Quantcast
Channel: BuzzFeed News
Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live

How The Sequester Could Turn Government Workers Into Foreign Spies

$
0
0

4.8 million Americans have access to classified information, and thousands of them are getting pay cuts. Is the sequester making us vulnerable to spies?

WASHINGTON — The mandatory cuts to federal spending threaten to become an unexpected security nightmare for the federal counterintelligence agencies that protect government institutions against foreign spying.

Lawmakers and officials who oversee security clearances say the abrupt cut to roughly 20 percent of federal workers' pay is pushing tens of thousands into the category of financially strapped government workers for whom foreign agents look in recruiting moles and spies.

It may sound far-fetched, but those with experience in espionage cases said the threat is genuine.

The risk that financial hardship could lead to espionage is "definitely a concern," South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, a former Judge Advocate General in the Air Force, told BuzzFeed.

"When I was in the Air Force we had a few espionage cases. Every time we had an espionage case, it was somebody who got involved because their life had fallen apart," Graham said.

Lawmakers and sources working in the security clearance process agreed the sequester's cuts could give outside forces ranging from allies like Israel to rivals like Russia and China a fresh crop of potential recruits.

"It's expanding the number of people for them to target," one official involved in the security clearance process warned.

America's classified national security apparatus, in the public and private sectors alike, has been booming since September 11, 2001, and 4.8 million U.S. citizens currently hold a security clearance, according to an October 2011 survey by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the first and only survey of security clearances. There's even a booming business of matching cleared workers with open jobs that require a clearance, one that offers people like Evan Lesser, the founder of the Des Moines-based ClearanceJobs.com, a glimpse into the sprawling world of jobs that require keeping secrets.

"If workers with security clearances are furloughed … you're going to see a lot more people with security clearances in financial difficulties, and that will have a negative impact on national security," said Lesser, a former manager at federal defense contractors.

The vast majority of clearances are for the lowest classification, known as "confidential," which grants the holder access to sensitive information or so-called "clean" facilities that are highly secure.

According to Lesser, while some of the clearances are for jobs like spies, intelligence analysts or senior officials, most "[are] IT, engineering, logistical, and management roles."

"You can have truck drivers with security clearances. The people who cook meals on … Air Force One have security clearances," Lesser said.

From a security standpoint, that means that there are millions of Americans with knowledge of what may seem like mundane information — say, the time a truck driver is to report for duty on a particular day — but which could be critical to agents looking to hijack sensitive chemicals, attack an installation, or simply track movements of government officials.

Pop culture depictions of espionage often focus on the sexiest of spying tactics: High-tech snooping, or "honey traps" baited with kinky sex, and targeting White House officials. But while those sorts of tactics certainly play a role in modern espionage, the vast majority of the craft is far more mundane, consisting of tedious hours of identifying workers with financial difficulties who can be subtly exploited and then slowly cultivated over time.

And intelligence community sources said there are several areas that screeners look for when determining whether an applicant for a security clearance should be approved. For instance, there are obvious red flags like direct involvement in subversive or terrorist organizations; personal secrets; or failing lie detector tests.

But those issues either keep vulnerable people from applying for jobs in the first place or quickly rule them out for security clearances early in the review process.

And the intelligence officials said the biggest concern investigators have is financial in nature. People with massive debts, loans, or gambling obligations are extremely vulnerable to recruitment by foreign agents, since they can offer a quick and seemingly easy way to maintain their lifestyle.

"Delinquent debt is what we look for," one source involved in clearances explained.

Lesser agreed, explaining, "One of the primary reasons a person can be denied a security clearance is because of financial concerns."

But while the front-end security clearance process can weed out anyone in that position when they first apply, the sequester has placed a new and potentially dangerous pressure on federal workers.

A significant number of federal workers, contractors, and military personnel who have been cleared for secret or top secret clearances are either living paycheck-to-paycheck or close to it. With the sequester resulting in furloughs that are cutting more than 20 percent of their pay, many of those people will suddenly find themselves in a financial bind.

In fact, like most Americans, people with security clearances have already started to feel the pinch.

"As we've seen over the last number of years with the recession, it's been harder and harder for people to keep their clearance because of what has happened in the economy," said Lesser.

Most will respond by finding ways to cut their expenses. Others will simply acknowledge their difficulties and file for bankruptcy, which will not necessarily cost them their clearances.

But for others, the social stigma of bankruptcy and the social and familial pressure to maintain their lifestyles could become too much — making them perfect targets for foreign agents.

One of the key problems is that once an individual has security clearance they have years to operate unmonitored by authorities before their next review. Depending on the level of clearance, these periodic "reinvestigations" occur anywhere from five to 15 years after the clearance was issued. Although there is a "self-reporting" rule that requires clearance holders to inform investigators if they go into bankruptcy, are going through a divorce, are in therapy for certain types of mental illness and other red flag issues, it's a voluntary system.

"No, nobody's monitoring them," said Lesser.

Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, acknowledged that the sequester could push government workers and military personnel into becoming agents for foreign governments, but argued that most are already willing to sell out their country like Jonathan Pollard, a civilian intelligence officer who spied for the Israeli government.

"It's hard to rule out that kind of person existing," O'Hanlon said. "On the other hand, wouldn't that be shameful … their behavior would be every bit as criminal as Jonathan Pollard."

But not all, or even most, people who end up spying on their own country are motivated by ideological reasons.

Robert Hanssen is a former FBI agent who spent more than two decades working for Soviet and Russian spymasters. Hanssen, a devout Catholic and ardent conservative, was not turned for ideological reasons. But with seven children and a stripper-cum-mistress to support, Hanssen simply needed cash. Over his 22 years as a spy, Hanssen collected more than $1.2 million in cash and diamonds from his handlers in exchange for information.

With the sequester cutting workers' pay, stories like Hanssen's could become more common, and ironically, will put further stress on a sprawling security system that is itself facing new strains from the sequester.

"Stability is a good thing," Graham said. "That's why you monitor family problems, alcohol problems."


Conservative Infighting Over Immigration Reform Grows

$
0
0

Conservative leader Holtz-Eakin dismisses expected Heritage critique as “not relevant to immigration reform in any way.”

A man holds an immigration reform protest sign during a rally for immigration reform near Senator Dianne Feinstein's office, in Los Angeles, California, April 10, 2013.

Via: Jonathan Alcorn / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Conservative supporters of a comprehensive immigration reform plan are stepping up their efforts to provide Republicans with cover for a looming vote in the Senate, pushing back against their brethren at the Heritage Foundation and other groups that have launched an assault on the proposal.

On Thursday, American Action Forum President Doug Holtz-Eakin unleashed the latest in a series of conservative broadsides against Heritage for it's 2007 report questioning the costs of giving 11 million undocumented workers a pathway to citizenship.

"The study is not relevant to immigration reform in any way. That is, a paper presumably about reform does not shed any light on what reform legislation would do," Holtz-Eakin writes in a blog post published Thursday morning. Holz-Eakin, who is the former director of the Congressional Budget Office, also points to a 2006 report by Heritage that was far less critical of immigration reform as a "better-designed and well-reasoned economic analysis."

Heritage is currently in the process of updating it's 2007 report, which will reportedly make the case that the federal budget will sky-rocket as the 11 million new citizens begin to take advantage of federal benefits.

For weeks a loose coalition of groups including American Action Forum, the Hispanic Leadership Network, the Cato Institute and the Chamber of Commerce have been waging war against Heritage and other hard-line conservative opponents of immigration reform. The push for reform clearly has significant momentum in both chambers and influential lawmakers like Sens. Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are on board. But with a deal expected to be announced in the Senate as soon as this week, conservative opponents have ramped up their efforts to block the legislation.

Earlier this week, Heritage President Jim DeMint dismissed the criticisms, telling bloggers and reporters, "Sounds like Washington to me."

Biden: If You Protect Your Home With An AR-15, You'll Probably Shoot Your Kids

Republican Plan To Turn The Tables On Chained CPI Falls Flat

$
0
0

Greg Walden’s scheme to co-opt progressive messaging and attack Obama appears to leave him out in the cold.

Via: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee tried hard Wednesday to flip Republicans from supporters of chained CPI — the mechanism used in President Obama's budget to cut Social Security benefits — into opponents. By Thursday morning, however, it appeared he was all alone in the plot.

Rep. Dave Camp, a top Republican budget leader in the House, refused to go along with NRCC chair Greg Walden's criticism of chained CPI, making him the latest Republican to bail on Walden's entitlement messaging.

"I think the president made a step forward on entitlements reform in his budget and I welcome that step forward with chained CPI," Camp told BuzzFeed when asked about Walden's comments at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. "So I think that is the beginning of a potential discussion of how we make programs like Social Security and Medicare sustainable for future generations."

Obama added the entitlement cuts to his budget plan as an olive branch to Republicans, who White House officials believe will eventually come to the bargaining table if Democrats woo them hard enough. Chained CPI is an idea long favored by Republican leaders. It's also despised by Obama's progressive base, who say any cuts to entitlement benefits consitute breaking the promise of Social Security and penalizing America's most vulnerable.

On Wednesday, Walden tried to co-opt some of that progressive messaging, aiming to turn chained CPI into a cudgel Republicans can wield on the congressional campaign trail in 2014.

"You're trying to balance this budget on the backs of seniors and I just think it's not the right way to go," Walden told CNN's Wolf Blitzer when asked about chained CPI.

This was a dramatic shift from what most Republican leaders say about chained CPI and if it was a political move by Walden it was a Machiavellian one. Democrats immediately cried foul, and accused Republicans of flipping on an issue they used to support as soon as Obama came out in favor of it.

But Camp, the chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, said he's taking Obama's offer of chained CPI in good faith and is ready to engage with the White House on something both he and the president agree on. Camp seems to favor doing the entitlement changes right away, something Obama has said won't happen. The president wants to trade chained CPI for increased taxes. Still, Camp was favorable to Obama's budget when it came to entitlements, showing no signs of changing his tune the way Democrats warned Republicans might.

"First of all, the president came to the Republican conference and I was able to ask him a question. And i brought up the issue of entitlements. And I said in areas where we agree, like chained CPI, combining A and B in Medicare…let's just do it," Camp told BuzzFeed. "And the president, I thought gave a very good response to that exchange that we had. So now the president's put that in his budget, these are things that obviously we're discussing."

"I think it is a positive step forward for the president to offer chained CPI in his budget and I'm going to continue to look at this issue," he said.

Meanwhile, conservatives are starting to scold Walden for his comments. Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post called on Republicans to "muzzle" the NRCC chair and, indeed, other Republican leaders praised the inclusion of chained CPI in Obama's budget (though they were skeptical of the budget overall and once again rejected Obama's call for new revenues.)

For the moment Walden appears to be sticking to his guns on chained CPI.

"He believes it's wrong to cut benefits for seniors to pay for more wasteful spending," a spokesperson told Politico.

Malaysian Government Critic Faces DDoS Attack

$
0
0

Sarawak Report exposed an international propaganda campaign. The attack comes a few weeks before the election

Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak.

Via: Bazuki Muhammad / Reuters

WASHINGTON — A website critical of the Malaysian government is down on Thursday in what its owner says is a denial-of-service attack.

Sarawak Report, run by British investigative journalist and Clare Rewcastle Brown, has been taken offline. So has Radio Free Sarawak, an AM radio program Brown founded.

Brown, whose brother-in-law is former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, wrote on Sarawak Report's Twitter and Facebook that her sites had been the victims of a denial-of-service attack. She didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Sarawak Report broke the story in 2011 of a London-based public relations and television production firm, FBC Media, being paid to produce propaganda for the Malaysian government, which was aired as editorial content on the BBC and other major international television networks. That effort was part of a covert propaganda campaign that also made its way into the onto American online outlets.

It's unclear who carried out the attack, though the incident is taking place in a moment of heated political rhetoric: the Malaysian general elections are set to take place on May 5. The governing party led by current Prime Minister Najib Razak has been in power for 56 years, but faces a stiffer challenge this time around from the opposition, led by Anwar Ibrahim — a main target of the propaganda campaign.

Update: Brown sent out a statement on Thursday saying that hers is not the only site to have been attacked: (5:59 p.m.)

The websites for Radio Free Malaysia, Radio Free Sarawak and the news portal Sarawak Report, which represent free media in Malaysia, have all been subject to relentless DDOS attacks since the beginning of this week.

Today, Thursday 11th April, the sites were hacked and all three were brought down. The attacks have coincided with various forms of jamming which have been attempted against the broadcasts of both the independent Radio Stations, which operate from outside of Malaysia.

According to Brown, this is not the first time she's been targeted.

The Distributed Denial Of Service (DDOS) attacks have been mounting against the anti-corruption site Sarawak Report for the past few weeks. The site has focused on exposing timber corruption over the past three years, demonstrating how the destruction of the Borneo Jungle has been driven by a small number of politically connected individuals in the East Malaysian states of Sarawak and Sabah.

Yesterday, Wednesday 10th April, the site was targeted by 64 million hits designed to take down its server. The sister sites for the two radio stations received similar attacks. Most of the attacks have radiated out of Russia and Eastern Europe and site administrators were able to fend off the onslaught until the site itself was hacked earlier today.

White House Responds To Jay-Z's "Impeach Me" Lyric

$
0
0

The White House press secretary responds to Hova's new track, Open Letter , with a little afternoon snark.

"I guess nothing rhymes with Treasury." — Jay Carney

View Video ›

Carney: "I guess nothing rhymes with 'Treasury.' Because Treasury offers and gives licenses for travel as you know, and the White House has nothing to do with it."

Reporter: So, are you saying the President did not have a conversation with Jay-Z?

Carney: "I am absolutely saying that the White House, from the President on down, had nothing to do with anybody's travel to Cuba. That is something the Treasury handles. OFAC, Treasury, these are tough words to rhyme.

Reporter: [not audible]

Carney: "It's a song, Donovan, the president did not communicate with Jay-Z over this trip."

6 Beefs Rappers Had With Politicians

$
0
0

Jay-Z boasted about his recent trip to Cuba in a new song out today that blasted his critics, including Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio and Florida House Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.

Nicki Minaj said she was voting for Mitt Romney because "lazy bitches fucking up the economy."

She was being sarcastic.

Source: youtube.com

Tupac attacked Bill Clinton in "How Do You Want It."

Tupac attacked Bill Clinton in "How Do You Want It."

Bill Clinton, Mr. Bob Dole
You're too old to understand the way the game's told
You're lame so I gotta hit you with the hot facts
Want some on lease? I'm making millions, n***as top that
They wanna censor me; they'd rather see me in a cell
Living in hell — only a few of us'll live to tell

Via: factmag.com

Lupe Fiasco was thrown off the stage at an inaugural event for attacking Obama.

Tupac said, "Vice President Dan Quayle eat a dick up!" in the song "Peep Game."

Tupac said, "Vice President Dan Quayle eat a dick up!" in the song "Peep Game."

Via: factmag.com


View Entire List ›

The 5 Best Political Jingles Ever Made


White House: Our Gun Strategy Is Working

$
0
0

“The president has said all along…that Congress will do the right thing if the American people speak up,” Carney says.

Via: Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

WASHINGTON — The White House says Thursday's motion to proceed on gun violence legislation in the Senate is all evidence needed that President Obama's strategy of consistently engaging the American people on gun control after Newtown has worked.

Obama has been out on a limb on guns in recent weeks, as action in Congress appeared stalled and a signature part of Obama's second-term agenda seemed to be imploding. But two conservative senators, Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, breathed new life into the debate with their new proposal to expand background checks aimed at appeasing concerns of the gun rights community. Obama's participation in that process is that the Toomey-Manchin process is unclear. The White House is taking its share of the credit for the movement in the Senate anyway, saying it shows the power of the bully pulpit remains strong.

"The president has no doubt whatsoever that the voices of the Newtown families and the voices of Americans across the country that were raised this week as part of an effort to urge the Senate to move forward and not block procedurally progress on this legislation had a positive effect," he said. "This is an important milestone. but it is an early milestone. And there is no question that challenges will continue to be placed in the way of making progress on passing common sense legislation to reduce gun violence. But we are obviously very pleased with today's vote."

The White House tried to put pressure on Congress this week with emotional speeches by Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama. Vice President Biden took to the airwaves Thursday morning to talk guns too. Those were just the latest in a long series of speeches and public statements pushing hard for gun legislation in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting.

After gun control supporters overcame a filibuster and moved ahead with debate, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters that Obama directly engaging the American people on the politically sensitive issue of guns had resulted in an important win.

Carney said public pressure after Newtown was working — and that vindicates all the work Obama has put into guns.

"The president has said all along, and you heard him on Monday, that Congress will do the right thing if the American people speak up," Carney said. "If they raise their voices, if they make their views known. As he said then, it's not about him, it's about the American people and what the right, common-sense thing is to do when it comes to taking action to reduce gun violence."

Carney said Obama called family members of Newtown shooting victims Thursday after the Senate cloture vote and hailed the vote in a call with them as "an important step forward." Several families have been in Washington this week lobbying the Senate to move forward on gun control legislation, and Carney said Obama offered his congratulations to them after the Senate voted.

Top Democrat Joins Push To Send Guns To Syrian Rebels

$
0
0

The administration inches toward action. “You and I have been talking to entirely different people,” McCain tells Ford.

Smoke rises after shells exploded in the Syrian village of al-Jamlah, close to the ceasefire line between Israel and Syria.

Via: Baz Ratner / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Thursday he supports arming rebels intervention in Syria, a move that will likely put more pressure on the Obama administration to act.

"In my view, looking at the situation as it exists, the time has come to consider providing military aid to the opposition," Menendez said during a hearing on the Syrian conflict on Thursday. "It should include weapons, but stop short of those weapons that could threaten our own interests if they fall into the wrong hands — like shoulder fired missiles."

Menendez pressed Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Elizabeth Jones on what a political solution to the conflict would look like, saying that the efforts so far had resulted in a "stalemate" and noting that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has a "monopoly on air power and he has a monopoly on artillery power."

The hearing, which only attracted about half of the senators on the Foreign Relations Committee, featured testimony by Jones, U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford, and Daniel Glaser, the assistance secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes the Treasury Department. It occasionally became cantankerous as senators grew frustrated with the witnesses.

Pressed on specifics of how the political solution would happen, the witnesses gave the same kind of vague generalities that have been offered with regard to Syria since almost the beginning of the conflict.

They stressed the need to keep chemical weapons from being used and to improve the humanitarian situation in Syria, while keeping vague about the infighting in the Syrian opposition and avoiding a clear definition of how a political solution to the problem would come about.

"I agree with you that the prospects in Syria are not good," Jones said in response to Menendez's question, "What is the political solution that you envision?"

One solution, Jones said, is "to support the Syrian opposition coalition as much as we can."

Asked if fighting would continue in Syria even after Bashar al-Assad's eventual fall, Ford answered carefully, "the groups that we are supporting are talking about a vision of a country and vision of a state that is inclusive and will treat citizens equally."

"There is absolutely an extremism problem in Syria," Ford acknowledged. "It is incumbent on the Syrian opposition coalition to isolate those extremists."

Ford said that he had recently met with Ghassan Hitto, the Syrian expatriate elected as interim prime minister of the Syrian opposition.

Few solutions were offered for the Syrian refugees.

"They would like to be able to go home," Ford said of Syrian refugees. "They're frustrated that there isn't a magic-key solution to unlock that door."

Ford didn't have a clear answer on whether the U.S. knows exactly where its assistance is going.

"We do not have, as you would put it, Senator, we do not have boots on the ground," Ford said in response to Senator Ben Cardin's question. "But we have a good sense of where the assistance is going."

Senator John McCain took the sharpest tone with the witnesses.

"I don't know what to say," McCain said. "I don't know what to say to you, Ambassador."

"Shouldn't we do something that will prevent this massive slaughter that's going on? And you think that non-lethal assistance will accelerate Bashar Assad's departure?" McCain said.

"Ambassador Ford, you and I have been talking to entirely different people," McCain said. "I've been to the refugee camps. They're angry and bitter at the United States of America for not helping them."

Watch CNN's Jake Tapper Rap

$
0
0

Challenge accepted , Jay Carney.

"Got cleared by Treasury. We can travel at your lesure, B." — Jake Tapper

View Video ›

The Fashion Industry Loves Christine Quinn

$
0
0

The NYC mayoral candidate gets courted by Cosmo and has an upcoming feature in Vogue .

.

Via: Brad Barket / Getty Images

They certainly didn't come for the free food.

At a lunch on Wednesday intended to introduce New York City mayoral candidate Christine Quinn to the fashion community, the event's host, Cosmopolitan editor-in-chief Joanna Coles, joked that the fashion crowd in attendance would be unlikely to finish even their salads. But some of fashion's top players — including Tim Gunn, Isaac Mizrahi (who wore neon yellow Nikes), CFDA President Steven Kolb, Modern Family's Jesse Tyler Ferguson, and a slew of fashion editors — did come to meet the front-runner in New York's upcoming mayoral election.

Quinn told BuzzFeed she was eager to connect with the fashion industry, which she called "an incredibly important economic engine in New York City."

"It's an industry that has the potential to create and sustain lots of jobs that intersect with folks who have lots of different education experiences," she said. "I'm for any and all industries that put people to work, and if they make you look good while they're doing it, all the better."

Quinn recently appeared on the cover of New York magazine, in a photo spread that some critics described as overly "harsh" or having "a certain Dracula quality." But Quinn is not shying away from fashion magazine coverage. Her staff said an excerpt of Quinn's memoirs, which will be released in May, will appear in Vogue this spring and that they recently did a photo shoot with the magazine. Coles said Cosmopolitan will "totally feature her."

Via: Andrew H. Walker / Getty Images

"I've found that the times I've taken pictures for magazines and whatnot, the people couldn't be lovelier and they're very supportive and kind to those of us who are not used to having our pictures taken like that," Quinn said.

The fashion community seems eager to embrace her back. When Quinn took the podium to make remarks at the lunch, the group of designers and fashion executives pressed her on issues related to their industry, such as supporting the Garment District and attracting wealthy tourists from countries like China and Brazil, who are likely to spend on luxury products. But they were mostly interested in helping to get her elected. Gunn, of Project Runway fame, asked point-blank: "What can we do to ensure you're the next mayor of this great city?"

Gunn had no style tips for Quinn. "I live on the Upper West Side and I have neighbors who say, 'Don't you think she's a little too glamorous?' But I love this about her!" he said. "I love her style and I love her look and I don't want her to change it." Coles added that Quinn's hair looked great, calling it "one hell of a blowout."

Quinn was not able to escape the lunch without being badgered about "who she was wearing." For the record: "The clothes are Elie Tahari, the bracelet is Alexis Bittar, the necklace is David Yurman, and the earrings I got in Sag Harbor from some guy named Lee."


View Entire List ›

Jay-Z's Nets Diss Track Was Not The Only Song The White House Addressed Today

$
0
0

White House press secretary Jay Carney responded today to a question about a Jay-Z lyric involving President Obama from the rapper's Brooklyn Nets diss track. As this exclusive transcript indicates, it was not the session's only musical digression.

"The gentleman...I believe the gentleman has admitted to shooting the sheriff...but the President does believe it is his right to enter a plea of self-defense at trial."

Via: Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

White House Daily Press Briefing
4/11/2013

Jay Carney: Ok, we've got a lot of things today. The President's new budget proposal, chained CPI, gun control legislation. Let's start over here, Jessica Yellin.

Jessica Yellin, CNN: Jay, I'm sure you're aware of Jay-Z and Beyonce's recent trip to Cuba and the controversy surrounding that...

JC: Yes...

JY: Well, Jay-Z released a rap song today. Some of the lyrics: "You gettin' too much bread, they try to jam you / Boy from the hood but got White House clearance," and a little later...uh...let's see..."Obama said 'chill, you gonna get me impeached' / But you don't need this shit anyway / Chill with me on the beach." When did the White House OK Jay-Z's Cuba trip and how often does the President communicate with Jay-Z?

JC: It's Treasury that handles authorizing travel to Cuba and it's my understanding that the group they traveled with was OK'd. (chuckles) The President does not communicate with Jay-Z.

JY: But, Jay-Z mentions here references a conversation with the President pertaining to Cuba....

JC: That's a song; those are song lyrics. That's a metaphor. Next, ummm, Ed Henry.

Ed Henry, FOX News: Jay, I'd like to draw your attention to a song by Johnny Cash where he...uh...here it is...where he admits to shooting a man. In Reno. Has Justice moved on this case at all, and if not why is the AG [attorney general] dragging his feet on this?

JC: Again these are song lyrics...and anyway I believe this song was released some years ago. I don't even think the President was alive...

EH: The statute of limitations on murder never runs out...

JC: I've stated our position. Next...Jake Tapper.

Jake Tapper, CNN: Jay, Bob Marley admits to, not only the murder of a law enforcement officer, but seems to intimate that he has knowledge of the murder of a second. He also mentions marijuana trafficking as the probable motive for the murder of the second man...uh...a Sheriff, John Brown...any chance this is Aryan Brotherhood...

JC: Ok, let's move on... David Brody.

David Brody, CBN: Jay, Eric Clapton recently said "if you wanna get out you need to take her out, cocaine." Seems like a clear issue for the DEA, no? Or has the White House put drug issues on the back burner?

JC: (sigh)...You know, I don't...for one Eric Clapton didn't even write that song. Next, let's see..non-music questions, OK? Rob Reynolds.

Rob Reynolds, Al-Jazeera: Jay, Steve Miller has stated emphatically his intent to "fly like an eagle into the future." Who regulates time-travel technology, FAA? Does the Pentagon have this technology and wouldn't altering the time-stream be a national security concern? I'm a little fuzzy on the time-stream thing, but my son recently watched Looper and he assures me...

JC: Next. Chuck Todd.

Chuck Todd, NBC: Jay, by his own admission, Sammy Hagar refuses to comply with federally mandated highway speed limits...

JC: That's it, we're done.

Same-Sex Couples Missing From Immigration Debate — For Now

$
0
0

Although unlikely to be a part of the initial Senate bill, LGBT advocates are confident protections for same-sex couples will be added in committee.

Via: Jose Luis Magana / Reuters

WASHINGTON — Same-sex couples could be left out in the cold when the Senate's comprehensive immigration reform bill is introduced, but LGBT advocates are confident their issues will be addressed in committee.

None of the bipartisan "Gang of Eight" senators have said there is any plan to include bi-national same-sex couples — who are barred by the Defense of Marriage Act from obtaining a green card for a non-citizen spouse — in their immigration reform bill, and one leading advocate has gone so far as to say the decision not to include same-sex couples already has been made.

The measure, introduced for the past several congresses as a standalone bill called the Uniting American Families Act, would allow an American who is part of a bi-national same-sex couple to sponsor his or her non-citizen "permanent partner," a new category for green card sponsorship that would be created by the law. The Obama administration has said it supports the inclusion of the measure in any comprehensive immigration reform.

But with Republicans in the "Gang of Eight" — Sens. John McCain, Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio — expressing doubt and in some cases opposition to its inclusion in reform, none of the Democrats in the coalition — Sens. Chuck Schumer, Michael Bennet, Bob Menendez and Dick Durbin — have pushed the issue as a "make or break" measure for the delicate coalition's compromise draft legislation.

Nonetheless, LGBT advocates joined other immigration reform supporters at a rally on Capitol Hill Wednesday in support of reform. A main reason why there hasn't been much outcry about the measure's inclusion in the base bill is that advocates fully expect the measure to be added into the bill later in the Senate process.

"We have urged Senators to include binational couples in the base bill. However if that does not happen, we will push for an amendment during Senate Judiciary Committee consideration and are confident that amendment will be adopted," Human Rights Campaign spokesman Michael Cole-Schwartz said Thursday. "We will then work with allies to ensure that languages remains in the bill through floor consideration."

Winnie Stachelberg, the Center for American Progress' senior vice president, echoed HRC, saying, "We've heard repeatedly that including UAFA is one of their key priorities during the markup and amendment process, and we believe that [Senate Democrats] will do so."

A similar plan had been discussed regarding the inclusion of LGBT protections in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) reauthorization bill, but an effort to keep bipartisan support for the package coming out of committee resulted in pro-LGBT amendments being withdrawn when a Senate committee considered the ESEA reauthorization back in 2011.

While the coalition dynamics might be part of the reason that the issue hasn't risen to the top of the debate during the crafting of the comprehensive immigration reform bill in the Senate this year, another key reason may be that the law keeping same-sex spouses from sponsoring their non-citizen spouse could be ruled unconstitutional by summer.

Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which bans the federal government from recognizing same-sex couples' marriages, is before the Supreme Court in Edith Windsor's challenge to the law, and it could be struck down as unconstitutional by the end of June. If that happens, married bi-national same-sex couples should then be eligible for green card sponsorship — although questions would remain about same-sex couples unable to get married.

In the meantime, though, advocates are continuing to push for inclusion for same-sex couples in the congressional legislation.

"There are many members of Congress for whom the Uniting American Families Act is important. They and we will keep pushing for its inclusion at each step of the legislative process — even with the Windsor decision pending. Nobody knows what the outcome of the Supreme Court cases will be, and we have to keep advocating to ensure the broad range of issues affecting LGBT people are included," says Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Federal Officials Aim For "Speedy" Response Following Missouri Hospital Arrest

$
0
0

After the arrest of gay patient's partner in Missouri's Research Medical Center, federal officials are “working to gather the facts and determine what steps to take in a speedy manner.”

Via: facebook.com

WASHINGTON — Federal officials are "aware" of the Missouri hospital that had a man arrested for refusing to leave the bedside of his partner, and "are working to gather the facts and determine what steps to take in a speedy manner," a Medicare/Medicaid spokesman said Thursday afternoon.

News spread Thursday about the arrest of Roger Gorley, who had been trying to visit at Research Medical Center in Kansas City with the man he described in a Facebook note as his husband, Allen Mansell. The two were joined in a civil union.

When one of Mansell's family members asked him to leave, he refused and was later arrested. According to a note posted on Research Medical Center's Facebook page Thursday afternoon, "This was an issue of disruptive and belligerent behavior by the visitor that affected patient care." The hospital also states in the post that the decision was unrelated to sexual orientation.

At President Obama's direction during his first term, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius issued regulations mandating that hospitals that receive Medicaid or Medicare funds allow patients the right to have visitors of their choosing, regardless of sexual orientation.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which enforces the regulations through coordination with the states, is looking into the situation. CMS spokesman Brian Cook told BuzzFeed Thursday afternoon, "CMS is aware of this specific issue and we are working to gather the facts and determine what steps to take in a speedy manner."

"All Americans are guaranteed the right to receive hospital visitors that they designate, and there are specific protections in our rules for same-sex couples across the country," Cook added. "We take alleged violations of federal rules around hospital visitation very seriously."

Guidance issued by CMS on the regulations includes the following: "When a patient who is not incapacitated has designated, either orally to hospital staff or in writing, another individual to be his/her representative, the hospital must involve the designated representative in the development and implementation of the patient's plan of care."


The Disastrous Collapse Of Kentucky's Least Effective Liberal Group

$
0
0

Whatever Progress Kentucky is trying to do, it should probably stop right now.

Via: Win McNamee / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — It's probably possible for a political group to be worse at accomplishing its core mission than Progress Kentucky is, but it's difficult to imagine how.

In its short lifespan, the super PAC focused solely on defeating Sen. Mitch McConnell has instead helped the Republican incumbent deflect his low approval rating and conservative critics by subjecting McConnell to comically incompetent political attacks.

"They've managed to become McConnell's favorite whipping boy," said Jimmy Cauley, a longtime Kentucky Democratic strategist. "It's kind of laughable because they didn't exist four months ago. And yet they've gotten wrapped up in a string of four or five controversies."

Kentucky Democrats aren't ready to say Progress Kentucky has helped McConnell, but national Democratic observers have their jaws on the floor as they watch the group turn McConnell into a sympathetic figure, generating good headlines for him time and again.

The latest came on Thursday when a Kentucky county Democratic chair fingered Progress Kentucky as the group behind the recording of a McConnell strategy session that included an unsavory opposition research report about would-be opponent Ashley Judd that showed McConnell was willing to use mental problems Judd had written about in the past against her on the campaign trail. (Judd decided not to run.)

If the leakers of the tape wanted it to hurt McConnell, their plan backfired. McConnell raised money off his claim that he had been the victim of "Nixonian" tactics, and generally fomented conservative support with his outrage-based spin strategy after the tape came to light. Now that it looks like McConnell might be proven right about the origins of the tape, it's likely he'll get even more mileage out of Progress Kentucky.

Progress Kentucky's founder, Shawn Reilly, has denied responsibility for incident — which is now under investigation by the FBI — and has instead saddled the blame with Curtis Morrison, whom Reilly's attorney calls a "former volunteer" for the PAC.

"Shawn is completely innocent of any criminal wrongdoing," said Annie O'Connell, Reilly's lawyer. "He is a witness not a suspect. He has fully cooperated with the with the United States Attorney's office for the Western district of Kentucky since the recording became public."

O'Connell told BuzzFeed that her client "voluntarily" cooperated with the authorities as soon as 8 a.m. Tuesday, just hours after the tape was made public, to provide "material assistance to the investigators, specifically information that we believe has been helpful in locating Curtis Morrison."

Asked if she and her client believed Morrison was responsible for the recording, O'Connell said, "Yes."

But Morrison, a Louisville blogger and activist, is actually a former top official with the organization who resigned in March after Progress Kentucky's last major scandal. BuzzFeed tracked him down, and over email he said he's "not making a statement at this time." He did not respond to multiple follow-up calls.

Meanwhile, Terry Boyd, founder and executive editor of Insider Louisville, the site where Morrison is a contributing reporter, told BuzzFeed he doubted Morrison was behind the tapes.

"I can't imagine him doing that. He's a real good reporter with skills. But in my opinion, it just doesn't add up that he'd do something like that," he said, adding that he last heard from Morrison Wednesday. "I have no idea where he is. I'm not even sure how I can get in touch with him. He actually owes us stories."

"I don't know what the hell is going on with the Mitch McConnell thing, and I don't want to know," Boyd said.

This kind of chaos is par for the course with Progress Kentucky.

The PAC's treasurer reportedly resigned Thursday but didn't say if the tape came from his group. But if the allegation about the recording is proven true, it will be the latest example of the group helping McConnell when they were trying to hurt him.

Back in February, the group posted a series of racist tweets about Elaine Chao, McConnell's wife (as well as some questioning McConnell's sexuality), leading to an apology from Progress Kentucky and more room for McConnell to claim that Democrats are out to get him by any means necessary.

Republicans are passing around the popcorn.

"Democrats in Kentucky apparently don't want to touch challenging McConnell with a ten-foot pole, which has created this vacuum where morons like this can operate," said Scott Jennings, chair of the pro-McConnell PAC, Kentuckians for Strong Leadership, which has ties to Karl Rove. "I don't know how to measure exactly how badly they've damaged Democratic chances in this race, but it is at least a bushel or a barrelful."

As Jennings suggests, Progress Kentucky — for all the headlines it produces — is not part of the Democratic mainstream in the state.

"They've been misrepresented as legitimate ever since the whole tweet controversy about Elaine Chao. It's like three guys with a thousand dollars who are cast-offs that no one takes seriously," said one well-connected Kentucky Democrat. "They have no connection to the Kentucky Democratic Party and have no influence. I know they were trying to raise money early on last year, and they had a really hard time getting Democrats to listen to them or take their calls."

"They're sketchy people," the official said.

It's true that the Democratic Party in Kentucky gave one of the strongest condemnations of Progress Kentucky during the Chao controversy. And the man who says he outed Progress Kentucky as the source of the McConnell meeting tape said he did so to "to protect the Democratic Party."

"I did not want their bad behavior, their poor mistakes — I shouldn't say 'bad behavior' — their mistakes, their lack of judgment, to hurt our party's efforts here in the state [of] Kentucky and in Jefferson County, here in Louisville," Jefferson County Democratic Party chair Jacob Conway told Fox News Thursday afternoon.

McConnell has real political problems, including low approval ratings and Tea Party types in the GOP who are less than thrilled with his leadership in the Senate. National Democrats fear that the repeated Progress Kentucky faceplants are letting McConnell coast along.

"If it was them, this is an idiotic move and something that could jeopardize the larger push against McConnell in '14," one senior Democratic strategist in D.C. said of the tape. "If this is true, you ask yourself, why anybody would risk such a maneuver, especially on a tape was damning but not a game changer?"

In fact, Progress Kentucky is so bad at its stated task that some Democrats whisper behind the scenes (a better word is "hope") that it must to be a front set up by McConnell to make him look good and Democrats look terrible. Jennings had a message for those Democrats: no such luck.

"That's wishful thinking on the part of Democrats, I am sure, who seriously want to be as far away from these people as possible," he said.

Four Documents To Understand The Kermit Gosnell Trial

$
0
0

The trial of the “House of Horrors” abortion clinic doctor is receiving national attention.

The Absolutely Horrifying And Chilling Grand Jury Report

1996 Fine And Censure By New York State For Having An Unlicensed Physician Assistant

1996 Fine And Censure By Pennsylvania For Having An Unlicensed Physician Assistant

Kermit Gosnell's Final And Indefinite License Suspension In 2012


View Entire List ›

"Laptop In Iran" Tumblr Shuts Down To Protect Its Subjects

$
0
0

“The lady in the photos on the site has been in touch with me and was very distressed,” del Torto says.

One of the photos taken by del Torto's laptop.

Via: laptopiniran.tumblr.com

WASHINGTON — The tumblr of photos taken of life in Iran by a Londoner's stolen laptop there has been shut down to protect the computer's new owner from "further embarrassment," according to the blog's author.

Dom del Torto, an illustrator and designer in London, had his laptop stolen from his apartment. The Hidden app pinpointed its location in Iran and sent him photos from the lost computer, and del Torto made a blog of photos the computer was taking of its new owner without her knowledge.

The "Laptop in Iran" tumblr was a hit on social media on Thursday, but as of Friday it is gone. Del Torto told BuzzFeed he has removed the blog at the behest of his laptop's new owner.

"I turned off the site to protect her from further embarrassment," he said in an email.

He also updated the tumblr one last time:

The innocent new owners of my laptop have been in touch and are mortified about the story and are keen to return the laptop.

Given the huge error of judgement on my part in sharing the story and failing to respect their privacy I have asked them to keep it by means of an apology.

Del Torto also wrote a lengthy apology, emphasizing that "the people shown on the blog site are not thieves."

Liberal Group Ties Mitch McConnell To Al-Qaeda On Gun Control

$
0
0

The terrorist organization told American sleeper cell terrorists to take advantage of weak background laws in 2011 to buy guns for Mumbai-style terrorist attacks. Now the liberal group Americans United for Change is using it to hit McConnell in a new TV spot.

Source: youtube.com

The Online Right Is Freaking Awesome

$
0
0

Last week, Ben Howe was pilloried by some in the conservative blogosphere for writing for BuzzFeed. Now he offers a tribute to the right's vibrant online community.

Over the past couple weeks, I've been attacked by some conservative bloggers as a traitor to my ideology, an enemy of the conservative movement, and a sell-out.

And all of it has let me to this completely earnest conclusion: The online right is freaking awesome.

Here's the backstory. Last week I published an opinion piece at BuzzFeed about a conservative video that I believed was too campy and lacking of substance to be taken seriously. I laid out my criticisms and closed with my concerns that productions of this caliber would stigmatize conservative artists, thus making it more difficult for their work to get produced.

I expected some negative response, especially from the Tea Party Patriots who produced the video, and I knew some conservatives would take issue with my decision to write the piece for BuzzFeed, which is not exactly a card-carrying citizen of the conservative blogosphere.

What I did not expect was to be taken to the woodshed and told that what I'd done was tantamount to ideological treason. Yet that's exactly what happened when the article first hit Twitter.

I had a few fellow bloggers tell me that they were unwilling to even click on the link, while others claimed that I'd become a pawn of some master plan by BuzzFeed to undo conservatism. John Nolte of Breitbart started by indicating he thought I'd been duped, saying BuzzFeed "manipulated review of a single conservative movie to trash the movement." After I pushed back he was less kind, eventually implying I was implicit, saying it was "exactly like the old Big Hollywood days: pushing back against a media unfairly trashing fledgling con-artist movement." The odd use of "con-artist" aside, it was stunning to find out I'd apparently become what Andrew Breitbart built his empire fighting.

I immediately began to think that I'd made a mistake and that my peers simply weren't ready for conservative writers to expand beyond our "family" of friendly blogs. But before long, what I'd always known conservatives prided themselves on rang true, as people from all walks of the conservative blogosphere and grassroots activism jumped to my defense. For several days, they brought me on their podcasts and radio shows, wrote about the uproar and, possibly most importantly to my original purpose, agreed with both the venue choice and the substance of my article.

Despite the loud few that wanted to hang me in effigy, the vast majority seemed hungry for discussion and for varying opinions to be voiced in as many places as possible. Like me, they believed that conservatives do themselves a great disservice by hiding in a shell and talking only to one another. After all, if we're right in what we believe, we should trust that the truth will win hearts and minds in any public forum, albeit with a careful eye on how we deliver it. As long as we can ensure that our opinions and arguments are not altered or manipulated, we can and should feel safe and, in some respects obligated, to take our beliefs outside of our self-imposed bubbles.

So far, BuzzFeed has graciously agreed not to edit my articles in a way that would create a false impression of my beliefs. Stunning, I know.

The events also caused me to reflect on why the conservative movement experiences so much success online. I can say with a fair amount of certainty that the way events unfolded for me is simply not how it would've played out if the roles were reversed and it had been a left-of-center blogger condemning a Hollywood film with a liberal message.

Even when conservatives get it wrong and try to discredit an opinion like mine for being in the wrong venue, it's still born from loyalty. They feel betrayed. As misguided as that feeling may be, it speaks volumes to the relationships on the right versus the left in web politics which thrive on loyalty and camaraderie.

In the conservative blogosphere, the lines between establishment old guard publications, powerful politicians, and "amateur" blogs are largely irrelevant. It's an active, vibrant community that advocates open discussion and allows the conservative grassroots to stay in regular communication with the most influential players in the movement, and often the GOP.

Meanwhile, the liberal online community these days is so disjointed and disconnected that there appears to be no loyalty fostered between one another at all. When's the last time you saw various liberal bloggers from Wonkette or Fire Dog Lake making an appeal to other liberal bloggers to join them in an effort to support one of their own? Or pitch in to send someone to a conference? Or work together to elect a candidate? Maybe it's not about partisanship for them, or maybe they are so committed to their ideology that the idea of collective mission is alien. Ironic considering their views on government.

I follow these guys on twitter and I read their blogs (Of course I'd rather gouge my eyes out with a spork, but it's part of my job description.) And mostly what I see is gutter sniping and whining. The real organization and unified purpose on the left comes from their seemingly endless supply of non-profits like Think Progress and Media Matters. To me, that indicates that their loyalty to one another is a product of pay, not common belief. Certainly there are nonprofits on the right, but while ours compliment a community compromised mostly of freelancers or unpaid bloggers, the left seems to take all of their cues from these billionaire funded groups. It's the definition of astroturf.

The right on the other hand is blessed with community. At RedState you could just as easily find a link to Jim Geraghty at National Review as you could to Jim Jamitis at Anthropocon.com. The best part is that all three writers most likely know each other, and will share a drink next time they're in town together. They work together. They're colleagues. They're friends.

And while that loyalty can occasionally result in suspicion of those of us who venture outside the bubble, more often the not, it enables thoughtful, important conversations to take place in the conservative movement.

How did the left get this so wrong? I have no idea. But after last week, I must say I'm grateful to have been reminded how conservatives have gotten this right.

This is why we can have nice things.

Ben Howe is an editor at RedState.

Viewing all 15742 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>