Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

New York's Metropolitan Opera Season Opens With Gay Protest

$
0
0

“SUPPORT RUSSIAN GAYS!” the sign outside the high-society event declared, as Queer Nation NY and others protested — inside and outside — over the Met’s refusal to dedicate Monday night’s event to Russia’s LGBT population. One more front in the fight against Russia’s anti-LGBT laws.

queernationny.org

In advance of tonight's Metropolitan Opera Gala, featuring Russian conductor Valery Gergiev and soprano Anna Netrebko in the performance of gay Russian composer Peter Tchaikovsky's Eugene Onegin, supporters of LGBT people in Russia staged a protest.

In advance of tonight's Metropolitan Opera Gala, featuring Russian conductor Valery Gergiev and soprano Anna Netrebko in the performance of gay Russian composer Peter Tchaikovsky's Eugene Onegin , supporters of LGBT people in Russia staged a protest.

queernationny.org

Queer Nation NY, which led the protest, described the conductor and soprano as "longtime and vocal supporters of Vladimir Putin." Another composer, Andrew Rudin, had started a petition asking the Met to dedicate tonight's Gala to LGBT people in Russia.

Queer Nation NY, which led the protest, described the conductor and soprano as "longtime and vocal supporters of Vladimir Putin." Another composer, Andrew Rudin, had started a petition asking the Met to dedicate tonight's Gala to LGBT people in Russia.

queernationny.org

The petition garnered more than 9,000 signatures:

The petition garnered more than 9,000 signatures:

change.org


View Entire List ›


Rand Paul Competes With Other 2016 Republican Hopefuls To Woo New York Donors

$
0
0

An RNC fundraiser brought the Republican Party’s most buzzed-about presidential prospects under one roof for an audition in front of elite donors. “They actually really like Rand.”

Associated Press

Several of the GOP's top potential presidential candidates gathered in the home of New York Jets owner Woody Johnson Monday night for a fundraiser that doubled as an early audition in front of the party's elite money crowd.

The fundraiser for the Republican National Committee — co-hosted by Chairman Reince Preibus and Johnson — was headlined by a who's-who of 2016 speculation, including New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Rep. Paul Ryan, Sens. Rand Paul and Marco Rubio, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, and Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder.

It also featured a roomful of Republican establishment figures and wealthy donors eager to size up the field of would-be candidates.

"I'm just here to see who's running and get information," John Catsimatidis, a New York billionaire and failed mayoral candidate, told BuzzFeed of the headliners (none of whom have yet announced intentions to run for president). Former New York Governor George Pataki was less blunt in his description of the night's purpose, saying it's too early to obsess over the field: "I think the important thing is ideas at this point and not candidates."

Still, it has remained an open question which of the 2016 hopefuls is best positioned to inherit Mitt Romney's expansive network of big-ticket donors — the only indisputably successful piece of his troubled campaign infrastructure. Christie's pragmatic record and proximity to the country's financial industry should theoretically make him the likeliest heir, but many former Romney donors remain upset with his eleventh-hour abandonment of their nominee last year after Hurricane Sandy.

While Christie works behind the scenes to mend relations with the donor class, other prospective candidates are trying to take advantage of the rift — particularly Paul. The Kentucky libertarian has risen to fame this year by picking fights with precisely the wing of the party that aligned with Romney's brand of Republicanism last year. Paul's platform, until recently dismissed as a fringe joke by most party elders, might seem anathema to the GOP establishment.

But, according to one Paul adviser, the senator's early endorsement of Romney last year — which came even before his father fully terminated his own presidential campaign, and which helped attract some Tea Party support to the primary front-runner — endeared him to the nominee's most loyal donors.

"They actually really like Rand because of how he came out and supported Romney," the adviser said, adding, "I think he'll surprise a lot of people with how much he can raise from [Romney's former donors]."

One prominent New York Republican concurred, telling BuzzFeed after the event that while he was "surprisingly" impressed by Rubio's mastery of the issues, too many are underestimating Paul's appeal among the moneyed crowd that populated Johnson's home Monday.

Still, it wasn't all friendly faces for Paul at the event. Upon leaving the building, Long Island Rep. Peter King, who has said he's considering a presidential bid in part to combat libertarian creep within the GOP, merrily told BuzzFeed, "We're all just one big happy family" — before declaring he wouldn't donate a penny to Paul's campaign.

Later, Christie, who started a public spitting match with Paul this past summer, waved off questions with a curt, "Not a chance."

Thirty minutes after Christie's departure, Paul quietly emerged from the event — the last 2016 hopeful to leave.

Trader Lost Millions Apparently Trying To Manipulate Intrade Data To Favor Mitt Romney

$
0
0

A new study reveals that a single trader may have been responsible for making the race seem closer than it really was in the final stretch to Election Day.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney pauses as he addresses supporters during his election night rally, Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012, in Boston.

David Goldman / AP

One trader lost at least $4 million betting on former presidential candidate Mitt Romney through Intrade, possibly to make it appear he was faring better against President Barack Obama in the waning days and hours of the 2012 election than he was.

That's what a new study by Microsoft Research's David Rothschild and Columbia University's Rajiv Sethi suggests. The study, published earlier this month, analyzed Intrade transaction level data over the course of the final two weeks of the election cycle.

Intrade is an online exchange where members make bets on various events, notably presidential elections, and is watched closely by political insiders to gauge the strength of a candidate. Intrade was thrust into the spotlight in 2008 when it correctly predicted the outcome of the presidential election.

Rothschild and Sethi found that a single trader accounted for one-third of all bets made on Romney during the two week period of the study, which saw about 3.5 million contracts traded. The total election cycle had 7.6 million contracts traded.

The trader bet solely on Romney and constantly sold on Obama, losing about $4 million in the process.

Those actions effectively created what the study called a "firewall" that kept prices within a defined range and made the race seem closer than it really was.

During the same period prices on Betfair, another exchange that operates similarly to Intrade, were changing rapidly as new information came in while Intrade prices remained within a defined range.

The study says some voters tend to go with who they perceive as the "winning candidate" and will abandon those who they think are likely to lose. Turnout can also be affected by a similar sentiments. Although it was unlikely that this effort had any significant effect on the final tallies, according to the study, it was unusually successful in its ability to manipulate prices on the exchange.

The study says it's possible this trader was simply hedging bets on Intrade to account for bets made in other exchanges such as Betfair, or thought Romney was underpriced, but the authors lean towards the explanation of manipulation.

The "firewall" was created around 3:30 p.m. ET on Election Day and collapsed around 9 p.m. ET when polls closed.

Read the full report here:

Which New York City Mayoral Candidate Was A Bigger High School Heartthrob?

$
0
0

A tough choice.

Republican Joe Lhota vs. Democrat Bill de Blasio

Republican Joe Lhota vs. Democrat Bill de Blasio

Cornel West + "Crossfire" = One Hell Of A GIF Factory

$
0
0

Thank goodness for split screen reaction shots on cable news.

You may have missed the extremely animated debate over Obamacare and the future of conservatism last night on Crossfire.

You may have missed the extremely animated debate over Obamacare and the future of conservatism last night on Crossfire .

Well, Bill Kristol was there, and he did this, which was great.

Well, Bill Kristol was there, and he did this, which was great.

Van Jones got fired up for a second but chilled out pretty quickly.

Van Jones got fired up for a second but chilled out pretty quickly.

And S.E. Cupp's eyebrows were working overtime.

And S.E. Cupp's eyebrows were working overtime.


View Entire List ›

Obama Lays Out America's "Core Interests" In The Middle East

$
0
0

Obama calls for new negotiations with Iran on nuclear weapons and a return to the bargaining table for Israelis and Palestinians.

Pool / Reuters

WASHINGTON — President Obama laid out America's four "core interests" in the Middle East at a speech before the U.N. General Assembly Tuesday, outlining a vision for American foreign policy that he said keeps the U.S. closely involved in the region while avoiding the mistakes of Iraq.

The United States will engage Iran in direct negotiations over nuclear weapons, a move long promised by Obama but one that has only come with a change in the leadership of that country.

"We are encouraged that President Rouhani received from the Iranian people a mandate to pursue a more moderate course," Obama said. "Given President Rouhani's stated commitment to reach an agreement, I am directing John Kerry to pursue this effort with the Iranian government, in close coordination with the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China."

Obama was cautiously optimistic about a thaw with Iran, noting that he did not believe the deep divides between the two nations "can be overcome overnight" because "the suspicion runs too deep."

On Syria, Obama called on the U.N. Security council with "consequences" for the regime there if it fails to keep its promise to turn over chemical weapons to the international community. Addressing the larger Syrian situation, Obama said it was important for the international community to work together moving ahead.

"As we pursue a settlement, let us remember that this is not a zero-sum endeavor. We are no longer in a Cold War. There's no Great Game to be won, nor does America have any interest in Syria beyond the well-being of its people, the stability of its neighbors, the elimination of chemical weapons, and ensuring it does not become a safe haven for terrorists," Obama said. "I welcome the influence of all nations that can help bring about a peaceful resolution of Syria's civil war."

The speech set out a path for America's involvement in the world's most volatile region that kept open the use of military force but backed away from the notion of regime change or spreading democracy through force.

"The United States of America is prepared to use all elements of our power, including military force, to secure these core interests in the region," Obama said, before laying out four tenets:


We will confront external aggression against our allies and partners, as we did in the Gulf War.

We will ensure the free flow of energy from the region to the world. Although America is steadily reducing our own dependence on imported oil, the world still depends upon the region's energy supply, and a severe disruption could destabilize the entire global economy.

We will dismantle terrorist networks that threaten our people. Wherever possible, we will build the capacity of our partners, respect the sovereignty of nations, and work to address the root causes of terror. But when its necessary to defend the United States against terrorist attacks, we will take direct action.

And finally, we will not tolerate the development or use of weapons of mass destruction. Just as we consider the use of chemical weapons in Syria to be a threat to our own national security, we reject the development of nuclear weapons that could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region, and undermine the global non-proliferation regime.

Even as he reserved the right to act unilaterally to protect U.S. interests in the Middle East, Obama sought to reassure the world leaders gathered at the U.N. that his Middle East policy will not look like his predecessor's, and that America has learned the lessons of regime change.

"I also believe that we can rarely achieve these objectives through unilateral American action — particularly with military action," he said. "Iraq shows us that democracy cannot be imposed by force. Rather, these objectives are best achieved when we partner with the international community, and with the countries and people of the region."

But that doesn't mean Obama is backing away from the idea of American exceptionalism that has guided the nation's foreign involvements for decades. In a not-so-thinly veiled response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's New York Times op-ed, Obama reiterated his belief that America is an exceptional country.

"Some may disagree, but I believe that America is exceptional," Obama said, "in part because we have shown a willingness, through the sacrifice of blood and treasure, to stand up not only for our own narrow self-interest, but for the interests of all."

The world needs the United States, Obama said, saying it would be a mistake for the country turn away from the world's hotspots due to what he has called in the past "war fatigue" among Americans.

"The danger for the world is that the United States, after a decade of war; rightly concerned about issues back home; and aware of the hostility that our engagement in the region has engendered throughout the Muslim World, may disengage, creating a vacuum of leadership that no other nation is ready to fill," Obama said. "I believe that would be a mistake. I believe America must remain engaged for our own security. I believe the world is better for it."

Senate Confirms Todd Hughes, First Out Gay Federal Appeals Court Judge, With No Opposition

$
0
0

Todd Hughes, a longtime Justice Department lawyer, was approved to serve on the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on a 98-0 vote Tuesday. “No senator voted in the negative.”

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Todd Hughes' nomination to be a judge on the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on a 98-0 vote, making him the first out gay federal appellate judge in the nation's history.

President Obama nominated Hughes to the post on Feb. 7. He was the second out gay man he nominated for the Federal Circuit. The first nominee, Edward DuMont, never had his nomination advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee and it eventually was withdrawn.

Hughes, a 46-year-old Duke Law School graduate, has worked in the Department of Justice since 1994, currently serving as the deputy director of the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Justice Department's Civil Division. After graduating from law school in 1992, Hughes clerked for Judge Robert Krupansky of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for two years before starting at the Justice Department.

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals is a specialty court that focuses on the issues that have been a part of Hughes' practice at the Justice Department. Unlike other federal appeals courts, the federal circuit only considers a limited docket of cases: appeals of patent cases, appeals from the Federal Court of Claims and other specifically delineated areas of appeal. Other federal appeals courts, in contrast, have the cases they hear determined by geography.

After a hearing on June 19, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent Hughes' nomination to the full Senate on a voice vote on July 18, leading to Tuesday's historic vote.

"I am proud that today the Senate is finally taking this critical step to break down another barrier and increase diversity on our Federal bench," Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said in a statement after Tuesday's vote.

The Alliance for Justice, which tracks judicial nominations, and the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund, which supports out LGBT appointees and candidates, celebrated the confirmation.

"Today's vote to confirm Todd Hughes marks another milestone in the long journey toward justice and equality," Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron said in a statement. "Alliance for Justice long has fought for a federal judiciary that reflects the full diversity of America and a confirmation process that evaluates candidates based on their legal expertise, not how they look or who they love."

"All of us at Victory Fund are thrilled with today's vote. Todd's confirmation speaks to the growing opportunity for LGBT Americans who want to serve their country, and to the president's respect for the depth of talent and experience within the LGBT community," Chuck Wolfe, the president of the Victory Fund, said in a statement provided to BuzzFeed.

Although several other of Obama's out LGBT judicial nominees have been approved by the Senate, The New York Times reported Tuesday morning that Sen. Marco Rubio had withdrawn his support for a Florida district court judicial nominee, Judge William Thomas, effectively holding up the nomination as one of the two home-state senators. Thomas would be the first out gay black male federal judge.

In addition to Thomas, after Hughes' confirmation, one other out nominee — Judith Levy, nominated for the Eastern District of Michigan — remains pending. She was nominated on July 25 and rated as "Unanimously Qualified" by the American Bar Association.

Currently serving out LGBT federal lifetime-tenured judges include Judge Deborah Batts, who is on senior status in the Southern District of New York; Judges Paul Oetken and Alison Nathan, both also of the Southern District of New York; Judge Michael Fitzgerald of the Central District of California; Judge Pamela Ki Mai Chen of the Eastern District of New York; Judge Michael McShane of the District of Oregon; and Judge Nitza Quiñones Alejandro of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

23 Really Clever And Unique Ted Cruz Puns The Media Uses


Sen. Robert Menendez Demands A Less Trigger-Happy Patrol At The Mexican Border

$
0
0

“Sometimes kids throw rocks over the border and border guards ignore it. Other times they shoot back. There’s something wrong with that policy,” the New Jersey Democrat said.

A memorial for Ramses Barron-Torres, who was shot and killed by U.S. Border Patrol agents in 2011.

John Stanton

WASHINGTON — Sen. Robert Menendez Tuesday harshly criticized the Department of Homeland Security's use of force along the U.S. Mexico border, arguing that a lack of a use of force policy for Border Patrol agents has led to dozens of injuries and deaths of unarmed Mexican nationals inside of Mexico.

Over the last several years, cross border violence between Border Patrol agents and Mexican civilians has been on the rise, leading to scores of injuries and more than 20 deaths, including the shooting of 16 year old Nogales, Mexico resident Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez who was shot seven times in the back by Border agents in October of last year.

"It's a little crazy. Sometimes, depending on what part of the border, maybe there is a degree of danger and I want people to be able to protect themselves. But even in the city, where you're in a tough neighborhood, you don't shoot first and ask questions later," Menendez told Buzzfeed Tuesday.

The deaths and a rising number of complaints of excessive use of force by Mexicans in Mexico and migrants detained along the border is a concern because "there doesn't seem to be a unified policy on the use of force. Sometimes kids throw rocks over the border and border guards ignore it. Other times they shoot back. There's something wrong with that policy," Menendez said.

A DHS Inspector General's report, requested by Menendez and other lawmakers, makes clear that Border Patrol agents lack the proper training, bluntly stating that, "many agents and officers do not understand use of force and the extent to which they may or may not use force."

But that report provided no recommendations on how to improve the current system, nor did it recommend imposing a unified use of force policy — a fact that Menendez was critical of. The report "lacked depth and just asking for more statistical information in my mind wasn't the goal," Menendez said.

The use of deadly force by Border Patrol agents along the Mexican border has become an increasing source of tension over the last several years, and is something that activists and congressional aides said the administration has been slow, or in some cases, reluctant, to respond to.

For instance, the decision by the Department of Justice in August to not pursue criminal charges against Border Patrol agents in the 2011 deaths of Ramses Barron-Torres and Carlos LaMadrid has enraged Mexicans living along the border, as well as their government.

LaMadrid, a U.S. citizen who the Border Patrol says was seen loading narcotics into a vehicle, was shot and killed by border agents while trying to allegedly flee over the border fence.

In the Barron-Torres case, DOJ said the shooting occurred because agents were protecting themselves from rocks being thrown over the fence.

"Barron-Torres continued to throw rocks, and one of the agents fired a round at Barron-Torres from his service weapon, fatally striking him. A videotape of the incident captured Barron-Torres making a throwing motion with his right arm, then falling to the ground," DOJ said in a statement.

In the Rodriguez case, the teen was shot while walking down a busy residential street in downtown Nogales that runs along the U.S. Mexican border. According to media reports, Border Patrol agents, who were behind the fence on top of a high cliff running along the street, fired as a result of a rock throwing incident. That shooting is still being investigated.

The Mexican government condemns "cross-border gunfire and reiterates its emphatic rejection of the use of lethal force in migration control operations," the government's consulate said in a statement to the Nogales International last month.

Menendez warned he will not sit idly by during the confirmation of DHS' next Secretary, and said he will expect outgoing Secretary Janet Napolitano's replacement to address cross-border violence.

"As we look at a new nominee for this opportunity, it is my hope that we'll have a clear understanding … that we're going to have some serious attention to what is the appropriate use of force and what is not. Because right now I think there has been use of force that at times is beyond what is called for," he said.

Hillary Clinton On A Female President: "Someday I Hope It Happens"

$
0
0

“It’s not going to solve all our problems, but I think it would be a very strong statement,” the former secretary of state says.

Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and their daughter Chelsea Clinton appear on stage at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting Tuesday in New York.

Lucas Jackson / Reuters

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an audience at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting Tuesday afternoon that electing a woman to the White House would send "a very strong statement."

"Someday I hope it happens," she said with a smile, in response to a question from moderator Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a host on CNN.

Gupta asked Clinton, who is mulling a second bid for the presidency in 2016, how important it is to her personally to see a woman hold the position of commander in chief for the first time. The question, phrased in a way that made Clinton let loose a booming laugh, was Gupta's last of the afternoon at a panel on women's health.

"That is a question I will answer taking myself totally out of it," Clinton said, alongside three other panelists. "It is, for me, a part of a larger mission to expand participation and leadership among women around the world."

Clinton described the landmark goal as "symbolic," but added that "symbolism is efficacious."

"We have a lot of challenges," she said. "Electing one person, a woman, is not going to end those challenges, but it provides the kind of boost to the efforts that so many of us have been making for so long."

"So I guess the short answer is, I think it would be important," Clinton said. "It's not going to solve all our problems, but I think it would be a very strong statement that would be made to half our population, and half the world's population."

Who Is Corner Guy?

Ted Cruz: "Who Cares?"

$
0
0

During his filibuster, Ted Cruz tells America that defunding Obamacare isn’t about “personality.”

View Video ›

Twenty Years Later, Still Trying To Make AmeriCorps Cool

$
0
0

National service is an idea everyone likes, few know actually exists, and people are still trying to figure out how to politically defend.

Quinn Warwick, 26, an accounting student at WSU and an Americorps urban safety project member, removes branches from a fallen tree in the back of an abandoned home on Melbourne St. on Saturday, March 30, 2013 in Detroit. / AP

WASHINGTON — Last month, Jay Leno, the late-night voice of middle America, was in the middle of an interview with President Obama when he came up with a great idea.

"Would it be possible to do a modern WPA, almost like a America Peace Corps where kids get paid a decent wage, you give them food, and they fix up Detroit, they fix up other cities — whatever — they fix bridges?" Leno asked.

Watching the show from home, Zach Maurin, the executive director of the advocacy ServiceNation, and a man who graduated from just such a program more than a decade ago, sighed.

"It's like, 'dude, you got something. It's been around for 20 years. A million people have done it,'" he recalled in a recent interview with BuzzFeed.

It's been two decades since President Clinton controversially created AmeriCorps, the national service program that provides a small stipend to around 80,000 young people each year in return for a year or so of work for non-profits. The organization helps Americans across the country and the idea seems like an easy sell for Republicans and Democrats alike.

It's pretty simple and, budget-wise, pretty cheap: the government funds slots for young people who work with existing non-profits across the country, providing young people trying to figure out what to do next in their life with some money and experience, while also providing non-profits like the Red Cross with the warm bodies they desperately need. AmeriCorps corpsmembers helped rebuild New Orleans after Katrina, the northeast after Sandy and places like Joplin, Missouri after the tornado hit there. Corpsmembers work in schools, national parks, day care centers, soup kitchens, cities by the thousands every year.

Yet the program has never really caught on with actual young people on a large scale, says Maurin, and that's left AmeriCorps both misunderstood — and politically vulnerable. That's why Maurin's nonprofit advocacy group is launching an effort to make national service cool.

Relying on a campaign tactic last used successfully by Mothers Against Drunk Driving to make something else seen as uncool — designated drivers — into something commonplace, ServiceNation hopes to make sure that no one asks the question Leno asked Obama ever again, and to once and for all make a year of paid service to the nation commonplace. If it's successful, AmeriCorps will finally be the central part of society so many say they want it to be.

AmeriCorps has one main problem, Maurin says. People who should be thinking about it (Americans aged 20-28 are ServiceNation's target group), aren't. The more they do, the stronger the support for AmeriCorps in Congress and the easier it will be to expand the program. Maurin's statistics show there are 30% less Google searches for AmeriCorps now than there were 10 years ago. Numbers of applicants have risen, but nowhere near to where they should be.

"Last year there was a record number of applications: 582,000 for 80,000 positions," he said. "Everyone was excited because that's a record, but it's actually a really, really small percentage of millennials. So while that's exciting, and it's a great story to tell Congress, it's actually a really small number, especially given unemployment among young people. So we think that's a great indicator the awareness is not there."

Maurin's got a plan to make that cribbed from an unlikely source, the campaign to raise awareness to make designated drivers popular. Following the lead of MADD years ago, ServiceNation is meeting with writers and producers of hit TV shows to urge them to insert AmeriCorps into their plotlines.

"Shows are already depicting young people and what they want to do," Maurin said. "Whether they're going to go to college or trying to find a job or whatever else."

Maurin specifically mentioned plotlines on Parenthood and Modern Family, where characters around that 20-28 age bracket have been featured in plotlines about people trying to figure out what to do next.

"Working with writers and showrunners, as they're putting together their scripts, we believe…we can make the case that this is a powerful idea they can include in their scripts both to have an interesting story — because we have to respect the creative process — but at the same time really highlight a powerful idea that this generation will respond to," he said. "And then they'll help cultivate what I like to say will be the next greatest generation."

President Obama has made national service a big priority, announcing a taskforce in July that seeks to expand the number of opportunities for people to serve their country through national programs that put paid corpsmembers on the ground with non-profits after natural disasters, in schools, and helping out with infrastructure projects across the country. It's not something Obama gets criticized a lot for on the right — though the program was controversial when it was founded, Americorps was fully embraced by President George W. Bush and eventually became a program with bipartisan support.

But growing the program never became a reality. Obama's campaign promise to expand the program from 80,000 corpsmembers to 250,000 was never realized after Congress failed to fund the move. After Republicans took over the House in 2010, eliminating Americorps became one of their budget goals.

Supporters of AmeriCorps in Congress say that desire to cut the program comes less from a majority view among Republicans that AmeriCorps is bad and more from a mentality that it cutting things is generally a good thing to do.

"It's a sign of the times. We've moved from having a debate about how to balance the budget and fix our fiscal challenges to a debate about whether or not government is necessary," said Sen. Martin Heinrich, a Democrat from New Mexico and the first AmeriCorps alum to be elected to Congress, said. "And so from that frame, suddenly things that historically have been bipartisan and very non-controversial become opportunities to fight that debate over and over. And I think [Americorps] is just caught up like many other programs."

Heinrich said AmeriCorps can be saved from the current budget battles if members are made more aware of what it does.

"It's really hard to visit one of these afterschool programs that wouldn't exist without AmeriCorps and not see the value of having kids focused on their schoolwork in the hours of 3-6 instead of being latchkey kids. I mean that has an enormous not only social value but economic value," he said. "The more that they can see that first hand and not just have an ideological or an intellectual debate about it here in Washington, the more that I think it will have broad support."

AmeriCorps boosters point to numerous examples of national service skeptics in Congress changing their mind after seeing the impact of AmeriCorps in their districts. Therefore, they say, greater exposure for AmeriCorps can only help the program. The program funnels young people to existing non-profits across the country, providing a system that's friendly to locals but difficult to quantify supporters say: AmeriCorps is all over the place, but sometimes they look like the Red Cross volunteers, or other groups' volunteers.

AmeriCorps' new CEO, Wendy Spencer, is seeking to raise exposure for the group by expanding its role across government. Over the next couple months, she's meeting with every cabinet secretary to find ways AmeriCorps members can serve their agencies, broadening the reach of the program and, she says, saving significant taxpayer money.

"I just challenged my entire leadership here to be broadcasters," she said. "I told them to broadcast the great work that you're doing. Because we can engage in national service, we can run great programs, we can have great evaluations of outcomes in an evidence-based way, but if we don't tell anybody about it it's like the tree in the forest. Does it make a noise? We have got to tell our citizens and our constituents why it works, how it works, and the outcomes."

For Maurin, the outcome of the program for him was a career. Around a decade ago, he was a young guy trying to figure out what to do with himself, something "productive" that wasn't part of school. National service programs offer something other programs for young people like internships do not: money. The small stipend Maurin earned as an AmeriCorps member helped him live, and helped kick off a lifelong passion.

"I found AmeriCorps and it changed my life," he said.

Maurin has ambitious goals for his awareness program. In a matter of years, he wants to boost interest in AmeriCorps from the current half-million applicants tenfold. Five million young people interested in national service will finally get the idea the momentum it deserves, he says.

"If we're going to scale this, we need a movement of everyday Americans, alumni, people who are passionate about this pressing their members of Congress," he said. "But at the same time, we need to get it in front of the American people in a much more powerful way."

Hillary Clinton Takes On Congressional Republicans Over Obamacare

$
0
0

At a Clinton Global Initiative panel, the former secretary of state gets political. “It wouldn’t be the worst thing for Democrats if [Republicans] tried to shut the government down,” says Clinton.

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defended the Affordable Care Act and criticized House Republicans at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting in New York City.

Getty Images

At a Clinton Global Initiative panel discussion on women's health, Hillary Clinton momentarily turned the conversation to Washington politics when she offered a full-throated defense of the Affordable Care Act and laid into a "noisy minority" of Republicans threatening to shutdown the government over the bill.

Clinton's riff on the current affairs of the capital, where House Republicans are attempting to defund President Obama's landmark health care bill, marked a notably partisan moment for the former secretary of state. Clinton has kept quite this year on much of what happens inside the Beltway.

"I find the debate over this issue to be quite unfortunate," Clinton said Tuesday, on a panel moderated by CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta about women's health. "A law was passed. It was upheld by the Supreme Court. It is the law of the land."

To affect a contrast with what she described as today's "noisy minority" of House Republicans, Clinton cited past health care bills, specifically George W. Bush's Medicare Part D benefit, which also presented implementation challenges but was met with less opposition by lawmakers on the right. "You didn't have obstructionist members of Congress once the vote was taken," said Clinton.

Clinton, a possible presidential candidate in 2016, did acknowledge that Democrats could stand to benefit from Republican threats in Washington to shutdown the government over funding for the bill. "It wouldn't be the worst thing for Democrats if they tried to shut the government down," she said. "We've seen that movie before. It didn't work out too well."

"If they want to try to shut the government down," Clinton added, "that's on their head — that's their responsibility."

But Clinton said that if Republicans "go even further" by refusing to raise the debt ceiling over the issue, sending the country into default, "that is not just partisan politics, that is going to the heart of our credibility around the world," she said. "I hope that smarter, cooler heads prevail and that we deal with our budget and we deal with our debt limit."

Clinton, calling Obama's health care reform a "significant step forward," did acknowledge the bill wasn't infallible. "Nobody is saying it's a perfect bill. I served in the senate for eight years — there is no such thing as a perfect bill."

She also gestured toward the public messaging problems the Obama administration has faced with the measure, stressing that while people may "agree with the specifics" of health care reform, "they have been in effect convinced the overall program is not to their liking.

"We're in this sort of bipolar political world," Clinton said.

The 19 Most Revealing Documents From Bill De Blasio's Socialist Past

$
0
0

New York Democratic mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio was a member of the Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater New York. A collection of their papers, which is housed at New York University, gave a glimpse of what the organization was actually like. Ed. note: I was only able to look through two of the group’s boxes. Several of the other boxes were simultaneously being browsed by other news organizations.

A Bill de Blasio signed fundraising letter.

A Bill de Blasio signed fundraising letter.

"George Bush Murder, Criminal, and Terrorist."

"George Bush Murder, Criminal, and Terrorist."

Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater Collection/Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archive/Elmer Holmes Bobst Library/New York University

"Call: Cuba will stay free Response: Drive the Yankees to the Sea."

"Call: Cuba will stay free Response: Drive the Yankees to the Sea."

Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater Collection/Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archive/Elmer Holmes Bobst Library/New York University

An entire Castro speech.

An entire Castro speech.

Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater Collection/Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archive/Elmer Holmes Bobst Library/New York University


View Entire List ›


Ted Cruz Privately Approached Harry Reid To Ask For Time To "Filibuster"

$
0
0

“By that time there was nothing Senator Cruz could do to delay the Wednesday cloture vote, so Senator Reid did not object,” said Reid’s spokesman. A “fake filibuster”?

U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), denounces Obamacare as he speaks on the Senate floor.

Handout / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Sen. Ted Cruz has known since Monday exactly how long he'd be allowed to speak, and that no matter how long he talked, he wouldn't be able to prevent a vote he had hoped to stop.

That's because, according to a spokesman for Majority Leader Harry Reid, Cruz approached Reid privately on the floor requesting the time to talk. And when no other Senator objected, Reid allowed it.

The spokesman, Adam Jentleson, blasted Cruz on Twitter Tuesday afternoon:

The Texas Republican has been speaking on the Senate floor since early Tuesday, to protest Obamacare and a looming vote on a short-term budget resolution that Cruz has pushed his colleagues to oppose.

Because Reid had already filed what's known as "cloture" on the continuing resolution — effectively a countdown clock to a vote that would end debate on the bill — the vote will happen and Cruz will need to stop talking by Wednesday afternoon.

"By that time there was nothing Senator Cruz could do to delay the Wednesday cloture vote, so Senator Reid did not object," Jentleson said in an email.

A spokesman for Cruz responded to the report, telling BuzzFeed, "That's correct."

Reid mentioned their conversation on the floor Monday:

"People can talk all they want. There's no way that we can be prevented from having that vote. We'll have conversation, but it's not — there won't be any filibusters. Because this is under the rules of the time for talking but it doesn't delay anything," Reid said. As I indicated today earlier with a conversation I had with a Republican senator, just follow the rules. Whatever the rules are we'll follow them and do the best we can to make sure we're as fair to everyone as possible."


View Entire List ›

Ted Cruz Reads "Green Eggs And Ham" On The Senate Floor

$
0
0

The Texas Republican takes some time to read a bedtime story to his daughters in the middle of a long floor speech to protest Obamacare.

It was likely the first time "I could not, would not with a goat" was said on the Senate floor.

View Video ›

How Ted Cruz's Anti-Obamacare Filibuster Could Cost Him Millions

$
0
0

Top Republican donors are rolling their eyes at the senator’s crusade. “Sure, he’s revving up the base, but so did Michele Bachmann and Pat Buchanan.”

Cruz, mid-"filibuster"

Handout / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's quixotic campaign to defund Obamacare — currently culminating in an hours-long quasi-filibuster on the Senate floor — has caused conservative activists across the country to swoon.

But one key contingent of the Republican Party is decidedly unimpressed with the gambit: Big-ticket donors.

According to several Republican sources, most of whom declined to disparage a rising star on the record, the party's donor class is rolling its eyes at Cruz's last-minute, long-shot attempt to keep the controversial health care law from fully going into effect — dismissing it as unintelligible parliamentary trickery at best, and counterproductive self-promotion at worst.

Cruz, who most Republicans believe is positioning himself for a 2016 presidential run, will need the support of at least a portion of the party's moneyed donors to stay competitive in a primary. But skeptics say he's running the risk of being seen as unserious by the same people he will need to write him checks in a couple of years.

"Sure, he's revving up the base, but so did Michele Bachmann and Pat Buchanan," said one longtime Republican strategist who has worked on multiple state and national campaigns. "If you're serious about running for president... you need the serious money, more than the direct mail crowd and the small money donors."

"That," the Republican said, "is the difference between winning the Iowa Caucus and winning in a serious state like Florida."

Like most Americans, Republican donors generally oppose Obamacare — but many disagree with the tactics Cruz has employed to block it. The Texas senator has pursued a strategy that could force a government shutdown unless funding for the law is revoked.

"People see it as an inside-the-beltway play, and I think donors see it the same way," said one operative with ties to major GOP fundraisers. He noted that while activists may take visceral satisfaction in Cruz's campaign, many donors are more results-oriented — and they're savvy enough to know that none of his maneuvering will actually stop the law from being implemented.

But Cruz has never shown much interest in, or capacity for courting his party's elite. He was elected in Texas by taking on the favored candidate of the establishment and running to his right as a champion of the common conservative voter. And at a Republican National Committee fundraiser this week in Manhattan, Cruz was one of the only prospective 2016 candidates who didn't show his face.

As of June 30, Cruz's PAC, the Jobs, Growth & Freedom Fund, raised just $313,323 with $183,537 cash on hand, according to OpenSecrets.org. That's a far cry from the $1.8 million Rubio's PAC has raised, and the $929,904 Rand Paul's PAC has taken in.

Cruz's war chest is likely to grow some following his headline-grabbing filibuster. Jackie Bodnar, spokesperson for the Tea Party activist powerhouse FreedomWorks, said of Cruz's crusade, "It's giving me 2010 flashbacks. Republicans especially should know, with all eyes on the Senate, grassroots America is watching them."

But several Republicans expressed doubt that the activist support Cruz is receiving will ultimately make up for the credibility he's losing among the big-money crowd.

"When the Wall Street Journal starts to belittle you... that's what these people read every day," said one senior GOP aide.

A spokesman for Cruz declined to comment.

Ted Cruz Launches Into Star Wars Analogies 18 Hours Into His Senate Speech And They Are Perfect

Ted Cruz's Office Prints Drudge Filibuster Screenshots

$
0
0

“Printed and posted near my desk,” said Cruz communications adviser and speechwriter Amanda Carpenter.

Via yfrog.com

Via theblaze.com

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images