Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

White House Says Many Agencies Are Taking The Lead On Ebola

$
0
0

The White House says Lisa Monaco is the point person, but other departments are leading parts of the epidemic response.

View Video ›

There are a number different departments and agencies overseeing the U.S. Ebola response, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday.

Earnest described White House official Lisa Monaco as leading the "interagency response" to the epidemic:

Q: Just to follow up -- because Lisa Monaco has many other things on her plate, and this is such a multidisciplinary -- Ebola -- issue for the president, can you just clarify, who is his point person here in the White House to coordinate for him on this issue?

EARNEST: Lisa does have a lot on her plate, but she's a very talented individual, as you saw when she conducted the briefing here on Friday.

She is the point person here at the White House who is coordinating the interagency response to this effort, but again, it's USAID that's the point on the ground. They've been dealing with this situation for eight or nine months now, so they have a very good sense of what's needed there. You have the Department of Defense, that's responsible for putting in place this logistical infrastructure that reflects their own expertise in this area. We've already seen how that response from the United States military has galvanized the international community and their willingness to commit resources to this ongoing effort.

And in terms of the safety of the -- of the American public here at home, HHS and the Centers for Disease Control are the lead in communicating with state and local officials and with public health officials in states all across the country to ensure that they are all aware of the medical protocols that are in place and should be applied in this circumstance, and again, those professionals continue to be confident that the risk of an Ebola outbreak in the United States is exceedingly low. OK?

Last week, Sen. Jerry Moran criticized the lack of a central figure in the administration overseeing the Ebola response, in an interview with BuzzFeed News.


View Entire List ›


Mitt Romney Thinks Selfies Are Super Weird

$
0
0

And here’s why he probably thinks that.

View Video ›

Mitt Romney thinks selfies are super weird.

"It's just a strange thing in America today," Romney said on Bloomberg Politics' new show With All Due Respect with Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. "Which is, if you're famous or you've been on TV people want to take a selfie and then put it on their Facebook and say, 'Look here's me with a famous person.' I wish I could say all those people voted for me and I would have won by a wide margin but I'm convinced that most of the selfies are just looking for someone they've seen before."

Here's exhibit A through K:


View Entire List ›

Heartwarming Pictures From The First Same-Sex Weddings In Oklahoma

Justice Anthony Kennedy's Marriage Equality End Game

$
0
0

With Monday’s nondecision decision, marriage equality is moving forward. What’s more, Justice Anthony Kennedy, as both the court’s key vote and guiding force on gay rights, created the path to end same-sex marriage bans nationwide.

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy often focuses on two ideas when he plays a part in moving the law: human dignity and the cumulative importance of the states.

On Monday, the court decided not to take up seven cases involving bans on same-sex couples' marriages. The decision advanced Kennedy's two main interests in a significant way — and set the course for achieving marriage equality in 50 states.

The court increased human dignity, as understood and detailed by Kennedy in a trio of gay rights cases that began in 1996. As Kennedy most famously put it in the middle of those cases, the Constitution's founders knew that "times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress." Those three cases struck down an anti-gay amendment in Colorado in Romer v. Evans, struck down sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas in 2003, and culminated — at least, for now — in the 2013 decision striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor.

In that Windsor decision, Kennedy described how New York had expanded marriage to same-sex couples. "This status is a far-reaching legal acknowledgment of the intimate relationship between two people, a relationship deemed by the State worthy of dignity in the community equal with all other marriages" he wrote. "It reflects both the community's considered perspective on the historical roots of the institution of marriage and its evolving understanding of the meaning of equality."

But DOMA, Kennedy wrote, was invalid — because it did not protect the dignity of the individual and some individuals' marriages. "The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity." He wrote that the law violated the Fifth Amendment because it treated "those persons as living in marriages less respected than others."

Now, same-sex couples in five additional states — Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin — are living under legal marriage equality. And, same-sex couples in six more states — Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming — are expected to have the right to marry in short order.

For Kennedy, "personhood and dignity" were winners on Monday.

The court's decision not to decide has the effect, then, of adding 11 more states to the marriage equality column — an issue that could be key to a decision of the court on whether marriage equality should be the law of the land in all 50 states.

Look at how Kennedy addressed the issue back in 2003, when he wrote the court's opinion striking down sodomy laws, reversing a decision from 1986 in Bowers v. Hardwick that upheld the constitutionality of such laws:


View Entire List ›

Conservative Pro-Marriage Equality Group Launches Grassroots Effort

$
0
0

The Paul Singer-backed American Unity Fund seeks to reach “rank-and-file Republicans” in an effort that’s focused on 2016. A BuzzFeed News exclusive report.

Via americanunityfund.com

WASHINGTON — A pro-marriage equality group backed by a major conservative donor is launching a campaign Tuesday to enlist support from "rank-and-file" Republicans.

The American Unity Fund, started by hedge-fund manager Paul Singer in 2012, will begin the campaign with a video featuring Republicans, and led by MSNBC host Abby Huntsman, stating why they support marriage equality.

"What this campaign is designed to do is to give rank-and-file Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, moderates, independents across the country a way to express their support for freedom for everyone and to become a part of this civil rights movement of our generation," the group's senior adviser, Jeff Cook-McCormac, told BuzzFeed News on Monday.

People will be invited to submit their own videos about why they "stand out" for marriage equality. Among the videos uploaded to the site at its launch include one from Theodore Olson, the former top appellate lawyer for President George W. Bush who led the legal teams that ended California and Virginia's bans on same-sex couples' marriages.

American Unity Fund's bigger initiative is in the donor world: The group last week hosted a a conference in D.C. for Republican donors and major activists.

The campaign, Stand Up & Stand Out, is being formally launched later Tuesday with this video promoting the effort:

youtube.com

Saying that many donors and "all the big thinkers in the party" have been working to convince officials that the Republican Party needs to moderate its position on marriage, Cook-McCormac acknowledged, "What has been slower to occur is the ... mobilization of this much larger network of tens of millions of Republicans across the country who embrace the full freedom to marry."

American Unity Fund aims for this campaign to let those people speak out in order to start building that grassroots support within the party. But, Cook-McCormac acknowledged, it also will provide the group with a list of "specific voters who are committed to this issue as we prepare for what will be a very interesting election cycle in 2016."

Asked if that means American Unity Fund expects a pro-marriage equality candidate to be a possibility for the GOP in 2016, Cook-McCormac, told BuzzFeed News, "A few years ago, people thought that was an impossibility. And, now, I think the dynamic has completely changed."


View Entire List ›

The 19 Most Anti-LGBT Members Of Congress, According To Pro-LGBT Group

$
0
0

Including one Democrat. A BuzzFeed News exclusive report.

Gary Cameron / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The nation's largest LGBT advocacy organization has a new list of the 19 "most anti-equality" members of Congress.

The Human Rights Campaign says to be included in its first ever "Hall of Shame," a lawmaker had to vote for or cosponsor legislation that "would enshrine discrimination into our nation's body of laws and our Constitution." HRC said it also reviewed lawmakers' public statements on LGBT issues.

Of the 14 House members and five senators listed, North Carolina Rep. Mike McIntyre is the only Democrat. HRC stated that McIntyre made the list because he cosponsored the Federal Marriage Amendment, which aimed to define marriage in the U.S. Constitution as a union between one man and one woman, and "if there is a pro-equality vote opportunity, McIntyre can usually be counted on to vote no."

In addition, all but one lawmaker on the list — outgoing Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann — are men.

"If you want to understand why LGBT equality has hit a roadblock in Congress, you don't need to look any further than these leaders of anti-LGBT obstruction and animus," said David Stacy, HRC's government affairs director. "These members go out of their way to oppose any step toward equal protection under the law or to protect LGBT Americans from violence, discrimination and harassment. They proactively work to undermine existing legal protections and promote anti-LGBT discrimination."

Other lawmakers who made the list include Andy Harris, Louie Gohmert, Tim Huelskamp, Steve King, Ted Cruz, and Mike Lee.

HRC will release its full scorecard for the 113th Congress on Thursday.

House

Michele Bachman (R-MN)

Louie Gohmert (R-TX)

Andy Harris (R-MD)

Tim Huelskamp (R-KS)

Jim Jordan (R-OH)

Walter Jones (R-NC)

Mike Kelly (R- PA)

Steve King (R-IA)

Doug LaMalfa (R-CA)

Mike McIntyre (D-NC)

Randy Neugebauer (R-TX)

Steve Pearce (R-NM)

Tim Walberg (R-MI)

Randy Weber (R-TX)

Senate

Ted Cruz (R-TX)

Michael Enzi (R-WY)

James Inhofe (R-OK)

Mike Lee (R-UT)

Jeff Sessions (R-AL)

Republican Congressional Candidate Wrote Rant About YOLO

$
0
0

“Drake and Little Wayne are wrong.”

Zach Dasher, a cousin to the Duck Dynasty family and a Louisiana congressional candidate, hates YOLO.

Before running for Congress, Dasher, who is challenging 'kissing congressman" Republican Rep. Vance McAllister, was the sole-proprietor of the website Willingtothink.org, a religious podcast "dedicated to encouraging folks to be willing to think about the deeper questions in life" and wrote about his disgust for the phrase of Facebook.

Dasher thought YOLO, which began to gain traction in November of 2011 when it was feature in Drake's song The Motto, was a "clearly atheistic message that has brainwashed a generation."

"The lyrics are pornographic so I would not recommend you download it. But what about the message in the title," Dasher wrote. "Do we only live once? If the atheist is correct then yes, you only live once. You have about 80 years if you are lucky. And then it's six feet under you go to push up daisies. If this is all there is I have a bit of advice for you. Go get after it. Consume as much as you can for tomorrow you die.

"The most dangerous part of YOLO is not the porn lyrics but the clearly atheistic message that has brainwashed a generation."

Dasher concludes by saying, "Drake and Little Wayne are wrong."

"Folks the bottom line is this, Drake and Little Wayne are wrong and Jesus was right. YOU CAN LIVE TWICE," wrote Dasher.

Here's the post:

Facebook: Willingtothink.org

Marriage Equality Comes To Colorado

$
0
0

Beginning today, Colorado’s 64 county clerks are legally required to issue licenses to same-sex couples who request them. [Update: Slower movement in the other five states indirectly impacted by Monday’s Supreme Court action: Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming.]

AFP / Getty Images MARK LEFFINGWELL

WASHINGTON — Colorado now has marriage equality, Attorney General John Suthers has advised county clerks.

The state is the first to allow same-sex couples to marry outside of the five states directly affected by Monday's Supreme Court action denying requests to hear appeals of several marriage cases.

Several state and federal marriage challenges had been pending in Colorado, which is within the same federal appeals circuit as Utah and Oklahoma — two of the states directly affected by Monday's Supreme Court denials.

Because the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling striking down Utah and Oklahoma's bans is now the law of the circuit, Suthers announced on Monday that he would seek to withdraw his appeals of lower court rulings pending in the Colorado challenges.

"Beginning today, Colorado's 64 county clerks are legally required to issue licenses to same-sex couples who request them. In addition, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment is required to register such marriages in the records of the State of Colorado," he announced on Tuesday, after the Colorado Supreme Court dismissed two marriage case appeals and ended its stays on the lower court rulings.

Read the full statement:

Read the full statement:

Via coloradoattorneygeneral.gov


View Entire List ›


Dem. Congressman: Capitol Police Told Me My Life "Could Be In Danger" From Tea Party In 2009

$
0
0

During the Obamacare debate, Rep. G.K. Butterfield says.

Freedom Fan / Via en.wikipedia.org

North Carolina Democratic Rep. G.K. Butterfield said the Capitol Police told him and Georgia Rep. John Lewis during the 2009 Tea Party protests that their lives "could be in danger" if they walked out through the crowd protesting the debate over the Affordable Care Act.

Butterfield was speaking at the Durham County Library, where they were kicking off the Durham Reads Together 2014 with a march led by Reps. Lewis, Butterfield, and David Price.

"Do you remember when Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act was being debated and we all thought it was going to pass rather easily, and we went home for the August recess to find the Tea Party waiting for us at home and they organized by the tens of thousands and they were well-financed and well-organized," Butterfield said at the event.

Butterfield said Capitol Police instructed him and Lewis their lives "could be in danger" if they chose to walk through the protests back to their offices.

"The Tea Party organized and they came to Washington and walked out on the balcony of the Capitol and we could see nothing but thousands of Tea Party protesters standing and waiting for us to walk off of the House floor," Butterfield said. "The Capitol Police walked up to us and said, 'Congressmen, don't go outside, your lives could be in danger. I want you to go down the steps and into the tunnel and back over to your office buildings.'"

Butterfield then pointed to Lewis, and said Lewis and him both wanted to walk through the protests.

"And this man, against the advice of his chief of staff and my chief of staff, with those who served in Congress and came out of the struggle, we understand. We said let's do it and we walked right through the Tea Party. Walked back to our office."

Here's the video:

View Video ›

YouTube/User Dave Wofford / Via youtube.com

Conservative Groups Use Aurora Shooting Photo In Attack Ads ... Again

$
0
0

Americans For Prosperity apologized for using a photo of the president mourning Aurora shooting victims in a negative political ad in April. A similar group used the same photo in a new Colorado attack ad this week. Update: the photo is being removed from the TV ad.

WASHINGTON — Two conservative groups are using a photo of President Obama visiting a Colorado hospital after the Aurora movie theater shooting in a new series of negative ads attacking Democratic Sen. Mark Udall.

When the Koch-funded Americans For Prosperity used the same image in an April ad campaign, the group called it "an unfortunate oversight."

Now the photo is back in advertising in Colorado, popping up in a social media campaign run by AFP and brand new negative TV spot funded by the Koch-backed Freedom Partners Action Fund.

The original wire photo, taken July, 2012, at University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora.

The original wire photo, taken July, 2012, at University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora.

Read about the visit here.

Freedom Partners Action Fund's latest TV ad, now on air in Colorado.

KKTV / Via youtube.com

A cropped version of the photo of Obama at the Aurora hospital appears 16 seconds in.

A cropped version of the photo of Obama at the Aurora hospital appears 16 seconds in.


View Entire List ›

Idaho And Nevada Marriage Bans Unconstitutional, Some Marriages Starting Wednesday

$
0
0

A fourth federal appeals court to reach the same conclusion. [Update: Nevada state officials say the state will not appeal the matter further.]

The 9th Circuit ruling — regarding Idaho and Nevada — comes one day after same-sex couples began marrying again in Utah.

Jim Urquhart / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Idaho and Nevada's bans on same-sex couples' marriages are unconstitutional, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday.

Judge Stephen Reinhardt, writing for the unanimous panel, applied additional scrutiny to the claimed sexual orientation discrimination the same-sex couples in the two states faced by the bans. The 9th Circuit held earlier this year that such additional scrutiny — heightened scrutiny — applies to sexual orientation claims under equal protection.

He wrote:

We hold that the Idaho and Nevada laws at issue violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because they deny lesbians and gays who wish to marry persons of the same sex a right they afford to individuals who wish to marry persons of the opposite sex, and do not satisfy the heightened scrutiny standard we adopted in SmithKline.

The ruling comes one day after the Supreme Court denied five states' appeals of other marriage cases where other appeals courts had ruled that those states' bans are unconstitutional.

Under the court's rules, the mandate — which puts the ruling into effect — will not issue from the 9th Circuit until "7 days after the expiration of the time for filing a petition for rehearing or 7 days from the denial of a petition for rehearing, unless the Court directs otherwise."

Of course, as Nevada's governor and attorney general stopped defense of their state's ban after the 9th Circuit ruled that heightened scrutiny applied to sexual orientation claims, it is possible that they could take action to attempt to allow the ruling, as to their state, to go into effect sooner.

In key, Reinhardt writes for the court:

In key, Reinhardt writes for the court:

Read the court's opinion:


View Entire List ›

Labor Department Will Delay Enforcement Of Home-Care Workers Wage Protections

$
0
0

The delay will last for at least six months.

Larry Downing / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Labor Department will delay enforcement of a rule that extends minimum wage and overtime protections to home care workers. The rule was supposed to go into effect in full starting in January.

The rule will not be enforced from Jan. 1, 2015 to June 30. After that, there will be another probationary period through Dec. 31, in which the Labor Department "will exercise prosecutorial discretion in determining whether to bring enforcement actions."

The rule still technically goes into effect on Jan. 1 as originally planned, though employers who, during the delay period, continue to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act as it was before the rule will be able to avoid prosecution.

"Some states, tell us that they're ready to implement the rule," the department wrote in a blog post. "Others, because of budget and legislative processes, have requested an extension."

The department added that throughout the 12-month delay, it will continue "extensive outreach and technical assistance" for states that need it.

Reaction to the announcement has been mixed.

"The final rule issued by the Department of Labor today represents an essential measure of fairness for home health care workers," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said in a statement. "It is high time that those caring for our friends and loved ones be covered by the minimum wage and overtime protections guaranteed in the Fair Labor Standards Act."

AFSCME President Lee Saunders said he was glad the rule was still being implemented on time, but expressed concern that some states are still not ready to implement the rule even though they've had more than a year to prepare.

"States and other employers have been on notice for more than a year that minimum wage and overtime protections would be extended to home care workers, he said in a statement. "Although some states continue to claim that they are unprepared to make the administrative changes to facilitate this basic protection, they should be able to fully comply in short order and the DOL has indicated it will assist them with implementation."

Others were less enthusiastic. The Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute issued a statement saying they were disappointed by the delay.

"The decision to delay means that 2 million home care workers — largely low-income women, and disproportionately women of color — will have to wait as long as another 12 months to receive even the most basic labor protections, guarantees that most other American workers take for granted," PHI said.

Rumors about an enforcement delay have been swirling recently, prompting a coalition of advocates to send a letter to Labor Secretary Tom Perez urging him continue on with the rule as planned.

"We were alarmed by recent remarks by Department of Labor officials suggesting that the Department may delay implementation of the rule, which we fear would put this historic workplace victory in jeopardy," the coalition, which includes a number of unions and advocacy groups, wrote on Sep. 29.

Leading Tea Party Group Part Of Fake Founding Father Quotes Epidemic

$
0
0

As John Adams once said, don’t believe everything you read on the internet…

The conservative Tea Party Express bills itself as wanting to return America to the principles held in the founding documents. A review of the branded and heavily-shared quotes from our nation's founders the group posts on Facebook reveals many are of dubious origins, however.

Tea Party Express pledges to restore "this great Republic to the limits articulated by our founders in the Constitution of the United States of America," reads another post.

Here are some of the misquotes:

There's this Franklin quote, which is not only partially butchered and inaccurate in meaning, but actually about money.

There's this Franklin quote, which is not only partially butchered and inaccurate in meaning, but actually about money.

Via Facebook: ourcountrypac

The Thomas Jefferson Foundation has said it has “not found this particular statement in his writings” and Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience is most likely the real source of this quotation:

The Thomas Jefferson Foundation has said it has “not found this particular statement in his writings” and Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience is most likely the real source of this quotation:

Via Facebook: ourcountrypac

The Yale Book of Quotations editor Frank Shapiro has said that "no one has ever found any evidence that Washington said" this:

The Yale Book of Quotations editor Frank Shapiro has said that "no one has ever found any evidence that Washington said" this:

Via Facebook: ourcountrypac


View Entire List ›

How A 12-Year-Old Rape Victim Lost His Mom To “Failure To Protect” Law

$
0
0

Collin Grant wishes he had never told anyone that his stepfather raped him.

Jimmy Don Mackey would hold Collin down, punch him in the back if he tried to move, and cover his mouth if he tried to scream. On one occasion, Jimmy Don duct-taped Collin’s mouth shut. He told Collin that if he ever disclosed the abuse to anyone, he would kill him.

Yet Collin eventually did tell the authorities in Muskogee County, Oklahoma, about Jimmy Don’s abuse. Collin testified about it in court, where it also emerged that Jimmy Don had repeatedly beaten his mother, Alishia Mackey. Jimmy Don pled guilty to rape, forcible sodomy, and other sex crimes, and was sent to prison.

Yet Collin’s mother was also sent to prison for failing to protect her son.

Jimmy Don got 15 years for raping Collin. For permitting the rape to happen, Collin’s mother got an even harsher sentence: 20 years.

As a 12-year-old recovering from repeated sexual abuse, Collin was cut off from his mother.

Today, Collin is 22. He said he misses his mom and believes she does not deserve to be in prison. She should be pardoned, he said.

He also wishes he had never come forward about what his stepfather was doing to him. “Honestly,” Collin told BuzzFeed News, “I would rather have gone through the abuse for the rest of my life.”

Jimmy Don Mackey

Oklahoma Department of Corrections

A recent BuzzFeed News investigation exposed cases in which mothers have been given sentences of up to life in prison for failing to protect their children from their violent partners — even when, as in Alishia’s case, there is evidence that the mother herself was battered.

In Texas, for example, Arlena Lindley was sentenced to 45 years, despite the fact that she tried to grab her 3-year-old son from her partner the day he beat the boy to death, and despite the fact that she herself had been beaten viciously for months. The prosecution said she should have called 911.

Collin Grant’s case illuminates what domestic violence advocates say is a different problem: the collateral damage to the children of mothers sent away to prison for years.

“What are we really doing on behalf of that child who is the victim of the crime?” said Deborah D. Tucker, executive director of the National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence. “How is that” — imprisoning the mother — “helpful to them?”

At least 29 states have laws that explicitly criminalize parents’ failure to protect their children from abuse. In addition, prosecutors in at least 19 states can use other, more general laws against criminal negligence in the care of a child or placing a child in a dangerous situation.

Only a handful of state laws provide specific defenses for parents who reasonably feared they would be harmed if they stepped in to stop child abuse.

Many prosecutors defend the laws and the harsh sentences as sending a message that mothers must defend their children, even if their own safety is at risk. Domestic violence advocates counter that such sentences are unjust — and a sign that the criminal justice system does not understand how battering victimizes women.

Altogether, BuzzFeed News found 28 cases in which mothers were sentenced to at least a decade in prison despite evidence they themselves were victims of their violent partners. Alishia Mackey was one of those mothers. She was tried under Oklahoma’s “enabling child abuse” law, which has the same maximum sentence — life in prison — as actually committing child abuse.

Jimmy Don and Alishia married in 1995. His beatings waxed and waned — bad in the early years of their marriage, for example, then bad again not long before Collin’s abuse came to light.

Alishia testified that Jimmy Don “would punch me repeatedly, hit me with things, choke me, hold the back of — hold a gun to my head, threaten to kill me and my kids if I even told anybody” that he beat her. A former friend told the court that Alishia had confided in her at the time that Jimmy Don was battering her. Collin testified that he saw his mom get beaten. She escaped once, he told the court, but Jimmy Don “tracked us down.”

One night, Alishia woke up to find she was alone in bed. She got up and went to her son’s bedroom. What exactly she saw is unclear. Collin testified that Jimmy Don was molesting him, and Alishia first told police that she saw Jimmy Don on top of Collin with both of their pants down. But in court, she and Collin testified that he and Jimmy Don were both clothed.

On the stand, Alishia changed many parts of her story and contradicted herself. “She was her own worst enemy,” David Pierce, the prosecutor, said in an interview.

That’s not uncommon. In its investigation, BuzzFeed News found that many battered mothers lie and take other actions that make them look guilty. The terror they feel sometimes lasts even after the their partner has been arrested. Then too, repeated trauma, like PTSD, can harm a person’s mental health. “There are many times when victims don’t put their best foot forward for a host of reasons — including their own sense of guilt and failure,” Tucker said.

Alishia also testified that she suffered from petit mal seizures that led her to have a faulty memory.

At trial, prosecutors alleged that the moment when Alishia walked in on her husband and her son came two years before authorities learned of it. Police pointed to an interrogation in which she allegedly said the incident happened in January of 2002, but officers didn’t tape that interview. Collin testified that it happened in the fall of 2003, which would mean that the abuse came to light within a few months of her seeing it.

Whatever the details, prosecutors argued that Alishia failed to protect her son by neither leaving the relationship nor going immediately to the authorities. On the stand, Collin estimated that Jimmy Don molested him “maybe” five more times after his mother first learned of the abuse and before Jimmy Don was arrested.

Pierce, the prosecutor, declared in court that Collin wanted his mother put away. “He’d like to see her spend the rest of her life in prison,” Pierce told the judge. Asked about this, Collin told BuzzFeed News he was on psychotropic medication at the time of the trial and, because he was screened off from his mother during his testimony, did not realize he was testifying at her trial. He said he thought he was at his stepfather’s trial.

One thing that Pierce never disputed was the fact that Jimmy Don had violently abused Alishia. Indeed, Pierce cited his battering of Alishia as evidence of her poor decision-making. “She made the decision to stay,” he told the jury.

Jurors found Alishia guilty and recommended 20 years in prison. Alishia’s attorney, Corrine O’Day, protested that the prosecution had sought only 15 years when Jimmy Don pled guilty to raping Collin. “The state is not fully consistent,” she said. But the judge went with the jury’s recommendation.

Told that Collin recently said his mother should not be in prison, Pierce said, “I’m not surprised with that at all. It’s his mother.”

But that does not change Pierce’s view on Alishia’s sentence. “I believe that that was an appropriate punishment for what she did,” he said.

Jimmy Don’s case was handled by a different prosecutor, Sejin Brooks. Now an attorney in Austin, Texas, Brooks said “you’re absolutely right” that it might look strange that Alishia, who was convicted of permitting abuse, got a harsher punishment than Jimmy Don, who actually raped Collin. But, Brooks said, Alishia did not plead guilty but instead went to trial, risking the wrath of a judge and jury.

Visitors leave the Mabel Bassett Correctional Center in McLoud, Oklahoma.

Sue Ogrocki / AP Photo

The courthouse would be the last place Collin saw his mother for more than five years, until he turned 18. During those years, he said, he was shuttled among group homes and shelters, never quite feeling like he fit in anywhere.

Without his mother, he lacked someone to confide in as he grew up, he said. “The one person I was supposed to be able to turn to for almost anything — I didn’t have that.”

He and his siblings now live with Collin’s grandmother. Alishia is more than 100 miles away, and visiting hours at Mabel Bassett Correctional Center are on weekend mornings. They make it out there about once a month.

“My mother is one of the most caring people in the world,” Collin said. “And I will say that to anyone.”

Ellie Hall contributed reporting to this story.

Justice Anthony Kennedy Halts Idaho Marriages, Allows Nevada Ruling To Go Into Effect

$
0
0

Update: Following a morning order stopping same-sex couples from marrying in Idaho and Nevada, a second order from the justice only puts the Idaho ruling on hold.

WASHINGTON — In response to a last-minute request from lawyers for the state of Idaho, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on Wednesday stopped Tuesday's federal appeals court marriage ruling from from going into effect immediately.

The temporary order appears to have put same-sex couples' marriages on hold in both states impacted by Tuesday's decision from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — Idaho and Nevada — despite the request only having coming from Idaho officials.

Under a Tuesday evening order from the 9th Circuit, the mandate in the cases challenging both Idaho and Nevada's bans on same-sex couples' marriages was issued. The mandate is the final step the appeals court needed to take in order to put its ruling that the bans are unconstitutional into effect.

Following the issuance of the mandate, Nevada officials announced they would not be appealing further and at least some local officials began preparing to allow same-sex couples to begin marrying on Wednesday. Idaho officials gave no such indication, with the state's attorney general saying, "It's still too early to know fully what the decision and orders mean for Idaho and how the state will proceed."

On Wednesday morning, however, lawyers for Idaho went to the Supreme Court, asking Kennedy to issue a temporary stay of the 9th Circuit's mandate, noting, "Unless stayed, the district court's injunction and the Ninth Circuit's mandate will compel Idaho officials to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples beginning at 8:00 a.m. MDT this morning."

Although the application seeking the stay only came from Idaho officials, Kennedy's order issuing a stay includes the 9th Circuit case numbers of both the Idaho and Nevada cases. From the language of Kennedy's order, then, the rulings as to both Idaho and Nevada are on hold for now.

It was not immediately clear why Kennedy's order referenced the Nevada case number, although a Tuesday decision from the 9th Circuit might be why. On Tuesday, in a brief order issued just prior to the release of its decision striking down both states' bans, the 9th Circuit stated, "These cases are consolidated for purposes of disposition." As such, all of the orders — including the mandate — issued in the two states' cases were handled in a single order each time on Tuesday, meaning there was only one mandate issued as to both states' cases.

[This post was updated as new information became available, with the final update at 11:30 a.m.]


View Entire List ›


Conservative Nevada Judge Recuses Himself From Ending Marriage Ban

$
0
0

After upholding Nevada’s ban on marriages for same-sex couples in 2012, Judge Robert C. Jones ended his involvement in the case on Wednesday morning.

Although same-sex couples began getting marriage licenses in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on Monday, October 6, 2014, couples in Nevada are still on hold, following a temporary stay being issued by Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on Wednesday morning, October 8, 2014.

Nick Oxford / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Two years ago, U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones upheld Nevada's ban on same-sex couples' marriages.

Faced with a request Tuesday night to enforce a higher court's decision striking down the ban, Jones on Wednesday morning instead filed an order recusing himself from the case.

Nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush, Jones' 2012 decision to uphold Nevada's ban was pointed — he argued legalizing marriage for same-sex couples could make opposite-sex couples less likely to marry.

In the Nov. 26, 2012 decision upholding the ban in Sevcik v. Sandoval, Jones wrote at length about the "legitimate" reasons the state had for the ban. If same-sex couples were allowed to marry, he wrote, "it is conceivable that a meaningful percentage of heterosexual persons would cease to value the civil institution as highly as they previously had and hence enter into it less frequently … because they no longer wish to be associated with the civil institution as redefined."

On Tuesday, the 9th Circuit overturned Jones' decision:

The judgment of the district court in Sevcik v. Sandoval is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for the prompt issuance of an injunction permanently enjoining the state, its political subdivisions, and its officers, employees, and agents, from enforcing any constitutional provision, statute, regulation or policy preventing otherwise qualified same-sex couples from marrying, or denying recognition to marriages celebrated in other jurisdictions which, if the spouses were not of the same sex, would be valid under the laws of the state.

The 9th Circuit soon thereafter issued a mandate in the case, the final step in putting its ruling into effect. Lambda Legal, representing the plaintiffs in the case, filed a proposed order on Tuesday night in Jones' court asking for it to put the 9th Circuit's ruling in effect. Jones' role in ending the ban would have been more formality than anything — rubber-stamping something decided by a higher court.

Before acting on the request, though, Jones recused himself from the case on Wednesday morning. He gave no reason for his decision.

As it turned out, though, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy issued a stay of the 9th Circuit's mandate in the case anyway, which appears to have put the issue on hold for now.


View Entire List ›

Obama Administration Ready To Brag About HealthCare.Gov Again

$
0
0

The Department Of Health And Human Services says this time, it’s going to work.

We won't be seeing this again.

WASHINGTON — A year after the calamitous launch of Obamacare's online portal, three new officials who weren't with HHS when HealthCare.gov went live sat with reporters Wednesday at the department's brutalist headquarters.

Their message: HealthCare.gov is now a thoroughly modern website (reporters were urged to note the new fonts) from top to bottom, ready to offer the thoroughly modern health care enrollment process the administration also promised last year but failed to deliver.

There is a caveat. The top HHS officials declined to directly answer questions about how confident they are the revamped version of HealthCare.gov will be able to handle a fully-loaded enrollment day, saying the the site is still under testing. The testing regimen is much more rigorous than last time, they said.

Andy Slavitt, principal deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services — the wing of the sprawling department responsible for HealthCare.gov — Kevin Counihan, CEO of the government health care marketplace and Lori Lodes, the CMS director of communications, walked reporters through the extensively retooled Obamacare website at the briefing.

All three officials have been at HHS for only a matter of months, and they stood as a new face for HealthCare.gov.

The site has been redesigned to improve efficiency, eliminating systems that required users to enter the same information several times, as well as a back-end system that caused the site to communicate with a sever multiple times during the enrollment process, which the officials said led to some of the infamous delays that came to symbolize HealthCare.gov the last time around. The site is now optimized for mobile, and the enrollment process for users with the simplest enrollment process — which the administration has said in the past is the vast majority — is down from 76 separate webpages pages to more like 16. The backend has been improved, too.

A robust testing program is now in its second day. The new version of the site has been live-tested since July for use by some enrollees signing up under special enrollment periods that exist outside the annual open enrollment, which begins this year on Nov. 15. More people are being added to health care call centers in case there are problems when open enrollment opens up.

Everything about the new version of the site is meant to convey modernity and efficiency, the officials said, down to the smallest details.

"Look at the fonts and the layout. It's very clean," Counihan said. "It's very accessible, it's not intimidating...it's a much easier and more satisfying user experience."

HHS intends to keep reporters in the loop this time, keeping them up to date on the site's progress with a number of press briefings. The next one is scheduled to tackle re-enrollment, a new problem that the CMS team has been designing systems to handle.

Will the new emphasis on transparency, efficiency, user experience, backend and testing mean a smooth enrollment next month? After the administration was burned badly for making promises that buying health care would be like shopping on Amazon, it's not ready to make a prediction about how well things will go this time.

"Give us time to finish end-to-end testing," Slavitt said when asked by BuzzFeed News about how confident he was there won't be another debacle at HealthCare.gov. "I want people to try to break the system and then we'll try to build out from there."

The new look of HealthCare.gov, from HHS:

The new look of HealthCare.gov, from HHS:


View Entire List ›

Supreme Court Blocks North Carolina Same-Day Voter Registration, Out-Of-Precinct Voting

$
0
0

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissent.

Visitors stand in line to watch arguments on the first day of the new term of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington October 6, 2014.

Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed changes to North Carolina voting law to go into effect, blocking an appeals court order that would have allowed same-day voter registration and out-of-precinct voting to continue in the state.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would not have granted the state's request for a stay of the lower court's ruling. Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined her dissenting opinion.

"The Court of Appeals determined that at least two of the measures—elimination of same-day registration and termination of out-of-precinct voting—risked significantly reducing opportunities for black voters to exercise the franchise in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. I would not displace that record-based reasoned judgment," Ginsburg wrote.

Besides Ginsburg and, by signing on to her dissent, Sotomayor, no other justices explained their view on the case. A majority of justices, however, agreed to the stay request.

The ruling follows a similar ruling from the court this past week allowing new Ohio restrictions on early voting to go into effect.

Read the dissent to the decision granting the stay:


View Entire List ›

How A Coal Miner's Autopsy Proved A Top Doctor Wrong

$
0
0

After working underground in the coal mines of southern West Virginia for almost 35 years, Steve Day thought it was obvious why he gasped for air, slept upright in a recliner, and inhaled oxygen from a tank 24 hours a day.

More than half a dozen doctors who saw the masses in his lungs or the test results showing his severely impaired breathing were also in agreement.

The clear diagnosis was black lung.

Yet, when I met Steve in April 2013, he had lost his case to receive benefits guaranteed by federal law to any coal miner disabled by black lung. The coal company that employed the miner usually pays for these benefits, and, as almost always happens, Steve’s longtime employer had fought vigorously to avoid paying him. As a result, he and his family were barely scraping by, sometimes resorting to loans from relatives or neighbors to make it through the month.

Like many other miners, he had lost primarily because of the opinions of a unit of doctors at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions that had long been the go-to place for coal companies seeking negative X-ray readings to help defeat a benefits claim. The longtime leader of the unit, Dr. Paul Wheeler, testified against Steve, and the judge determined that his opinion trumped all others, as judges have in many other cases.

Today, however, there is final and overwhelming evidence that Wheeler was wrong: Steve’s autopsy.

On July 26, what was left of Steve’s lungs gave out. He was 67 years old. The doctor who performed the autopsy found extensive black lung. With the permission of Steve’s family, I shared his autopsy report with three leading doctors who specialize in black lung and related diseases. Each said essentially the same thing: Steve had one of the most severe cases of black lung they had seen.

“A majority of his lungs had been replaced by scar tissue with coal dust,” said Dr. Francis Green, a professor of medicine at the University of Calgary and one of the world’s top experts on the pathology of black lung.

Dr. David Weissman, who heads a federal agency’s division that certifies doctors — including Wheeler — to read chest X-rays, said it was “very concerning” that a certified reader would fail to recognize a case as severe as Steve’s.

Reached by phone, Wheeler said, “I’d love to talk to you, but the hospital has asked that everything be referred to the legal team.”

A Johns Hopkins spokesperson would not comment on Steve’s case, but noted that the black lung X-ray-reading program headed by Wheeler has been suspended, pending an internal review. The spokesperson refused to provide details about the review, saying only that it “is proceeding as rapidly as possible, and I can assure you that Johns Hopkins takes it very seriously.”

Eight months before he died, Steve filed a new claim for benefits, presenting evidence that the masses in his lungs had grown and his breathing had worsened even further. He underwent an exam by a doctor of the company’s choosing, and even this physician found severe black lung.

Miners who win their cases receive a monthly check paid, in a majority of cases, by their former employer. Here are the current rates set by the federal government.

Department of Labor / Via dol.gov

In late September, a Labor Department claims examiner issued an award of benefits. But this is only a first step in what is usually a protracted process of appeals. Indeed, Steve also had won at this initial level in 2005. The company that employed Steve, now a subsidiary of Patriot Coal Corp., appealed that decision, leading to the denial of the claim by a judge.

Patriot refused to say whether it would continue to fight Steve’s current claim. “Patriot Coal follows set procedures in the handling of claims,” a spokesperson said in a statement. “We will continue to follow our procedures and will respond accordingly.”

I asked whether, given the overwhelming autopsy evidence, the company would be willing to concede that Steve had a legitimate claim for benefits. “We have procedures we follow in reviewing a claim, and we will follow these procedures with this claim, as with all others,” a spokesperson responded. She would not say what those procedures are.

Paul Frampton, an attorney at the firm Bowles Rice LLP, handles a large number of black lung cases on behalf of coal companies and defeated Steve’s previous claim. He is again representing Patriot Coal in the current claim. He did not respond to repeated voicemails and emails.

Steve became the face of a series of investigative stories I wrote last year while at the Center for Public Integrity; the series logo featured an image of him holding his hardhat with tubes feeding oxygen through his nostrils. He freely shared his story, granted me access to deeply personal records, and became a symbol of the struggles many other miners face.

Now his autopsy report and his personal story highlight how Wheeler’s approach to reading chest films, applied in thousands of cases over decades, led to wrongful denials — with devastating consequences.

Courtesy of the Day family

It was 1969 when Michael Steve Day arrived back home in Glen Fork, West Virginia, after a tour in Vietnam, where he had worked base security for the Air Force. He returned amid tumult in the Appalachian coalfields.

Steve Day served in Vietnam, working base security for the U.S. Air Force.

Courtesy of the Day family

A widespread strike had virtually shut down the coal industry in West Virginia, and tens of thousands of miners had descended on the state capitol in Charleston, demanding legislation to address a problem that had plagued miners for more than a century. It had gone by many names, but a movement had coalesced around a simple, descriptive term: black lung.

Later that year, Congress would make a promise to the nation’s miners: Coal companies would be required to control levels of disease-causing dust, an approach meant to virtually eradicate black lung, and anyone who did get it would receive fair compensation.

But at the time, Steve, 23, had romance on his mind. He met a girl named Nyoka Gayle Fortner. They spent afternoons taking walks, holding hands. They’d been together only weeks when Steve asked her to marry him.

“Aw, Steve, you can do better than me,” Nyoka recalled telling him. “No, I want you,” he said. They eloped on July 25, 1969.

Both Steve’s and Nyoka’s fathers had been coal miners. Nyoka had seen the physical toll of the job, and she asked Steve not to go underground. He said he wouldn’t.

But options are limited in southern West Virginia, and the lure of the best paycheck around soon hooked Steve. He went to work for Eastern Associated Coal in September 1969, and he would work the rest of his roughly 33-year mining career for this company that’s now owned by Patriot Coal.

He did the dustiest jobs: cutting coal with powerful machinery, hauling it in shuttle cars, or driving bolts into the roof of a freshly mined area to ensure it didn’t collapse. He’d work double shifts, extra days — whatever he could to earn more for his family.

Steve and Nyoka Day with their children (from left) Stepheny, Michael, and Patience.

Courtesy of the Day family.

Steve and Nyoka had three children: a son, Michael Steve Day Jr., and two daughters, Stepheny and Patience. “My dad would come in from the mines, and he’d still be dirty, coal dust all over him. And he would stop and play,” Patience recalled. “I remember many a day when we would be out in the front yard, we would have ball gloves, and he would toss the baseball around with me.”

Jobs came and went with the boom and bust of the coal industry. There’d be layoffs, and Steve would drive around day after day looking for work. And there were the inherent dangers of working in often-unstable caverns deep underground, surrounded by powerful equipment. Rocks slammed into Steve’s back and bruised and split open the skin on his elbows and knuckles. He sometimes worked in tunnels so low that he had to crawl for entire shifts. He’d come home with knees like balloons. “He would work and work and work,” Patience said, “and it was all for his family.”

The more serious problem was less obvious. By the late 1990s, he began to notice coughing and labored breathing. In 2004, Steve’s doctor told him to get out of the mines; his lungs were shot. The man Nyoka had always seen as indestructible, “a superman,” had to retire.

courtesy of the Day Family

Steve’s case, which he filed in 2005, grabbed my attention for a simple reason: The judge’s 2011 decision denying benefits didn’t seem to make much sense. Continuing to read through thousands of decisions, I came to realize that nonsensical conclusions are surprisingly common in the arcane world of federal black lung benefits.

When a miner files a claim, he is entitled to a medical exam conducted by a doctor approved by the Labor Department, but he also must submit to an exam by a doctor of the company’s choosing.

Steve unwittingly selected a doctor who frequently testifies for coal companies to conduct his Labor Department-paid exam, but even this doctor found the most advanced form of black lung. The doctor chosen by the company also found black lung initially, but he changed his mind after being sent Wheeler’s reports on the chest films.

A miner has to prove not only that he has black lung but also that it has rendered him totally disabled. In Steve’s case, every doctor agreed his lung function was so bad that he was totally disabled, and every doctor except Wheeler and his two Johns Hopkins colleagues saw black lung on the X-rays and CT scans.

But the reports and testimony from the Johns Hopkins doctors were the ones that counted. Deferring especially to Wheeler’s qualifications — multiple professional certifications, undergraduate and medical degrees from Harvard University, a long list of publications, four decades of teaching at a world-renowned institution — the judge found that Steve “did not have” black lung.

There was no evidence that Steve had any of the illnesses Wheeler suggested as alternatives — tuberculosis, bird tuberculosis, or a fungal infection caused by exposure to bird or bat droppings. The judge made no determination about what was causing Steve’s obvious disability, just that it wasn’t black lung.

Reading through other cases, I saw many instances of disabled miners who were being treated for black lung but who, according to judges who based their decisions in large part on the opinions of Wheeler and his colleagues, didn’t have the disease or couldn’t prove they had it. It was as if they had some mystery illness.

Who was right and who was wrong: See a comparison of what doctors said about Steve Day's lungs — and what the autopsy proved.

In reading Steve’s X-rays and CT scans, all of the doctors more or less agreed about the white splotches they saw; the main difference was how they interpreted them. But the most definitive way to determine if someone had black lung is not to analyze shadows on film but to examine the lungs themselves in an autopsy.

Steve’s diseased lungs, then, provide a useful test of who was right and who was wrong.

Of the reports by doctors who saw black lung on the images of Steve’s chest before his death, perhaps the most detailed was by Dr. John E. Parker, who, for the last decade, has been chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the West Virginia University School of Medicine and, before that, ran the X-ray-reading program at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), which licenses physicians such as Wheeler to examine films for black lung and similar diseases. Parker teaches doctors to read X-rays on behalf of NIOSH and the American College of Radiology.

In 2013, I asked him to review Steve’s X-rays and CT scans, telling him only Steve’s name, age, and mining experience, as well as the fact that the interpretation of the films was contested. With the exception of one CT scan, Parker evaluated all the films Wheeler reviewed, as well as some taken more recently. Considering only the earlier films — those also evaluated by Wheeler — his conclusion was clear: Even back then, Steve already had end-stage black lung.

“Mr. Day’s history and findings are so characteristic that I am confident that Mr. Day has lung disease related to his coal mining,” Parker wrote in his report. “I am so confident, that I am indeed certain a biopsy or an autopsy, if performed, would confirm my diagnosis.”

Wheeler, by contrast, had been asked during a deposition in 2009 whether the spots he saw were black lung. “They’re not,” he testified.

How did Wheeler arrive at this conclusion? He has a strict set of criteria that he applies when reading films. Yet medical literature contradicts some of his opinions, and Steve’s autopsy report supports these texts and the reports of Parker and the other physicians who saw black lung.

For example, evaluating a 2005 CT scan, Wheeler noted areas of dead tissue inside the masses in Steve’s lungs and said these are typical of an infectious disease but not black lung. This film was not available for Parker to review, but, in later CT scans, he also saw areas of dead tissue. Consistent with medical literature, Parker said that they could be characteristic of severe black lung. As the disease progresses, areas of lung tissue inside masses can die, become liquid, and sometimes rupture into the airway, causing miners to cough up black phlegm. This matches what Steve and Nyoka described experiencing, and the doctor who performed the autopsy confirmed that this is what was happening in Steve’s lungs.

This pattern recurs in the reports. Wheeler and Parker saw essentially the same things. They more or less agreed on characteristics such as the location of the masses and the prevalence of smaller background spots. Yet Wheeler said these things pointed to tuberculosis or a fungal infection, while Parker said they pointed to black lung. The autopsy report shows that Parker was right and Wheeler was wrong.

The criteria Wheeler applied in Steve’s case didn’t just contradict Parker and other doctors. Many of the standards Wheeler used when reading films are at odds with the definitive text, written by an expert panel of the College of American Pathologists and still in use today, on the appearance of black lung.

Nonetheless, Wheeler has used these criteria in countless other cases. He has recited them in report after report, deposition after deposition. In a system with few attorneys willing to represent miners — and even fewer who know enough to challenge Wheeler’s views — his assertions have carried great weight and contributed to many miners being denied black lung benefits.

In more than 1,500 cases decided since 2000, Wheeler has not found a single case of the most severe form of black lung, even as other doctors saw the advanced form of the disease in 390 of these cases. Overall during that time, which is as far back as digital records go, miners have lost more than 800 cases after other doctors saw black lung on an X-ray but Wheeler graded the film as negative.

And that’s only counting the cases that made it to the second stage in the claims process — a hearing before an administrative law judge — and not cases that were denied at the initial level. Decisions at that early stage are not publicly available. The Labor Department recently contacted more than 1,000 miners who have filed claims since 2001 and were denied after negative readings by Wheeler, informing them that they could seek to reopen their claims or file new ones.

Wheeler has been reading X-rays for black lung for at least 40 years.

Steve and Nyoka

Courtesy of the Day family

White House Uses Emojis To Make Its Economic Case To The Youth

$
0
0

Say it with tiny flexing arms and mortarboards.

WASHINGTON — The White House is preparing a new emoji-based social media campaign to make it's economic pitch to young people, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Starting Thursday, White House social media accounts will blast out charts, graphs, and yes, emojis, aimed at catching the eye of young voters weeks before the November elections.

Even the staid administration report illustrating administration efforts to reduce student loan costs and boost enrollment in the Affordable Care Act for younger Americans — both of which contribute to improved economic opportunity for those starting careers, according to the White House — has a youthful flavor. "15 ECONOMIC FACTS ABOUT
MILLENNIALS," reads the cover of the White House Council Of Economic Advisors report.

Inside the report, the news is not all good. The economic downturn that helped fuel youth support for President Obama's 2008 campaign still haunts younger Americans, the reports authors find.

"[T]he Great Recession will at least affect Millennials' labor market performance as well
as savings and investment behavior in the short-term, though at this point, it is still too soon to know how large and lasting these impacts will be," reads one of the report's conclusions. Millennials interested in home ownership are still squeezed by a tight credit market, the report finds, and lasting fallout from the recession on the labor market means millennials are staying with the same employer longer than their counterparts in Generation X.

"[T]he long-term impacts of these changes are unclear and there are both benefits and costs to longer tenure at jobs," the report finds.

The focus of Thursday's social media campaign — student debt and Obamacare — also get a lot of ink in the report. The Affordable Care Act means young people "are much more likely to have health insurance coverage than young workers in the past," the report says. But a rise in student loan payment delinquencies, especially among students enrolled in for-profit schools or those who don't graduate, shows some millennials are facing a heavy financial burden even before they enter the job market, the report finds.

Younger Americans have traditionally been a Democratic base group, and Obama's team has done a masterful job of turning them out in his presidential campaigns. But college aged voters have much lower turn out rates in non-presidential election years, and the White House is hoping to prop up those numbers during next month's crucial election that will determine control of the Senate.

A look at the White House social media campaign on millennials and the economy:

A look at the White House social media campaign on millennials and the economy:


View Entire List ›

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images