Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Ted Cruz, Ben Carson Call For U.S. To Reconsider Taking Syrian Refugees After Paris Attacks

$
0
0

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Following the deadly attacks in Paris Friday night, two prominent Republicans have called for the United States to table plans to accept thousands of Syrian refugees, citing terror concerns.

Sen. Ted Cruz wrote in a statement on Friday that the U.S. needs to "immediately declare a halt to any plans to bring refugees that may have been by ISIS to the United States." Cruz has raised security concerns before about the prospect of accepting more refugees at this point from Syria.

View Video ›

Facebook: tedcruzpage


Presidential candidate Ben Carson said in Orlando, Florida, that Congress should act to block the Obama administration's plan to accept more refugees.

"If we're going to be bringing 200,000 people over here from that region — if I were one of the leaders of the global jihadist movement and I didn't infiltrate that group of people with my people, that would be almost malpractice," Carson said, according to the Washington Post.

The Obama administration has said it plans to accept at least 10,000 Syrian refugees in 2016. As of last month, fewer than 2,000 refugees had been accepted from Syria, in part because vetting process for refugees is significantly more involved than the process in some European countries.


Rand Paul: Rubio Blocked Amendment That Would Have Protected U.S. From Jihadists

$
0
0

“…Rubio was more intent on working with Chuck Schumer than he was in working with conservatives.”

Steve Pope / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Asked about the Paris attacks, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul singled out opponent Florida Sen. Marco Rubio on Saturday for blocking an amendment he offered to the 2013 Senate immigration bill that would have made it harder for foreigners from countries with a large jihadist presence to come to the United States.

"We have to protect ourselves, we have to protect our citizens. And this debate's been going on for a while, about two to three years ago in Bowling Green, Kentucky where I'm from, refugees from Iraq that we brought over here — 60,000 of them — two of them tried to buy surface to air missiles and attack people in the United States," Paul said on SiriusXM radio to host David Webb.

"At that time, the immigration battle was going on," he continued. "Rubio had his bill on the floor and I said, 'you know what, why don't we introduce an amendment that would have special scrutiny and screening for people who come from about 25 countries that have large jihadists.'"

The Kentucky senator said Rubio worked with New York Sen. Chuck Schumer to block any amendments to the Senate's immigration bill, including Paul's own.

"Unfortunately, Marco and Chuck Schumer had a secret deal to block all amendments. So my amendment, which would have had special scrutiny for people, foreigners who want to come to our country, was defeated because Rubio was more intent on working with Chuck Schumer than he was in working with conservatives," said Paul.

The two former Iraqi citizens living in Bowling Green that Paul is referencing, Mohanad Shareef Hammadi and Waad Ramadan Alwan, had been attempting to send weapons and money back to Iraq to kill U.S. soldiers.

Paul added his plan to defeat ISIS would involve making sure we "amplify our allies in the region," saying he thought "the best fighters over there are the Kurds."

"I think we should supply arms directly to the Kurds," said Paul." The Shiites in Baghdad, not so much. We gave them a trillion dollars worth of weapons. Five thousand of our soldiers, our young men and women died to liberate them and who's their best friend now: Iran. Who's there second best friend: Russia. So, I'm not sure the Baghdad government is really going to do much. Iran's helping them now, Russia's helping them, but I think we should help the Kurds directly because no one's helping them and they're the best fighters."

Paul said he would encourage Turkey to help in the fight against ISIS as well as help the Jordanians.

"I that there's enough people in the region that if we amplify and help them, I think the boots on the ground ought to be Arabs. I don't want to send Americans back over there. I think the first war was a mistake and I'm not for another one."

How The United States Screens Syrian Refugees

$
0
0

There’s a robust security process in place, but there are also legitimate concerns about vetting Syrian refugees.

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

Many European countries will accept a refugee application based simply on a case file. The U.S. system works much differently.

Fewer than 2,000 Syrian refugees have been admitted to the United States since the start of the Syrian civil war. Though the Obama administration has the United States will accept 10,000 refugees in 2016, the complexity of the process takes on average 18 to 24 months.

Many of those refugees that would be approved in 2016 are already going through the security-screening process and upon completion will enter the U.S. next year, according to a senior State Department official.

Some have raised concerns this fall that even the level of security that the United States applies to the process is not sufficient enough to actually keep extremists from entering the country.

Secretary John Kerry told Congress earlier this year that the plan was to engage in "super vetting, I mean an extraordinarily level of vetting." He added that if the FBI wasn't satisfied, he was "quite confident that people aren't going to be allowed in."

  • Multiple high-level security checks
  • Biometric screening
  • A mandatory interview with the Department of Homeland Security
  • A medical screening
  • A cultural orientation program (which consists of videos on housing, employment, education, and hygiene, among other topics)

Several of the checks only remain current for a certain period of time, but to qualify for entry into the United States, a potential refugee must have approved status for each step at the same time.

For instance, the medical screening is valid for only six months, and most security checks expire after 15 months.

U.S. officials have emphasized a specific concern about accepting refugees from Syria: The lack of on-the-ground intelligence in Syria that could be used in the vetting process.

U.S. officials have emphasized a specific concern about accepting refugees from Syria: The lack of on-the-ground intelligence in Syria that could be used in the vetting process.

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images


View Entire List ›

Hillary Clinton Invokes 9/11 In Defense Of Wall Street Contributions

$
0
0

“So, I represented New York, and I represented New York on 9/11 when we were attacked. Where were we attacked?” Bernie Sanders had challenged Clinton on whether the Wall Street contributions she receives influence her.

View Video ›

Facebook: video.php

After Bernie Sanders challenged Hillary Clinton's independence from the influence of her corporate donors, she offered a defense during Saturday night's debate — and included her work as a New York senator after September 11th.

"Why, over her political career has Wall Street been a major — the major campaign contributor to Hillary Clinton?" Sanders asked onstage after calling her financial policy package not good enough. "You know, maybe they're dumb and they don't know what they're going to get, but I don't think so."

Clinton, offered the chance to respond, first cited the number of small donors to her presidential campaign, and then that the majority of them are women.

Then, she turned to 9/11.

"So, I represented New York, and I represented New York on 9/11 when we were attacked," she said. "Where were we attacked? We were attacked in downtown Manhattan where Wall Street is."

"I did spend a whole lot of time and effort helping them rebuild," she continued. "That was good for New York. It was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country."

SANDERS: Here's the story: I mean, you know, let's not be naive about it. Why do — why, over her political career has Wall Street been a major — the major campaign contributor to Hillary Clinton? You know, maybe they're dumb and they don't know what they're going to get, but I don't think so.

Here is the major issue when we talk about Wall Street. It ain't complicated. You have six financial institutions today that have assets of 56%, equivalent to 56% of the GDP In America. They issue two-thirds of the credit cards and one-third of the mortgages.

If Teddy Roosevelt, a good Republican, were alive today, you know what he'd say? "Break them up." Reestablish Glass-Steagall. And Teddy Roosevelt is right. That is the issue. Now I am the only candidate up here that doesn't have a super PAC. I am not asking Wall Street or the billionaires for money. I will break up these banks. Support community banks and credit unions. That's the future of banking in America.

DICKERSON: Great follow up because you — and Secretary Clinton, you will get a chance to respond. You said they know what they're going to get. What are they going to get?

SANDERS: I have never heard a candidate never, who has received huge amounts of money from oil, from coal, from Wall Street, from the military industrial complex, not one candidate say, oh, these campaign contributions will not influence me. I'm going to be independent. Well, why do they make millions of dollars of campaign contributions? they expect to get something. Everybody knows that. Once again, I am running a campaign differently than any other candidate. We are relying on small campaign donors, 750,000 of them, 30 bucks a piece. That's who I'm indebted to.

CLINTON: Well, John, wait a minute. Wait a minute, he has basically used his answer to impune my integrity. Let's be frank here.

SANDERS: No, I have not.

CLINTON: Oh, wait a minute, senator. You know, not only do I have hundreds of thousands of donors, most of them small. And I'm very proud that for the first time a majority of my donors are women, 60%

So, I represented New York, and I represented New York on 9/11 when we were attacked. Where were we attacked? We were attacked in downtown Manhattan where Wall Street is. I did spend a whole lot of time and effort helping them rebuild. That was good for New York. It was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country.

So, you know, it's fine for you to say what you're going to say, but I looked very carefully at your proposal. Reinstating Glass-Steagall is a part of what very well could help, but it is nowhere near enough. My proposal is tougher, more effective, and more comprehensive because I go after all of Wall Street not just the big banks.

Clinton Campaign Texts Supporters With Typo — And It Got Tweeted Out Again And Again

Bernie Sanders Has A Fine Night In Des Moines

$
0
0

Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images

DES MOINES — Expectations that sharing a stage with Hillary Clinton in the hours after the terrorist attacks on Paris would make for a rough night for Bernie Sanders melted away minutes into the second Democratic presidential debate here Saturday.

The Vermont senator did just fine. But hopes among the Bernie faithful that the debate would give Sanders a chance to regain the extraordinary momentum he lost in October didn’t materialize.

Sanders got a chance to be Sanders during the debate — a back-and-forth over Wall Street ties with Clinton left Hillaryland feeling the Bern, big time — but he still didn’t move the needle on gun control, where he’s been pummeled by his rivals over past votes against the Brady Bill.

And asked twice to attack Clinton on Saturday night, Sanders stopped short, in ways that left some observers scratching their heads.

If the takeaway moment from the first debate was Sanders standing up for Clinton on her emails, this time, Sanders was clearly looking for a different soundbite. Earlier in the day on Saturday, his campaign quietly uploaded video of Sanders’s speech on the House floor opposing the Iraq War to its YouTube page. Sanders mentioned his vote against the war and Clinton’s vote for it in his first answer of the debate.

After the Iraq war moment, Sanders was asked directly if he could criticize anything specific about Clinton’s term as secretary of state. He didn’t, instead criticizing a raft of U.S. foreign policy moves from decades before.

“I think we have a disagreement, and the disagreement is that not only did I vote against the war in Iraq. If you look at history, John, you will find that regime change — whether it was in the early '50s in Iran, whether it was toppling Salvador Allende in Chile, whether it is overthrowing the government of Guatemala way back when — these invasions, these toppling of governments, regime changes have unintended consequences,” Sanders said. “I would say that on this issue, I'm a little bit more conservative than the secretary and that I am not a great fan of regime change.”

And after the back-and-forth over Clinton’s Wall Street donors — a moment that gave Sanders, the only candidate besides Donald Trump without a super PAC, a time to really shine — Sanders similarly held back.

Asked “what is it in Secretary Clinton's record that shows you that she's been influenced” by her Wall Street donors, Sanders replied that Clinton is opposed to reinstituting the Glass-Steagall law, which banned commerical and investment banks from being combined. But he didn’t directly tie Clinton’s votes to her Wall Street donors.

This was after Sanders said Clinton’s claim that her millions in Wall Street donations have no power over her politics was “Not good enough.”

In the spin room after the debate, Sanders campaign guru Tad Devine said Sanders walking away from chances to more directly call out Clinton was part of a strategy.

“I’ll tell you why: Bernie Sanders is not looking to have a negative campaign with Hillary Clinton. I know there’s a lot of appetite for it, I know people are looking for negative politics, but it is not the politics he practices,” Devine said. “This campaign is never going to be about attacking her, and pushing back on her and diminishing her.”

Guns, the area where Clinton and the third man on the stage, Martin O’Malley, have attacked Sanders the most, still proved to be a tough spot for the Vermont senator. Sanders was asked several times if his votes against the Brady Bill were a mistake, especially given that today he supports essentially the same gun control agenda as his rivals. He first refused to say that it was and then eventually stood quietly and said nothing while the moderator asked a final time. O’Malley jumped into the silence to make his own points, bailing Sanders out.

Devine said the mistake question was frivolous.

“If you go back 25 or 30 years, the situation was completely different than the situation we confront today,” Devine said, citing the mass shootings that have come to define the gun debate in recent years. “I think when you go back and say, ‘I would have done this that or the other thing differently,’ I think it’s not completely honest. You can say what you want about Bernie Sanders but you can’t say the guy’s not honest.”

Clinton Campaign Pins 9/11 Remark Response On Twitter User

$
0
0

Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images

DES MOINES, Iowa — It was an abrupt turn in topic by Hillary Clinton at the Democratic debate on Saturday, moving from Wall Street policy and Wall Street contributions to small-dollar donors — and then outlining her role in the 9/11 recovery as a U.S. senator.

So had Clinton, the day after the terrorist attacks in Paris, referenced the New York City tragedy to rebut a critique from Bernie Sanders about her Wall Street contributions?

No, her campaign said — it was Andy Grewal.

Grewal is the Iowa resident and debate viewer who upon, watching the exchange that led to Clinton’s remark, fired off a disapproving tweet that was featured later in the broadcast. “Have never seen a candidate invoke 9/11 to justify millions of Wall Street donations. Until now,” Grewal’s tweet read.

When one of the debate’s moderators, CBS News’s Nancy Cordes, read the tweet aloud, Clinton did not push back on the characterization. “I’m sorry that whoever tweeted that had that impression, because I worked closely with New Yorkers after 9/11 for my entire first term to rebuild,” Clinton said.

Clinton’s communications director, Jennifer Palmieri, said that Grewal, the Twitter user, had mischaracterized the remark.

“This is not in response to donations,” Palmieri said. “That is what the person on Twitter did.”

The point, she told reporters after the debate, was that Clinton’s work as a senator in New York wouldn’t make her less likely to pursue Wall Street legislation: “She was senator of New York during 9/11, and I think she was proud to help that industry recover,” said Palmieri. “But when she disagreed with them in 2007, as she did, about the direction the industry was going in, she never afraid to stand up and say she disagreed with them.”

“It was the person on Twitter who connected it to donations. That is not what she did,” she said.

The exchange, among several forceful back-and-forths aimed at Clinton, began with a question from Sanders: “Why, over her political career has Wall Street been a major — the major campaign contributor to Hillary Clinton?” he asked. “You know, maybe they’re dumb and they don’t know what they’re going to get, but I don’t think so.”

Clinton pushed back: the majority of her campaign donors make small contributions, she said, and 60% are women. “So,” she said, “I represented New York, and I represented New York on 9/11 when we were attacked. Where were we attacked? We were attacked in downtown Manhattan where Wall Street is.”

“I did spend a whole lot of time and effort helping them rebuild,” she continued. “That was good for New York. It was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country.”

Palmieri noted that in 2007, Clinton warned of the mortgage practices that led to the recession. This fall, Clinton also outlined a Wall Street plan that would tax high-frequency trading, close a loophole in the “Volcker rule,” and regular risk across banks and hedge funds.

“Obviously she’s got a plan now that a lot of people on Wall Street don’t like,” Palmieri said.

LINK: Hillary Clinton Invokes 9/11 In Defense Of Wall Street Contributions

Sanders Doesn't Back Off $15 Minimum Wage — Even Challenged On Job Losses

$
0
0

Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders positioned himself ever more as the candidate of the progressive protest movement #Fightfor15 on Saturday night, defending at length his position that the minimum wage should be $15 nationally.

As he often does, Sanders emphasized the urgency for a wage increase Saturday:

Real inflation accounted for wages has declined precipitously over the years. So I believe that, in fact, this country needs to move towards a living wage.

It is not a radical idea to say that if somebody works 40 hours a week, that person should not be living in poverty. It is not a radical idea to say that a single mom should be earning enough money to take care of her kids.

So I believe that over the next few years, not tomorrow, but over the next few years, we have got to move the minimum wage to a living wage, 15 bucks an hour. And I apologize to nobody for that.

But he also on Saturday conceded that there might be jobs lost in raising the minimum wage.

"No public policy doesn't have, in some cases, negative consequences," he said when challenged on the effects of a dramatic increase to the federal minimum. "But at the end of the day, what you have right now are millions of Americans working two or three jobs because their wages that they are earning are just too low."

When the CBS moderators followed up on the point, Sanders argued that increased disposable income would decrease unemployment nationally:

"This is what I think. This is what many economists believe that one of the reasons that real unemployment in this country is 10%, one of the reasons that African-American youth unemployment and underemployment is 51% is the average worker in America doesn't have any disposable income.

You have no disposable income when you are make 10, 12 bucks an hour. When we put money into the hands of working people, they're going to go out and buy goods, they're going to buy services and they're going to create jobs in doing that. Kathie, that is the kind of economy I believe, put money in the hands of working people, raise the minimum wage to 15 buck an hour.

In recent weeks, Sanders has fallen behind rival Hillary Clinton in the polls, which show her ahead in key states, including Iowa and New Hampshire, which neighbors Sanders' home state of Vermont.

Clinton reiterated on Saturday night her support for a $12 federal minimum wage, arguing local governments could go higher. "That is why I support a $12 national federal minimum wage. That is what the Democrats in the Senate have put forward as a proposal. But I do believe that is a minimum. And places like Seattle, like Los Angeles, like New York City, they can go higher. It's what happened in Gov. O'Malley's state. There was a minimum wage at the state level, and some places went higher."


Hillary Clinton’s New Hit On Sanders: Health Care

$
0
0

Charlie Neibergall / AP

DES MOINES, Iowa — Bernie Sanders went after her on the Iraq War, on her Wall Street policy and her corporate donors. Martin O’Malley joined in when he could get the airtime, drawing contrasts on gun control, the Middle East, and Glass-Steagall.

All night at the second Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton was a target. But in a brief exchange here at Drake University, the Democratic frontrunner volunteered her own major policy critique — casting a Sanders health care plan as an effort dismantle the Affordable Care Act and place legislative control in the hands of states run by Republican governors.

Clinton, responding to a question about a single-payer health care, brought up a 2013 bill, sponsored by Sanders, that would replace President Obama’s health program, as well as private health insurance and other programs, in favor of a universal benefits and coverage system.

“I've looked at the legislation that Sen. Sanders has proposed,” Clinton said. “And basically, he does eliminate the Affordable Care Act, eliminate private insurance, eliminates Medicare, eliminates Medicaid, Tri-care, children's health insurance program — puts it all together in a big program, which he then hands over to the state to administer.”

Sanders has advocated for a universal health care system this year, but has yet to detail a proposal specific to his presidential campaign. Clinton’s comments on Saturday night — among the most critical she has made of any Democratic opponent this year — referred specifically to the senator’s American Health and Security Act.

Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s communications director, said after the debate that the proposal should worry Democratic voters who worked in support of Obama’s sweeping legislation.

“It’s something that she’s obviously really concerned about,” Palmieri said of Clinton. “They’re tearing down Affordable Care Act and bringing the country into another big health care debate. That’s not a great way to make progress.”

Sanders’s plan, Clinton told voters here, would turn health care over to Republican governors like Iowa’s Terry Branstad. (The bill does includes a provision ensuring that, in the absence of a state plan, the federal government would implement one.)

“I have to tell you, I would not want, if I lived in Iowa, Terry Branstad administering my health care,” Clinton said. “I think as Democrats, we ought to proudly support the Affordable Care Act, improve it, and make it the model that we know it can be.”

“It’s not as if the ACA doesn’t need to be improved,” Palmieri added afterward. “It does. But don’t tear it down and then let it up in the state’s control.”

Given the chance to respond during the debate, Sanders said the Affordable Care Act already grants Republican governors state control. His administration, he said, would make health care a citizen-wide right. “We don't eliminate Medicare. We expand Medicare to all people,” said Sanders.

Later on Saturday night, his campaign aides acknowledged the issue as a substantive difference between the two candidates. But they also suggested that Clinton had been unfair to suggest that his proposals would give more control to Republicans.

Plus, his campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, argued that support for Sanders, a longtime Independent, would help usher in more Democratic leadership.

“Republican governors are a problem everywhere. They’re a problem with Obamacare,” Weaver said. “You know how we deal with that problem? We nominate Bernie Sanders to be president of the United States. We bring out millions of young people, working-class people in the political process, and we sweep those people out of office.”

“It’s not going to be anymore a problem than it is under Obamacare,” said Weaver.

Jeb Bush: U.S. Should Focus On Christian Refugees From Syria

$
0
0

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Republican presidential candidate and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said on Sunday that he believes the United States has a responsibility to take in Syrian refugees with proper vetting, but that U.S. assistance should focus on Christians in Syria.

"I do think we have a responsibility to help with refugees after proper screening," Bush said on Meet the Press. "And I think our focus ought to be on the Christians who have no place in Syria anymore. They're being beheaded, they're being executed by both sides. And I think we have a responsibility to help."

Following the attacks in Paris, some GOP candidates, including Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Ben Carson, have called for the U.S. to stop taking refugees from Syria and the Middle East, citing security concerns.

When pressed by CNN's Jake Tapper on how authorities would be able to tell if a refugee was Christian, Bush said that the U.S. already has a screening process in place.

"Well, we do that all the time. We do that," Bush answered. "It takes almost a year for a refugee to be processed into the United States."

In both interviews, Bush repeated his call for a "safe zone" in Syria.

"As it relates to the refugees, I think we need to do thorough screening and take a limited number," Bush said on CNN. "But, ultimately, the best way to deal with the refugee crisis is to create safe zones inside of Syria, so that people don't risk their lives and you don't have what will be a national security challenge both for our country and Europe of screening."

LINK: Ted Cruz, Ben Carson Call For U.S. To Reconsider Taking Syrian Refugees After Paris Attacks

LINK: How The United States Screens Syrian Refugees



Marco Rubio: "We Won't Be Able To Take More Refugees" From Syria

$
0
0

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Republican presidential candidate and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said in an interview on Sunday that the U.S. shouldn't take in more refugees from Syria because there's no way to run a background check on them.

"Listen, the background checks are required now. The problem is not the background checks," Rubio said on ABC's This Week. "The problem is we can’t background check them. You can’t pick up the phone and call Syria, and that’s one of the reasons why I said we won’t be able to take more refugees. It’s not that we don’t want to, it’s that we can’t."

In September, Rubio told Boston Herald Radio that he was open to accepting more refugees if it could be done without threatening U.S. national security.

“We’ve always been a country that’s been willing to accept people who have been displaced,” Rubio said, “and I would be open to that if it can done in a way that allows us to ensure that among them are not infiltrated — people who were, you know, part of a terrorist organization that are using this crisis.”

“I think overwhelmingly, the vast and overwhelming majority of people that are seeking refuge are not terrorists, of course. But you always are concerned about that,” he added.

On Sunday, however, Rubio said there was no amount of vetting for Syrian refugees that would reduce the risk of ISIS infiltration.

"In the case of what’s happening in Europe, this is a swarm of refugees, and as I’ve said repeatedly over the last few months, you can have 1,000 people come in, and 999 of them are just poor people fleeing oppression and violence, but one of them is an ISIS fighter," Rubio said. "If that’s the case, you have a problem, and there is no way to vet that out. There is no background check system in the world that allows us to find that out, because who do you call in Syria to background check them?"

LINK: Rubio: I’d Be Open To More Syrian Refugees If The Security Is Sound

LINK: Jeb Bush: U.S. Should Focus On Christian Refugees In Syria

LINK: Ted Cruz, Ben Carson Call For U.S. To Reconsider Taking Syrian Refugees After Paris Attacks


Martin O'Malley Once Invoked 9/11 To Attack Bush Budget Cuts

$
0
0

Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images

Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley criticized Hillary Clinton in Iowa on Sunday for invoking the Sept. 11 attacks to explain her ties to Wall Street during Saturday's Democratic presidential debate.

After being challenged on her Wall Street contributions on Saturday night, Clinton talked about her small donors, her women donors, and then invoked 9/11 — a remark that immediately drew scrutiny.

O'Malley himself has invoked 9/11 in the past in an unusual context. In 2005, O'Malley, then mayor of Baltimore, compared President George W. Bush's proposed budget cuts to attacks.

"Back on Sept. 11, terrorists attacked our metropolitan cores, two of America's great cities. They did that because they knew that was where they could do the most damage and weaken us the most," O'Malley said, according to the Washington Post.

"Years later, we are given a budget proposal by our commander in chief, the president of the United States," he continued. "And with a budget ax, he is attacking America's cities. He is attacking our metropolitan core."

O'Malley was roundly criticized at the time the remark, and told the Post in a subsequent interview that he "in no way intended to equate these budget cuts, however bad, to a terrorist attack."

He further clarified the remarks in an interview with Al Franken, who was then hosting a talk radio show. "What I said was, our city centers were attacked on Sept. 11. And the reason that America's cities were attacked was because terrorists were trying to harm our economies," O'Malley told Franken. "And I said, three years later, these budget cuts would further weaken America's cities. We cannot expect America to be strong unless our cities are strong."

The O'Malley campaign on Sunday told BuzzFeed News in a statement that O'Malley was concerned about security when he made the comments in 2005.

"As a big city mayor, Gov. O'Malley was rightfully angry that cities were being underfunded by the Bush administration, and he was worried about preventing future terrorist attacks just four years after 9/11," spokesperson Haley Morris said.

"Secretary Clinton invoked the horrific attacks on 9/11 to justify her close ties to Wall Street. One person here owes an explanation — and it's not Martin O'Malley."

LINK: Hillary Clinton Invokes 9/11 In Defense Of Wall Street Contributions

LINK: Clinton Campaign Pins 9/11 Remark Response On Twitter User

A Federal Agency Inadvertently Just Gave Super PACs More Power

$
0
0

Scott Olson / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The blurred lines of coordination between campaigns and super PACs have dominated the election cycle.

How involved, for instance, can future candidates be in raising and spending money for their super PACs? Jeb Bush raised $100 million for his super PAC before announcing his White House bid.

Can future candidates film footage intended to be used later by a super PAC in ads? John Kasich filmed footage — eventually used in ads by his super PAC — before he announced his bid.

As of Friday night, the operatives running super PACs on behalf of candidates can push some legal bounds with even more confidence.

The agency responsible for enforcing campaign finance laws announced that they are deadlocked on key issues related to the separation between campaigns and outside groups. And in taking no action, the Federal Election Commission — which includes three Democrats and three Republicans — essentially permitted these types of activities in its final opinion released Friday evening by showing that it doesn't have the required votes needed to take action against them.

"When the commission deadlocks, you can do what you want because it’s clear that there aren’t four votes for enforcement,” said FEC Chairwoman Ann Ravel in an interview, explaining how lawyers will immediately view the inaction.

"That’s what the unfortunate outcome is. That’s not the law, but it’s the practicality."

There was one question that the FEC was able to decide: The commission voted 4-2 to allow candidates to raise money on behalf of their allied super PACs with some stipulations. Now, a meeting with as few as two people could constitute a fundraiser — if there is an official invitation or candidate remarks — allowing the candidate to be present in the room as super PAC representatives court donors on their behalf. The candidates themselves still can't explicitly ask for unlimited money, but it's hard to imagine the presence of a candidate — Democratic or Republican — with a small group of donors not being beneficial to their super PACs.

The combined effect of the deadlocked issues — which were brought to the FEC by Democratic lawyer Marc Elias, who is also Clinton’s lawyer, on behalf of groups House Majority PAC and Senate Majority PAC — and the new fundraising rule have strengthened super PACs more than ever, Ravel said.

"I think that all of those things will lead to much more pushing of the envelope,” Ravel said. "And we already know that there are going to be more and more candidate-aligned super PACs participating in congressional and potentially mayoral and other races.”

The 2016 cycle has explored new frontiers in campaign finance with several candidates forming outside groups to raise and spend money on their behalf before making their White House bid official — a new experiment in today's complex campaign finance landscape. The dominance of super PAC fundraising and spending has not been without its cautionary tales: Both Scott Walker and Rick Perry, the first two candidates to exit the presidential race, raised tremendous amounts of money for their super PACs, but struggled to pay for their actual campaigns.

Even at the higher prices that super PACs must pay for television spots, though, the groups will likely take on a key messaging role as the primaries and the general election get closer.

Charlie Spies, a lawyer for the pro-Bush super PAC pushed back on the criticism of creating PACs before campaigns begin, equating the formation of his group prior to the former Florida governor’s announcement to Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s family foundation.

In a memo to the FEC, he wrote that “should the Commission not disapprove of the so-called testing the waters activities outlined above — funded largely by the global non-profit corporation, and subsidized by foreign donations — we would consider advising our clients to establish similar ‘global initiative’ type non-profit organizations to house staff, pay for luxury travel, and offset the costs of their pie-candidacy testing the waters activities.”

Dan Backer, a campaign finance lawyer who represents conservative groups and candidates, said the midterm election in 2018 will likely be when more congressional candidates use the Bush model of raising money for a super PAC before announcing their bids.

"This cycle, it was used in the presidential race,” he said. “In the 2018 midterms you’re going to see a huge amount of this going on — if you’re an incumbent you’re kind of screwed by this. It’s actually something that will give challengers an advantage over incumbents for once."

For now, the Democratic super PACs focused on House and Senate races are silent on whether they will capitalize on the FEC's deadlock in 2016 and beyond and launch candidate-specific super PACs even before candidates announce.

“We believe today's decision will create a somewhat more level playing field moving forward,” said Shripal Shah, spokesman for Senate Majority PAC — one of the groups who brought the questions before the FEC, in a statement.

Governor Of Alabama Says His State Will Refuse Syrian Refugees

$
0
0

Steve Helber / AP

Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley announced in a statement on Sunday night that he will opposes any effort to relocate Syrian refugees to his state after the attacks in Paris.

“After full consideration of this weekend’s attacks of terror on innocent citizens in Paris, I will oppose any attempt to relocate Syrian refugees to Alabama through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. As your governor, I will not stand complicit to a policy that places the citizens of Alabama in harm’s way,” Bentley said.

"I will not place Alabamians at even the slightest, possible risk of an attack on our people," Bentley continued. "Please continue to join me in praying for those who have suffered loss and for those who will never allow freedom to fade at the hands of terrorists."

Bentley did not elaborate in the statement how he would block the program in his state. Alabama is the second state to try to refuse Syrian refugees. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder announced earlier on Sunday that he was suspending Michigan's plans to accept refugees from Syria.

"Given the terrible situation in Paris, I've directed that we put on hold our efforts to accept new refugees until the U.S. Department of Homeland Security completes a full review of security clearances and procedures," Snyder said. "There will be difficult days ahead for the people of France and they remain in our thoughts and prayers. It's also important to remember that these attacks are the efforts of extremists and do not reflect the peaceful ways of people of Middle Eastern descent here and around the world."

Out of approximately 2,000 Syrian refugees that have been resettled in the United States since the start of the Syrian civil war, none have been relocated to Alabama, according to the statement. The Obama administration announced in September that they plan to accept 10,000 Syrian refugees in the 2016.

The terrorist attacks in Paris have brought renewed attention on the U.S. refugee program, specifically the threat that ISIS could exploit the process to infiltrate and attack the United States. Several Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates have called on the administration to stop taking Syrian refugees, citing security concerns.

Refugees are extensively vetted — the process takes on average 18 to 24 months — but senior U.S. officials have said they are concerned there is a lack of on-the-ground intelligence in Syria that could be useful in the screening process.

LINK: How The United States Screens Syrian Refugees

LINK: Ted Cruz, Ben Carson Call For U.S. To Reconsider Taking Syrian Refugees After Paris Attacks

More Than Half Of U.S. Governors Say Syrian Refugees Not Welcome Now

$
0
0

Governors in 26 states have all said they will stop or otherwise oppose accepting additional Syrian refugees in their states at this time.

Eric Gay / AP

  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Mississippi
  • Nebraska
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • South Carolina
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Wisconsin

Several state governors announced on Monday that they will not accept Syrian refugees following the attacks in Paris, citing concerns for security.

The governors of some two dozen states announced measures on Monday to stop or oppose any additional Syrian refugees from resettling in their states. Alabama and Michigan made similar announcements on Sunday.

The terrorist attacks in Paris have brought renewed attention to the U.S. refugee program, specifically the threat that ISIS could exploit the process to infiltrate and attack the United States. Several Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates have called on the administration to stop taking Syrian refugees, citing security concerns.

The governors of Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, and Connecticut, meanwhile, have backed the Obama administration's policy, voicing their support for accepting refugees in their states.

New Hampshire Gov. Maggie Hassan became the first Democratic governor to join the dozen-plus Republican governors in calling for a halt to new Syrian refugees.

Protecting the safety and security of our people is the first responsibility of government," Hassan communications director William Hinkle said in a statement. "The Governor has always made clear that we must ensure robust refugee screening to protect American citizens, and the Governor believes that the federal government should halt acceptance of refugees from Syria until intelligence and defense officials can assure that the process for vetting all refugees, including those from Syria, is as strong as possible to ensure the safety of the American people."

Refugees are extensively vetted — the process takes on average 18 to 24 months — but senior U.S. officials have said they are concerned there is a lack of on-the-ground intelligence in Syria that could be useful in the screening process.

Among Republican governors, Utah Gov. Gary Herbert made a statement that he would change his policy of supporting the acceptance of refugees if circumstances warranted — but did not do so on Monday.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal issued an executive order on Monday instructing agencies in his state to "utilize all lawful means" to stop Syrian refugees from resettling in the state.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal issued an executive order on Monday instructing agencies in his state to "utilize all lawful means" to stop Syrian refugees from resettling in the state.

Joe Raedle / Getty Images


View Entire List ›


Mike Huckabee Questions Existence Of The Poop Swastika At Missouri

$
0
0

“They found some people who claimed to know people who claimed to have seen it, but couldn’t find any names.”

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican presidential candidate and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee weighed in on student protests at the University of Missouri, this time questioning the existence of the infamous poop swastika, one of several alleged incidents of racism on campus that led to the protests.

Missouri students have been protesting the school administration's handling of several recent alleged incidents, such as swastika drawn on a wall using human feces and the black student body president being called a racial slur.

In his Huckabee Exclusive podcast last week, the former Arkansas governor had said protesters at the University of Missouri never identified the exact policies they were protesting. On Friday he took aim at the Nazi symbol carved in waste.

"At the university of Missouri there were protests against the university over an alleged drunken racial slur that may or may not have actually happened. And if it did, might not have been uttered by a student," Huckabee said on Friday before quickly transitioning to the so-called poop swastika.

"There was also a report, and please pardon me, I'll try to put this delicately, a report of someone drawing a swastika on a bathroom wall with human waste," Huckabee said. "The police claim to have verified the story, but reporters for the Federalist couldn't track down a single witness — not among the custodial staff who would've been responsible for cleaning it up."

Conservative media had raised questions that the poop swastika, could have been a hoax. However, by Thursday, before Huckabee's podcast, police released photos of the fecal Nazi emblem.

"They found some people who claimed to know people who claimed to have seen it, but couldn't find any names," continued Huckabee. "But that was proof enough to burn up the internet and set off protests that resulted in the resignations of the university president and a well-liked professor who refused to cancel an exam just because some students claimed to feel unsafe."

"He told his class that, if you give in to bullies, they win. The only way bullies are defeated is to stand up to them," added Huckabe. "Naturally, that indisputable and eternal truth sparked outrage at the professor who felt forced to apologize and resign. Although, at last word someone at the university still had enough spine left to refuse to accept his resignation."

Obama Slams Republicans: "Not American" To Only Accept Christian Syrian Refugees

$
0
0

Saul Loeb / AFP / Getty Images

Toward the end of his press conference on Monday, President Obama became animated, sharply criticizing the idea that the United States should no longer accept refugees from Syria, or only accept Christians, as some including Ted Cruz have suggested.

"When I hear folks say that, well, maybe we should just admit the Christians, but not the Muslims," Obama said, "when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which person who's fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted, when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefited from protection when they were fleeing political persecution, that's shameful."

"That's not American," he continued. "That's not who we are. we don't have religious tests to our compassion."

Earlier this year, as refugees flooded into Europe, the Obama administration pledged to accept 10,000 refugees in 2016. The administration so far has accepted just under 2,000 — the U.S. security vetting for refugees is significantly more involved than that of many European countries.

In recent days, a number of lawmakers have called on the Obama administration to halt those plans, citing security concerns following the Paris attacks. At least one of the attackers was found with a Syrian passport; his fingerprints matched those of someone who passed through Greece earlier this year.

On Sunday, Jeb Bush said that given the level of persecution against Syrian Christians, the United States should focus on bringing them into the country. "I think we need to do thorough screening and take in a limited number," Bush said on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. "There are a lot of Christians in Syria that have no place now. They'll be either executed or imprisoned, either by Assad or by ISIS. We should focus our efforts as it relates to the refugees for the Christians that are being slaughtered."

Cruz, who has argued that the United States cannot take the security risk of accepting refugees all fall, told reporters on Sunday that Christians do not pose a “meaningful risk” to security.

"There is no meaningful risk of Christians committing acts of terror," Cruz told reporters, according to the Washington Post. "If there were a group of radical Christians pledging to murder anyone who had a different religious view than they, we would have a different national security situation."

Obama, who had largely during his remarks on Monday — his second since the terrorist attacks in Paris, but his first since the full extent of that attack was known — went on to talk about Pope Francis's calls to protect people of all faiths.

"The people who are fleeing Syria are the most harmed by terrorism, they are the most vulnerable," Obama said. "They are the most vulnerable as a consequence of civil war and strife. They are parents. They are children. They are orphans."

Jeb Bush Says He Didn't Know What "Caliphate" Meant A Year Ago

$
0
0

“Could you ever imagine a caliphate — I didn’t even know what the term meant, literally, a year ago — a caliphate the size of Indiana, garnering energy each and every day because of our inaction?”

youtube.com

Republican presidential candidate and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, speaking about the Islamic State at a campaign event last week at a Coca Cola bottling plant in Atlantic, Iowa, said he didn't know what the term "caliphate" meant a year ago.

"Could you ever imagine a caliphate — I didn't even know what the term meant, literally, a year ago — a caliphate the size of Indiana, garnering energy each and every day because of our inaction?" Bush said. "Recruiting Americans to go fight their fight in the caliphate, that is in Syria and Iraq, but also recruiting Americans to do harm to us here. Thousands and thousands of Internet exchanges trying to recruit people who have a delusional view of this great country of ours."

The Clinton Campaign Wants To Win The Latino Vote One Text At A Time

$
0
0

Jim Cole / AP

The Clinton campaign saw an opportunity to damage an opponent.

It was late August, back before Marco Rubio replaced Jeb Bush as the candidate many Democrats viewed as the most formidable general election opponent, and Bush had used the term "anchor babies" while talking about stronger immigration enforcement.

The campaign's Latino team, which includes Hispanic outreach director Lorella Praeli, digital organizing director Jessica Morales Rocketto, Hispanic media director Jorge Silva, and Paola Luisi on the communications team, discussed how to best respond before settling on an SMS text blast to the campaign's growing list of Latinos who signed up to receive messages on their mobile phones.

They went with an aggressive attack, comparing Bush to Donald Trump, saying this is how he speaks about Latinos "when he thinks no one is listening" and if recipients replied with "HEAR" they received an automated call with audio of Bush's remarks in English and Spanish.

The campaign says the response was incredible. The Latino list saw a spike in growth, with people getting their friends to text in, as well as high numbers of people actually listening to the phone call.

"We always sort of had a theory that this was going to work, but what proved it was the Jeb Bush anchor baby text," Morales Rocketto said.

According to the campaign, tens of thousands of Hispanics have signed up to receive the bilingual text messages (recipients can say whether they prefer English or Spanish; 75% ask to receive them in English). Unsurprisingly, the top states are some of the most populous: Texas, California, and critical Florida. Other big, reliably blue states mostly round out the top 10, but also included are Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona.

In the primary, Latino voters recognize and support Clinton at significantly higher levels than her opponents. A program like this aims to keep younger Hispanics, which now make up a larger percentage of the Latino vote, engaged and ultimately send them out to volunteer or vote. But for a campaign looking to recapture the younger, more diverse Democratic coalition that elected President Obama twice, programs like this are even more likely tests for next fall.

A poll released last week by Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg found motivation from the "Rising American Electorate," defined as minorities, young voters, and single women, is lagging behind that of Republican-aligned voter groups.

But so far, the Clinton campaign says they’re seeing enthusiasm with their texting program. Amid the bevy of data they’ve collected through the program (all tied to phone numbers), according to the campaign, 91% of those responding are eligible voters, with 9% not eligible to vote but still wanting to volunteer or be involved (the campaign considers the latter group to be made up significantly of undocumented immigrants).

Reaching Hispanics and young adults goes hand-in-hand. In fact, a source close to Jeb Bush's super PAC, Right to Rise, said the group was pitched that 50% of Latinos are “millennials” and 25% of “millennials” are Hispanics. And the Clinton’s push to reach these voters on their phones makes sense, said Mark Hugo Lopez of Pew Hispanic.

"More than half of Hispanic adults are cellphone-only so if you want to reach Latinos one of the best ways is mobile," he said, adding that Hispanics go online at higher rates than other groups.

The campaign has used high-profile endorsements from well-known figures in the Latino community to grow their list (the strongest: when Marc Anthony brought Clinton on stage during his concert in Miami and pitched the texting program or when Julian Castro told those gathered at a San Antonio rally to take out their phones and text the campaign).

When Dolores Huerta, a labor leader who worked with Cesar Chavez, endorsed Clinton, the action rate of people listening to her endorsement message was about three times higher than some of the broader audience messages, the campaign said.

The program has also not been perfect: Saturday’s immigration text misspelled the word — “immigation” — and the campaign’s text, typo included, was repeated again and again on Twitter during the debate.

But it is providing the campaign with early returns, a lot of data, and a reliable way to reach supporters. People who sign up to receive texts are asked to self-identify (Latinos are not monolithic). Thus far, most respondents have Mexican heritage, followed by Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Salvadorans, Colombians, Cubans, Peruvians, and Ecuadorians.

And they’ve experimented with the language in the text, at times mixing some familiar Spanish words into the English-language texts, meant for the bicultural audience, for example. The campaign has tested messages beyond immigration, which is an issue of importance for Latinos but not the only issue, as well. During Saturday's debate it sent Spanish-language texts on health care and gun control, in addition to immigration.

While the campaign says the SMS program is deeply integrated into its digital strategy as an organizing and voter-education tool, with plans to use it for get-out-the-vote efforts later on in the cycle, Democrats also view the SMS program is an effective tool for attacking Republicans, and in particular, tying them to Trump.

Strategist Maria Cardona said that while Trump is favorably citing a deeply controversial 1950s policy called "Operation Wetback" to defend his plan to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, Clinton is engaging Latinos positively.

"A fire has been lit underneath the Hispanic community's feet and young people have been a large part of that because of what they’re hearing," Cardona said. "Romney lost Latinos 27% to 71% and he was just advocating self-deportation."

Huckabee: Put Syrian Refugees in Homes of "Limousine Liberals"

$
0
0

Or the University of Missouri dorms.

Darren Hauck / Reuters

Republican presidential candidate and Former Arkansas Gov. Huckabee suggested in a radio interview Saturday that Syrian refugees be put in the neighborhoods or homes of the "limousine liberals" who support accepting them into the U.S.

"[L]isten, all of these feel good liberals who say we ought to be taking in refugees," Huckabee said on the John Gibson show Saturday, "how come they never end up in the neighborhood where the limousine liberal lives? Behind gated communities and with armed security around."

Additionally, Huckabee said he wanted Democratic debate moderators to ask presidential candidate Hillary Clinton if refugees should be housed in her neighborhood of Chappaqua, New York.

"Mrs. Clinton, you have suggested we take in 65,00 refugees, how many can we bring to your neighborhood in Chappaqua? Can you please just give us a number. That would be the question that I would like to ask her," Huckabee said.

Huckabee concluded the interview with one last suggestion: Students at the University of Missouri, which has recently been roiled by student protests over the university's handling of racism on campus, should house the refugees.

"Heck, we may take them to the University of Missouri," Huckabee said. "A lot of the students are so stressed out from feeling unsafe because somebody said a word they didn't like that they are not using their dorm rooms anymore. Maybe we can put them there."

Huckabee also questioned whether Syrian refugees could acclimate to the U.S.

"And if you think about it, we would be bringing people in who lived in the desert their entire lives, and they would be completely disrupted, not only in terms of their culture, their language, their religion, my gosh even in terms of their climate," Huckabee said. "Can you imagine bringing in a bunch of Syrian refugees who've lived in the desert their whole lives that are suddenly thrown into an English speaking community? Where it's maybe in Minnesota where it is 20 degrees below zero? I mean just I don't understand what we possibly can be thinking."

w.soundcloud.com

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images