weiner narrowly won the race, besting Cohen by 195 votes and Garson by 125 votes and Weiner would apologize for his tactics, after his victory.

"It was a screw up that I'm not proud of," Weiner admitted to New York Magazine in his profile. "I've got to take my lumps for it."


Is This The Face Of A New Global Human Rights Movement?

$
0
0

A controversial son of Venezuela’s elite brings a Cold War sensibility to the chaotic 21st century. “I’m not washing my hands here,” says Thor Halvorssen.

Via: John Gara/Buzzfeed

OSLO, Norway — The real business of the Oslo Freedom Forum, a conference held earlier this month that hosts human rights activists from around the world — Eritrea, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Syria — doesn't take place onstage where activists give speeches and sit on panels. Dissidents, the journalists who want to cover them, and the donors who might be induced to support them do their schmoozing at the Grand Hotel or upstairs at the Christiania Theater, two downtown Oslo landmarks that are taken over for three days in May.

On the afternoon of May 14, Thor Halvorssen, the 37-year-old Venezuelan-Norwegian who runs the forum, was upstairs in the breakfast room of the Christiana, chatting with the exiled Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng and his wife Yuan Weijing. He could be overheard giving Chen a few items of advice.

Of grave importance, he leaned in and told Chen in a tone that could be heard clear across the room, was cultivating his relationship with "Christian." He meant Christian Bale, the "Batman" actor, who had gone to China to try and negotiate with the authorities to free Chen. Chen listened and nodded.

"I don't make the rules of the culture," Halvorssen told me a few days later, worried that the anecdote would sound silly. "The fact that Christian Bale went to meet that guy and put the spotlight on him, that's huge. So if he maintains that relationship, it'll be very good long-term. That's a card up his sleeve."

Halvorssen's deep engagement in the complicated and often dizzying politics of global human rights has put him at the center of a series of international conflicts. It has also made him one of the most polarizing and perplexing figures in the arena of human rights activism. His New York–based Human Rights Foundation has one item on its agenda: to combat oppressive regimes worldwide, whether that means extricating activists from their countries, mounting campaigns to free political prisoners, or inviting dissidents and journalists to the Foundation's annual forum, in its fifth year this year. Halvorssen has been a figure of some controversy for a few years in Norway, where the conference is held and where his family originated before his grandfather, Oestein Halvorssen, moved the clan to Venezuela as the Norwegian king's consul and became the Venezuelan representative for large corporations such as Ericsson.

The conference attracted 450 attendees during the daytime speeches and panels and 250 for the dinners and evening activities this year, according to the Human Rights Foundation. Fifty-seven countries were represented. The forum has been called the "Davos of human rights": an internationalist networking party where dissidents trade tips on overthrowing authoritarian regimes.

Halvorssen himself is a kind of ideological throwback to the days of the anti-Soviet freedom movement, which carried elements both of the right and the anti-Communist left. That's a world whose institutions have been overshadowed and have divided other movements and ideologies: The American group Freedom House represents one of its threads; Human Rights Watch, which grew from Helsinki Watch, another. Halvorssen now bridles at the general view that he's a conservative, or a creature of the Latin American right, and insists he's a "classical liberal" with no interest in politics, only in human rights. But his work has made him a peculiar figure in the staid human rights advocacy world, a 20th-century figure with a 21st-century set of tools at his disposal and a diverse array of associates, all of which he employs for one goal: deposing the dictators he grew up hating.

"The truth is that I'm a rather unfortunate son of Venezuela's elite," Halvorssen said in an interview with me on the last day of the Oslo Freedom Forum in May. We were up in the press room in the Christiania Theater in central Oslo where he had impressed the importance of Christian Bale on Chen Guangcheng, a few blocks away from the Royal Palace. I had been waiting to do the interview for about an hour as Halvorssen buzzed around the room, talking to his staff, introducing people to each other, and becoming absorbed in his laptop at random intervals.

Halvorssen's name is as Nordic as anyone else in the forum's host country, but culturally and linguistically, he belongs nowhere. He speaks four languages fluently — English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese — and says he understands Norwegian, adding, rather cryptically, that "it's easier" if people don't know he speaks it.

Halvorssen was born in Venezuela, as were his two siblings (a younger sister named Randi, a Pilates instructor in England, and older brother Edward, a construction contractor in Miami). His mother, Hilda Mendoza (also at the conference, along with Randi), is a descendant of Simón Bolivar whose family has been in Venezuela since the 1530s, Halvorssen says. His father, Thor, and uncle Olaf were in their day "Venezuela's most eligible playboys," as The New York Times described them, and the elder Thor was a senior aide to President Carlos Andrés Pérez Rodriguez.

The first Pérez term — he served twice, once from 1974–1979, and the second time from 1989–1993 — was a time of newfound prosperity in Venezuela, as Pérez, who had been exiled during an earlier authoritarian period, nationalized the country's oil industry. The second was more challenging, marked by unrest and coup attempts as well as a $4.5 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund. One of the coups was led by Hugo Chávez. Pérez was impeached and booted from office in 1993 for corruption. The elder Halvorssen served as the president of the state telephone company during Pérez's first term, and the anti-drug minister in the second.

In 1993, Halvorssen fell from grace and found himself locked up. In an op-ed he published in 1994 in the Wall Street Journal, he wrote that his work led him to "incontrovertible evidence of money-laundering in Venezuelan banks" and that he alerted U.S. authorities. Halvorssen was arrested shortly thereafter and beaten, he wrote, as well as "psychologically and physically tortured." He was accused of having planned a series of bombings in Caracas the year before.

The elder Halvorssen was also a CIA informant, though never a paid agent. He admitted to the University of Pennsylvania's newspaper that he had worked closely with Duane Clarridge, a former top CIA official in Latin America who was indicted during the Iran-Contra affair and who now runs his own spy agency.

The younger Halvorssen rejects the idea that his father had a special relationship with the CIA.

"My father was the ambassador for drugs," he told me. "He talked to every government and every intelligence agency. It's an absurd statement. When he was in prison, all sorts of stuff started coming out. [Pablo] Escobar's people were on a rampage to silence him."

As his father fought it out in Venezuela's domestic politics, which would soon be reshaped by a new left under Col. Hugo Chávez, the younger Halvorssen went off to college at family alma mater Penn. He edited an alternative conservative school paper called Red and Blue and lived the life of an American college kid, albeit one more worldly than most. His crowd was "the international crowd," he told me. "Lots of Brazilians, Mexicans, and Persians." Halvorssen found ways to cross paths with influential American and international figures.

One of them, the Republican pollster Frank Luntz, recalled feeling, when he first met Halvorssen in the mid-1990s, that he had been tricked into a meeting with a child.

"When I saw him, I was like, I can't believe I came up here for this," Luntz recalls. He was meeting Halvorssen, then a college student at the University of Pennsylvania, at the school's university club in New York sometime during the '90s. But he thought he was meeting a totally different person. Luntz, who was teaching at Penn at the time, was expecting a congressman's chief of staff who also went by the name of Thor, not a baby-faced college kid. "I felt like I'd wasted a day coming to New York, wasted the flight."

Halvorssen wasn't, it turned out, wasting Luntz's time. Instead, he was setting him up with his first international polling gig. The candidate was Henrique Salas Römer, who would go on to run and lose against Hugo Chávez in 1998 in the last election considered free and fair in Venezuela. Halvorssen, the son of a former top official in the presidency of Carlos Andrés Pérez, translated flawlessly between English and Spanish for the two men. He threw in some "barbs" and asides of his own for Luntz's benefit, which Luntz appreciated.

"It wasn't till he started the translation that I said, Oh my god, this guy's really quick," Luntz said. "It was amazing to me that a college kid understood politics and cultures that well." (Democratic National Committee treasurer Andrew Tobias, another friend of Halvorssen's, has a similar story in which a college-age Thor met him at a book reading and invited him to "some incredibly fancy French restaurant in Philadelphia, and I thought, how pretentious, and he insisted on paying, and it was crazy." Halvorssen ended up winning Tobias over as well, and the two remain friends.)

Luntz took the job. Halvorssen had found a new partner to help him poke Chávez in the eye, a task that holds a special place in his heart.

Halvorssen's early political involvement was in the bitterly divided politics of Venezuela, and the defining moment of his life came in 1993 when his father was imprisoned. Halvorssen, then an undergraduate student, helped mount a campaign with Amnesty International and other rights organizations that successfully pressured the Venezuelan authorities to free his father after 74 days in prison.

"He was a target of Pablo Escobar and even uncovered president Pérez's secret bank accounts containing stolen money," Halvorssen wrote as part of a 26-page primer he released to Norwegian media outlets who were inquiring into him in 2010.

Halvorssen's relationship with his home country has not improved. Ten years after his father's stint as a political prisoner, his mother was the parent who got on the wrong side of the Venezuelan authorities. She was shot, Halvorssen has said, in 2004 by Chávez security forces at a protest in Caracas against the recall referendum that kept Chávez in office that year. He included pictures of the alleged gunmen, who shot into the crowd, in his letter to the Norwegian media.

"And the men were arrested, and then they were freed," Halvorssen told me. "My mother is a force of nature. She's in pain every day."

Halvorssen is a Venezuelan citizen but hasn't been back there in five years. He says he'll be arrested if he returns. He is also, for a sort of international celebrity, an intensely private figure: He refuses to talk about his sexuality or relationships on the record ("irrelevant"), or where he lives exactly, citing death threats he's received (though he is based in the United States and travels constantly). He even refuses to discuss his hobbies on the record. "That's irrelevant for BuzzFeed or anywhere else," he said. He did tell me about how he has already paid up to have his body cryogenically frozen, an idea he says he picked up from Peter Thiel.

Halvorssen, who has the clean-cut looks and style of a preppy '80s teen-movie villain, is rumored to be enormously rich, though he says his net worth is "considerably less than what people imagine." His annual salary is $85,000, he says. He owns the rights to a Robert Heinlein novel that he hopes to turn into a movie. He also has invested in a news magazine in Norway. In between it all, he goes to the hippie Burning Man festival in the Nevada desert every year. But the only thing one can be sure of when it comes to Halvorssen — the only thing he really likes to talk about — is his work.

His began in earnest — and on the right — after college in 1999 with the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, which battled the culture of stringent political correctness on college campuses. The issue resurfaced in a documentary Halvorssen produced, 2007's Indoctrinate U, in which filmmaker Evan Coyne Maloney walks around college campuses annoying students and professors by asking where the campus "men's center" is, among other stunts that poke fun at the liberal status quo at most universities. More controversially, Maloney also compared identity-based campus groups and centers to the days of school segregation. It's one of several documentaries Halvorssen has produced or helped produce, including one about the sugarcane industry in the Dominican Republic and another about jokes and humor during the Soviet era.

Since the mid-2000s, Halvorssen has focused on his work with the Human Rights Foundation, which originally zeroed in on combating left-wing populist authoritarianism in Latin America and has since expanded its scope. The bulk of the activities, energy, and money, though, seems to go to the forum in Oslo, a city Halvorssen chose as his venue upon the recommendation of his uncle Olaf. It's the city of the Oslo Peace Accords, and it's where the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded. The Freedom Forum started small but has grown every year, and is now what one young staffer — Halvorssen has 11 and refers to them as colleagues instead of employees — described to me as the organization's Super Bowl.

Via: John Gara/Buzzfeed

Halvorssen is intensely energetic, a trait that can be a little much in person but that translates well on TV or in front of a crowd. He opened up the conference by exhorting the crowd to attend every speech and to not show up late for any of them, and for the rest of the time, stayed off stage, preferring to work with activists and help them network.

"When people at the conference ask me if I know Thor, I always tell them that he is a force of nature," said Jamie Kirchick, a journalist based in Berlin who has known Halvorssen since 2006, when a column by Kirchick in the Yale Daily News about Hugo Chávez caught Halvorssen's eye.

"He possesses a burning desire to right the countless injustices of this world and he has committed himself to this task with an intensity to match that of the dictatorships he has placed in his sights," Kirchick said. "And he does not care if those injustices are being committed by 'right-wing' or 'left-wing' regimes."

"Thor is extremely driven and hardworking with energy levels that are hard to compete with," said Jacob Mchangama, a Danish free speech advocate whose NGO collaborated with Halvorssen and others in the exfiltration operation that planned to remove dissident blogger Ali Abdulemam from Bahrain, an exploit that became a much-discussed article in The Atlantic. "Through OFF he has managed to both give human rights advocacy some cutting edge and create a big tent where people of very different backgrounds can unite behind the idea of spreading basic freedom."

Mchangama said HRF was "instrumental" in helping his libertarian-leaning think tank, CEPOS, find people for its annual Freedom Award, and that the organization has lent him a hand getting into places he couldn't normally. Halvorssen is as much a fixer as he is a showman.

"In 2012 I traveled to Cuba to hand dissident Yoani Sanchez a piece of the Berlin Wall I managed to smuggle into the country," Mchangama said. "That would not have been possible without HRF. I can't be specific about Ali Abdulemam, but Nasser Weddady from the American Islamic Congress and I had been discussing the possibility of getting Ali out of Bahrain for a while. We then turned to Thor, who made things happen and never looked back." It was Halvorssen's idea to find a body double for Abdulemam and to send performance artists in as cover for his escape, which he ended up making in a secret compartment of a car before Halvorssen and the others could carry out their plan. The finished article on the subject read like a spy novel.

Halvorssen can also be an effective salesman, friends say. Garry Kasparov, the Russian chess grandmaster who has become one of the more vocal critics of Vladimir Putin and who sits on the board of directors of HRF, described a meeting in which Halvorssen refused to let two unenthusiastic prospective financial backers walk out the door without helping them.

"I can't discuss the name of the organization we were meeting with or details. We were there with the top guys, and we were sort of pitching them to support an ambitious HRF program," Kasparov said. "They immediately shot us down, and not in the most polite way, basically saying they didn't do that sort of work, that's it."

"Now, me, I am ready to explode!" Kasparov said. "Why were we there? I was ready to walk out, to slam every door! But Thor continued as if nothing had happened. In a few minutes he had shifted to talking another program that these guys might be much more interested in."

"He's not going to let his ego get in the way of doing good, and apart from his empathy, he has the boldness anyone needs to effect change in a world where too many interests are aligned to preserving the status quo," Kasparov said.

If you show a glimmer of interest in Halvorssen's crusade against authoritarian regimes, you don't need to find him. He or one of his staffers or friends will find you. Right after I wrote a story showing that the Malaysian government had paid for a propaganda campaign in the U.S. carried out by conservative American bloggers, Halvorssen got in touch with me in a gushy phone call. "Rosie, this is SUCH juicy stuff," he said, officially drawing me into his vast network of contacts.

That orbit includes everyone from Social Network actor Armie Hammer to actor and Steppenwolf founder Gary Sinise to Empire State Building owner Peter Malkin to libertarian mega-donor Peter Thiel — the last three of whom are also some of Halvorssen's donors.

It has also associated him with some strange bedfellows. The pro-Palestinian website Electronic Intifada published a 6,000-word piece during the conference criticizing Halvorssen's donors, some of whom have also given money to anti-Muslim commentators, and accusing him of being a "right-wing activist, film producer and scion of Venezuela's moneyed elite whose years of involvement in ultra-conservative politics enabled him to corral a small coterie of mostly far-right moneymen into bankrolling his Human Rights Foundation."

The story also tried to use Halvorssen's donors to tie him to Norwegian mass killer Anders Breivik, who massacred nearly 70 youths at a Labour Party summer camp on Utoya island near Oslo in 2011 as well as bombed a government building in Oslo.

The story, by writer Max Blumenthal, reports that one of the largest donors to the Human Rights Foundation is Donors Capital Fund, which also donated to fund the distribution of Obsession, the anti-Islam movie from 2007 that was among many of the documents cited by Breivik in his manifesto. Other influences mentioned by Breivik included Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer. Blumenthal describes Donors Capital Fund as a "slush fund for the cadre of rightist donors who bankroll the conservative movement."

Halvorssen dismissed the material about Breivik's inspirations as a clumsy and offensive attempt at guilt by association.

"In Norway you don't just bring up Utoya," Halvorssen said. "It's a very serious matter; the wound has not healed."

Halvorssen also pointed out that his group has worked with a survivor of the massacre, Bjørn Ihler, who credits it with helping his rehabilitation. He shared an email from Ihler's father with me that expressed the family's gratitude for OFF helping Bjørn recover.

"What did Max Blumenthal do for the survivors of Utoya?" Halvorssen asked me.

Still, the problem of donors has become, for the self-avowedly apolitical Halvorssen, a sticky matter of politics as his profile in America rises. And a few days after the conference, he emailed to point out that "DCF/DT account holders also donate, for instance, to the Brookings Institution, Museum of the Rockies, Boston College, Autism Speaks, Cornell, American Himalayan Foundation, Notre Dame, Dominican Sisters of Mary Mother of the Eucharist, Danish American Society, Jewish Camping, New York Historical Society, Mt. Vernon Ladies Association, and Friends of the Dallas Public Library. This obviously doesn't mean we necessarily agree with the views and opinions of the Dominican Sisters, Boston College or the august Ladies of Mt. Vernon."

Halvorssen says his donors have no say in the operation of HRF or in the planning of the forum, and that he returned a $250,000 check once because the donor wanted to choose which political prisoners the organization would advocate for. He said that many of the donors aren't right-wing at all — most notably Google founder and major Obama donor Sergey Brin, as well as the government of Norway, which contributed about $138,000 to the forum this year.

In a larger sense, he dismissed the Blumenthal piece on the grounds that all of these issues were already litigated in the Norwegian press a few years ago when he was starting the forum, particularly by the socialist publication Klassekampen ("Class Struggle"). The new accusations are merely "regurgitation," he said, and besides, the donors are listed by name online and have been for some time.

One section of Blumenthal's story deals with an interview Halvorssen did in April on noted Islamophobe Frank Gaffney's radio show, in which he appeared to agree with Gaffney's wondering whether Vladimir Putin was somehow behind the Boston Marathon bombings.

In our interview, Halvorssen stuck to his guns. "The false flag thing, the whole Putin thing and the Boston Marathon, I stand by that," he said. "The Russians state that they talked to the U.S. and said these guys are dangerous. And then they let them back into Russia? And then they disappeared for several months?"

He said he didn't know enough about Gaffney, or about other anti-Muslim figures associated with him, to judge them.

"Frank Gaffney wants to hear my views, good for Frank Gaffney," he said. "It is precisely this division between the left and the right that has been so poisonous to civil rights."

I pointed out that Gaffney was, by any measure, a controversial figure on the outside of the American political mainstream.

"If Frank Gaffney interviews me on the radio — Alex Jones has interviewed me on the radio," Halvorssen said, getting heated. "And so has Christiane Amanpour. And so have you."

"I'm not washing my hands here," he said.

Halvorssen also accused Electronic Intifada of being opaque about its own donors, which he suspects of being less than palatable: "What are they hiding?" A request for comment from Ali Abunimah, the EI's editor, went unreturned. Halvorssen said that he never received an email from Blumenthal himself while EI was developing that story, but that Abunimah was his point of contact for the article.

"I can't respond to all of these things," Halvorssen said. But he had been engaged in a Twitter war with the author and with some of his allies since the day before.

"Yeah, of course," Halvorssen said. "It's fun. It's like a video game."

Behind it is a division among human rights advocates, one that pits left against right, and that often centers on the Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian issue. "In human rights the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a weapon of mass distraction used incessantly by actors in the region trying to divert attention away from their own human rights crises," Halvorssen says. "It's also become a power play and profit center for many groups and individuals."

"I came onto Max's radar screen when defending against the smear piece he wrote against [Mauritanian-born Twitter activist] Nasser Weddady," Halvorssen later emailed. "I hadn't heard of him or his intifada before but I'm flattered that they wanted to provide the fireworks for OFF13. I gained 300 new Twitter followers thanks to him."

In his love of a good dust-up, Halvorssen shows more in common with the political types he abhors than he might like to admit. At the same time, his refusal to reject conspiracy theorists like Gaffney is a reminder that his firm commitment to being politically incorrect keeps him from ever being a real political animal.

But the public spat with Blumenthal and Abunimah is also the kind of thing that makes Halvorssen stand out from his tamer peers at Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International. From YouTube videos of oppressed dissidents ("So many people take videos of dissidents and forget the lights. Dammit, production values!") to the splashy account of Abdulemam's escape from Bahrain ("It's a damn good story!"), Halvorssen's job of opposing strongmen is arguably more media-friendly than that of anyone doing human rights work today.

And so is he, though he says he has no interest in being a figurehead.

"I hate having to be the face of the organization," he told me in Oslo. "I don't want it to be the Thor Show."


View Entire List ›

House May Launch Hearings Over Justice Department Media Spying Scandal

$
0
0

“If we lose the constitutional foundations of a free press in this country, tyranny is at the door. Obviously I am very concerned about that,” Rep. Trent Franks said.

Attorney General Eric Holder

Via: J. Scott Applewhite / AP

WASHINGTON — House Republicans are considering holding formal hearings into the Department of Justice's spying campaign against multiple news organizations as part of a widening probe of what critics call a pattern of intimidation by the Obama administration, BuzzFeed has learned.

According to Republicans, at least two committees — the Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform panels — are currently discussing holding separate hearings into spying on reporters from the Associated Press and Fox News by the DOJ as part of its efforts to root out leaks.

"There are definitive discussions on [holding hearings] right now," Rep. Trent Franks told BuzzFeed Wednesday. Franks is chairman of the Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.

"I chair the subcommittee on the constitution. If we lose the constitutional foundations of a free press in this country, tyranny is at the door. Obviously I am very concerned about that," he added.

At the same time, Government Affairs and Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa is also considering holding hearings into DOJ's activities. "I think there's clearly potential for hearings… they certainly haven't been ruled out for this committee," committee spokesman Frederick Hill said Wednesday.

Hill said committee staff "are looking at it, it's something the chairman is interested in," particularly if it turns out DOJ was pulling information on reporters' conversations with lawmakers.

Given that phone lines used by AP in the House Press Gallery were reviewed, Hill said the case could have "echoes of the [former Rep.] William Jefferson search … [that] represented an intrusion on the legislative branch."

Hill was referencing a 2006 corruption investigation into Louisiana Democrat William Jefferson — who famously stored thousands of dollars in his freezer — during which the FBI raided his congressional office, seizing documents and other evidence.

The raid drew strong bipartisan outrage from then Speaker Denny Hastert and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

Talks about potential hearings come as the White House has dug in over DOJ's probes of media outlets.

On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, for instance, made clear the White House won't force DOJ to disclose the names of other reporters and news organizations that have been targeted.

"Here's the challenge it presents, is that that would be — the action you're suggesting any president might take would be to actively involve himself or herself, any president, in an ongoing criminal investigation," Carney said.

"And the consequences of doing that are potentially enormous. And that's why it's very difficult, when you talk about ongoing activity, to suggest that the White House or the President should intervene or take action," he said.

Tensions Brew Inside White House Over Counsel's Role

$
0
0

Has an overly-aggressive White House Counsel’s office gotten Obama into trouble more than once?

Via: Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

WASHINGTON — As they watched President Obama lumber into controversy over mandating contraception coverage last winter, some White House staffers were banging their heads against the wall. The lawyers had done it again.

Tensions between operatives and the lawyers hired to protect them from legal trouble are a constant in politics. But as President Obama's beleaguered aides look for someone to blame in an escalating series of scandals, former political, communications, and policy officials complained to BuzzFeed that one culprit is a balance that has tilted too far toward the lawyer, allowing avoidable controversies to boil over.

Two former White House officials laid some of the blame for the Benghazi mess on the counsel's office, led by Kathyrn Ruemmler. They say that staff led by Ruemmler shut down their attempts to head Republican questions off at the pass. And a veteran of Obama's first term told BuzzFeed Wednesday that the same dynamic had produced, in the past, a similar pattern: A slow-walk until an issue "explodes in our face."

The worries about the Obama White House counsel's office derailing scandal prevention before it can start are not universal. One former White House official recalled working smoothly with the counsel's office and described a collaborative process that generally resulted in all parties being satisfied. And everyone says the lawyers in the White House counsel's office are among the smartest in the business.

A White House official called Tuesday's report on the Benghazi timeline "off base" Tuesday, and declined Wednesday to participate in a broader story on tensions between political staffers and the White House Counsel's office. But that tension, which has boiled in the background for years, helps explain some of Obama's current quandary.

In the case of contraception, some in the White House saw conservative and religious outrage over Obamacare's contraception coverage requirement coming a mile away: Weeks before the mandate was officially rolled out in January of 2012, they pushed hard to seek a compromise that would allow religious employers who found contraception objectionable to avoid paying for it. Others thought large religious-run organizations like hospitals and universities shouldn't be allowed an exception to the contraception mandate. On their side was the White House counsel's office. As reported by the Los Angeles Times last November, any talk of a compromise plan was scrapped due to Ruemmler's objections. Eventually, after a conflagration in the press and on Capitol Hill following the announcement of the original mandate, President Obama stepped in personally and overruled the counsel's office, pushing his staff to find the compromise some had advocated for in the first place.

A former White House official who watched the political bellyflop told BuzzFeed the counsel's office overreached its mandate, taking a political stand with those in the White House who opposed a compromise plan and wrapping that opposition in legal advice.

"This has happened several times before, including on the contraception issue. First, we get an inkling of a crisis. Next, Counsel's office, led by Kathy, develops and sells an opinion that there is no legal way to address the crisis. Finally, when it explodes in our face, we have to walk Kathy's advice back and find a way out," a former administration official said. "I am sure she's a competent lawyer and she's a really great person, but when she has too much sway on major strategic decisions that are more politics than law, the president is left holding the bag."

Of course, after an embarrassing moment like the first couple weeks of the contraception fight — which Democrats eventually spun into a winning narrative that dominated much of the election — someone will always come forward with the "I told you so." And "blame the lawyers" is a common refrain across Washington, regardless of the partisan side.

But every modern president has to balance the need to be on the political playing field with the need to protect his White House from legal challenges. How that balance works can be the difference between an administration slipping past controversy and one getting mired in "scandal."

"At some level, right, that's the lawyer's job — to be over-cautious and constantly try to protect their client from legal exposure. I do think there is sometimes the challenge of looking to win the legal battle and then lose the broader war, the communications war, the political war," said Chris Lehane, a political strategist and lawyer brought in to the Clinton White House counsel's office as part of a small team that handled the legal-political balance during the Clinton scandal years.

From his current digs in San Francisco, Lehane said observing the Obama White House gave him the sense they don't have the kind of special unit in the counsel's office Clinton did. "Every White House is run differently, and every White House is run somewhat consistent with how the person at the top wants it run," he said. "And my perspective is that this is a president who has a small group of advisers who he trusts and works closely with and a lot of the activity really does end up going through a relatively small cohort of folks."

Lehane praised the Obama counsel's office decision not to inform the president of the upcoming IRS Inspector General's report, saying such a move would have put the president at political risk with no discernable reward.

"That was protecting their client," he said. "That was a smart call."

But he said Obama might want the kind of unit in his counsel's office Clinton had in his, a group focused solely on wrangling the negative stories swirling around the White House at the moment. "What's unclear to me is whether there's a group of people sitting in a room that includes the political people and the legal people and they're executing against a strategy that's designed to serve the best interests of the building and the president," he said. "Typically, in these situations every single decision should not be because it's the legally cautious thing to do."

As the White House continues to figure out how to deal with the scandals it faces — Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters Wednesday there are "legitimate criticisms" of the way the IRS story was handled for one — the White House counsel's office could play a major role in determining if Obama can get things back on track quickly or will be forced to settle in for a long haul of Congressional investigatons and media inquries.

Left Presses Andrew Cuomo On Campaign Finance

$
0
0

“If he only does a half-measure or doesn’t come through, it would be very hard for him to have an excited base,” Radford says.

Via: Mike Groll / AP

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has four weeks before the end of this year's legislative session to deliver on a pledge to pass public financing of elections in his state — an issue that is the latest in a series of chances he and other possible presidential contenders have to woo or alienate progressives before the 2016 primary season begins in earnest.

Cuomo, who is widely thought to be considering a bid for the next Democratic nomination, has stressed the importance of campaign finance reform in all three of his State of the State addresses since becoming governor in 2009. In his speech earlier this year, Cuomo proposed a public-funding option for statewide elections based on the system now in place in New York City, which allocates matching funds and places spending caps on primary and run-off races. The governor has also vowed to overhaul disclosure rules and lower contribution limits for all offices.

Advocates say the proposed program would not only mitigate the longtime pattern of corruption in Albany — including the arrests this spring of two state senators — but would serve as the first sweeping campaign reform effort since a 2010 Supreme Court case, known as Citizens United, that made yet more space for the influence of corporate money in electoral politics.

"Governor Cuomo promised to clean up Albany, and now he's got the opportunity to do it by passing public financing of elections," said Ilya Sheyman, the campaigns director for MoveOn.org's political action committee. "This is on him. Millions of progressives are watching to see if he'll step up and deliver."

MoveOn and other progressive groups — including the Communications Workers of America and CREDO Mobile — have tried to ramp up national pressure on Cuomo leading up to the end of the state legislative session on June 20.

Even an organization like Greenpeace, one of the largest environmental groups in the country, is citing public financing as a "top issue" this year. Executive director Phil Radford argued that as long as "the natural gas industry can buy elected officials," Greenpeace won't be able to advance its environmental causes.

"New York State was really the first out of the gate in significant reform in recent years," said Radford, citing Cuomo's push to pass same-sex marriage in 2011. "This could really be an incredible model for the rest of the country, and the governor could be a model for democracy and reform. He could really act in a bold way."

Advocates also make the case that Cuomo's focus on campaign finance could make him a progressive hero on the national stage ahead of a possible run for the presidency.

Martin O'Malley, the Democratic governor of Maryland, already signed an overhaul of his state's campaign laws earlier this year, but if Cuomo's ambitious package succeeds this spring, "he'll be far and away the leader on this nationally," said Radford.

"He's a presidential contender in 2016 and what he does matters nationally," said Becky Bond, the head of CREDO. "He might run for president as the man who cleaned up elections. That would be a huge momentum point in our organization."

But progressives who have their hopes pinned on the campaign finance push also worry that Cuomo may be going soft on his commitment to sealing a full package of legislative reforms.

In the face of state Republican opposition, the governor has expressed some doubt that he would be able to check off all his initiatives this year, including an abortion rights bill also opposed by Dean Skelos, the New York Senate Republican Leader.

"Those issues, some may fall off. It may become an even smaller handful as we get closer," Cuomo said late last month.

CREDO recently released a petition warning its some three million members — 200,000 of whom live in New York — that "even after two huge corruption scandals," Cuomo appeared to be "stepping back rather than stepping up."

"Rather than seizing the moment and leading the fight to pass public financing, Gov. Cuomo instead expressed pessimism that it would pass," the petition reads.

Bond noted that Cuomo expressed his support last year for independent redistricting reform, but failed to follow through on legislation. "Politicians make a lot of promises," she said. "Governor Cuomo said that he would support independent redistricting, and then he backed away from it. The ball is in his court here. If he doesn't follow through it will send a strong message that what he says and does are not aligned."

"There's always worry with Andrew," added Mike Lux, a former Clinton administration official and CEO of Progressive Strategies. "He is more than a bit slippery."

If Cuomo does fall back on his commitment to full reform, said Radford, he'll have to answer to the progressive community during a possible campaign, in which a contender like O'Malley could potentially out-flank him on the left.

"If he only does a half-measure or doesn't come through, it would be very hard for him to have an excited base," Radford said.

Inside New York, political observers say they'll know when the famously aggressive Cuomo, a skilled inside-player, wants to get serious about ramming through the campaign finance deal.

"People know what it looks like when the governor wants to move something forward, and this isn't it yet," said a state Democratic operative involved in the reform movement. "He continues to say something good one day and then nothing for three days. We have seen what he's like when he's really focused — he'll be banging heads together in private meetings."

Skelos will "keep his thumb on it, and if the governor doesn't make it clear that he has to lift it off, he'll just keep it there," the operative added. "There is a definite sense that the Republicans are going to say 'no' until the governor says 'yes.'"

But if anything will motivate the legislation forward, the operative argued, it's that Cuomo knows national Democrats are watching — and closely.

"This is part of what made Andrew interested in it. He'd be the first to do a post-Citizens United thing that was real. This would establish him as the leader on it nationally, and that would be a very big deal."

Others working closely on the issue were optimistic, noting that four weeks is time enough to push through even the most ambitious legislation.

"There's a lot of time left in the session even though it doesn't look that way on the calendar," said David Donnelly, executive director of the Public Campaign Action Fund. "And New York is notorious for getting deals made in the crucible of a tightening calendar."

"We're not concerned about it," added Steve Pampinella, spokesman for FAIR Elections for New York, a coalition group supporting Cuomo's reform push. "We know that the governor is going to come through. We're confident that he's going to push this, and that he's reliable on this."

Cuomo's press office didn't respond to an inquiry about the legislation.

Anthony Weiner Ready For Apology Campaign

$
0
0

The disgraced former congressman says he’s apologized to his wife “many, many times,” and he’ll apologize to voters, too. “I know that part of this process is going to be doing a lot of apologizing.”

Via: Brendan Mcdermid / Reuters

In his first live interview since announcing his comeback bid for New York City mayor, ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner told WNYC Thursday he would continue to apologize to voters about the scandal that ousted him from office two years ago, and promised that the behavior would not occur again.

Weiner said he and his wife, longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, had put the incident behind them.

"I put her through some difficult things. She says it's in the rear view mirror — but it's not far in the rear view mirror," Weiner told WNYC host Brian Lehrer.

Asked by Lehrer if he was "confident" another scandal wouldn't emerge, Weiner said only, "It is behind me."

"There's no doubt about it. I made very big mistakes. I compounded it immeasurably by being dishonest about it," Weiner said. "I have apologized many, many times to my wife, and frankly I know that part of this process is going to be doing a lot of apologizing."

Lehrer wondered whether Weiner's illicit online activity could be described as an addiction, but the former congressman dismissed the characterization.

"I don't know what it was," he said. "It's none of those things. It was simply a blind spot. It was a thoughtfulness I had about my private behavior."

"I don't have a good explanation," he added.

Weiner announced his mayoral bid late Tuesday night with a glossy campaign video featuring Abedin. He held his first campaign event at 125th Street early Thursday morning.

The full audio of Weiner's interview with Lehrer can be found on WNYC's website.

The 23 Most Important Expressions Of Jay Carney

$
0
0

So…colorful.

Via: Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

Via: Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

Via: Susan Walsh / AP

Via: Win McNamee / Getty Images


View Entire List ›

How Long Can House Republicans Go Before Turning On Each Other?

$
0
0

The divided conference unifies in the wake of Washington scandals — but how long can it really last? “I think there’s a little spring in our step these days, but the real test will be the debt limit,” says Hudson.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Thursday, May 16, 2013.

Via: Molly Riley / AP

WASHINGTON — The Republican Conference is experiencing something it hasn't had in a long time: unity.

Speaker John Boehner has overseen one of the most bitter and divided conferences in recent memory. Conservatives have consistently, and openly, defied him, while moderates have publicly criticized the rightward lean of the GOP under his stewardship.

But those divisions are, at least for now, taking a backseat to Republican unity, thanks to a series of ugly Obama administration scandals, a lack of crises needing immediate attention, and shrewd scheduling decisions that have kept divisive issues off the floor.

"Yes, Todd Rokita has faith in leadership. We are best when we are bold, it's a new day," said Rep. Todd Rokita, referring to himself in the third person at a Heritage Foundation event. "And I don't mean just because of the IRS scandal — whatever this environment is, it's a new day, it's a new Congress."

"Yeah, I think there's a little spring in our step these days," Rep. Richard Hudson told BuzzFeed. But Hudson acknowledged the reality that all the intra-party love that's going on may be nothing more than a scandal-induced sugar high, and that once Boehner tries to force tough decisions on his conference, it could all fall apart.

"The real test will be the debt limit," he said, adding, "we've got a while to go before then, things could change."

Rep. Justin Amash, who often bucks his leadership and voted against Boehner for speaker, said he was more skeptical of Boehner's ability to keep his promises.

"Trust but verify," he said.

So what's changed from January, when leadership relied on Democratic votes to pass a Hurricane Sandy relief bill and conservatives were openly plotting to oust Boehner?

For one thing, the deluge of scandals over the last several weeks.

For members who have long argued that the Obama administration was heavy handed against its enemies, recent scandals have left them feeling somewhat vindicated. There have been and will be repeated hearings into the revelation that the IRS targeted conservative groups for auditing, and some conservatives have been gleefully saying, "I told you so" to reporters now that it's been revealed the Department of Justice seized the phone records of Associated Press reporters and editors. Republicans have kept the heat on the White House over the terrorist attack last year in Benghazi.

It's not just the scandals that have brought Republicans together. Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy have, with critical exceptions, loaded the floor with easy votes for their members: They've been united on things like building the Keystone pipeline and agreed to again hold a vote on the repeal of Obamacare. And tactically, Republicans say they were boosted and scored a legislative win when they passed the "No Budget, No Pay" act, arguing they effectively forced the Senate Democrats to pass their first budget in four years.

But when leaders have sought to pursue controversial legislation, or even bills that its most conservative members don't like, the results have been embarrassing.

Cantor was forced to pull a bill from the floor that would have transferred money from one piece of Obamacare to a fund for people with pre-existing conditions because conservatives argued it would extend the life of the law they have committed to repealing. Leadership is working to revise the bill to make it more palatable to Republican opponents, Roll Call reported, but so far they've been unable to convince any opponents to drop their concerns.

Aware that the unity is fragile, the conservative group Heritage Action for America sent a warning to Boehner and Cantor, urging them to keep the focus on the scandals and "avoid bringing any legislation to the House Floor that could expose or highlight major schisms within the conference."

"Recent events have rightly focused the nation's attention squarely on the actions of the Obama administration. It is incumbent upon the House of Representatives to conduct oversight hearings on those actions, but it would be imprudent to do anything that shifts the focus from the Obama administration to the ideological differences within the House Republican Conference," wrote Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham, also noting that the GOP shouldn't give the press any reason to shift the focus from Obama "to write another 'circular firing squad' article."

But a strategy built on Obama scandals and avoiding difficult issues can only last so long, and in the coming months, Republicans will once again have to figure out a strategy for raising the nation's debt ceiling — a subject that has divided the conference on more than one occasion. The big question is whether they keep a united front moving into the summer.

Conservatives believe the GOP is in a good position to win on budget and spending issues and have held off from the normal sniping at leadership that accompanies the months before a tough vote, in part because of the so-called Williamsburg accord.

More a capitulation by leadership to back conservative demands for ideological purity, the agreement was brokered during the Republican Conference in Williamsburg, Virginia, in January and requires leadership to agree to a debt ceiling increase only if it is part of a deal to balance the budget in 10 years.

"I think the most united we have been in the past two and half years has been when we do what we said we would," said Rep. Tim Huelskamp, a Kansas Republican and frequent critic of the speaker. "We had a very strong vote on a budget. The next part of the Williamsburg accord is putting that budget into the debt ceiling vote. That was the whole purpose of those votes, finding a way to get into the driver's seat."

Of course, there is almost no chance President Obama will ever even see a debt ceiling measure that fits conservatives' bill. Senate Democrats will never agree to the kind of massive cuts in spending a 10-year balanced budget would require. Even if by some legislative miracle the bill gets through the Senate, Obama will certainly veto it.

"Oh, there's no way we're going to get that," one senior Republican aide acknowledged. The problem for leadership is that they'll need some wiggle room from their conservatives if they hope to get the strongest deal possible for their members.

House leadership held the first in a series of listening sessions with members last week on what a debt ceiling agreement should look like, and already there are some disagreements.

Rep. Raul Labrador, a harsh conservative critic of leadership, said at a Heritage Foundation event that one suggestion to tie the debt increase to only a tax reform bill — and not include spending cuts — was "nonsensical" and a "slap in the face."

"We're going to have to do a lot better than 'No Budget, No Pay,' which I opposed," Amash said. "We still don't have a budget, every member of Congress has been paid, and the debt ceiling increased."

But others said they were confident in leadership moving forward.

Rep. Tom Rooney described Boehner in the listening session on the debt limit as "very attentive" and said that the tides for the conference had shifted in recent weeks.

"I definitely get the sense that things are better. There's some conferences where it's almost screaming matches between people, harsh disagreements," Rooney said. "And that's not been what's happening lately. We have been more on the same page lately."

With reporting from John Stanton.


Young Ron Paul In A Uniform And On A Bicycle Is Decidedly Dapper

Anthony Weiner Recycles From Old Campaign: Four Old Ads

$
0
0

The brochure, the logo, the video of his mother, the love of “stickball,” and the sort of subway sound at the end of his videos are all ideas from his 2005 run for mayor worked into his new campaign.

Four of his old ads:

View Video ›

Via:

His new ad:

Source: youtube.com

Video: Anti-Drone Protestor Takes Over Obama's Counterterrorism Speech

$
0
0

“I’m willing to cut the young lady who interrupted me so slack, because it’s worth being passionate about.”

President Barack Obama was heckled during a major counterterrorism speech Thursday. The President was speaking at National Defense University in Washington, D.C.

The interruption was caused by Code Pink's Medea Benjamin according to reporters at the event.

"I'm willing to cut the young lady who interrupted me some slack, because it's worth being passionate about," the President said.

"Abide by the rule of law. You're a constitutional lawyer," the protestor said.

"The voice of that woman is worth paying attention to. Obviously I do not agree with much of what she said," the President added.

View Video ›

View Video ›

Via:

View Video ›

Via:


View Entire List ›

LGBT Job Discrimination Bill Won't See Action Until July, Senator Says

$
0
0

Advocates — and the bill’s lead sponsor — had hoped the chairman would consider the bill, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, in his committee in May or June. It won’t happen until “probably after the Fourth of July break,” Iowa’s Tom Harkin says.

Via: Joshua Roberts / Reuters

WASHINGTON — LGBT advocates — who faced a setback this week when the Senate kept protections for same-sex couples out of immigration reform — will have to wait until after the Fourth of July holiday to see any action on another top priority: a bill to ban workplace discrimination against LGBT people.

"I've got a couple, three things on my agenda right now. I think we're going to do ENDA probably after the Fourth of July break," Sen. Tom Harkin, the chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that is considering the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, told BuzzFeed this week.

Supporters had hoped to see the bill move out of the committee by June at the latest.

At ENDA's introduction, the bill's lead sponsor, Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, had told BuzzFeed that he hoped to have the bill marked up in May or June.

"It's not ideal," said Freedom to Work executive director Tico Almeida, who called the delay "disappointing."

"It would have been the preference of many LGBT advocates to hold the markup in May or June, but the committee has a very busy schedule, and I do think that some policy makers in Washington, D.C., have a philosophy that nothing should be done on any gay rights issue until after the Supreme Court rules in the marriage equality cases," he said. Almeida said he disagrees with that philosophy, but, "[M]any people in this town have decided to put all LGBT issues on hold until the Supreme Court rules."

Almeida's organization has attempted to move forward nonetheless, filing a complaint on Wednesday in Illinois alleging that ExxonMobil discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation in its employment practices.

Human Rights Campaign spokesman Michael Cole-Schwartz wouldn't directly criticize Harkin's move, only telling BuzzFeed, "We have been pressing the chairman to bring up for a markup and have every confidence that he will make good on that pledge. We would like to see that as soon as possible."

Almeida, whose organization has been more vocal than HRC in criticizing the lack of legislative and executive movement on workplace protections, nonetheless added, "We remain 100% confident that Chairman Harkin plans a markup this summer that will move ENDA successfully from the committee and position it for floor action in the fall."

On that, Cole-Schwartz concurred, saying, "We expect that ENDA will be marked up with plenty of opportunity for the majority leader to bring it for a vote as well. Our hope is that ENDA will receive a floor vote this year."

Merkley's office had no comment on Harkin's statement, but a spokesman noted that the bill already has support from 46 co-sponsors, plus Reid's support, and that they remain optimistic the bill will be heard on the Senate floor this year.

Two Republicans, Sens. Susan Collins and Mark Kirk, are co-sponsors of the bill. Eight Democrats — Sens. Maria Cantwell, Tom Carper, Heidi Heitkamp, Tim Johnson, Joe Manchin, Bill Nelson, Mark Pryor, and John Rockefeller — and Independent Sen. Angus King, who caucuses with the Democrats, are not co-sponsors.

This Is The Woman Who Interrupted Obama's Speech

$
0
0

Medea Benjamin interrupted President Obama’s speech on drones Thursday afternoon. This is not the first time she’s done something like this.

This is Medea Benjamin, she's the co-founder of Code Pink, an antiwar organization.

This is Medea Benjamin, she's the co-founder of Code Pink , an antiwar organization.

Source: facebook.com

Benjamin and others in her group make a practice of interrupting, heckling, and protesting press conferences and government hearings.

Benjamin and others in her group make a practice of interrupting, heckling, and protesting press conferences and government hearings.

Via: facebook.com

She interrupted Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association, when he gave a speech following the shootings in December at Sandy Hook Elementary in Connecticut.

Source: youtube.com

In March, she protested while Attorney General Eric Holder was testifying before Congress about targeted drone strikes.

In March, she protested while Attorney General Eric Holder was testifying before Congress about targeted drone strikes.

Source: facebook.com


View Entire List ›

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images