Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Future Clinton Campaign Staffers Working As Volunteers

$
0
0

A group of top Democrats are getting Hillary Clinton ready for 2016 — and working for free until the launch of a campaign.

Yana Paskova / Getty Images

Hillary Clinton has a growing team of strategists and advisers who are already building her all but certain presidential bid — but they have been and will be working strictly as unpaid volunteers until the campaign's formal launch.

An undisclosed number of future staffers, including those in line to serve as top aides, have worked for free ahead of an expected spring announcement.

Those future staffers, and subsequent hires, will be paid for work rendered after the formation of a campaign entity, sources close to Clinton confirmed. (The Federal Election Commission also gives potential candidates who decide to run a 15-day window before they must declare. Staff could be paid for that period.)

Nick Merrill, a Clinton spokesman, said the former secretary of state is technically in the "testing the waters" phase of a campaign. In that period, as defined by the FEC, potential federal candidates may explore the feasibility of a run — with such activities as polling or travel — without announcing.

"She hasn't made a decision about running. She is currently 'testing the waters,' as the Federal Election Commission calls it," Merrill said on Monday night. "Like anyone considering running for office, she has the support of many individuals who have agreed to volunteer their time to help her make this decision."

Expenses that Clinton has incurred during this period have been paid out of pocket, a source familiar with the likely campaign said. Under federal election law, if Clinton does make her candidacy official, those expenses will be reported.

The bevy of high-level operatives who have been working on a volunteer basis is a testament to the draw of a Clinton campaign — and to the sparse field of candidates on the left: The former secretary is the only game in town for most Democratic operatives looking to work on a presidential race this year.

Just one Democrat, former U.S. Sen. Jim Webb, has opened a presidential exploratory committee. Martin O'Malley, who recently finished his last term as governor of Maryland, has only said he is considering a White House bid.

Clinton does not hold public office or maintain an established political entity, unlike the Republicans expected to run. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush launched his Right to Rise leadership PAC in January of this year and has used it to hire staff. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker also set up a committee, Our American Revival, that same month. Others, like Sen. Rand Paul, have had associated PACs since before the 2016 cycle began.

It is not clear how many staffers are now working for Clinton as volunteers.

In recent months, the names of senior aides advising Clinton have steadily leaked to the press. Some, such as pollster Joel Benenson, maintain their own firms representing other clients.

Robby Mook, the strategist set to manage the campaign, was said to have helped Clinton's office on political matters last year, while also working as a consultant to other groups. State and federal filings show Mook was paid during the 2014 cycle by the Democratic Governors Association, a PAC supporting Sen. Mark Warner, and a PAC for Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the longtime Clinton fundraiser whose Virginia gubernatorial campaign Mook successfully managed in 2013.

Mook's longtime campaign partner, Marlon Marshall, is also helping the Clinton team. After leaving his job at the White House in January, Marshall returned to 270 Strategies, the consulting firm he co-founded.

Senior and mid-level staffers for other departments, including finance and communications, have been brought onto the campaign more recently.


Lindsey Graham Mocks Rivals At New Hampshire Breakfast

$
0
0

“Cruz couldn’t be here because he’s building a fence… up on the Canadian border keeping his family out.”

Joshua Roberts / Reuters

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, who's potentially looking at a presidential run, roasted his Republican rivals at the light-hearted annual Wild Irish Breakfast charity breakfast in Nashua, New Hampshire, Tuesday.

"Cruz couldn't be here because he's building a fence... up on the Canadian border keeping his family out," joked the South Carolina senator.

Speaking to former New York Gov. George Pataki, the other presidential hopeful in attendance, he said, "George Pataki, me being here today has made you the front runner."

Both Pataki and Graham received 0.1% in the CPAC straw poll.

Graham likewise mocked Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's high-priced fundraisers.

"Jeb couldn't be here and you better be glad because it would be $10,000 a plate," said Graham.

Of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, he said, "You better be glad Scott Walker's not here 'cause he'd beat you up."

Graham also reserved time for his Senate ally Arizona Sen. John McCain. Roasting his hawkish stance on foreign policy he said McCain "couldn't be here because he's planning the invasion of Switzerland."

The video of the event embedded from WMUR.com is below, with Graham's speech coming at around the 20-minute mark:

View Video ›

WMUR/ / Via cdnapisec.kaltura.com

Veterans Group Launches Social Network To Put Personal Face On VA Scandal

$
0
0

The site’s goal is to provide a view of veterans care around the country in real time.

Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona.

Christian Petersen / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A veterans group has created a new way for service members to put pressure on the Veterans Administration as complaints of long lines and substandard care continue to plague the VA.

The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America will launch TheWaitWeCarry.org Tuesday, a social network that lets veterans post personal stories of seeking and receiving care at VA facilities around the United States. These stories are then displayed on an interactive map of the U.S., providing a birds-eye view of veterans care around the country.

The site allows users to directly contact any participant on the site, which the IAVA hopes will help reporters, congress, and the VA better understand the story of care.

In an interview with BuzzFeed News, IAVA founder and Iraq War veteran Paul Rieckhoff said the new website offers a powerful way to examine VA care in real-time and stop the next scandal before it starts.

"We knew about Phoenix, and everyone in the [veterans community] knew about Phoenix," he said. "But the folks in Washington seemed surprised by it. So what The Wait We Carry can do is also show them where the next Phoenix is going to be, where the real problems are now. Because one thing we do know is we can't count on VA to know themselves."

Last week, President Obama and Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert McDonald attended a bipartisan roundtable at the Phoenix VA facility, where media reports detailed delays that went on so long, some veterans allegedly died while waiting for care. Following the reports, complaints about the overloaded VA hospital system emerged all over the country.

The president said there's much more work to be done at the VA, but said everyone he spoke with who made it through the backlog to actually receive care found it to be "outstanding."

Rieckhoff said that statement painted a rosier picture of VA care than he's seen. He also criticized the president for taking so long to visit the Phoenix VA, where problems first emerged in the media over a year ago. IAVA hopes the new social network will spur interest in a story that has faded from the national agenda.

"The president taking this long to get to Phoenix was like President Bush taking a long time to get to Katrina," he said. "What this [site] offers the opportunity to do is, imagine if you could talk to people in Katrina a couple of years after it and say, 'how are you doing?' This gives us a chance to ask veterans around the country, 'how are you doing?'"

Rieckhoff is cautiously optimistic about the future of the VA with former Proctor and Gamble CEO McDonald at the helm. Obama nominated McDonald for the job after the president's first VA secretary, former Gen. Eric Shinseki, resigned at the height of the backlog scandal. Reickhoff praised the move and said McDonald has asked to be briefed by IAVA on their new tool. (A spokesperson for the VA declined to comment on the record.)

The website is latest in high tech "asymetrical warfare" advocacy by the IAVA, in the words of Rieckhoff. Last year, as the backlog scandal raged, IAVA created an online toolkit to teach would-be VA whistleblowers how to evade being caught by federal investigators.

The group is launching this new website like a startup -- developers at South by Southwest were given a private preview, and tech thinkers at TED in Vancouver this week were treated to a "guerilla" launch by Rieckhoff, who attended the conference.

IAVA hopes the website, developed with a grant from the Knight Foundation by IAVA's in-house tech team, will empower vets whose time on the battlefield came well before the internet generation. TheWaitWeCarry.org is open to veterans of all American wars, not just the two IAVA's members fought in.

"I don't think women in the VA system would consistently say care is great. I don't think people in rural areas would consistently say care is great," Rieckhoff said. "There's the old saying, 'if you've seen one VA, you've seen one VA.' It's really inconsistent."

Congressman Aaron Schock Resigning Amid Ethics Questions

$
0
0

The 33-year-old Illinois Republican’s spending habits have been under scrutiny in recent weeks.

Seth Perlman / AP

Illinois Rep. Aaron Schock announced his resignation from Congress Tuesday amid inquiries into his spending of campaign and taxpayer money.

The news of his resignation was first reported by Politico.

In a statement, he said he was announcing his resignation with a "heavy heart":

Serving the people of the 18th District is the highest and greatest honor I have had in my life.

I thank them for their faith in electing me and letting me represent their interests in Washington. I have given them my all over the last six years.

I have traveled to all corners of the District to meet with the people I've been fortunate to be able to call my friends and neighbors.

"But the constant questions over the last six weeks have proven a great distraction that has made it too difficult for me to serve the people of the 18th District with the high standards that they deserve and which I have set for myself.

I have always sought to do what's best for my constituents and I thank them for the opportunity to serve.

Schock's spending habits became the subject of intense media scrutiny after his Downton Abbey-inspired office was featured in a story in the Washington Post.

The congressman's lavish and ethically questionable spending was then investigated by several media outlets, including BuzzFeed News. The investigations raised questions about how Schock spent public money.

Schock's resignation is effective on March 31.

This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates or follow BuzzFeed Politics on Twitter.

Marriage Equality Advocates Stall On Decision About Who Will Argue At Supreme Court

$
0
0

While state officials have announced who will be presenting the defense of same-sex marriage bans to the justices, lawyers for the plaintiffs have proposed splitting the arguments among the four legal teams. The marriage equality side also has not named who will be arguing on April 28.

Susan Walsh / AP

WASHINGTON — It's been a question for years: Which lawyer will argue the decisive marriage equality case in front of the Supreme Court? On Tuesday, the lawyers announced their decision, for now, was not to decide.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs in the six cases out of four states before the Supreme Court asked the justices to split the April 28 arguments, which will include 90 minutes focused on whether states can ban same-sex couples from marrying and 60 minutes focused on whether states can refuse to recognize same-sex couples' marriages, between four lawyers.

The plaintiffs' lawyers have asked the court to split the marriage question between the Michigan and Kentucky teams and to split the marriage recognition question between the Ohio and Tennessee teams. The letter did not, however, announce who would be arguing in each spot.

What's more, those four as-of-yet unnamed lawyers support the request of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. to also argue in support of marriage equality — meaning a total of five lawyers, each with 15 minutes, likely will appear at the podium to present arguments in support of marriage and marriage recognition.

On the other side of the arguments, the situation is much more simple.

On the marriage question, the Michigan Attorney General's Office has announced that the state's former solicitor general, John Bursch, will be arguing in defense of state bans on same-sex couples' marriages. Joe Whalen, the associate solicitor general in the Tennessee Attorney General's Office, will argue in defense of the recognition bans.

As Dan Tierney, a spokesman with Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine, told BuzzFeed News, "It was the Court's expressed strong preference that only one person argue in defense of each of the two questions."

The underlying skirmish among supporters of marriage equality about who will bring the case that will — they hope — be credited with bringing marriage rights to same-sex couples across the nation has been a point of contention since the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in 2013 and declined to rule on the merits of the case same-sex couples had brought against California's Proposition 8.

With dozens of cases pending across the country since then, and with different cases moving at different speeds up through the legal system, it was anyone's guess which case would be the one.

After a false start when the Supreme Court denied review of several cases in October 2014, the court accepted cases for review out of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee in January. The Kentucky and Michigan cases directly address whether states can ban same-sex couples from marrying, while the Kentucky case also — along with the Ohio and Tennessee cases — address whether states can ban recognition of same-sex couples' marriages.

The Supreme Court, when it accepted the cases, announced that it would be hearing 45 minutes of arguments per side on the marriage question and 30 minutes per side on the recognition question. It did not, however, assign who — or even which cases' lawyers — would argue before the court.

The court had asked for parties to submit their proposals for oral arguments by Tuesday.

The states' oral argument proposal for the marriage cases:

The states' oral argument proposal for the marriage cases:

The plaintiffs' oral argument proposal for the marriage cases:

The plaintiffs' oral argument proposal for the marriage cases:


View Entire List ›

Congressman: Obama Executive Action Conspiracy To Make America "One-Party State"

$
0
0

“So make no mistake about it, that this is a part of a grand plan for the Democrat Party to make this nation into a single party state…”

w.soundcloud.com

Rep. John Fleming, Republican from Louisiana, said President Obama's executive action on immigration is part of a "grand plan" to make America a "single party state" to fix elections using undocumented immigrants.

"Well there is no question that this 5 or 10 million illegals who were here under this program would receive first of all, a driver's licenses. Then they can get Social Security benefits. They can get tax refunds. They can get earned income tax credit. They can enjoy free healthcare. They can enjoy welfare and the many things that go with that," Fleming said.

Speaking with the John Fredericks Show, Fleming said this was part of a "grand plan" to make the U.S. a "single party state."

"So in many states, the only thing that are required to vote is simply an ID, well they'll have one," he said. "So make no mistake about it, that this is a part of a grand plan for the Democrat Party to make this nation into a single party state, as they have already accomplished in California, and you see the devastating impact it's having there."

Fleming said while many undocumented immigrations were "hard working people" with "great values" they were "consistent Democratic voters."

"You know, the people who come across the border are hard working family people. They have great values, and that's all well and good but they are also very, very consistent Democrat voters. We know they come from cultures that look to government for solutions and so the Democrat Party knows this and they know that if they can't win elections using American citizens, this is a good way to go around that."

"So that's a reason why the good news about all of this is the courts have put a stay on the president's unlawful, unconstitutional executive amnesty, and we think we are going to win, but we hope that stay isn't lifted because a lot of damage can be done in the meantime. "

Ben Carson Operative Deletes Tweets Telling Obama To "Bend Over Bitch," Among Others

$
0
0

“I’m looking forward to McConnell shoving his fist up Obama’s ass. Although, he will, no doubt, like it. #tcot”

Kevin Lamarque / Reuters

The team building out Dr. Ben Carson's likely presidential campaign includes an operative who has recently deleted an entire Twitter account that often attacked President Obama, other Democrats, some other Republicans, and others with crude language.

The Carson exploratory team has been interviewing potential operatives in a wide range of states. One of the people on the effort, Jim Dornan, worked on the governmental affairs staff at the American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries and has plethora of Capitol Hill and campaign experience.

Dornan once operated a pseudo-anonymous Twitter account — which has since been deleted after BuzzFeed News asked about his tweets.

One tweet from Dornan referred to McConnell shoving his fist up Obama's butt. One tweet calls Ferguson protestors "thugs." Another calls Obama a "dipshit." One tweet calls Debbie Wasserman-Schultz a "pathetic excuse for a human being." Two tweets call Chris Matthews and the Huffington Post "aholes." Another tweet at Obama tells him to "bend over bitch."

What role Dornan is playing in the campaign is less clear. BuzzFeed News learned Dornan is the national field director for Carson's presidential exploratory committee.

"I do see the issue associated with his Twitter," a campaign spokesman said, but insisted the title of national field director was informal and the calls he was making on the behalf of the campaign to set up field operations were strictly on a volunteer basis. He admitted Dornan was paid for travel reimbursement costs for work for Carson's USA First PAC.

The likely campaign in recent weeks appears to be readying for work. Barry Bennett, a former Rob Portman aide hired to head the exploratory committee will start running the day-to-day operations of any potential Carson campaign with Steve Rubino (who National Review previously reported was Carson's ad man).

BuzzFeed News had also learned that Carson's longtime aide Terry Giles would be doing less day-to-day work saying, but the campaign disputed that characterization. "Terry Giles is active as ever. He's the chairman of the campaign. He's as active as he was two weeks ago," a committee spokesman told BuzzFeed News.

Here are the tweets.


View Entire List ›

Missouri Gets The Name Of The Man It Is Trying To Execute Wrong

$
0
0

Missouri opposed “Walter Storey’s Motion for a Stay of Execution” on Tuesday night at the Supreme Court. But Storey was executed on Feb. 11 — and Cecil Clayton is on death row now.

Missouri is due to execute Cecil Clayton on Tuesday, and the state is opposing his requests at the Supreme Court seeking a stay of execution. Here is one of Missouri's filings opposing a stay:

Missouri is due to execute Cecil Clayton on Tuesday, and the state is opposing his requests at the Supreme Court seeking a stay of execution. Here is one of Missouri's filings opposing a stay:

In the opening of the filing, however, Missouri officials caption the filing and reference a man the state executed on Feb. 11, Walter Storey:

In the opening of the filing, however, Missouri officials caption the filing and reference a man the state executed on Feb. 11, Walter Storey:

Later, the state refers to him as "Clay," which is not his name either:

Later, the state refers to him as "Clay," which is not his name either:

Then, they return to calling him the now-deceased Storey:

Then, they return to calling him the now-deceased Storey:


View Entire List ›


Conservative Group Will Run Ads On Fox News Backing Boehner's Budget

$
0
0

The ad from American Action Network contrasts the House GOP budget with President Obama’s — and, more importantly, is running on the network that conservatives watch.

Win McNamee / Getty

WASHINGTON — A conservative advocacy group closely aligned with Speaker John Boehner will launch a new ad campaign targeting independents and conservatives Wednesday that backs the House leadership's budget.

The $500,000 ad buy by the American Action Network, a 501c4 group, will run on Fox News over the next 10 days is designed to run at the same time that Congress begins consideration of the budget and ostensibly is aimed at creating a contrast between Republicans' budget and President Obama's.

"The Obama budget and House Republican budget are a study in contrasts," American Action Network President Mike Shields said, adding "The House Republican budget balances in 10 years, repeals Obamacare and is the right prescription for America's economy. Americans should let Congress know loud and clear that the House Republican budget is the right path to prosperity."

But the ad is also designed to appeal to conservative voters, particularly in districts in which Republicans could face primary challenges from the right.

Over the last several years a variety of conservative factions within Boehner's caucus have proposed their own, more austere budgets, muddling Republicans' message and giving Democrats political cover.

Although the ad doesn't mention groups like the Republican Study Committee, it does make clear that the official GOP budget hits popular conservative benchmarks, particularly the full repeal of Obamacare.

youtube.com

Woman Says Obama Tried To Nuke America, Santorum Offended She Suggested He’s Still In Congress

$
0
0

“First off, I take somewhat offense of referring it to ‘you’ because I’m not a sitting member of the Senate so I’m not taking blame for any of that stuff.”

Former Sen. Rick Santorum addressed the South Carolina National Security Action Summit last week, put on by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., president of Secure Freedom. Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. Bobby Jindal (by recorded message) also addressed the event.

Obama is not a citizen.

President Obama attempted to nuke Charleston.

Obama is a "communist, dictator."

Obama could have been removed a long time ago.

Obama has fired all the generals who would not fire on U.S. citizens if he attempted to take away people's guns.

Everything Obama has done is illegal.

He takes offense she might have suggested he was still in the Senate.

Santorum says he can "absolutely agree" that there's "a complete lack of leadership."

Obama's executive action on immigration does make "the word tyrant" come to mind.

Santorum says "the president has done a lot of dangerous" things, but his executive action of immigration is worst because it sets a bad precedent.

Santorum says he would shut down the government over the president's executive action.

Here's video of the exchange:

youtube.com


View Entire List ›

The Trials And Triumphs Of Heidi Cruz

$
0
0

LM Otero / AP

Around 10 p.m. on the night of Aug. 22, 2005, the Austin Police Department dispatched Officer Joel Davidson to an intersection a couple miles west of the Texas city’s downtown. A passerby had called to report that a woman in a pink shirt was sitting on the ground near the MoPac Expressway with her head in her hands, and no sign of a vehicle nearby. When the officer arrived, he found the woman on a swath of grass between an onramp and the freeway. She said her name was Heidi Cruz.

According to a police report recently obtained by BuzzFeed News, Officer Davidson proceeded to question Cruz, whose husband, Ted, was then serving as Texas solicitor general. He asked what she was doing by the expressway; she replied that she lived on nearby Hartford Street, and "had been walking around the area." She went on to tell Davidson that she was not on any medication and that she hadn't been drinking, aside from "two sips of a margarita an hour earlier with dinner." He wrote that he "did not detect any signs of intoxication."

The heavily redacted report goes on to describe that Davidson believed Cruz was a “danger to herself and others,” and notes that she was sitting 10 feet away from traffic. He asked if he could transport her somewhere — the proposed location is redacted — but she was "reluctant, stating that maybe she should ... get a ride home" instead. Eventually, Cruz followed him to his patrol car, and they departed the scene.

In response to questions about the incident, an adviser to Heidi Cruz's husband, Sen. Ted Cruz, sent a statement to BuzzFeed News shedding light on a period of their lives that the couple has not previously discussed in public.

"About a decade ago, when Mrs. Cruz returned from D.C. to Texas and faced a significant professional transition, she experienced a brief bout of depression," said Jason Miller, an adviser to the senator. "Like millions of Americans, she came through that struggle with prayer, Christian counseling, and the love and support of her husband and family."

BuzzFeed News requested an interview with Heidi Cruz to further discuss that night in 2005, and how she dealt with depression. A spokesman replied that she would consider the offer, and then two days later, reported back that she politely declined.

According to someone familiar with the situation, the Cruzes were aware of the police report — which was obtained by BuzzFeed News in response to a wide-ranging series of public-records requests — and they were resigned to the fact that it would eventually be made public, particularly as Ted Cruz moves toward a likely 2016 presidential bid. But while Heidi Cruz was not ashamed to talk about her experience, the person said, she ultimately decided against it because she didn't want to minimize the struggle of those who suffer from depression their entire lives by trumpeting her own happy ending.

The incident was a rare moment of visible vulnerability for a woman widely known to the public and among friends as an unflappable high achiever with preternatural poise. In a series of recent interviews with people close to the Cruzes and a review of her public appearances little mentioned in press accounts, the portrait that emerges is one that many career-oriented couples would recognize: two driven people, delicately negotiating the push and pull of their respective careers — and wrestling with the conflicts, compromises, and disappointments inherent to such a project. In 15 years of marriage, their parallel professional ascents have carried them from the bullpen of a national campaign to the upper echelons of Wall Street and Washington — and could soon have them contending for the White House.

For Cruz, the former Heidi Nelson, the trajectory was always expected to involve big things. She grew up in California with a religious family of Seventh-day Adventists, who stressed that personal success could be measured by good works. At just 4 years old, she began accompanying her parents on mission trips to Africa, where they provided free dental care to locals. When she was 12, she read a Time magazine article about the 1980 presidential election, and started to take an interest in government as a vehicle for public service, in its most literal sense. By the time she arrived at Claremont-McKenna College, a small liberal arts school outside of Los Angeles, she was plotting the intricacies of a career trajectory designed to one day land her a plum appointment in the federal government working in international affairs — an area where she felt she could make a difference in the world.

"She really knew where she wanted to go, and was all about getting there," said Ed Haley, a Claremont professor who became Cruz's mentor. They would meet often to discuss her career goals, and to talk through and tweak her various ladder-climbing strategies. "If you look over the past 50 or 75 years of the U.S. foreign policy establishment, most of those who are appointed into high positions are lawyers. Heidi and I discussed this a great deal," he said. "That's the mold." But she had little interest in being a lawyer; she wanted her private-sector training to be in business. So, they discussed which corporate skill sets might best position her for a job in a future administration, and she settled on finance.

Many who knew her believed she saw Wall Street as a pit stop. "She did definitely have a strong interest in government," said Jack Pitney, another Claremont professor, who helped get her an internship on Capitol Hill.

After a few years at J.P. Morgan in New York, she went to Harvard Business School and emerged, MBA in hand, with a bevy of lucrative job offers — including a highly coveted spot at Goldman Sachs.

Instead, she took an unpaid job on George W. Bush’s 2000 campaign.

Years later, she would explain her thinking at the time to a baffled-looking student interviewer during a taped Q&A at her alma mater. Cruz said she viewed the counterintuitive choice as a "measured risk," and recalled that her professors at Claremont had urged her to seize any opportunity she got to join a presidential campaign. "I didn't even have to touch base with them at the time ... for me, the decision was very clear," she said.

Haley, who closely watched his former protégé’s career, was thrilled to see her sticking to their plan. "That was very much the direction we had discussed," he said. "I had told her that, in general, political appointments come to those who find a way to do something constructive for politicians, and joining a campaign is one way to do that."

She turned down Goldman, packed her bags, and headed for Austin, where she took an unpaid position on the campaign's policy team, stashing her workout gear in a tiny cubicle, and spending long days tinkering with budget math and editing memos.

It was there that she met Ted Cruz, the ostentatiously brilliant, motor-mouthed Harvard Law grad who liked to talk about his debate championships, Supreme Court clerkship, and big plans for the future. Some in Bush headquarters were repelled by Ted's transparent ambition and steroid-infused self-confidence, but Heidi was drawn to him. She ended the campaign with a new husband, and an offer to work at the U.S. trade representative's office.

Those who encountered the couple were often struck by their almost palpable affection for each other — and the sharp contrast in their personal styles. Both Cruzes carry a kind of intensity about them, but whereas Ted's often manifested itself in passionate bursts of rhetoric that were not always properly calibrated to the setting, Heidi's was quieter, more polished and restrained. "It's hardly a revelation that Ted says off-the-wall things, whether it's with friends at dinner, or on the floor of the Senate. Heidi's not like that. She's not confrontational," said Haley, who added, "They're obviously deeply committed to one another." Another friend recalled, "He would light up every time he talked about her. It was always when he seemed the most human."

Several people also mentioned the earned intellectual respect they seemed to share for each other. "My sense was they had spirited conversations, in the best sense of the word, where they were both looking at each other to engage, and bounce ideas," one friend said. "I certainly don't think she's a yes man for her husband."

Her career took off. When Cruz moved to a job at the Department of the Treasury in 2002, she worked with the economist Brock Blomberg on the Latin America desk, shaping policy in response to the emerging market crises of the time. "I never thought of her as a true believer in the sense that she was very ideological," Blomberg recalled. Instead, she distinguished herself with a tenacious drive and a tireless work ethic. "The one thing I can say is she's a very earnest person. Whenever she had an opportunity, she gave it 100%."

Then, in 2003, Cruz was appointed director of Western Hemisphere on the National Security Council, reporting directly to Condoleezza Rice — exactly the kind of job she had been working toward since she carried textbooks across Claremont’s campus. Cruz was viewed by many inside the White House as a rising star, and it seemed likely that she would continue to rise if Bush were re-elected.

Things hadn't been going as well for the other Cruz in the Bush administration. After the campaign, Ted had landed with a thud at the Federal Trade Commission — a low-profile post far away from the action that offered little excitement for someone with his ambition. When he was offered the position of Texas solicitor general — a gig that would place him center stage in federal courtrooms, delivering forceful conservative arguments on behalf of the Lone Star State — it was a no-brainer. Ted moved back to Austin to begin making his name as a litigator, while Heidi stayed in Washington for her dream job at the White House. For more than a year, they maintained a long-distance marriage, flying back and forth on weekends and holidays.

One day in 2004, professor Haley, who had been spending some time at a Washington think tank, invited the Cruzes over for brunch. "Heidi said she was going back to Texas with Ted, and that he wanted to run for statewide office there, and it was too hard to maintain two homes," he recalled. Haley struggled to conceal his disappointment that his star pupil was walking away from the dream job they'd spent so much time planning for.

"Had she not been married, and free to choose, I think she would have stayed for three more years," he said. "My sense is she really loved what she was doing and chose to go back to Ted so that she could help him campaign ... She was sorry to go, and reconciled to going."

Upon returning to Texas, Cruz took a job as a vice president at Goldman Sachs in Houston. But after several years away from Wall Street, she felt out of practice and anxious about proving herself to her colleagues and subordinates — some of whom, she suspected, questioned her abilities, as she described at length in a panel discussion years later. She also quickly found that Houston's finance scene was considerably less accommodating to high-powered women than those of Washington or Manhattan.

"When I came out of Washington and the White House, I didn't feel that there was really a glass ceiling in the administration ... and Texas was very different," she would later say in a 2011 panel discussion. She was the only woman in Goldman’s Houston office, and described fumbling with hunting lingo during conversations with male clients. In the "very traditional culture" where she lived, few of the women in their social circles had careers.

And building financial models for the profit of a major investment bank wasn’t the same as trying to improve markets in poor Latin American countries. Asked years later whether she missed the public sector after leaving it in 2004, she responded, "I'm always quite honest in my answer so I have to say that I really do ... I think there is an important role to making a profit and doing so through a pretty definable skill set, and you can certainly impact industry. But to impact countries rather than companies, individually, is exciting and so I miss that component to it."

These were some of the frustrations weighing on Cruz during the “professional transition” in 2005 that would, according to the senator’s office, lead her late one August night to the grass by an expressway onramp. This period had been a sharp detour for a woman who had carefully plotted a career path she believed would enable her to serve the public and do good in the world.

Since 2005, however, the Cruzes’ lives have been marked by significant successes. Ted ended up taking longer to run for statewide office than planned — he formed and then abandoned a 2010 bid for attorney general — but in the meantime he was freed up to help his wife puncture Houston's finance boys clubs.

She began taking her husband — the accomplished attorney with Supreme Court war stories to spare — to dinners with male clients and colleagues. "He's very useful to me and interesting to clients, so it always helps me to bring in more business when I bring him along," she would tell an audience of Claremont's aspiring female financiers in 2011. She added, with a laugh, "I always kind of get him to help make the ask, and I always kind of go follow up. So, if you can marry somebody that is complementary to your business, it's great networking."

When Ted did eventually embark on a long-shot bid for the U.S. Senate in 2012, he suggested to Heidi, "Sweetheart, I'd like us to liquidate our entire net worth" — more than $1 million — "and put it into the campaign." The way he would tell it to the New York Times, his steadfast rock of a wife "astonished" him when she said without hesitating, "Absolutely." But in her version of the story, she reacted to her husband's proposal more like the savvy banker that she was. As she would recall to Politico, she proposed not investing any of their own money in the campaign "unless it made the difference between winning and losing." Really, she wanted to test the viability of his campaign by seeing if he could drum up funds from other donors. As she put it, it was "just common investment sense."

November 2012 was a big month for the Cruzes: Nine days after Ted won his insurgent Senate race, Goldman Sachs announced that Heidi would be promoted to managing director. And though she continued to miss the public sector, her success at Goldman enabled to get the firm involved in various philanthropic projects, temporarily satisfying her appetite for service, she has said.

Of course, in the coming weeks, the Cruzes are likely to embark on a mission that, if successful, would make them the most famous public-sector figures in the world. Heidi Cruz has already proved helpful in filling her husband's campaign war chest as he marches off to the presidential fray. Last December, Republican Rep. Kevin Brady, who has deep ties to major political donors in Houston and Dallas, said her status at Goldman and connections in the finance world make her "a wonderful, not-so-secret weapon" for Ted's fundraising efforts. "She's well-respected and has lots of admirers," Brady told the National Journal. "So that could be part of the reaching out — whether it's Wall Street or Texas."

But many who know her wonder how Cruz will respond to the expectations placed on politicians’ wives, particularly in the conservative activist circles where her husband is most popular.

Over the course of her husband's rise, she has proudly defied the cookie-cutter molds sometimes forced on political wives, speaking out against "people who believe that women who work outside the home are uncaring and can't be good mother," calling them "just misguided," and adding, "I would work and want to have a career, regardless of if my husband works. It's not only for the money."

When she sat on a 2011 panel at Claremont — titled "Women in Finance: Can You Achieve Work/Life Satisfaction?" — she urged the women in attendance to pursue careers in finance, preaching that they often make better investment bankers than men. She advised, too, that live-in help can be critical for working couples. The Cruzes have two daughters, the elder born in 2008, and live in a downtown Houston high-rise. "I still don't understand my friends who say it's not worth it to them to have someone living with them," she said. "It is worth it to me on every level. I don't mind sharing a bedroom down the hall if someone is willing to do all that. But I'm very comfortable with that and it allows me to work 80 hours a week and be... part of my husband's career, as well.”

But while such full-throated defenses of professional women have been commonplace in Heidi Cruz’s past, comments like those could prove combustible in a Republican primary.

"It's sort of interesting to think of her now as a potential first lady sort of person because that's not how I saw her back then," said Blomberg, who worked with Cruz at Treasury. "I just didn't see her as making her career about her husband ... I see her as being a lot deeper than that."

As for professor Haley, he has continued to track his protégé's career over the years, and holds out hope that she will one day return to an administration job, perhaps after their daughters are grown up. "She really does have the ethic of public service," he said. In the meantime, he said he was in awe of how she has managed to accomplish so much.

"It can't be easy to juggle all these balls: family, work, and Ted's ambitions," he said. "Her life is a complicated one. But that's Heidi. She can handle that."

Megan Apper and Andrew Kaczynski contributed reporting to this story.

With 2016 Looming, Obama Campaign Veterans Launch Diversity Hiring Effort

$
0
0

“This is about winning elections,” Democratic donor and Inclusv co-founder Steve Phillips told BuzzFeed News.

AP/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

A group of Obama campaign veterans who believe the Democratic Party must urgently diversify its hiring will launch a new operation to connect minorities with campaigns looking to hire them.

"I'm genuinely concerned progressives are going to lose elections if we don't increase our cultural competence in campaigns," said Inclusv co-founder Steve Phillips, a major Democratic donor. "That's what happened in 2010 and 2014, those campaigns were unable to inspire turnout of voters of color."

In many ways, Inclusv just formalizes the work the co-founders have been doing behind the scenes for years. The group includes Alida Garcia, who served as the national Latino vote deputy director for Obama in 2012; Quentin James, who is the black Americans director for Ready for Hillary; and Greg Cendana, who is the executive director of the Asian Pacific America Labor Alliance.

Phillips, who recently slammed Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid for endorsing a white candidate in the Maryland Senate race, which could feature high-profile black candidates, led an effort after Obama won in 2008 to fuel diversity in the administration. His Talent Bank initiative focused on minorities — including gays, those with disabilities, and women — received 5,000 résumés and led to 100 hires.

Garcia said Inclusv will serve a similar purpose for staff, consultants, and vendors of color, and will use the 2016 election as a pipeline and training ground for diverse candidates.

"There has been a lot of dialogue in D.C. around diverse contracting, which is a big gap that needs to be fixed," she said. "One part of how you fix it from the bottom up is by identifying young leaders now and getting them into these campaigns. They are the future press secretaries, pollsters, and campaign managers who will better understand and work with the communities they seek to engage."

Diversity hiring — particularly when it comes to outside vendors — remains a problem and a point of frustration for Democrats. A report last year found that only 1.7% of the $500 million the DNC spent on consultants were minority-owned firms, or run by a minority principal.

The Inclusv website will allow job seekers to upload their résumés and fill out a survey to further explain their campaign experience and interests.

Phillips sees a real urgency for Democrats, who he says have an electorate that's 45% people of color, but are lagging when it comes to campaign operative leadership. "It's extraordinary, alarming, and dangerous," he said.

Inclusv features an advisory board of Democratic women and people of color who are invested in minority hiring, like Angela Rye, former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus; Greg Jackson, former national field director for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC); and Gabriela Domenzain, who led Obama's 2012 Hispanic media efforts.

James acknowledged that for all of the record voter turnout for Obama in the past two presidential elections by black voters, not having Obama on the ballot presents something of a challenge for Democrats at all levels.

"The question becomes, 'How do you engage those demographics with the recognition that these are no longer fringe voting blocs?'" he said. "They helped control an election for the Democrats. "So Inclusv says let's keep our ear to the ground in a very traditional way by listening and engaging people of color early, and making sure they have equitable and prominent roles within Democratic campaigns this cycle."

James added black women were a key demographic in driving Obama to victory in 2012; Inclusv believes, for instance, campaigns should understand the impact black women can have on any election. "Any campaign that wants to increase voter turnout, then you may want to have black women in your camp."

One advisory board member, Lucy Flores, who ran for lieutenant governor in 2014 in Nevada, said this focus is crucially important for campaigns, even ones that feature a minority candidate at the helm.

"Even in my own campaign that was high-profile and well-funded, I had issues with trying to find culturally competent staff and consultants," Flores told BuzzFeed News.

She said she had to advocate to bring on a Latino media consultant and had to explain basics — you can't just translate a press release, for instance — which is why she brought on Domenzain. For Flores, this focus on diverse coalitions for Democrats is not just about Hispanics, either. She noted that the Filipino community in Las Vegas is the fastest growing group, outpacing Latinos.

That momentum is why Cendana said their inclusion is indispensable to Democrats in the next election. "Candidates and campaigns have a real opportunity to tap into that political power," he said.

Cendana said he sees Inclusv as a way to move minorities beyond outreach roles and into the upper echelons of campaigning — roles like campaign manager, and directors in field, communications, and finance.

"The best way to engage voters that like us is to have people like us who understand our issues on the ground working in our communities," he said. "We're the best messengers to get people engaged and voting."

"One thing we no longer want to hear we don't have anyone qualified who is a person of color. We know that talent exists."

So far, Hillary Clinton, the presumptive favorite for the Democratic nomination, has given early signals for more diverse hires within her political structure. Former congressional candidate Amanda Renteria will likely be her national political director in an eventual campaign, for instance. Dennis Cheng is expected to be Clinton's finance director, and Marlon Marshall, who is a longtime associate of the expected campaign manager, has also been doing work for Clinton.

Still, Phillips said that if Democrats face tickets featuring Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio in 2016, who he said are more moderate on immigration than many Republicans, and also multilingual and multicultural, it will be a big problem for them if there isn't "extraordinary cultural competence on the Democratic side."

"These campaigns need expertise on how you communicate and inspire these communities and that translates into having actual lived experience in these communities," he said.

The Final, Fitting End To Hillary Clinton's Non-Campaign

$
0
0

It was a speech to camp professionals under neon lights in Atlantic City.

Mel Evans / AP Photo

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — Her rivals spent the day in early-voting states. Scott Walker was in South Carolina, fundraising for local Republicans. Rick Perry was in Iowa, preparing for speeches in three cities. And Jeb Bush was in Georgia, making his fourth trip this month to the key states that decide the presidential primary.

Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, spent Thursday afternoon in the dark, gaping hall of the Atlantic City Convention Center at the Tri-State Camp Conference.

Below electronic screens bearing the word "CAMP" in cartoonish lettering, three thousand camp professionals waited, at times breaking out in dance and chant — "We've got spirit, yes we do! We've got spirit, how bout you?" — before Clinton took the stage to speak about the need for "adult summer camp," the "huge fun deficit in America," and the "enrichment" a sleep-away experience offers young kids.

It was the last paid speech Clinton is expected to deliver before joining Walker, Perry, Bush, and the rest of her opponents on the campaign trail this spring.

But the event at the Atlantic City Convention Center, where the faded wave-pattern carpeting and broken escalators invoke the decline of this gambling town, was a fitting coda to the apolitical two years that defined Clinton's post-State Department life. She worked on her family's foundation and delivered dozens of speeches, estimated at $250,000 a pop, to groups as arbitrary as the National Association of Convenience Stores and the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries.

Rarely did Clinton allude during those speeches to her expected campaign president. Rarely did she talk politics, or explain why she might want to run — should she, eventually, decide to do so. (Clinton's spokesman said as recently as this week that she still "hasn't made a decision about running," though she has picked out a campaign headquarters in Brooklyn and hired staff.)

The event on Thursday was no different.

"In many ways, camping really is about life skills," Clinton said, delivering a speech before the audience before sitting for a question-and-answer session with Jay Jacobs, a prominent New Jersey Democrat who owns summer camps.

Clinton talked about her new granddaughter, Charlotte; she recalled the time her daughter went away to summer camp for one week as a child ("It was the worst week," she said, pausing. "Well I've had a few bad weeks… But it was up there."); and she pitched the idea of a camp for lawmakers in Washington: "The red cabin and the blue cabin have to come together and actually listen to each other."

"It really is that village." Clinton said, making one of at least four references on Thursday to her 1996 book, It Takes a Village. "I want every child to have the same opportunity. And your camps are part of the fabric of our national life."

In her on-stage interview with Jacobs, who supported her past campaigns, Clinton spoke more about camping and answered a quick-fire round of questions about such subjects as her favorite historic figure (Eleanor Roosevelt), her preferred reading material ("mysteries and histories"), and the greatest lesson she took from her late father ("discipline…doing the best you can and not making excuses").

Clinton did talk briefly about gridlock in Washington, and her role in securing federal funding for New York after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 2001. But there was no mention of the news of the day, and no reference to her campaign, which could begin in a matter of days.

After about an hour on stage, Clinton finished her speech and the campers stood to applaud. As most of the three thousand attendees filed out of the hall, a long line formed near the back of the room with campers wearing VIP lanyards.

There, behind a black curtain, guarded by a band of security personnel, Clinton posed for photos — her last, most likely, as a paid non-candidate candidate.

Huckabee: Obama's "Extraordinary Disdain" For Israel Comes From "Identity With, Sympathy" For Middle East Nations

$
0
0

“I think he resents the strength of Israel.”

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee says President Obama has "extraordinary disdain" for Israel and such disdain originates from his own sense of identity and sympathy for the "other Middle Eastern nations."

Huckabee added that Obama resents the "strength of Israel" and re-elected prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Huckabee made the comments on NewsMaxTV's Steve Malzberg Show in response to the host asking why President Obama has such "extraordinary disdain" for Israel.

"It's hard for me to understand that. The only thing I can fathom is he has an extraordinary sense of identity with, sympathy for, many of the other Middle Eastern nations," Huckabee, a possible 2016 candidate, said.

"I think he resents the strength of Israel. I think he resents very much the strength of Benjamin Netanyahu, who is absolutely forthright in his understanding of what the threats are with Islamic jihadism, a term that President Obama cannot bring himself to utter, nor can his administration."

"I believe as a result of that he finds that Netanyahu represents what he can't be and that is a very strong leader who keeps his word. I have often said, I've been saying for years, Bibi Netanyahu is a Churchill in a world of Chamberlains."

Earlier in the interview, Huckabee said, "well it's very clear Steve that this administration in general, and this president in particular, has an extraordinary disdain for Israel in general and Benjamin Netanyahu in particular. And it's just inexplicable."

Pro-Israel Democrat: I Expect The Administration To Stand With Israel At The U.N.

$
0
0

If “there’s a resolution hostile to Israel, I would expect that this administration would veto it,” Rep. Brad Sherman says.

Lior Mizrahi / Getty

WASHINGTON — Rep. Brad Sherman, the second-ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and a prominent pro-Israel voice in his party, told BuzzFeed News on Thursday that he expects the Obama administration to continue to support Israel at the United Nations despite administration statements that the U.S. was reevaluating its posture at the world body.

If "there's a resolution hostile to Israel, I would expect that this administration would veto it," Sherman said.

Sherman said that the Israeli position on a Palestinian state is back to being in accordance with the administration's now that Benjamin Netanyahu has walked back his campaign statement that a Palestinian state would not come about during his tenure. That statement enraged the White House and Obama officials have been saying that they will re-evaluate the practice of supporting Israel at the United Nations and vetoing U.N. resolutions backing Palestinian statehood as a result, which would constitute a significant policy change.

"For perhaps 24 hours the Israeli position varied from ours, and now 24 hours after that it looks like the Netanyahu position and the American position are close enough together that one would expect that to us, to vote for resolutions, it would be consistent with the Israeli position today," Sherman said. "Keep in mind, I don't speak Hebrew. We're trying to compare an answer made in the campaign in Hebrew and to see whether that is consistent with clarification issued after the campaign. I've been on a lot of campaigns. If we got mad at everybody who made a campaign promise that may or may not be consistent with their position, we'd be mad at a lot of people."

"The position of the Israeli government [on two states] is clear and relatively consistent with that of the Obama administration," Sherman said.

Other pro-Israel Democrats have been more reticent on this issue today. Sen. Chuck Schumer declined to comment when asked about it by The Weekly Standard, later saying through a spokesperson that "The administration has strongly defended Israel at the UN and I expect that to continue." Other pro-Israel Democrats asked by BuzzFeed News declined to comment or didn't respond to requests for comment.

Asked if the Obama administration was overreacting, Sherman said, "I think the United States needed a clarification, I think we got a clarification. I think the government position today is, according to the Israeli government, the Israeli government's position of a week ago."

Furthermore, "if Netanyahu says, 'Hey, I don't think we're going to get to a two-state solution until Ramallah changes its position, I think he's right,'" Sherman said, saying that the Palestinian side is "way far apart from a two-state solution."

Sherman blamed the perception that Israel is now becoming a more partisan issue in the U.S. on Republicans. "John Boehner sacrificed Israel when he pulled his stunt," Sherman said, referring to Boehner's invitation to Netanyahu to speak to Congress earlier this month.

Sherman also discussed the Iran negotiations, saying that "there are elements of the deal as being described that are unacceptable." Sherman earlier told Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken that he was making a "preposterous argument" that Iran would in the future be deterred by the Non-Proliferation Treaty during a committee hearing on Thursday.

Sherman suggested that Obama's taking offense at Netanyahu's statements may be a ploy to solidify support behind his Iran policy in Congress and seal the deal in the nuclear talks.

"What the president has done is he's taken offense, that may be because he's genuinely offended, but with as the additional advantage of working to solidify Democratic votes behind sustaining a veto" of bills that have been introduced in Congress that would either increase sanctions or give Congress an up-or-down vote on the deal, and that Obama has promised to veto.

"So the president's power to conduct the negotiations and to sustain a veto has been increased by the hullabaloo which includes not only the Boehner offer and the Netanyahu acceptance, but also the Obama reaction," Sherman said.

"And whether he took extra offense because it provided an extra political advantage, you should ask the White House," Sherman said.


Benghazi Committee Calls On Clinton To Turn Over Email Servers For Outside Review

$
0
0

“Though Secretary Clinton alone is responsible for causing this issue, she alone does not get to determine its outcome,” Benghazi Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy warns.

Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) of the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

Gabriella Demczuk / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The House Select Committee on Benghazi Friday called on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to turn over her personal email servers to a third party for review, the first concrete step in the committee's widening investigation into Clinton's time as the nation's top diplomat.

Clinton used a private email address — and server — rather than a government issued State Department email. Although she has released thousands of pages of emails, Clinton's team decided which emails were related to her official work, and no third party has been able to determine whether in fact she has fully disclosed all of her communications.

Clinton has resisted the notion of turning over the servers to a third party to conduct an independent analysis, which prompted Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy to formally request the turn over of the servers Friday.

"Though Secretary Clinton alone is responsible for causing this issue, she alone does not get to determine its outcome," Gowdy said Friday. "That is why in the interest of transparency for the American people, I am formally requesting she turn the server over to the State Department's inspector general or a mutually agreeable third party."

Gowdy has already announced he will hold separate hearings into the email scandal, arguing without full access to Clinton's emails the committee cannot be sure it has received all materials relating to its core Benghazi investigation.

In a letter to Clinton's attorneys, Gowdy raises a number of concerns with the emails, including the use of key word searches to segregate personal emails from official correspondences and the appropriateness of Clinton being the final arbiter of what constitutes official correspondence. "In short, there is no assurance the public record regarding the Secretary's emails is complete," Gowdy argued.

Clinton and her allies have insisted she has followed State Department rules in disclosing some of her emails and have sought to paint Gowdy's interest in the emails as part of a partisan witch hunt.

The Committee's ranking member Rep. Elijah Cummings slammed the request, charging it seems "designed to spark a fight with a potential presidential candidate rather than following the standard practice in congressional investigations."

Cummings noted that during Democrats' investigation into Bush administration staff using Republican National Committee email accounts to conduct official business, then Chairman Harry Waxman "did not demand access to RNC servers, backup tapes, or non-official emails, but rather worked with RNC attorneys to develop search terms and then relied on them to produce those documents that were responsive. We should follow this responsible approach to resolve any remaining questions about these documents."

Steve King: I Don't Understand How American Jews Can Be Democrats

$
0
0

“But anti-Semitism is a component of this and just plain liberalism is another component. I mean the president wants the world to be, he thinks somehow he can force the world can be the world he myopically believes it is. You have to be a realist.”

w.soundcloud.com

Rep. Steve King of Iowa said he doesn't understand how American Jews can be "Democrats first and Jewish second" and support President Obama's approach to Israel.

"Well, there were some 50 or so Democrats that decided they would boycott the president's speech. One thing that's happened is — just look at the polling, that means — here is what thing that I don't understand, I don't understand how Jews in America can be Democrats first and Jewish second and support Israel along the line of just following their president," said the Iowa Republican on Boston Herald radio Friday, asked about members of Congress who did not attend Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu's address to Congress earlier in the month.

"And it's all — it says this, they're knee-jerk supporters for the president's policy. The president's policies throughout the Middle East have been a disaster. I would say to them, name a country where we have better relations today than we had when Barack Obama took office?' And I gave that in speeches in about six weeks until some lad stood up and said, 'I can name you two, they are Cuba and Iran.'"

Asked if anti-Semitism was a factor, he said it was a component along with "just plain liberalism."

"I see it growing. I'm amazed to see this happen. It's a phenomenon that I did not expect to see in post-World War II, the revulsion of what I saw. But anti-Semitism is a component of this and just plain liberalism is another component. I mean the president wants the world to be, he thinks somehow he can force the world can be the world he myopically believes it is. You have to be a realist."

Puerto Rico Government To Stop Defending Same-Sex Marriage Ban

$
0
0

A case challenging the ban is pending at the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.

WASHINGTON — Puerto Rico's government will no longer defend the commonwealth's ban on same-sex couples' marriages — although it has asked an appeals court to put a case challenging that ban on hold for now.

The lawsuit over that ban — which resulted in one of the few trial court rulings upholding any such ban — is currently on appeal before the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.

In a news conference on Friday, Puerto Rico Secretary of Justice César Miranda announced the government's new position.

In a filing on Friday afternoon at the 1st Circuit, lawyers for the commonwealth wrote that a prior Supreme Court decision holding that same-sex couples' marriage claims lacked a "substantial federal question" could no longer be considered good law given that the Supreme Court in January accepted marriage cases out of four states for review.

Without that procedural hurdle, they write, "it follows from recent doctrinal developments in this area of law that government regulations that affect people based on their sexual orientation cannot withstand constitutional attacks under the Equal Protection Clause unless they seek to further, at the very least, an important state interest by means that are substantial related to that interest."

Puerto Rico's marriage laws "distinguish based on sexual orientation and/or gender," they continue, and "the Commonwealth cannot prevail" under the heightened scrutiny that they believe such laws should receive from court.

Additionally, they note that the laws also clearly "burden fundamental rights" to marriage, meaning the ban "does not survive constitutional muster under due-process analysis as well."

At the same time, however, the government asked the 1st Circuit to hold off oral arguments in the case until the U.S. Supreme Court resolves the marriage ban cases currently pending before it.

"[W]e respectfully move the [1st Circuit] to postpone any oral argument in this case until a decision on the merits has been reached on the cases before the highest court," they write.

Lambda Legal, which has been representing the plaintiff same-sex couples fighting the ban, celebrated the government's changed position.

"In declining to further defend the Commonwealth's discriminatory marriage ban, Puerto Rico's government finally recognizes that denying marriage to LGBT people is harmful and cannot be justified. The marriage ban's sole purpose is to perpetuate discrimination, and it is just plain wrong," Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, a staff attorney for Lambda Legal, said in a statement.

Read the brief:

Rand Paul: “Difficult” For Clinton To Run On Women’s Rights While Taking Money From Saudi Arabia

$
0
0

“There’s a war on women and it’s in Saudi Arabia, and frankly you can be raped in Saudi Arabia and then publicly lashed for inappropriately being in a car with a man.”

w.soundcloud.com

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said Friday that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "should be ashamed" of the Clinton Foundation accepting foreign donations from countries where women lack basic rights. The potential Republican presidential candidate said it would be difficult to run as the first woman to potentially be president while her foundation takes money from such countries.

"I'm calling today for Hillary Clinton to return the money to Saudi Arabia," Paul said on Concord News Radio "There's a war on women and it's in Saudi Arabia, and frankly you can be raped in Saudi Arabia and then publicly lashed for inappropriately being in a car with a man. I think frankly Hillary Clinton should be ashamed of taking the money and I'm calling today for her to return that money from Saudi Arabia and I'm calling today for her to return the money to Saudi Arabia, to Brunei, to United Arab Emirates, to all of these countries that don't give women in the basic ability to have the rights in court and voting or on juries."

Paul called the Clinton Foundation taking money from foreign countries "an anchor that will drag Hillary Clinton down."

"It will be very difficult for her to run as the first woman candidate who could be president and to run on women's rights issues when she's been getting money from countries who have a terrible human's rights record, a terrible women's rights record. And frankly it's a little hard for her to explain -- in Brunei, if you commit adultery you are stoned to death, and she takes money from Brunei. She should immediately send all of that money back to Brunei and say, 'I can't accept it because I can't accept a country that doesn't let women vote, appear on juries, and allow women to be stoned to death for adultery.' That, I can't imagine that there is not an enormous clamor for Hillary Clinton to send that money back."

The Wall Street Journal earlier this month found that after Clinton left the State Department in 2014, the Clintons' foundation quietly started taking donations from foreign countries again.

Lobbyist For Saudi Arabia Sits On Rand Paul's Senate Re-Election Leadership Team

$
0
0

Paul is attacking Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation for accepting foreign donations from Saudi Arabia and other countries.

Former Senator Norm Coleman

Diane Bondareff

WASHINGTON — Kentucky Senator Rand Paul plans to attack Hillary Clinton in a speech Friday night for the donations that Saudi Arabia has given to the Clinton Foundation. But Paul has a factor on his side that could complicate that line of attack: former Senator Norm Coleman, who lobbies for the Saudis, sits on his Senate re-election leadership team.

In an interview, Coleman said he advises Paul from time to time on Middle East issues. Paul "comes to me for advice, for counsel," Coleman said. "I appreciate a lot of the positions that he stands for," he said, citing Paul's outreach to young people and the African-American community, as well as on privacy issues.

Coleman did not say he's supporting Paul's presidential run, however.

"I don't talk to him that often but on Middle East issues he may call or Doug [Stafford, Paul's key political advisor] may call," Coleman said. "I'm sure I'm not the only one he reaches out to."

Rand Paul was reported to have been "courting" Coleman last summer, as part of an outreach push to Jewish Republicans.

Coleman confirmed that his work for the Saudis as a member of the firm Hogan Lovells, which was made public last September, is ongoing.

Stafford said that Coleman is a "friend and supporter" and that he sits on Paul's Senate re-election campaign leadership team.

"Speaking of thinly veiled, it is hard to see this as anything other than a futile attempt by her friends in the media to distract from Hillary Clinton's problems," Stafford said in a statement to BuzzFeed News. "It won't work. These two items aren't even remotely analogous."

Paul plans to attack Hillary Clinton for the donations the Saudi government has given to the Clinton Foundation during a speech in New Hampshire on Friday. He told Politico on Friday that the donations from foreign governments are "thinly veiled bribes."

"In countries that stone people to death for adultery and imprison people for adultery, this is the kind of thing you would think someone for women's rights would be standing up against, instead of accepting thinly veiled bribes," he said.

Paul also called for the Foundation to return the donations, as well as returning those of the United Arab Emirates and Brunei.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images