Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

Obama Announces Trade Talks Between U.S. And Europe In State Of The Union

$
0
0

A considerable portion of the speech was devoted to foreign policy.

Image by Pool photo by Charles Dharapak/AP via Abaca Press/MCT

WASHINGTON –– President Obama announced that the U.S. will launch trade talks with the European Union during his State of the Union address on Tuesday. His speech devoted a considerable amount of space to foreign policy, ranging on topics from Afghanistan to Iran to global poverty and AIDS.

"To boost American exports, support American jobs, and level the playing field in the growing markets of Asia, we intend to complete negotiations on a Trans-Pacific Partnership," Obama said, according to a prepared copy of the speech. "And tonight, I am announcing that we will launch talks on a comprehensive Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union – because trade that is free and fair across the Atlantic supports millions of good-paying American jobs."

Reuters reported on Monday that the president was expected to call for the talks to begin.

Obama also directly addressed the nuclear test that North Korea conducted on Tuesday.

"The regime in North Korea must know that they will only achieve security and prosperity by meeting their international obligations," Obama said. "Provocations of the sort we saw last night will only isolate them further, as we stand by our allies, strengthen our own missile defense, and lead the world in taking firm action in response to these threats."

The passage of the speech dealing with North Korea served as segue into Iran, which Obama said, "must recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution, because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet their obligations, and we will do what is necessary to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon." He called on Russia to help the U.S. reduce nuclear arsenals around the world.

Obama avoided any firm stances on Syria, saying, "We will keep the pressure on a
Syrian regime that has murdered its own people, and support opposition leaders that respect the rights of every Syrian."

Obama announced a partial troop drawdown in Afghanistan, calling for half of the U.S. forces to return by next year.

The president also drew attention to less front-burner foreign policy issues, like climate change: "Four years ago, other countries dominated the clean energy market and the jobs that came with it. We've begun to change that. . . As long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we."

Additionally, Obama addressed poverty, AIDS, and women's rights – issues that became more prominent and pressing diplomatic issues during Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State: "The United States will join with our allies to eradicate such extreme poverty in the next two decades: by connecting more people to the global economy and empowering women; by giving our young and brightest minds new opportunities to serve and helping communities to feed, power, and educate themselves; by saving the world's children from preventable deaths; and by realizing the promise of an AIDS-free generation."


Joe Biden Has Had It With Obama's Jokes

50 Years Ago, JFK's Final State Of The Union Speech Was Pretty Similar To Obama's

$
0
0

And then, like now, everyone talked about the first lady's clothes. JFK talked about jobs, the economy, and weapons

In his State of the Union opening, President Obama referenced JFK's State of the Union speech 50 years ago. The two presidents shared a few main talking points.

Tonight, at his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama will speak about the economy, jobs, the environment and weapons.

50 years ago, during his final State of the Union address on January 14, 1963, President John F. Kennedy spoke on the same topics, but times were different. He was ramping up nuclear weapons, not reducing the stockpile. And the environmental topic of choice wasn't climate change: It was forests. But the president was looking to create jobs then, too. And the country couldn't keep its eyes off the style choices of his wife. Some things never change.

Via: jfklibrary.org

Job creation

Job creation

Via: jfklibrary.org

"No doubt a massive increase in Federal spending could also create jobs and growth-but, in today's setting, private consumers, employers, and investors should be given a full opportunity first," Kennedy said.


View Entire List ›

John Boehner Looks At His Boogers During The State Of The Union

$
0
0

The Speaker saw a winner.

It started with a cough from the Speaker.

It started with a cough from the Speaker.

Image by Dorsey Shaw/Buzzfeed

Getting worse.

Getting worse.

Image by Dorsey Shaw/Buzzfeed

Then the crucial moment.

Then the crucial moment.

Image by Dorsey Shaw/Buzzfeed

And the world watched.

And the world watched.


View Entire List ›

Rand Paul Calls For Sequester And Immigration Reform In Tea Party Response To SOTU

$
0
0

Paul gives the second and less official of two Republican responses to the State of the Union.

Senate Foreign Relations member Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. questions Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, during Kerry's confirmation hearing before the committee to replace Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. (AP Photo/J.

Image by J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Rand Paul is supporting the idea of sequester, embracing immigration reform, and calling for a balanced budget amendment in the Tea Party address to the State of the Union on Tuesday. The speech, which Paul is delivering after the official Republican response given by Senator Marco Rubio, goes further to position Paul as the conservative-libertarian option in 2016.

"Not only should the sequester stand, many pundits say the sequester really needs to be at least $4 trillion to avoid another downgrade of America's credit rating," Paul says in his speech, according to prepared remarks sent by his office. "Both parties will have to agree to cut, or we will never fix our fiscal mess."

Paul's address is carefully outsider-y, slamming lawmakers on both sides for inefficiency and waste.

"Demand Washington change their ways, or be sent home," Paul says. "To begin with, we absolutely must pass a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution!"

The balanced budget amendment is something that Rubio, around whom speculation of a presidential run swirls, also called for in his speech. Paul promises to announce a five-year balanced budget plan next month.

Paul is supporting being more accepting of immigrants in his speech, saying "We are the party that embraces hard work and ingenuity, therefore we must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future."

"We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities."

The speech also touches on Paul's foreign policy stances, demanding the stoppage of arms sales to Egypt and "ending all foreign aid to countries that are burning our flag and chanting death to America."

In the speech, Paul hits a few of the Tea Party's favorite subjects, like school choice and preventing tax hikes.

He also has some choice words for the President on gun control and the civil liberties: "We cannot and will not allow any President to act as if he were a king. We will not let any President use executive orders to impinge on the Second Amendment. We will not tolerate secret lists of American citizens who can be killed without trial."

Diane Sawyer References Japanese Kabuki Theatre, Slurs Words

$
0
0

The ABC anchor has previously been accused of being drunk during newscasts. After the State of the Union address, she referenced Japanese performance art.

View Video ›

Image by

And the world wondered...

And the world wondered...


View Entire List ›

Marco Rubio Has A WTF Moment With Water On Live Television

$
0
0

Refreshing.

The cameras came on and the senator from Florida was all like:

The cameras came on and the senator from Florida was all like:

Image by Dorsey Shaw/Buzzfeed

"I'm thirsty people."

"I'm thirsty people."

"This is delicious."

"This is delicious."

Image by Dorsey Shaw/Buzzfeed

"Ummm, wait."

"Ummm, wait."


View Entire List ›

Everyone On Twitter Made The Exact Same Joke About Marco Rubio's Water Break

$
0
0

The fall of western civilization is complete.

Tonight Marco Rubio did this:

Tonight Marco Rubio did this:

And then this happens:

And then this happens:


Jewish Democrats Blast Marco Rubio For Not Mentioning Israel

$
0
0

“Jewish Democrats are proud to stand with President Obama and his second term priorities that put support for Israel.”

Image by J. Scott Applewhite / AP

WASHINGTON — The National Jewish Democratic Council issued a statement criticizing Sen. Marco Rubio for leaving Israel out of their responses to President Barack Obama's State of the Union address.

"Speaking on behalf of the Republican Party, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) neglected to even say one word in support of Israel or our nation's efforts to stop Iran's nuclear weapons program," said Aaron Keyak, the group's executive director, in a statement that will be distributed to reporters late Tuesday. "President Obama was clear that we must stand steadfast with Israel in pursuit of security and a lasting peace, and do what is necessary to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon."

Obama mentioned Israel just once in his remarks to a Joint Session of Congress.

"And we will stand steadfast with Israel in pursuit of security and a lasting peace," Obama said, alluding to his visit to the region next month.

"Jewish Democrats are proud to stand with President Obama and his second term priorities that put support for Israel and preventing a nuclear Iran at the top of his foreign policy agenda," Keyak added. "Republicans should support President Obama and his strong leadership on these important issues -- or at least mention them when they choose to give a broad national address."

And unlike Rubio, Obama mentioned Iran, saying: "Likewise, the leaders of Iran must recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution, because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet their obligations, and we will do what is necessary to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon."

Bored Ted Nugent Slams Obama's Gun Control Plans

$
0
0

“Who doesn't know that… the color of guns has anything to do with saving lives and reducing crime?” the philosopher rock legend asks.

Image by Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Aging rocker Ted Nugent may have avoided making a spectacle during President Barack Obama's State of the Union address much to the chagrin in the scores of reporters on hand, but he had harsh words for the administration's gun control plans after the speech.

Invited to the State of the Union by Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman, Nugent sat in the far back corner of the visitor's gallery during the address. Although he respectfully rose to his feet when Obama first came into the chamber, he spent the rest of the speech firmly planted in his chair, a decidedly bored look on his face.

Nugent said he received a warm welcome in the nation's Capitol, despite the fact that he had threatened the president during last year's election and there were questions about how he would be treated by law enforcement tasked with protecting Obama and Congress.

"I love Washington D.C., I've always rock 'n rolled here, people love rock n roll here. I love coming to Washington D.C." Nugent said, adding, "See the smile on my face? I have a lot of friends here … who give me a whole lot of back slappin' and attaboys for speaking up on their behalf."

But when it came to gun control proposals, he didn't mince words.

"Its more nonsense. Nothing he proposes or nothing he's been proposed would have stopped any of the shootings. None of those shooters are gonna register anything," Nugent said as dozens of reporters huddled around the conservative agitator just off the House floor.

"Canada finally abandoned its multibillion waste of a C68 gun law where goose hunters and farmers had to register their squirrel rifles. And it didn't do anything to reduce crime or save any lives."

"Who doesn't know this? Who doesn't know that registration and limitation on magazine capacity and the color of guns has anything to do with saving lives and reducing crime?" the "Nuge" argued, before his handler whisked him away for a television interview.

Marco Rubio Tweets A Photo Of His Water Bottle

$
0
0

And his staff says he wrote the tweet himself.

After Sen. Marco Rubio did this on live television:

After Sen. Marco Rubio did this on live television:

Source: s3-ec.buzzfed.com

Marco Rubio Shrugs Off Climate Change In State Of The Union Response

$
0
0

“Government can't control the weather.” Climate activists in Florida were hopeful for a different outcome.

Delivering the official Republican response to the State of the Union, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio dismissed climate change as a challenge beyond government "control," and disappointed environmental activists in the Senator's home state hopeful that Rubio would acknowledge the issue given top billing in President Barack Obama's speech.

"When we point out that no matter how many job-killing laws we pass, our government can't control the weather — [President Obama] accuses us of wanting dirty water and dirty air," said Rubio, who gave the live televised address from the House Speaker's Conference Room.

Rubio's speech also made reference to clean energy sources such as solar and wind energy, but added, "God also blessed America with abundant coal, oil, and natural gas."

The Florida Senator also dismissed climate change as a challenge too large for government in an interview with BuzzFeed earlier this month. "Anything that we would do on [climate change] would have a real impact on our economy, but probably, if it was only us [the U.S.] doing it, a very negligible impact on the environment," Rubio said.

Climate change advocates in Florida were hopeful that Rubio's address would not only name climate change as one of the nation's top challenges, but acknowledge it as a man-made phenomenon. Members of Florida's Sierra Club delivered a letter Tuesday to the Senator's home office in Miami, urging Rubio to address the "thousands of Floridians who are being forced to protect their homes, businesses and livelihoods from the effects of climate change," read the letter.

"The economy of Florida is so tied to what happens to climate change that we're talking about the loss of our coastal areas," said Jonathan Ullman of the Sierra Club's South Florida chapter.

Ullman, who spoke to BuzzFeed by phone before Rubio's address, said, "We hope in his speech he acknowledges it, and acknowledges that it's man-made. I'm sure he's written the speech already, but he can stop the presses — there's still time."

Ullman said that Rubio's South Florida regional director, Alyn Cruz Higgins, promised the Sierra Club's letter would get passed along to Washington.

View Video ›

LGBT Advocates Give Obama A Pass For A Night

$
0
0

Scant reference of LGBT rights during the State of the Union, but advocates remain hopeful. “He laid out a vision,” one advocate says.

President Barack Obama has addressed the Human Rights Campaign multiple times since being elected president.

Image by Yuri Gripas-Pool / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Although President Barack Obama did not mention specific actions he would take to advance LGBT rights in the coming year during Tuesday's State of the Union address, most advocates appeared ready to give the president a pass — for the night.

Obama did include broad references to LGBT equality in the speech, saying that part of "the basic bargain" in America is that "if you work hard and meet your responsibilities, you can get ahead, no matter where you come from, no matter what you look like, or who you love."

He most directly addressed an area of LGBT advocates' concern when he later said, "We will ensure equal treatment for all service members, and equal benefits for their families — gay and straight."

Those mentions were enough to appease LGBT advocates, especially given the prominence their issues received in Obama's Inaugural address in January.

"Of course, we would have liked to have seen our community's priorities in the speech," Human Rights Campaign's spokesman, Fred Sainz, told BuzzFeed. "But let me be clear: the references in the speech were meaningful. Both reaffirm his commitment to equality in ways that are substantively and thematically important."

Advocates do, however, expect specific efforts to follow tonight's broad brushstrokes, from action on stopping anti-LGBT job discrimination, to supporting gay and lesbian couples asking the Supreme Court to strike down California's Proposition 8, to opening the military to out transgender service.

"The president has the power to issue an executive order banning companies that contract with the federal government from discriminating in employment based on sexual orientation and gender identity. This is a direct and immediate action he can take that will help millions of Americans," National Gay & Lesbian Task Force executive director Rea Carey said in a statement, adding that he "should also exert pressure on Congress to finally pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act."

Richard Socarides, a former adviser to President Clinton on LGBT issues who has been critical at times of the pace of progress by the Obama administration, issued both praise — and a checklist: "I think the inaugural address was so broadly thematic and aspirational and gay rights was so central in it that we are pretty much estopped from complaining about the State of the Union, but I hope that President is planning to soon sign the ENDA-related executive order and file a brief in the Proposition 8 case. I think he will do both soon."

On the marriage front, Freedom to Marry president Evan Wolfson said activists, as well as the president, have work to do in the coming months.

"I'm still riding high on his historic Inaugural Address exaltation of the freedom to marry, and focused on the work we need to do to win more states and continue winning over more hearts minds. That's how we maximize our chances of winning in court and beyond," Wolfson told BuzzFeed Tuesday night.

Noting this week's action by the Pentagon to extend same-sex domestic partner benefits, OutServe-SLDN executive director Allyson Robinson said more must be done. "To finish the task, the Supreme Court must strike down the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. Secretary Panetta's successor must enact equal opportunity and non-discrimination policies that protect LGBT troops and ensure America's military can attract and retain America's best. And outmoded, obsolete policies that bar qualified American patriots who are transgender from military service must be eliminated."

Not everyone was satisfied with Obama's overall performance, meaning Obama had some LGBT critics Tuesday night — on the left and the right.

GetEqual, which led a protest outside the White House Sunday night urging action on the executive order, pushed back again at Obama's inaction on that front. "He had his pen out today to sign other Executive Orders — it's incumbent on the LGBT community to ask why he decided to put that pen away before protecting 25% of the American workforce from workplace discrimination," GetEqual managing director Heather Cronk said in a statement.

"As LGBT conservatives, Log Cabin Republicans is pleased with recent progress toward equality for gay and lesbian Americans. If the President truly wants to be an ally to our community, he will not only continue pushing for social equality, but stop with the platitudes and get serious with a plan that addresses our nation's fiscal problems," Gregory T. Angelo, Log Cabin Republicans interim executive director said in a statement.

Center for American Progress vice president for external affairs Winnie Stachelberg, who generally has been a strong supporter of the administration, defended the president, telling BuzzFeed, "I think there's a comfort level, there's an acknowledgment of the integration of LGBT issues into the American frame. I think the president today, he painted a picture, rather than issuing a set of proposals. He laid out a vision, and we were part of that vision in a very integral way. Now, we need to start getting things done and engaging. I'm up to the task, and the people in the LGBT community are as well."

HRC's Sainz echoed that, saying of Tuesday night's speech, "This President has done a lot for LGBT people but one of his greatest legacies will be the unapologetic way in which he has included LGBT people when speaking about our country and the way it should afford opportunity to all."

The Future Of The Republican Party Is By The Pool At The Biltmore

$
0
0

The talk at the Miami hotel, where Jeb Bush works and Marco Rubio works out, is of the next president. But can the young senator get out from under Jeb’s shadow?

Image by John Gara/Buzzfeed

CORAL GABLES, Fla. — As a teenager in the late 1980s, Marco Rubio's favorite place to get drunk with his high school buddies was the golf course surrounding the Biltmore Hotel, a towering Mediterranean-style structure at the center of town. A decade later, the young lawyer and his wife Jeanette spent their wedding night in one of the Biltmore's suites. On election night in 2010, Rubio celebrated his unlikely election to the United States Senate in one of the Biltmore's ballrooms.

And sometime this year, the swirling circle of donors, activists, and politicos who spend their evenings gossiping at the Biltmore's bar will decide whether Rubio gets a chance to become president in 2016 — or whether that honor should be given to Miami Republicans' other favorite son, former Florida governor Jeb Bush.

In the months that have followed the 2012 election, the Biltmore, a 400-room luxury resort surrounded by banyan trees, has emerged as a national center of gravity for Republican politics: a must-stop for campaign fundraisers, and a favorite vacation spot for retired presidents. Bush runs his foundation out of an office at the hotel, and Rubio, who lives just a few miles away, has been spotted at the hotel gym's morning spin classes.

It has become a matter of social survival here to develop a playful non-answer when asked which candidate one would support if both men decided to run for president in 2016, something Ana Navarro knows better than anyone. A high-profile Republican strategist, longtime girlfriend to the Biltmore's owner, and an avowed friend and ally to both Rubio and Bush, Navarro described a Rubio vs. Bush face-off as "the nightmare scenario for everyone here."

"I'd get into the fetal position and lock myself in a room for nine months," she said. "That just cannot happen… If we have to all lock ourselves in the Biltmore until white smoke comes out and we pick one, that's what we will do."

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, who represents Florida's 25th district and considers both Bush and Rubio friends, had his own quip ready when asked how he'd react.

"If they both run? I think it would be a great ticket!" he exclaimed. When his joke was met with a beat of silence, he insisted, "That's my quote, and that's as much as I'm gonna say."

But not everyone is so bashful about stating loyalties.

On a sunny Sunday afternoon in December, Jeb Bush Jr. sat at a poolside table a few hundred yards from the office where his father plots his political future, and, between sips of Diet Coke, offered his view of the immigration landscape, eagerly name-checking high-profile Republicans he expected to work on the issue.

"You've got the old guard — Lindsey Graham, John McCain — but what will be really interesting to see is where [Texas Senator] Ted Cruz comes out on this issue," Bush said. "He's a Tea Party guy, but he's really nice. I mean, he's, you know, really bright, very intelligent, and also comes from Cuban descent."

Conspicuously missing from his list: another Cuban-American Tea Party star who happened to live a few miles away. Wouldn't Rubio be a leader on immigration?

"I hope so," Bush said. "He's got to actually execute and get something done rather than just talking."

In the political soap opera that is today's Republican Party, the younger Bush's not-so-veiled swipe at Rubio could be viewed as a juicy plot twist in the winding narrative arc that leads to the 2016 presidential primaries. (Rubio declined to comment on the jab.) But Bush was also giving voice to a sentiment that had been growing in his hometown ever since Rubio took office in 2010.

On the cover of Time magazine, Rubio is the "Republican Savior." On Capitol Hill, he is the lynchpin holding together a potentially historic effort to overhaul the nation's immigration system. And on Tuesday night, he will be his party's anointed standard-bearer when he goes on live TV and delivers the GOP's response to President Obama's State of the Union address in two languages.

But at the Biltmore, Rubio is just "Marco," a baby-faced freshman senator with lots of potential — and a maddening reluctance to live up to it.

While the senator's top-notch handlers have worked overtime to cast his recent foray into immigration reform as a courageous move by a conservative visionary, the portrait painted by his more impatient constituents is that of an overly cautious politician acutely aware of his national profile, and desperate not to tarnish his impeccable brand.

No man is a prophet in his own land — especially when he hails from the Biltmore Hotel.

"Do you want to see my Bush shrine?"

Navarro gestures toward the far end of her ornately decorated living room, where a shelf displays about half a dozen framed photos of her with various members of the Bush family.

Ana Navarro laughing on a tarmac with 41.

Ana Navarro posing in a group shot with Dubya.

Ana Navarro grinning alongside Jeb.

And one in the back, mostly covered by the rest, that stands out: Ana Navarro smiling at the camera next to Bill Clinton.

"We only bring that one out when Gene has Democrats over," she says.

"Gene" is Gene Prescott, the Biltmore's proprietor and the Democratic fundraiser who shares an expensive Spanish revival — along with a Mercedes and high-end golf cart parked out front — with Navarro in the palm-lined Miami suburb of Coral Gables. Prescott bought the shuttered Biltmore, which had once hosted the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, Bing Crosby, Judy Garland, and Al Capone in 1992. Within four years, he had convinced Bill Clinton to hold a summit of Latin-American leaders at the hotel, and kept luring him back for vacations and fundraisers; now he and Navarro have turned it into a bipartisan hub of the political money circuit, and the collection of Beltway boldface names that have graced the hotel's guest list over the years is among the couple's proudest achievements, and Navarro — who co-chaired Senator John McCain's Hispanic Advisory Council in 2008 — takes obvious pleasure in showing it off.

"It's not uncommon to go down to the breakfast area and see Nancy Pelosi meeting with someone, or John McCain holding court in the lobby," she boasts. "One time, George W. Bush and Harry Reid were here on the same night for different events. I thought I was going to have a heart attack."

The hotel's political relevance is only likely to increase in coming months, as it stages one of the most crucial plots in the Republican resurrection story: the awkward 2016 tango performed by Rubio and Bush.

With their shared passion for immigration reform, overlapping donor networks, and long, healthy alliance, Rubio and Bush have put Miami's political class in the improbable position of having two "favorite sons" in the top tier of 2016 speculation — and sources say both men are actively mulling it.

More than one Republican operative in the state said a Rubio vs. Bush face-off could engulf the south Florida GOP in a civil war that would take years to fully recover from.

Both men know that, of course, and their many mutual friends expect them to negotiate an arrangement in some remote corner the Biltmore well before announcements are made. What's less clear is which man will end up standing at a podium two years from now announcing his candidacy, and which man will be standing in the background, clapping politely.

To the national punditocracy, the question seems almost absurd. Of course Rubio, with his magazine covers, well-delivered hip-hop references, and youthful charisma, will beat out the old, fat, white guy who's been out of office for five years and shares a last name with one of the most unpopular presidents in modern history.

But the Biltmore crowd isn't so sure. Spend some time chatting with the local politicos here, and you get the sense that Rubio is still viewed as the kid straining to fill out an oversized suit, not quite ready for the grown-ups' table.

Late last December, the Tampa Bay Times polled a bipartisan group of the state's most "plugged-in political players," and, strikingly, most of them believed Bush would run and Rubio would sit 2016 out. What's more, an overwhelming majority — 82% — said Bush would be a stronger candidate.

"Rubio will make 2016 noises and preparations to increase his profile and lay the stage for himself in case Jeb doesn't run. But if Jeb does decide to run, he will step aside… Jeb Bush is heads and shoulders above Rubio, literally," one Republican wrote in the survey.

Similarly, a Democrat wrote of Rubio, "He's done the canned policy speeches at Heritage, done the roundtables at National Review. What is unclear is how he accumulates gravitas between now and 2014 when the GOP race will formalize. That is not a problem for Jeb."

Their predictions could be wrong of course, and any number of signs — including a report last week that Bush recently tried to buy the Miami Marlins — would seem to indicate that Rubio is taking this somewhat more seriously than Bush. But hometown perceptions matter in national politics, especially when you hope to raise enough money there to kick off a serious presidential campaign.

And even Navarro — while insisting "we're not going to have to pick between Jeb and Marco" — seemed to suggest that, if she did, she'd choose the former.

"It would be as painful as picking between two of your children," she said. "But time is a factor. Marco has plenty of time. Jeb doesn't. There's stopping Marco from being ready by 2016. Jeb is ready now. He's been ready for years, and we've been ready and waiting."

The prevailing complaint among Rubio's Republican critics here is that he has allowed an obsessive preoccupation with his public image to keep him from growing into the leader they want him to be.

One exasperated Republican recalled spending close to an hour listening to Rubio agonize over a National Journal article that criticized how his leadership PAC was spending its funds. The Republican tried to reason with the senator that "no one outside D.C. will care about this," but it was useless.

"He just lets these little things get to him, and he worries too much," the Republican said. "I'm just like, 'Marco, calm down.'"

Jeb Bush, on the other hand, has managed to adopt a certain cavalier, politics-be-damned attitude in the years since he left the governor's office that's endeared him to the insiders, vocally championing liberal immigration reform, lobbing bombs at his own party when he thinks they deserve it, and responding to media speculation about his presidential aspirations with a too-cool-for-school shrug.

"I think Jeb laid low on purpose when his brother was president because he understood that anything he said would ricochet back to his brother, or vice versa," said Navarro. "But in these last few years, we've had Jeb Bush unplugged, and it's so fun."

This contrast hasn't escaped Miami's Republicans, one of whom compared Rubio's meticulous care for his public image to Bush's apparent indifference by describing a pair of recent visits by New York Times reporters.

"When Jim Rutenberg came down here to do a profile, Jeb blew him off. When Mark Leibovich came down, Marco took him to a Dolphins game," the Republican said.

Bush's son, Jeb Jr., seemed to relish the distinction when asked about it in December.

"Marco's gotta be careful," he explained. "My dad can kind of say whatever he wants because he's not running for anything."

Not yet, anyway.


View Entire List ›

Karl Rove Huddles With House Republican Leaders

$
0
0

Even as he wars with the Tea Party, George W. Bush's political Svengali briefs House Republicans on the ways of messaging.

Image by Frederick M. Brown / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Republican strategist Karl Rove huddled with a group of House GOP leaders in the office Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy Thursday morning to discuss the party's messaging efforts, Republicans familiar with the meeting said.

Details of Rove's presentation to a group of McCarthy's "whip team" — a subset of the broader conference tasked with educating the rank and file, rounding up votes on key bills and generally enforcing discipline within Republican ranks.

Following the meeting, several lawmakers could be heard instructing staff to setup meetings with Rove.

Rove has been locked in a battle with conservatives over the last several weeks after he announced that he would use his Conservative Victory Project Super PAC to back "electable" Republicans in primaries during the 2014 election cycle. Tea Party activists took those comments as a direct attack on their movement. Mainstream Republicans have become increasingly unhappy with the Tea Party because of its use of primaries to oust moderate Republicans, which has ultimately meant a loss in the general election to Democrats.

Rove's trip to Capitol Hill may not be met with enthusiasm from every Republican. Rep. Steve King, one of the House's most vocal conservative firebrands, has been eyeing a run to replace Sen. Tom Harkin now that the veteran Iowa Democrat is resigning.

King is in many ways the sort of conservative candidate that makes the party's establishment nervous about the coming general election, and King told the Iowa Republican earlier this month his is now strongly considering a run — in part as a response to Rove.

"If I would back up in front of Karl Rove's initiative, that would just empower him, and he would go on state after state, candidate after candidate," King told the Republican.


John Boehner Sexes It Up For Valentine's Day

Boy Scouts "Will Not Employ Atheists, Agnostics, Known Or Avowed Homosexuals," According To Form

$
0
0

Some people will have a tough time working for the Boy Scouts, according to this employment application obtained by the Human Rights Campaign.

Image by Tim Sharp / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Human Rights Campaign released a Boy Scouts of America job application Thursday outlining BSA's employment policy forbidding the hiring of "known or avowed homosexuals."

The form, dated as the "2003 Printing," was obtained by HRC, and the Boy Scouts organization has not responded to a request for comment on whether the application is still in use.

According to the application, "the Boy Scouts of America will not employ atheists, agnostics, known or avowed homosexuals, or others as professional Scouters or in other capacities in which such employment would tend to interfere with its mission of reinforcing the values of the Scout Oath and the Scout Law in young people."

It is not surprising, given that the language is, more or less, an assertion of the right that the Boy Scouts fought to the Supreme Court in 2000 to be able to maintain among its members and leaders.

As quoted by the Supreme Court when James Dale challenged the Scouts' exclusion of him as an assistant scoutmaster, the Boy Scouts policy, as of 1993, was, "The Boy Scouts of America has always reflected the expectations that Scouting families have had for the organization. We do not believe that homosexuals provide a role model consistent with these expectations. Accordingly, we do not allow for the registration of avowed homosexuals as members or as leaders of the BSA."

The employment policy, however, is notable, given that the Boy Scouts exists in areas where discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs or sexual orientation are illegal for most employers.

Elsewhere, the application does note that felony convictions are "not an automatic bar to employment."

What The Boy Scouts Will Not Accept:

What The Boy Scouts Will Not Accept:

What The Boy Scouts Will Accept:

What The Boy Scouts Will Accept:


View Entire List ›

Hagel Spoke Of Cooperation With Iran In 2007 Speech

$
0
0

According to the Free Beacon Hagel allegedly said during the Q&A after the speech the State Department was adjunct to the Israeli Foreign Minister’s office. The prepared text accessed via a Nexis search of press releases from his old Senate website does not include the Q&A, but does include praise for U.S. cooperation with Iran in Afghanistan. [[Update]] Chuck Hagel's 2008 speech to the ADC, also sought by conservatives is at the bottom of this post as well.

In the speech at Rutgers, delivered in 2007, Hagel suggested reopening a U.S. consulate in Tehran. He also offered his view that the U.S. could find ways to work with Iran, based on "clear-eyed" common interest:

Iran has cooperated with the United States on Afghanistan to help the Afghans establish a new government after the Taliban was ousted. Iran continues to invest heavily in the reconstruction of western Afghanistan.

On Afghanistan, the United States and Iran found common interests - defeating the Taliban and Islamic radicals, stabilizing Afghanistan, stopping the opium production and the flow of opium coming into Iran. From these common interests emerged common actions working toward a common purpose. It was in the interests of Iran to work with the U.S. in Afghanistan. It was not a matter of helping America or strengthening America's presence in Central Asia. It was a clear-eyed and self-serving action for Iran.

Here's the full text of the speech:

"I want to speak today about a subject that I know is very much on the minds of Americans...and the world...America's relationship with the Middle East and in particular Iran. This relationship is at the center of some of the most important strategic challenges that America faces today and in the future...energy security...America's relationship with the Islamic world...and the future of the greater Middle East.

Today, the Middle East is more combustible and dangerous than any time in modern history. It is experiencing political upheaval driven by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, religious and ethnic differences, radical Islamic fundamentalism, terrorism, despair and the war in Iraq.

Forces and events in the Middle East cannot be neatly categorized. The swirl of Middle East history creates layers upon layers of complexity. There is little transparency in the Middle East. That is a reality that is inescapable and cannot be assumed away. To ignore this reality is to risk being trapped by false choices....false choices such as the question, 'which is worse - Iran with nuclear weapons or war with Iran?'

These are not our only choices in dealing with the Middle East and Iran. Diplomatic initiatives, UN mandates, regional cooperation, security frameworks, and economic incentives are part of the mix of international possibilities that must be employed to comprehensively address the challenges of the Middle East.

The United States must approach the Middle East with a clear understanding of the complexities of the region. Our strategic policies must be regional in scope...integrating Iran, Iraq, Syria, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, violent Islamic extremism, access to energy supplies, and political reform into a comprehensive policy equation. This should be developed through consultation, cooperation, and coordination with our regional allies Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Israel. This will require a new regional diplomatic and economic framework to work within...a new Middle East frame of reference.

On Tuesday, the Bush Administration announced a critical step forward by agreeing to participate in the two upcoming regional security conferences being organized by Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki. Iran and Syria have also agreed to participate in these conferences. I support the Administration's decision and have advocated such a diplomatic initiative for three years. There will be no stability in Iraq and the Middle East without the involvement of all of the nations of the Middle East.

It will be very important that the U.S. follow-through from the conferences be comprehensive, sustained, and at the highest levels of our government... including the direct involvement of President Bush at the appropriate time.

In the Middle East of the 21st Century, Iran will be a key center of gravity...a significant regional power. The United States cannot change that reality. America's strategic 21st century regional policy for the Middle East must acknowledge the role of Iran today and over the next 25 years.

To acknowledge that reality in no way confuses Iran's dangerous, destabilizing and threatening behavior in the region. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism and provides material support to Hezbollah, Hamas and other terrorist groups. Iran publicly threatens Israel and is developing the capacity to produce nuclear weapons. Iran has not helped stabilize the current chaos in Iraq and is responsible for weapons and explosives being used against U.S. and Iraqi military forces in Iraq.

Iran must be held accountable for its actions. These actions by Iran are one part of a complicated picture of a country with a three thousand year history, governed by a complex and opaque political structure, burdened by a stagnating economy, and located in a geostrategically unstable region.

Iran has cooperated with the United States on Afghanistan to help the Afghans establish a new government after the Taliban was ousted. Iran continues to invest heavily in the reconstruction of western Afghanistan.
On Afghanistan, the United States and Iran found common interests - defeating the Taliban and Islamic radicals, stabilizing Afghanistan, stopping the opium production and the flow of opium coming into Iran. From these common interests emerged common actions working toward a common purpose. It was in the interests of Iran to work with the U.S. in Afghanistan. It was not a matter of helping America or strengthening America's presence in Central Asia. It was a clear-eyed and self-serving action for Iran.

Complex sets of factors drive the dynamics inside Iran as well as Iran's actions in the Middle East.Iran is not monolithic. Iran is governed by competing centers of power. The President and the parliament - known as the Majles - are elected. But it is the Supreme Council, lead by the Supreme Leader...currently Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei...who serves as the Commander in Chief and has formal authority over Iran's armed forces and foreign policy. Ayatollah Khamenei has the power to dismiss Iran's President. In fact, Supreme Leader Khamenei did not support President Ahmadinejad's presidential bid. Power and influence in Iran evolve and shift...and are difficult to understand.

Two-thirds of Iran's population is under the age of 30. Iran is undergoing a generational shift that will shape Iran's outlook...and its opinions of the United States...for decades to come. Iran's young people use the internet in large numbers, wear American jeans, listen to American music and are positive about America and the West. We do not want to lose this pro-American generation by turning them away from us. They are the hope of Iran. They bristle under the heavy yoke of the Ayatollahs' strident limitations of personal freedom.

Our understanding of Iran is limited and incomplete. We have not had formal diplomatic relations with Iran for nearly three decades. Diplomatic contact at all levels is severely limited. We have no constructive military contact. Economic ties remain essentially severed as well. There is deep distrust and suspicion on both sides regarding intentions and motivations.
Put simply, the United States and Iran do not know one another. This unfamiliarity, distrust, and lack of engagement risks producing disastrous consequences. When countries do not engage, the risk of misperception based on faulty judgments spawns uninformed and dangerous decisions.

The United States needs to weigh very carefully its actions regarding Iran. In a hazy, hair-triggered environment, careless rhetoric and military movements that one side may believe are required to demonstrate resolve and strength...can be misinterpreted as preparations for military options. The risk of inadvertent conflict because of miscalculation is great.

The United States must be cautious and wise not to follow the same destructive path on Iran as we did on Iraq. We blundered into Iraq because of flawed intelligence, flawed assumptions, flawed judgments, and questionable intentions.

The United States must find a new regional diplomatic strategy to deal with Iran that integrates our regional allies, military power and economic leverage. This is why the regional security conferences being organized by Prime Minister Maliki are so important.
As the 2006 Baker-Hamilton report on Iraq concluded, "The United States should engage directly with Iran and Syria in order to try to obtain their commitment to constructive policies toward Iraq and other regional issues."

The upcoming regional security conferences about the future of Iraq could provide an opportunity to begin a dialogue with Iran...and begin to develop a process of mutual understanding between the United States and Iran that is based on direct discussions...not public rhetoric, perceptions, assumptions, or third-party communication. Diplomacy is an essential tool in world affairs to ratchet down the pressure of conflict and increase the leverage of strength.

Regional dialogue with Iran and Syria that produces a sustained and committed diplomatic process can be the basis for a new U.S. strategic approach to the Middle East.

There will be no stability in the Middle East until the broader interests of Iran, the region and the world are addressed.

The United States must employ wise statecraft to redirect deepening Middle East tensions toward a higher ground of resolution. We must be clear that the United States does not seek regime change in Iran. We must be clear that our objections are to the actions of the Iranian government...not the Iranian people.

America must have a strategic and comprehensive Middle East framework of resolution using all the levers of influence available to the U.S. and its allies. Engagement with Iran must be integrated with our decision to deploy a second carrier battlegroup and other military assets into the Persian Gulf...with our the decision to target Iranian military assistance flowing into Iraq...and with the world's response to Iran's failure to comply with last week's UN Security Council deadline to halt its uranium enrichment activities. A strategic and comprehensive strategy will create an opportunity for the United States to reaffirm, expand, and strengthen the international consensus to address Iran's nuclear program.

The United States must be prepared to act boldly and exploit opportunities to re-frame our relationship with Iran. Engagement should not be limited to government-to-government contact...but rather find new and imaginative ways to reach out to the Iranian people. Part of that initiative could be offering to re-open a consulate in Tehran...not formal diplomatic relations...but a Consulate...to help encourage and facilitate people-to-people exchange. All nations of Europe and most of our allies in the Middle East and Asia have diplomatic relations with Iran.

As Dr. Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, wrote in the Washington Post this week: "The proposed international conferences provide the best framework for serious diplomacy over Iraq. Iraq's neighbors are too much at odds with each other to be able to establish the psychological or the security equilibrium for a regional conference by themselves. Participation of the Security Council's permanent members, as well as Egypt as a nearby state, is vital...Paradoxically, [the conferences] may also prove the best framework for bilateral discussions with Syria and Iran...It is symbolically important that the Iraqi government call for the conferences as it has done, but the conferences cannot be concluded without consistent and strong American leadership."

Without a wise and integrated strategy, we risk drifting into conflict with Iran.
America's military might alone will not bring stability and security to the Middle East. That is an enduring fact of international relations that the late President Ronald Reagan understood well.

Throughout his eight years as President, the United States and the Soviet Union were locked in a global struggle, the Cold War. It was a war fought using containment, alliances, and political, diplomatic, economic and military power. Yet, nuclear war was averted and no shot was ever fired between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R.

President Reagan was always clear and resolute that the Soviet Union was our foe....that deep, fundamental differences divided the United States and the Soviet Union. He referred to the Soviet Union as the "evil empire."

In a speech before the National Association of Evangelicals on March 8, 1983, President Reagan said:"I urge you to beware the temptation of pride - the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault - to ignore the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire, to simply call the arms race a giant misunderstanding and thereby remove yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil."

Yet it was President Reagan who, in 1986, almost reached an agreement with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to abolish nuclear weapons. President Reagan understood the need for America to engage...to understand our friends and our adversaries...to explore our options...to identify common interests. President Reagan understood that great powers engage because they are secure in their beliefs and purpose but humble and wise in their policies and actions.

Fourteen years earlier, in 1972, President Nixon boldly demonstrated the power of diplomacy to achieve America's national interests when he announced that the United States would establish a strategic relationship with China and that he would visit Beijing for direct talks with Mao Zedong, the Chairman of the Communist Party of China.

The United States must have a policy on Iran...on Iraq...on the broader Middle East...that the American people understand, and will trust and support. Our words and our actions must seek to make America more secure, and the world more peaceful and prosperous. The world must know that, like all sovereign nations, the United States will defend itself and its interests, but that military conflict will always be the last resort.

The American people are deeply concerned about our direction in the Middle East. The American people expect and deserve a strategy that shows prospects for resolution. A U.S. military conflict with Iran would inflame the Middle East and global Muslim populations, crippling U.S. security, political, economic and strategic interests worldwide. I do not believe that the American people will believe that such an outcome improves America's security, stability and prosperity.

America cannot sustain political, diplomatic, economic or military engagement in the Middle East without the support of the American people. The rising tensions with Iran, the chaos in Iraq, the enduring Israeli-Palestinian conflict present a deepening crisis in the Middle East. America's policies must help lead the region out of the crisis. The American people increasingly understand this present and future danger.

Today, some of America's own actions are undermining the very interests that we must protect and advance in the Middle East. A recent poll conducted by Zogby International in the countries of Arab allies...Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates...found that only twelve percent expressed favorable attitudes toward the United States. As David Ignatius wrote last week in the Washington Post from a conference in Doha, Qatar, "It isn't a tiny handful of people in the Arab world who oppose what America is doing. It's nearly everyone."

If we lose our ability to influence outcomes in the Middle East, the consequences and implications for America and the world will be severe. We risk unstable energy supplies...growth in radical Islamic terrorism...increasing threats to Israel...and nuclear proliferation.

We are living today at an historic transformational time in history. The great challenges of the 21st century will require U.S. leadership that is trusted and respected, not feared nor resented. America cannot project only military power. Inspirational leadership and confidence in America's purpose, not imposed power, will be essential for world peace. If we fail, we will lose the next generation in Iran and around the world. This would result in a far more dangerous world than any we have ever known.

For the 21st Century, the U.S.-Iran relationship will frame the structure and dynamics of the Middle East. We must be sure of our actions and wise with our words. The prospects for peace that have eluded all nations of the Middle East for so long may be on the edge of a convergence of historic intersects. America can help shape the outcome with active and focused diplomacy...worthy of our heritage."

Bonus: Here is his speech to the ADC in 2008.

Source: youtube.com

Illinois Senate Passes Marriage Equality Bill

$
0
0

A 34-21 vote. Next up, the House.

On a 34-21 vote, the Illinois Senate passed a marriage equality bill at a little after 3 p.m. Thursday.

Following an afternoon of debate, Sen. Heather Steans, the lead sponsor of the bill, concluded the discussion by talking about her experience working with Rep. Greg Harris on the legislation.

Three Democrats voted against the bill: Sens. Gary Forby, William Haine and John Sullivan. One Republican, Sen. Jason Barickman voted for the bill.

The legislation now moves to the House, which is controlled by a Democratic majority. Gov. Pat Quinn is a strong supporter of the legislation and has said he will sign it into law.

View Video ›

Sen. Steans' Celebrates!

Sen. Steans' Celebrates!


View Entire List ›

Maryland Senator Gets Super Excited Over Ravens Superbowl Victory

$
0
0

Charm City's favorite daughter Sen. Barbara Mikulski gives the most adorable Superbowl speech ever. “You know, I'm short and chunky, but I was ready to do cartwheels around my condo that evening!”

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images