Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Sen. Mike Lee: Doesn’t Help GOP To Speak Of Immigrants In “Demeaning” Terms

$
0
0

“I don’t think it helps to speak of immigrants in terms that are insulting or demeaning.”

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican Sen. Mike Lee, a leader in the Tea Party movement, says members of his party should remember to speak of immigrants in terms that aren't demeaning.

Speaking with Utah's BeeHive Startups podcast this week, Lee was asked if he was concerned about some of the rhetoric in this year's Republican presidential primary surrounding immigration.

"I certainly think we need to make clear at every stage that we are a nation of immigrants and we can all hope that we'll continue to be a nation of immigrants," the Utah senator said. "It's not a source of weakness, it's a source of strength. And so, regardless of what position anyone chooses to take on border security, on how many visas we ought to be issuing, on what to do about the 11 million people who are here illegally right now, regardless of your position on that, you at least ought to acknowledge the fact that we're talking about human beings and human beings deserve to be treated with dignity and respect."

"And we ought to be talking about this in terms of how to design an immigration system that serves and furthers and facilities the American dream," said Lee. "That's where the focus ought to be.

"I don't think it helps to speak of immigrants in terms that are insulting or demeaning," he added.

Listen to the full interview below:

w.soundcloud.com


View Entire List ›


Supreme Court Appears Poised To End Public Sector Union Fee Requirements

$
0
0

Chris Geidner/BuzzFeed

WASHINGTON — A majority of the Supreme Court appears poised to overrule a 1977 case allowing public sector union "agency fees" — a ruling that would end the fees, which are paid by non-members to support public sector unions' collective bargaining work.

The 1977 case, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, allows public sector unions to require non-union members to pay a fee for the services provided to all employees regarding contract negotiations and administration.

Monday's case, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, was presented by Jones Day partner Michael Carvin as a free speech and association case about the First Amendment. Representing teacher Rebecca Friedrichs, Carvin argued that the First Amendment bars California from forcing Friedrichs to pay money to a union with which she disagrees and has chosen not to join.

California, Justice Department, and union lawyers countered that the 1977 case "converged" — as Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. put it — with other Supreme Court cases about the more lenient speech rules that apply to the government when it acts as an employer.

Such agency fees are permitted in private workplaces under federal law, but it took the Abood case to allow for such fees to be assessed in public sector unions since public employees aren't covered under the federal law.

While states could, and many have, limited the use of public sector unions, the Abood case allows states with public sector unions — where a union serves as the exclusive bargaining unit with a public employer — to require non-union members to pay the so-called "agency" or "fair-share" fee to the union to support its contract negotiation and administration work.

The Supreme Court, in a 2014 decision, hinted at the majority's dissatisfaction with the Abood ruling. Although Justice Clarence Thomas said nothing Monday, as is his usual practice, it does appear that the same five justices are prepare to overrule Abood with Friedrichs.

Justice Stephen Breyer pressed Carvin heavily on the role of stare decisis — the court's practice of following its past precedents — and several of the four more liberal justices questioned what special reason there was to overrule Abood.

"It was 40 years ago," Breyer said of the Abood decision. "It was 40 years ago," he repeated, questioning the effect on other related decisions — ranging from bar association fees to student activity fees.

When California Solicitor General Edward DuMont got up, however, the more conservative justices took the lead in questioning — with Justice Anthony Kennedy calling it "almost axiomatic" that public sector union matters are "matters of public concern" because, among other reasons, public money is involved.

As such, Kennedy continued, shouldn't forcing people to pay the fees be seen not as a "free-rider" problem — a reason the court in Abood allowed the agency fees — but instead as a "compelled-rider" problem — which would, under Carvin's argument, be a constitutional problem with requiring the fees.

LINK: Read the Friedrichs Supreme Court oral argument transcript.

Trump On Sean Penn's El Chapo Interview: "Sort Of Amazing The Way He Got In There"

$
0
0

“I guess we have bigger problems in this country, but I guess it was a little amazing that he was able to get an interview with a guy that everybody else was looking for, right?”

Scott Eisen / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Donald Trump said on Monday that it was "sort of amazing" that actor Sean Penn was able to interview the Mexican drug kingpin Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán amid the hunt for the escaped convict.

Asked by New Hampshire radio host Jack Heath whether he thought there should be an investigation of the circumstances surrounding the interview, Trump said he thought there should be, but also called Penn's interview, published in Rolling Stone, "a little amazing."

"Well, I guess there should be," Trump said. "But it was sort of amazing the way he got in there and all of the people that are looking for him couldn't find him and here's a guy sitting down with a rather long interview. You said there was an 8 or a 12 hour interview."

He continued, "So I don't know, I guess we have bigger problems in this country, but I guess it is a little amazing that he was able to get an interview with a guy that everybody else was looking for, right?"

Penn is reportedly already under investigation for the October interview with the drug lord. The actor's meeting with El Chapo is also reported to have helped authorities in his capture and arrest last week.

Trump's GOP rival Marco Rubio has condemned Penn's conversation with the cartel boss, calling it "grotesque."

Fiorina Says People Are Tired Of Politicians Renouncing Their Canadian Citizenship

$
0
0

Rage against the professional political class.

Sean Rayford / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Republican presidential candidate and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina says she finds it odd it took so long for Ted Cruz to renounce his Canadian citizenship, and listed his renouncement in 2014 as one of the reasons people are so fed up with politicians.

"I just think it's odd. Why would it take you this long to renounce a Canadian citizenship?" Fiorina said last week on the Heidi Harris Show last week. "Why would it take a year before you run for president? I think it's one of the reasons that people get sort of tired of politicians."

The former Fortune Top 20 CEO, Senate candidate in California, and vice chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee also raged against the "professional political class"

"He is a politician, always has been, and 80% of them are tired of the professional political class. I think it's time to take our country back and time to return to citizen government and that is why I'm running for president," Fiorina said.

New Effort Aims To Turn Out Latinos To The Iowa Caucuses — Against Trump

$
0
0

Mark J. Terrill / AP

DES MOINES, Iowa — With the Iowa caucuses less than three weeks away, nearly every type of voter has been canvassed, targeted, sent mailers, and messaged to on TV. But Latinos, who make up about 5.5% of the state's population and even less of the registered voters have largely been ignored — until very recently.

The nonpartisan League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) began a $300,000 effort at the end of November that started with mailers and phone calls to all 99 precincts in the state, and face-to-face, door-to-door canvassing in the 20 precincts where many of Iowa's nearly 50,000 registered Latino voters live.

A dismal 1,000 Hispanic voters caucused in 2012 — a showing that virtually ensured no campaign would really make an effort to reach them. LULAC hopes to get 10,000 Latino voters to caucus this time around. And they're pretty open about their motivation: It's an anti-Trump effort.

"What Trump has done with his hate is he has caused much concern among our young people," said Joe Enriquez Henry, who is in charge of the effort in the state, and is LULAC national vice president for Midwest coordinating.

Latinos and DREAMer immigrant youth have mobilized against Trump, his rhetoric, and policies — and he said, they've found a climate like they did at Iowa State University, where supporters of the candidate spat on protesters and tore their signs.

The basic message of the mailers is, "If you don't get involved someone else is going to make the decision for you," Henry said. Those mailers began in November; the third was sent this week. His five staffers are trying to contact each targeted voter three to five times each — all part of the effort to get them to commit to caucusing.

LULAC has invited campaigns from both parties to their bilingual caucus trainings, but Jeb Bush's campaign has been the one going to events across the state to make presentations for their candidate.

Bush, who began the race as the establishment favorite has seen his standing in the polls drop, only to be eclipsed by Ted Cruz leading many Iowa polls, followed by Trump and Rubio. (Henry and others involved with the LULAC efforts said Cruz and Rubio have not engaged in Hispanic outreach in the state.)

The Bush campaign has built up their own Hispanic efforts and latched onto LULAC's as well, going from one staffer dedicated to Latino outreach to five in the state now, including Hispanic media director Emily Benavides and respected operative Jose Mallea.

"I've been really impressed by LULAC," Mallea said.

Mallea, who said the campaign early on identified an opportunity with Hispanic voters in the state because no one was going after them, said campaign figures show the number of Latino voters in the state to be about 48,000 voters — 9,000 of them Republicans, and close to double that independent or unaffiliated voters.

He said LULAC's Henry told him early on that he was doing this effort to take on Trump.

"He's a former union guy but he put that aside and said, 'I'm going to do what’s best for our community, our community is not going to stand for these offensive tactics, the name calling,'" Mallea said. The LULAC bilingual caucus trainings, which the Bush campaign does as well as putting out bilingual literature in the state, are where Hispanic voters who are offended by Trump can learn about Bush. An "opportunity" for the campaign, Mallea said.

In a highly competitive state where Mike Huckabee won by fewer than 11,000 voters in 2008 and Rick Santorum won by a razor-thin 34-vote margin in 2012, a group of voters that are largely ignored could be a boon for Bush, said LULAC-Iowa political director Christian Ucles.

"In the Iowa caucus, the Bush campaign could get 2,500 Latinos to vote for him," Ucles said.

"If they turn out 2,000 people, that could be the difference between being seventh or fourth in the state," he added, noting that only John McCain ended up winning the nomination after finishing in sixth place in Iowa.

Ucles said the LULAC plan is to increase Latino political empowerment in the state, and hopes to be able to mobilize these voters in the future now that they are connected to LULAC, and eventually get Hispanic elected officials in the state legislature.

Henry said Latino Republicans in the state say they are going to voice "that they are sick and tired of the Trump hate," but the outreach has led LULAC to identify a rarity — one Hispanic Trump supporter in the state.

"He specifically wrote it on his post card — 'TRUMP 2016,'" Henry said. "I need to call him."

Rand Paul Didn't Make The Cut For The Next Republican Debate

$
0
0

The Kentucky senator told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer he won’t participate in “anything that isn’t first tier.”

CNN

Republican presidential candidate and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said Monday that the Fox Business Network had officially informed him that he would not be eligible for the main stage debate Thursday night, and vowed not to participate in the earlier undercard debate.

"We were just told they were having a mathematical problem over there, and they're adding the numbers, and we think they're confused because, they're not including us in the main stage and we think they're really wrong with that," Paul told CNN's Wolf Blitzer.

Fox Business Network said their debate criteria for the main stage would include the candidates who place top six in national polls or top five in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Paul cited recent polls showing him as one of the top six candidates, and said he didn't think any network should be able to categorize his campaign as "anything less than first tier."

"We think it's a rotten thing to do to try to designate which candidates have a chance and don't, and so we will not participate in anything that's not first tier," Paul said.

Hillary Clinton Calls For End To Obama Deportation Raids

$
0
0

Charlie Neibergall / AP

DES MOINES, Iowa — Hillary Clinton on Monday called for the end to President Obama's immigration raids begun in the New Year, marking her first comments after her initial statement of "real concerns" about them in December.

Clinton delivered that message at the Black and Brown Forum, held here in Iowa weeks before the caucuses, and featuring interviews with her as well as her opponents, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Martin O'Malley. Immigration activists criticized her December remarks, which were more measured compared to the sharper statements against the raids from her opponents.

Fusion's Jorge Ramos reminded Clinton that the last time they spoke he asked her if she had a "Latino problem" because of her comments that the unaccompanied minors coming from Central America should eventually be sent back. He was pointed once again: Would Clinton as president become another "deporter-in-chief" as some Latino and immigration activists call Obama?

She said she would not be.

"I have come out against the raids," she said, calling them "not an appropriate tool to enforce immigration laws."

Clinton leaned on the American ideal of "due process," saying she has come out in favor of government sponsored counsel so immigrants are not lost in the process and have the ability to "tell their story."

While Clinton has carefully threaded a line between saying she would go further than the president on immigration and not knocking his policies, her opposition to the raids was a clear break.

Her campaign sent out comments attributed to Clinton as she finished speaking on the issue doubling down on idea that the raids sow fear, saying "we shouldn’t have armed federal officers showing up at peoples’ homes, taking women and children out of their beds in the middle of the night."

More than 10,000 children reached the border in October and November alone, the Washington Post reported. In a closed door meeting last week, the White House told lawmakers the raids were “a clear way to send a signal to folks in Central America not to come," a lawmaker who attended the meeting told BuzzFeed News.

Ramos repeatedly asked Clinton if she would rule out deporting children, and she repeatedly leaned on the importance of due process as well as changing refugee and asylum laws. She said she would end family-detention centers but, "I can not tell you a blanket rule" on not deporting children.

Clinton said the Latin American countries need to be helped as well, and campaign officials noted that the president requested $1 billion for assistance to the region.

In the spin room afterwards, Sanders campaign's Erika Andiola said she wasn't surprised with said that Clinton is always careful with the words she uses on immigration. "The fact that she got asked two or three times about it and she had to think about it says it all," she said.

"To us, that is a very easy question to answer," Andiola continued. Asked if Sanders would pledge not to deport children, she said, "Of course."

Awkwardly, Clinton was asked about an exchange in New Hampshire, put on YouTube and shared around the Latino and immigrant political space that showed her using the term "illegal immigrants," while talking up her border security bonafides and the repeated times she voted for a barrier on the border.

Asked to pledge not to say "illegal immigrants" again, Clinton said she would not, calling it a poor choice of words.

(The Sanders campaign's Andiola said this was bigger than that. "The word illegal is something important to the community — not just activists, but also voters," she said. "You have places like Arizona and Alabama where you don't have to be undocumented to be called illegal.")

To Ramos, the fence she was talking about sounded a lot like Donald Trump's controversial plan to build a border wall. Clinton stood her ground, saying that talking about border security and a plan for undocumented immigrants in the country is not a contradiction. Trump's plan for a wall and deportation is "foolish," she said.

Clinton's national political director Amanda Renteria echoed Clinton saying she will always look to make sure enforcement is humane and suggested the campaign will look to see what the administration does next.

"We want to keep thinking about what we can do to solve these questions and as more raids happen we'll see how the administration reacts," she said.

In a round of rapid fire questions at the end, Clinton was asked about an awkward controversy that arose when a Latina member of her digital team wrote a piece comparing Clinton to abuelas, or grandmothers in Spanish. The hashtag #NotMyAbuela trended from people, upset at the use of the word.

Clinton joked that unlike most grandmothers, she's running for president, so that's how she's unlike them, while people in the auditorium for the forum said they heard someone yell "Not my abuela!" while she answered.

Everything You Need To Know About President Obama's Final State Of The Union

$
0
0

BuzzFeed News Washington, D.C., Bureau Chief John Stanton and correspondent Tarini Parti reported from Capitol Hill.

Susan Walsh / AP

  • Let's get this out of the way: "The State of our Union is strong."
  • Overall, the speech stuck largely to his achievements and his vision for the future — touching upon the economy, inequality, changing technology, national security, and campaign finance — and not specific policy proposals.
  • Right off the top, Obama set few policy expectations for this year "because it's an election season." He said he hoped both parties could accomplish criminal justice reform, "and helping people who are battling prescription drug abuse and heroin abuse."
  • Two science issues got big mentions: global warming and battling cancer. On the latter, he announced a new national effort to cure the disease led by Vice President Joe Biden.
  • Obama also took a veiled shots at two GOP presidential nominees: Texas Sen. Ted Cruz — who has called for carpet bombing in order to defeat ISIS — and Donald Trump, for his remarks on Muslims.
  • Obama notably made little reference to refugees from Syria and Iraq — resettling people has become a flashpoint in the nation.
  • And people really aren't happy with Obama's version of Middle Eastern history
  • Oh also everyone wanted to know WTF Vermont Sen. and Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was reading during the address.
  • Kentucky clerk Kim Davis showed up — even though the Congressman who essentially invited her said he didn't know he invited her. (Read more about BuzzFeed News's interaction with Davis below.)

In case you missed it: the full video is below. Here's the full text prepared before delivery.

youtube.com

  • "And for this final [speech], I'm going to try to make it shorter. I know some of you are antsy to get back to Iowa. I've been there. I'll be shaking hands after if you want some tips."
  • "We also need benefits and protections that provide a basic measure of security. After all, it's not much of a stretch to say that some of the only people in America who are going to work the same job, in the same place, with a health and retirement package, for 30 years, are sitting in this chamber."
  • "Now, I'm guessing we won't agree on health care anytime soon." (Even Obama was surprised this one got reaction.)
  • "Sixty years ago, when the Russians beat us into space, we didn't deny Sputnik was up there. We didn't argue about the science, or shrink our research and development budget. We built a space program almost overnight, and twelve years later, we were walking on the moon."
  • "I told you earlier all the talk of America's economic decline is political hot air. Well, so is all the rhetoric you hear about our enemies getting stronger and America getting weaker. The United States of America is the most powerful nation on Earth. Period. It's not even close. It's not even close. It's not even close." (Video clip here.)
  • "If you doubt America's commitment — or mine — to see that justice is done, ask Osama bin Laden." (Here's a video clip of that one.)
  • "We need to reject any politics that targets people because of race or religion."
  • "We have to end the practice of drawing our congressional districts so that politicians can pick their voters, and not the other way around."


View Entire List ›


John Sununu Goes Off On Donald Trump: "This Guy Is A Phony"

$
0
0

“The guy has no substance, he has no plan, he’s all mouth.”

View Video ›

Former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu on Monday called Republican front-runner Donald Trump a phony flip-flopper willing to suck up to Putin for a small bit of praise.

Trump had previously mocked Sununu at a rally in New Hampshire, saying he was fired "like a dog" as chief of staff by President George H.W. Bush.

"That's funny coming from a guy who's got four major billion-dollar bankruptcies. He screwed his stock holders. The bankers put him into bankruptcy. They said, 'Donald Trump, you're fired. You're fired like a beggar,'" Sununu said on NewsMaxTV's Steve Malzberg Show. "To use his words, they fired him like a dog. And he downplays these, but these are four major billion-dollar, multi-billion dollar bankruptcies."

"The guy has no substance, he has no plan, he's all mouth," continued Sununu. "He's thin-skinned. Putin proved that — Trump likes to brag that he can't be bought he's so rich — Putin proved that he's the cheapest buy in politics today, with 10 cents of flattery, Putin had him sucking up all the way. This is a guy that you can't put in as commander-in-chief."

The former governor also attacked Trump's record.

"All his life he's been a lefty liberal," he said. "He supports Obamacare. He's all for eminent domain. He has told us he's very pro-life. Even on immigration this guy has been lifelong liberal on immigration and now he's a conservative all of a sudden. He criticized Mitt Romney for being tough on immigration and said that Mitt Romney going to lose the Latino vote because he was so tough on immigration. This guy is a phony and I hope the voters will begin to see that. "

Obama Offered Biden Financial Help During His Son's Illness

$
0
0

“I’ll give you the money. Whatever you need, I’ll give you the money.”

Obama and Biden at the funeral of Beau Biden on June 6, 2015.

Yuri Gripas / Reuters

President Barack Obama offered to financially support Joe Biden's family when the vice president's son fell ill, it was revealed Tuesday.

In an interview with CNN, Biden recalled a discussion with Obama in which he confided his worries that he would struggle to financially support his son Beau Biden's family should he need to resign as Delaware's attorney general due to ailing health.

"I said, 'But I worked it out ... Jill and I will sell the house and be in good shape,'" Biden recalled of his conversation with the president.

"He got up, and he said, 'Don't sell that house. Promise me you won't sell the house,'" Biden recalled. "He said, 'I'll give you the money. Whatever you need, I'll give you the money. Don't, Joe. Promise me. Promise me.' I said, 'I don't think we're going to have to anyway.' He said, 'Promise me.'"

Biden did not ultimately sell his Wilmington, Delaware, home, and Beau Biden served out his second term in office before leaving in January 2015. He died in May 2015 from brain cancer at age 46.

In an iconic scene from Beau Biden's funeral, Obama embraced his vice president, describing him as his "brother."

LINK: Obama And Mourners Bid Farewell To Beau Biden, A Man With “A Mighty Heart”

Supreme Court Strikes Down Florida "Jury Recommendation" Death Sentencing Scheme

$
0
0

Chris Geidner/BuzzFeed

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, the Supreme Court struck down Florida's death sentencing scheme as unconstitutional because the state relied on "a judge's factfinding" and not "a jury's verdict" to sentence a person to death.

The decision striking down the scheme means the death sentencing law in the state will need to be changed. In addition, it calls death sentences in Florida — at least some of them — into question.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the court's opinion, in which she was joined by all of her colleagues but two. One, Justice Stephen Breyer, joined in the judgment of the court that Florida's scheme is unconstitutional, but for different reasons.

"The Sixth Amendment protects a defendant’s right to an impartial jury. This right required Florida to base Timothy Hurst’s death sentence on a jury’s verdict, not a judge's factfinding," Sotomayor wrote. "Florida’s sentencing scheme, which required the judge alone to find the existence of an aggravating circumstance, is therefore unconstitutional."

Without that finding of an aggravating circumstance, there could be no death sentence imposed. As such, Sotomayor reasoned, the court's prior opinions required a jury to make that determination.

The opinion was an application, for the most part, of a 2002 decision of the Supreme Court, Ring v. Arizona, in which the court held that Arizona's law allowing a sentencing judge, sitting without a jury, to find the aggravating factors necessary to impose the death penalty.

Breyer, who disagreed with the reasoning of Ring, continued in his opinion on Tuesday to note his disagreement with that earlier decision.

Justice Samuel Alito was the sole dissenting justice, arguing that "the jury plays a critically important role" in the Florida system, sufficient for what Ring requires under the Sixth Amendment's right to a jury trial.

Hurst's case will now go back to the Florida Supreme Court for implementation of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision.

The state's sentencing law itself will need to be changed after Tuesday's ruling, a fact Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi acknowledged in a statement.

"In light of today’s United States Supreme Court decision holding Florida’s capital sentencing procedure unconstitutional, the state will need to make changes to its death-sentencing statutes," Bondi said. "I will work with state lawmakers this legislative session to ensure that those changes comply with the Court’s latest decision."

More broadly, the decision could affect other Florida death sentences — at least those still on direct appeal — and potentially more, depending on whether the decision is given retroactive effect in Florida.

As to that, Bondi said, "The impact of the Court’s ruling on existing death sentences will need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis."

Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision calls into question Alabama's similar death sentencing scheme.

"We certainly believe that Hurst will generally have an effect on Alabama's sentencing scheme," John Palombi, an assistant federal defender in the Middle District of Alabama, told BuzzFeed News.

Rand Paul: Obama Should Say He's A Failure, Then Resign In State Of The Union

$
0
0

“Well, I think from President Obama’s perspective, the best thing he could do would be to leave office early.”

RAND PAL

w.soundcloud.com

Rand Paul says he'd like to see President Obama announce in the State of the Union that he's a failure and then resign.

"Well, I think from President Obama's perspective, the best thing he could do would be to leave office early," the Kentucky senator and Republican presidential candidate said on Good Morning with Dan Mitchell. "I wish that tonight he would announce, 'hey guys, I've really been a failure as a president over the last seven years and I'm gonna take off early so cause I want to go play golf.'

"I really think Obama has got it all wrong about economy," Paul added, more substantively, saying Obama likes deficits and market intervention.

"It would be nice if he could own up to that, but his world view is that government is the answer," said Paul.

Paul, who was recently knocked out of the main Republican presidential debate due to low poll numbers, also addressed his boycott of participation in any so-called undercard debate.

"Well, we don't think it's fair, we think it's a mistake on their part," said Paul. "Just last week, a CNBC national poll had me one point out of fourth, so how we can be sort of artificially designated as not being in the first tier we think is not really fair and is inappropriate. A lot of people look at the polls and think they're science but many of these people never really had a science class or a math class. There's no difference between being three, four, five, six, seven, eight in a poll because the standard of error is often three or four in these polls. So we think arbitrary, capricious, a big mistake and we've chosen to take our debate and our campaign directly to the people."

NRCC Replaces Video Featuring Deceased Democratic Congressmen

$
0
0

Thanks Obama!

The National Republican Congressional Committee on Tuesday uploaded, and has since replaced, a video titled Thanks President Obama, which featured a number of Democratic congressmen who lost their seats during Obama's presidency. Two of the congressmen featured in the original video are now deceased.

Former Rep. Jim Oberstar of Minnesota lost his seat in 2010 and passed away in 2014 and Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri also lost his seat in 2010 and passed away in 2013.

The video, according to its release, "thanked" President Obama for "his many failed policies that have helped House Republicans achieve a historic Republican majority in Congress."

According to its source code, the post which was "published" at 9:25:48 was "modified" at 10:22:07

Katie Martin, the communications director from the NRCC said, "Clearly this was an innocent mistake. No one can dispute that. The fact remains since President Obama has taken office Democrats have lost almost 70 House seats, 13 U.S. Senate seats, 11 Governors and more than 900 state legislators."

About 40 Seconds into the original video, Jim Oberstar and Ike Skelton are featured.

About 40 Seconds into the original video, Jim Oberstar and Ike Skelton are featured.

The new video replaces Oberstar and Skelton with Bob Etheridge and Gene Taylor

The new video replaces Oberstar and Skelton with Bob Etheridge and Gene Taylor

Via youtube.com

Here is the old video:

View Video ›


View Entire List ›

Carly Fiorina, Unlike Rand Paul, Sees Undercard Debate As Opportunity

$
0
0

“So I’ll debate anyone, anytime, anywhere and I’ll look forward to South Carolina.”

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Carly Fiorina says she isn't concerned about being relegated to the undercard stage in Thursday's Republican presidential debate.

"Well, you know, it's interesting, I started this campaign 17 out of 16. Nobody took me seriously. In the latest Fox News poll, I'm number six nationally, so I feel pretty good about where I am and last time I looked, voters decide elections," Fiorina, the former Senate candidate and NRSC vice chair said on Boston Herald Radio's Morning Meeting. "Polls and pundits don't, and in fact. If polls decided elections, we never would have had a Ronald Reagan, and we already would have had a Hillary Clinton. So I'll debate anyone, anytime, anywhere, and I'll look forward to South Carolina."

The comments draw a sharp contrast from her rival, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who is boycotting the undercard debate, saying that no one would tell him his campaign is less than "first tier."

"Honestly, people have told me to sit down and be quiet my whole life," Fiorina, continued. "And we have a professional, political establishment in this country. It's why I'm running for president, because I think we have to take our country back. So the establishment and the media and the pollsters have counted me out this whole race, but voters haven't."

"And I just might win this debate too. The voters have never counted me out. And in particular the voters of New Hampshire have never voted me out. That's how you go from 17 to 6, and I'm still climbing. So the people of New Hampshire need to believe what I believe, which is: citizens, citizens determine who wins elections in this country, so the people of New Hampshire should send me out of New Hampshire with the wind at my back."

Fiorina, the former NRSC vice chair, McCain presidential campaign surrogate, and failed Senate candidate, cited the millions of debate viewers as why she made a different decision from Paul.

"Well, I obviously am making a different decision. Look, millions and millions of people are going to tune in to that debate," she said. "And it's an opportunity to continue to carry my message to those millions of people. I started out with 95% of the people in this country not knowing who I was, and it takes a while for people to get to know you and trust you. But the more they hear from me the more they like what I have to say and trust that I'll do what I say. I'm running because I think it's time to take our country back, from the professional political class, from the media, from the establishment, from a government that no longer serves us, but serves and nurtures and protects itself. I think citizens agree with me, 80% agree, actually, that it's time to take our country back."

Weird: Bernie Sanders Campaign Photoshops Out Organizer's "I Love Van" Shirt

$
0
0

Last week, the Sanders campaign posted a photo with a staffer or volunteer wearing a t-shirt made by NGP VAN, the data company at the center of December’s big spat. On Tuesday, the t-shirt was photoshopped out!

On Tuesday, they posted the same photo — but with one small, key difference. Look at the person all the way on the right.

On Tuesday, they posted the same photo — but with one small, key difference. Look at the person all the way on the right.

Now this has been deleted:

instagram.com


View Entire List ›


Ted Cruz Says Trump "Embodies New York Values"

$
0
0

“I think he may shift in his new rallies to play ‘New York, New York’ because he comes from New York and he embodies New York values.”

Robyn Beck / AFP / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Ted Cruz said on Tuesday that Donald Trump "embodies New York values," and that Trump's constant attacks on him are a sign that the businessman is worried about his front-runner status in the race.

Cruz made the comment on the Howie Carr Show, after the host asked him about Trump playing Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA", a reference to the allegation, recently trumpeted by Trump, that Cruz may be ineligible to serve as president because he was born in Canada.

"Well, look, I think he may shift in his new rallies to play 'New York, New York' because Donald comes from New York and he embodies New York values," Cruz said, referring to the famous Frank Sinatra song.

The Texas senator went on to say that Trump seemed "rattled" by his rising stature in the race. He added that Trump had been "unloading at every stop with direct attacks." Cruz said he did not "intend to respond or reciprocate."

On Tuesday, however, Cruz twice appeared to take jabs at Trump, telling reporters earlier in the day that supporters of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton were "eager to support Donald Trump and the attacks that are being tossed my direction."

In the radio interview, Cruz reiterated this argument. In response to a clip of Clinton saying Trump was "a Democrat before he was a Republican," Cruz said, "Well, I would say, Hillary would know well how to identify Democrats. She has been a partisan Democrat herself obviously and, uh, she and Donald know each other well and I do think it's interesting that Hillary Clinton's key supporters are doing everything they can to echo Donald's attacks on me."

Democratic attacks on him, he added, "may be driven by the fact that the polling right now shows Donald loses to Hillary and loses by a pretty big margin but I beat Hillary and I think that's got the Hillary folks a little bit concerned and so they're doing everything they can to amplify Donald's attacks."

Cruz also addressed Trump's comment that "not a lot of evangelicals come out of Cuba" by inviting the reality TV star to go to church with him.

"Any time someone is attacking your faith that starts to suggest they're getting really nervous about what's happening in the race," Cruz said. "I would be happy to invite Donald to come with me to church any time he would like. He would certainly be welcome there. And, uh, you know, at the end of the day, my focus is not to engage in the mudslinging."

Here's President Obama's Entire Final State Of The Union Address

$
0
0


President Obama delivers his final State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill on Jan. 12, 2016.

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, my fellow Americans:

Tonight marks the eighth year I’ve come here to report on the State of the Union. And for this final one, I’m going to try to make it shorter. I know some of you are antsy to get back to Iowa.

I also understand that because it’s an election season, expectations for what we’ll achieve this year are low. Still, Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the constructive approach you and the other leaders took at the end of last year to pass a budget and make tax cuts permanent for working families. So I hope we can work together this year on bipartisan priorities like criminal justice reform, and helping people who are battling prescription drug abuse. We just might surprise the cynics again.

But tonight, I want to go easy on the traditional list of proposals for the year ahead. Don’t worry, I’ve got plenty, from helping students learn to write computer code to personalizing medical treatments for patients. And I’ll keep pushing for progress on the work that still needs doing. Fixing a broken immigration system. Protecting our kids from gun violence. Equal pay for equal work, paid leave, raising the minimum wage. All these things still matter to hardworking families; they are still the right thing to do; and I will not let up until they get done.

But for my final address to this chamber, I don’t want to talk just about the next year. I want to focus on the next five years, ten years, and beyond.

I want to focus on our future.

We live in a time of extraordinary change – change that’s reshaping the way we live, the way we work, our planet and our place in the world. It’s change that promises amazing medical breakthroughs, but also economic disruptions that strain working families. It promises education for girls in the most remote villages, but also connects terrorists plotting an ocean away. It’s change that can broaden opportunity, or widen inequality. And whether we like it or not, the pace of this change will only accelerate.

America has been through big changes before – wars and depression, the influx of immigrants, workers fighting for a fair deal, and movements to expand civil rights. Each time, there have been those who told us to fear the future; who claimed we could slam the brakes on change, promising to restore past glory if we just got some group or idea that was threatening America under control. And each time, we overcame those fears. We did not, in the words of Lincoln, adhere to the “dogmas of the quiet past.” Instead we thought anew, and acted anew. We made change work for us, always extending America’s promise outward, to the next frontier, to more and more people. And because we did – because we saw opportunity where others saw only peril – we emerged stronger and better than before.

What was true then can be true now. Our unique strengths as a nation – our optimism and work ethic, our spirit of discovery and innovation, our diversity and commitment to the rule of law – these things give us everything we need to ensure prosperity and security for generations to come.

In fact, it’s that spirit that made the progress of these past seven years possible. It’s how we recovered from the worst economic crisis in generations. It’s how we reformed our health care system, and reinvented our energy sector; how we delivered more care and benefits to our troops and veterans, and how we secured the freedom in every state to marry the person we love.

But such progress is not inevitable. It is the result of choices we make together. And we face such choices right now. Will we respond to the changes of our time with fear, turning inward as a nation, and turning against each other as a people? Or will we face the future with confidence in who we are, what we stand for, and the incredible things we can do together?

So let’s talk about the future, and four big questions that we as a country have to answer – regardless of who the next President is, or who controls the next Congress.

First, how do we give everyone a fair shot at opportunity and security in this new economy?

Second, how do we make technology work for us, and not against us – especially when it comes to solving urgent challenges like climate change?

Third, how do we keep America safe and lead the world without becoming its policeman?

And finally, how can we make our politics reflect what’s best in us, and not what’s worst?

Let me start with the economy, and a basic fact: the United States of America, right now, has the strongest, most durable economy in the world. We’re in the middle of the longest streak of private-sector job creation in history. More than 14 million new jobs; the strongest two years of job growth since the ‘90s; an unemployment rate cut in half. Our auto industry just had its best year ever. Manufacturing has created nearly 900,000 new jobs in the past six years. And we’ve done all this while cutting our deficits by almost three-quarters.

Anyone claiming that America’s economy is in decline is peddling fiction. What is true – and the reason that a lot of Americans feel anxious – is that the economy has been changing in profound ways, changes that started long before the Great Recession hit and haven’t let up. Today, technology doesn’t just replace jobs on the assembly line, but any job where work can be automated. Companies in a global economy can locate anywhere, and face tougher competition. As a result, workers have less leverage for a raise. Companies have less loyalty to their communities. And more and more wealth and income is concentrated at the very top.

All these trends have squeezed workers, even when they have jobs; even when the economy is growing. It’s made it harder for a hardworking family to pull itself out of poverty, harder for young people to start on their careers, and tougher for workers to retire when they want to. And although none of these trends are unique to America, they do offend our uniquely American belief that everybody who works hard should get a fair shot.

For the past seven years, our goal has been a growing economy that works better for everybody. We’ve made progress. But we need to make more. And despite all the political arguments we’ve had these past few years, there are some areas where Americans broadly agree.

We agree that real opportunity requires every American to get the education and training they need to land a good-paying job. The bipartisan reform of No Child Left Behind was an important start, and together, we’ve increased early childhood education, lifted high school graduation rates to new highs, and boosted graduates in fields like engineering. In the coming years, we should build on that progress, by providing Pre-K for all, offering every student the hands-on computer science and math classes that make them job-ready on day one, and we should recruit and support more great teachers for our kids.

And we have to make college affordable for every American. Because no hardworking student should be stuck in the red. We’ve already reduced student loan payments to ten percent of a borrower’s income. Now, we’ve actually got to cut the cost of college. Providing two years of community college at no cost for every responsible student is one of the best ways to do that, and I’m going to keep fighting to get that started this year.

Of course, a great education isn’t all we need in this new economy. We also need benefits and protections that provide a basic measure of security. After all, it’s not much of a stretch to say that some of the only people in America who are going to work the same job, in the same place, with a health and retirement package, for 30 years, are sitting in this chamber. For everyone else, especially folks in their forties and fifties, saving for retirement or bouncing back from job loss has gotten a lot tougher. Americans understand that at some point in their careers, they may have to retool and retrain. But they shouldn’t lose what they’ve already worked so hard to build.

That’s why Social Security and Medicare are more important than ever; we shouldn’t weaken them, we should strengthen them. And for Americans short of retirement, basic benefits should be just as mobile as everything else is today. That’s what the Affordable Care Act is all about. It’s about filling the gaps in employer-based care so that when we lose a job, or go back to school, or start that new business, we’ll still have coverage. Nearly eighteen million have gained coverage so far. Health care inflation has slowed. And our businesses have created jobs every single month since it became law.

Now, I’m guessing we won’t agree on health care anytime soon. But there should be other ways both parties can improve economic security. Say a hardworking American loses his job – we shouldn’t just make sure he can get unemployment insurance; we should make sure that program encourages him to retrain for a business that’s ready to hire him. If that new job doesn’t pay as much, there should be a system of wage insurance in place so that he can still pay his bills. And even if he’s going from job to job, he should still be able to save for retirement and take his savings with him. That’s the way we make the new economy work better for everyone.

I also know Speaker Ryan has talked about his interest in tackling poverty. America is about giving everybody willing to work a hand up, and I’d welcome a serious discussion about strategies we can all support, like expanding tax cuts for low-income workers without kids.

But there are other areas where it’s been more difficult to find agreement over the last seven years – namely what role the government should play in making sure the system’s not rigged in favor of the wealthiest and biggest corporations. And here, the American people have a choice to make.

I believe a thriving private sector is the lifeblood of our economy. I think there are outdated regulations that need to be changed, and there’s red tape that needs to be cut. But after years of record corporate profits, working families won’t get more opportunity or bigger paychecks by letting big banks or big oil or hedge funds make their own rules at the expense of everyone else; or by allowing attacks on collective bargaining to go unanswered. Food Stamp recipients didn’t cause the financial crisis; recklessness on Wall Street did. Immigrants aren’t the reason wages haven’t gone up enough; those decisions are made in the boardrooms that too often put quarterly earnings over long-term returns. It’s sure not the average family watching tonight that avoids paying taxes through offshore accounts. In this new economy, workers and start-ups and small businesses need more of a voice, not less. The rules should work for them. And this year I plan to lift up the many businesses who’ve figured out that doing right by their workers ends up being good for their shareholders, their customers, and their communities, so that we can spread those best practices across America.

In fact, many of our best corporate citizens are also our most creative. This brings me to the second big question we have to answer as a country: how do we reignite that spirit of innovation to meet our biggest challenges?

Sixty years ago, when the Russians beat us into space, we didn’t deny Sputnik was up there. We didn’t argue about the science, or shrink our research and development budget. We built a space program almost overnight, and twelve years later, we were walking on the moon.

That spirit of discovery is in our DNA. We’re Thomas Edison and the Wright Brothers and George Washington Carver. We’re Grace Hopper and Katherine Johnson and Sally Ride. We’re every immigrant and entrepreneur from Boston to Austin to Silicon Valley racing to shape a better world. And over the past seven years, we’ve nurtured that spirit.

We’ve protected an open internet, and taken bold new steps to get more students and low-income Americans online. We’ve launched next-generation manufacturing hubs, and online tools that give an entrepreneur everything he or she needs to start a business in a single day.

But we can do so much more. Last year, Vice President Biden said that with a new moonshot, America can cure cancer. Last month, he worked with this Congress to give scientists at the National Institutes of Health the strongest resources they’ve had in over a decade. Tonight, I’m announcing a new national effort to get it done. And because he’s gone to the mat for all of us, on so many issues over the past forty years, I’m putting Joe in charge of Mission Control. For the loved ones we’ve all lost, for the family we can still save, let’s make America the country that cures cancer once and for all.

Medical research is critical. We need the same level of commitment when it comes to developing clean energy sources.

Look, if anybody still wants to dispute the science around climate change, have at it. You’ll be pretty lonely, because you’ll be debating our military, most of America’s business leaders, the majority of the American people, almost the entire scientific community, and 200 nations around the world who agree it’s a problem and intend to solve it.

But even if the planet wasn’t at stake; even if 2014 wasn’t the warmest year on record – until 2015 turned out even hotter – why would we want to pass up the chance for American businesses to produce and sell the energy of the future?

Seven years ago, we made the single biggest investment in clean energy in our history. Here are the results. In fields from Iowa to Texas, wind power is now cheaper than dirtier, conventional power. On rooftops from Arizona to New York, solar is saving Americans tens of millions of dollars a year on their energy bills, and employs more Americans than coal – in jobs that pay better than average. We’re taking steps to give homeowners the freedom to generate and store their own energy – something environmentalists and Tea Partiers have teamed up to support. Meanwhile, we’ve cut our imports of foreign oil by nearly sixty percent, and cut carbon pollution more than any other country on Earth.

Gas under two bucks a gallon ain’t bad, either.

Now we’ve got to accelerate the transition away from dirty energy. Rather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future – especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. That’s why I’m going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources, so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet. That way, we put money back into those communities and put tens of thousands of Americans to work building a 21st century transportation system.

None of this will happen overnight, and yes, there are plenty of entrenched interests who want to protect the status quo. But the jobs we’ll create, the money we’ll save, and the planet we’ll preserve – that’s the kind of future our kids and grandkids deserve.

Climate change is just one of many issues where our security is linked to the rest of the world. And that’s why the third big question we have to answer is how to keep America safe and strong without either isolating ourselves or trying to nation-build everywhere there’s a problem.

I told you earlier all the talk of America’s economic decline is political hot air. Well, so is all the rhetoric you hear about our enemies getting stronger and America getting weaker. The United States of America is the most powerful nation on Earth. Period. It’s not even close. We spend more on our military than the next eight nations combined. Our troops are the finest fighting force in the history of the world. No nation dares to attack us or our allies because they know that’s the path to ruin. Surveys show our standing around the world is higher than when I was elected to this office, and when it comes to every important international issue, people of the world do not look to Beijing or Moscow to lead – they call us.

As someone who begins every day with an intelligence briefing, I know this is a dangerous time. But that’s not because of diminished American strength or some looming superpower. In today’s world, we’re threatened less by evil empires and more by failing states. The Middle East is going through a transformation that will play out for a generation, rooted in conflicts that date back millennia. Economic headwinds blow from a Chinese economy in transition. Even as their economy contracts, Russia is pouring resources to prop up Ukraine and Syria – states they see slipping away from their orbit. And the international system we built after World War II is now struggling to keep pace with this new reality.

It’s up to us to help remake that system. And that means we have to set priorities.

Priority number one is protecting the American people and going after terrorist networks. Both al Qaeda and now ISIL pose a direct threat to our people, because in today’s world, even a handful of terrorists who place no value on human life, including their own, can do a lot of damage. They use the Internet to poison the minds of individuals inside our country; they undermine our allies.

But as we focus on destroying ISIL, over-the-top claims that this is World War III just play into their hands. Masses of fighters on the back of pickup trucks and twisted souls plotting in apartments or garages pose an enormous danger to civilians and must be stopped. But they do not threaten our national existence. That’s the story ISIL wants to tell; that’s the kind of propaganda they use to recruit. We don’t need to build them up to show that we’re serious, nor do we need to push away vital allies in this fight by echoing the lie that ISIL is representative of one of the world’s largest religions. We just need to call them what they are – killers and fanatics who have to be rooted out, hunted down, and destroyed.

That’s exactly what we are doing. For more than a year, America has led a coalition of more than 60 countries to cut off ISIL’s financing, disrupt their plots, stop the flow of terrorist fighters, and stamp out their vicious ideology. With nearly 10,000 air strikes, we are taking out their leadership, their oil, their training camps, and their weapons. We are training, arming, and supporting forces who are steadily reclaiming territory in Iraq and Syria.

If this Congress is serious about winning this war, and wants to send a message to our troops and the world, you should finally authorize the use of military force against ISIL. Take a vote. But the American people should know that with or without Congressional action, ISIL will learn the same lessons as terrorists before them. If you doubt America’s commitment – or mine – to see that justice is done, ask Osama bin Laden. Ask the leader of al Qaeda in Yemen, who was taken out last year, or the perpetrator of the Benghazi attacks, who sits in a prison cell. When you come after Americans, we go after you. It may take time, but we have long memories, and our reach has no limit.

Our foreign policy must be focused on the threat from ISIL and al Qaeda, but it can’t stop there. For even without ISIL, instability will continue for decades in many parts of the world – in the Middle East, in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in parts of Central America, Africa and Asia. Some of these places may become safe havens for new terrorist networks; others will fall victim to ethnic conflict, or famine, feeding the next wave of refugees. The world will look to us to help solve these problems, and our answer needs to be more than tough talk or calls to carpet bomb civilians. That may work as a TV sound bite, but it doesn’t pass muster on the world stage.

We also can’t try to take over and rebuild every country that falls into crisis. That’s not leadership; that’s a recipe for quagmire, spilling American blood and treasure that ultimately weakens us. It’s the lesson of Vietnam, of Iraq – and we should have learned it by now.

Fortunately, there’s a smarter approach, a patient and disciplined strategy that uses every element of our national power. It says America will always act, alone if necessary, to protect our people and our allies; but on issues of global concern, we will mobilize the world to work with us, and make sure other countries pull their own weight.

That’s our approach to conflicts like Syria, where we’re partnering with local forces and leading international efforts to help that broken society pursue a lasting peace.

That’s why we built a global coalition, with sanctions and principled diplomacy, to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. As we speak, Iran has rolled back its nuclear program, shipped out its uranium stockpile, and the world has avoided another war.

That’s how we stopped the spread of Ebola in West Africa. Our military, our doctors, and our development workers set up the platform that allowed other countries to join us in stamping out that epidemic.

That’s how we forged a Trans-Pacific Partnership to open markets, protect workers and the environment, and advance American leadership in Asia. It cuts 18,000 taxes on products Made in America, and supports more good jobs. With TPP, China doesn’t set the rules in that region, we do. You want to show our strength in this century? Approve this agreement. Give us the tools to enforce it.

Fifty years of isolating Cuba had failed to promote democracy, setting us back in Latin America. That’s why we restored diplomatic relations, opened the door to travel and commerce, and positioned ourselves to improve the lives of the Cuban people. You want to consolidate our leadership and credibility in the hemisphere? Recognize that the Cold War is over. Lift the embargo.

American leadership in the 21st century is not a choice between ignoring the rest of the world – except when we kill terrorists; or occupying and rebuilding whatever society is unraveling. Leadership means a wise application of military power, and rallying the world behind causes that are right. It means seeing our foreign assistance as part of our national security, not charity. When we lead nearly 200 nations to the most ambitious agreement in history to fight climate change – that helps vulnerable countries, but it also protects our children. When we help Ukraine defend its democracy, or Colombia resolve a decades-long war, that strengthens the international order we depend upon. When we help African countries feed their people and care for the sick, that prevents the next pandemic from reaching our shores. Right now, we are on track to end the scourge of HIV/AIDS, and we have the capacity to accomplish the same thing with malaria – something I’ll be pushing this Congress to fund this year.

That’s strength. That’s leadership. And that kind of leadership depends on the power of our example. That is why I will keep working to shut down the prison at Guantanamo: it’s expensive, it’s unnecessary, and it only serves as a recruitment brochure for our enemies.

That’s why we need to reject any politics that targets people because of race or religion. This isn’t a matter of political correctness. It’s a matter of understanding what makes us strong. The world respects us not just for our arsenal; it respects us for our diversity and our openness and the way we respect every faith. His Holiness, Pope Francis, told this body from the very spot I stand tonight that “to imitate the hatred and violence of tyrants and murderers is the best way to take their place.” When politicians insult Muslims, when a mosque is vandalized, or a kid bullied, that doesn’t make us safer. That’s not telling it like it is. It’s just wrong. It diminishes us in the eyes of the world. It makes it harder to achieve our goals. And it betrays who we are as a country.

“We the People.” Our Constitution begins with those three simple words, words we’ve come to recognize mean all the people, not just some; words that insist we rise and fall together. That brings me to the fourth, and maybe the most important thing I want to say tonight.

The future we want – opportunity and security for our families; a rising standard of living and a sustainable, peaceful planet for our kids – all that is within our reach. But it will only happen if we work together. It will only happen if we can have rational, constructive debates.

It will only happen if we fix our politics.

A better politics doesn’t mean we have to agree on everything. This is a big country, with different regions and attitudes and interests. That’s one of our strengths, too. Our Founders distributed power between states and branches of government, and expected us to argue, just as they did, over the size and shape of government, over commerce and foreign relations, over the meaning of liberty and the imperatives of security.

But democracy does require basic bonds of trust between its citizens. It doesn’t work if we think the people who disagree with us are all motivated by malice, or that our political opponents are unpatriotic. Democracy grinds to a halt without a willingness to compromise; or when even basic facts are contested, and we listen only to those who agree with us. Our public life withers when only the most extreme voices get attention. Most of all, democracy breaks down when the average person feels their voice doesn’t matter; that the system is rigged in favor of the rich or the powerful or some narrow interest.

Too many Americans feel that way right now. It’s one of the few regrets of my presidency – that the rancor and suspicion between the parties has gotten worse instead of better. There’s no doubt a president with the gifts of Lincoln or Roosevelt might have better bridged the divide, and I guarantee I’ll keep trying to be better so long as I hold this office.

But, my fellow Americans, this cannot be my task – or any President’s – alone. There are a whole lot of folks in this chamber who would like to see more cooperation, a more elevated debate in Washington, but feel trapped by the demands of getting elected. I know; you’ve told me. And if we want a better politics, it’s not enough to just change a Congressman or a Senator or even a President; we have to change the system to reflect our better selves.

We have to end the practice of drawing our congressional districts so that politicians can pick their voters, and not the other way around. We have to reduce the influence of money in our politics, so that a handful of families and hidden interests can’t bankroll our elections – and if our existing approach to campaign finance can’t pass muster in the courts, we need to work together to find a real solution. We’ve got to make voting easier, not harder, and modernize it for the way we live now. And over the course of this year, I intend to travel the country to push for reforms that do.

But I can’t do these things on my own. Changes in our political process – in not just who gets elected but how they get elected – that will only happen when the American people demand it. It will depend on you. That’s what’s meant by a government of, by, and for the people.

What I’m asking for is hard. It’s easier to be cynical; to accept that change isn’t possible, and politics is hopeless, and to believe that our voices and actions don’t matter. But if we give up now, then we forsake a better future. Those with money and power will gain greater control over the decisions that could send a young soldier to war, or allow another economic disaster, or roll back the equal rights and voting rights that generations of Americans have fought, even died, to secure. As frustration grows, there will be voices urging us to fall back into tribes, to scapegoat fellow citizens who don’t look like us, or pray like us, or vote like we do, or share the same background.

We can’t afford to go down that path. It won’t deliver the economy we want, or the security we want, but most of all, it contradicts everything that makes us the envy of the world.

So, my fellow Americans, whatever you may believe, whether you prefer one party or no party, our collective future depends on your willingness to uphold your obligations as a citizen. To vote. To speak out. To stand up for others, especially the weak, especially the vulnerable, knowing that each of us is only here because somebody, somewhere, stood up for us. To stay active in our public life so it reflects the goodness and decency and optimism that I see in the American people every single day.

It won’t be easy. Our brand of democracy is hard. But I can promise that a year from now, when I no longer hold this office, I’ll be right there with you as a citizen – inspired by those voices of fairness and vision, of grit and good humor and kindness that have helped America travel so far. Voices that help us see ourselves not first and foremost as black or white or Asian or Latino, not as gay or straight, immigrant or native born; not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans first, bound by a common creed. Voices Dr. King believed would have the final word – voices of unarmed truth and unconditional love.

They’re out there, those voices. They don’t get a lot of attention, nor do they seek it, but they are busy doing the work this country needs doing.

I see them everywhere I travel in this incredible country of ours. I see you. I know you’re there. You’re the reason why I have such incredible confidence in our future. Because I see your quiet, sturdy citizenship all the time.

I see it in the worker on the assembly line who clocked extra shifts to keep his company open, and the boss who pays him higher wages to keep him on board.

I see it in the Dreamer who stays up late to finish her science project, and the teacher who comes in early because he knows she might someday cure a disease

I see it in the American who served his time, and dreams of starting over – and the business owner who gives him that second chance. The protester determined to prove that justice matters, and the young cop walking the beat, treating everybody with respect, doing the brave, quiet work of keeping us safe.

I see it in the soldier who gives almost everything to save his brothers, the nurse who tends to him ‘til he can run a marathon, and the community that lines up to cheer him on.

It’s the son who finds the courage to come out as who he is, and the father whose love for that son overrides everything he’s been taught.

I see it in the elderly woman who will wait in line to cast her vote as long as she has to; the new citizen who casts his for the first time; the volunteers at the polls who believe every vote should count, because each of them in different ways know how much that precious right is worth.

That’s the America I know. That’s the country we love. Clear-eyed. Big-hearted. Optimistic that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word. That’s what makes me so hopeful about our future. Because of you. I believe in you. That’s why I stand here confident that the State of our Union is strong.

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

Both Sides Pile On Trump At State Of The Union

$
0
0

Pool / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump wasn’t mentioned by name, but both President Obama and the Republican Party’s chosen face on State of the Union night, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, offered dire warnings about what could happen to America if he isn’t stopped.

Obama’s address was divided into “four questions” about the future of America. The most important one, White House communications director Jen Psaki said before the speech, was the section on the political discourse in America. Though Psaki and other aides stressed that the speech was not about any specific politician or even focused on the raging presidential race at all, the theme mentioned over and over was “optimism.”

“The president believes this is the greatest country on earth,” said Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s senior adviser.

The subtext was not subtle. And on Tuesday night, Obama warned that the continuing frustration in the country is letting rhetoric like Trump’s ascend.

“As frustration grows, there will be voices urging us to fall back into tribes, to scapegoat fellow citizens who don’t look like us, or pray like us, or vote like we do, or share the same background,” Obama said. “We can’t afford to go down that path. It won’t deliver the economy we want, or the security we want, but most of all, it contradicts everything that makes us the envy of the world.”

In a speech mostly focused on a big picture take on America and the Obama years, the president defended Muslims against Trump-style criticism.

“When politicians insult Muslims, when a mosque is vandalized, or a kid bullied, that doesn’t make us safer. That’s not telling it like it is. It’s just wrong,” Obama said in the prepared version of the speech sent to reporters. “It diminishes us in the eyes of the world. It makes it harder to achieve our goals. And it betrays who we are as a country.”

Haley’s Republican remarks cast a similar tone, defending immigration using her personal story as a first generation Indian American. Immigration has defined the Trump campaign from the start of his campaign through his recent call to deny any Muslim entry to the United States.

“Immigrants have been coming to our shores for generations to live the dream that is America,” she said. “Today, we live in a time of threats like few others in recent memory. During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices. We must resist that temptation. No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love our traditions should ever feel unwelcome in this country.”

Washington’s leaders, for the most part, have steered clear of Trump. As the New York businessman has risen in the polls, Republican leaders in Congress have given him a wide berth, preferring to focus on governing. The White House, eager to remain the center of attention even as the campaign season gets louder and louder, has by and large avoided daily battles with Trump (with some notable exceptions).

But on Tuesday, surrounded by the full pomp and circumstance of the American political establishment, the focus was on Trump.

Ted Cruz Calls Elian Gonzalez Saga "A Sad Day For America"

$
0
0

“You saw the federal government sending stormtroopers with machine guns to grab a six-year-child whose mother had died trying to give him freedom and instead for us to send him back to Fidel Castro.”

Alan Diaz / AP

w.soundcloud.com

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz emphasized on a podcast on Tuesday his policy on immigration would be to deport those in the country illegally while adding he believes it was wrong for the Clinton administration to send Elian Gonzalzes — the child famously at the center of a heated custody battle between his Cuban father and Miami-based relatives — back to Cuba in 2000.

Cruz made the comments speaking to Fox News podcaster Todd Starnes in the context of his recent comments that he wouldn't have a deportation force to remove undocumented immigrants but would have law enforcement remove lawbreakers.

"The media are who they are," he told Starnes. "They have their agenda and they try to push it. I think any conservative has to understand that, and just be willing to speak the truth with a smile. At the same time in that, there was astonishment expressed when I said that we should enforce the law. Like why would the president possibility enforce the law? For me, I'm a Constitutionalist. The Constitution is my touchstone. Article II of the Constitution says the president must quote 'take care to faithfully enforce the law.' Federal immigration law says if someone is apprehended here illegally, they must be deported."

"As president that's exactly what I'm gonna do, I'm gonna enforce the law. We are going to deport those here illegally, secure the borders, and keep this country safe," he continued. "And that astonishes many in the media but it should be the president's responsibility, especially in an age of terror."

Cruz emphasized the frontline of terror was both in airports and the southern border. Turning to Gonzalez, who was returned to Cuba after a long custody battle, the Texas senator emphasized the episode as a sad chapter in American history.

"I suspect you are referring to Elian Gonzalez, who they actually sent goons in to snatch a six-year-old boy and wrongly return him to an oppressive Communist dictatorship. That was a sad day for America when you saw the federal government sending stormtroopers with machine guns to grab a six-year-child whose mother had died trying to give him freedom and instead for us to send him back to Fidel Castro."

Carly Fiorina Slams Nikki Haley's Speech: "It Was The Wrong Note"

$
0
0

The former NRSC vice chair also spoke out against the professional political class.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

w.soundcloud.com

Former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina said South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley hit the "wrong note" in her response to President Obama's State of the Union address.

After radio host Mike Gallagher took Haley's speech to task for saying the Republican Party shouldn't give in to the angriest voices on immigration, Fiorina responded, "Look I don't speak for Nikki Haley and she doesn't speak for me. I think you're correct that it was the wrong note."

Fiorina then transitioned to slamming President Obama's message in the address to the nation.

"Look, let's be clear, the GOP has an establishment, a political class, just like the DNC has an establishment and a political class," added Fiorina, the former NRSC vice chair and Senate candidate. "I'm running against it. I got out there and talk everyday to Americans that it is time to take our country back, and our country back, and our government back and our future back. And we're not gonna do that by electing another politician."

In her speech on Tuesday evening the South Carolina governor urged calm in her party on the issue of immigration.

"Immigrants have been coming to our shores for generations to live the dream that is America," Haley said. "Today, we live in a time of threats like few others in recent memory. During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices. We must resist that temptation. No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love our traditions should ever feel unwelcome in this country."

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images